Development of Roughness Prediction Models for Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Recycled Pavement Projects

The few existing life cycle assessment studies considering pavement recycling techniques usually omit the stages of maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) and use. The reason for this omission is the lack of information about how the pavement’s performance evolves over time and absence of methods to determine the M&R frequency and service life for completed projects. As a result, the deterioration of pavement recycling projects in the long term is not clearly understood. Few projects have available data, the majority of which are on low volume primary and secondary roads. This paper describes an approach to develop a family of roughness models for recycling projects in Colorado using functional data analysis, and individual models for selected projects in Virginia to support ongoing life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. In the case of Colorado, full depth reclamation (FDR) projects will most likely deteriorate following an average group rate of 1.4 in./mi/year, with an initial international roughness index (IRI) between 52 and 70 in./mi. For the individual roughness models developed for Virginia projects, the initial IRI values and the rate of change for the treatments analyzed were found to range between 49 and 107 in./mi and between 0.7 and 5.2 in./mi/year, respectively, depending on the recycling method and type of stabilization treatment. The results of an LCA case study show that, in addition to recycling, Virginia Department of Transportation can achieve statewide emission reduction goals if focus is placed on achieving smoother roads while measures are taken to keep the annual rates of deterioration low.

Ruggedness Evaluation and Precision Estimates for Newly Developed Test Methods for Asphalt-Treated Cold Recycled Pavements

Asphalt-treated cold recycled pavements, including cold in place recycling, full depth reclamation, and cold central plant recycling, are becoming popular rehabilitation options because they are economical, sustainable, and provide good performance. Because asphalt-treated cold recycled pavements use foamed or emulsified binder, they require a curing period post-construction before being opened to traffic or surfaced. Uniform guidelines on when an asphalt-treated cold recycled roadway can be opened to traffic or surfaced are not widely established, many are based on time or moisture content, and extreme ranges exist among agency specifications. Mixture designs also vary widely among agencies with regard to active filler use and asphalt recycling agents, further complicating the determination of necessary curing time. NCHRP Project 09-62 investigated a variety of test methods for determining when a recycled roadway could be opened to traffic or surfaced. This included extensive laboratory and field evaluations. New shear strength and raveling test methods were developed. For each test method a ruggedness study and inter-laboratory study were performed. The ruggedness study revealed critical test fixture and operation parameters. Six asphalt-treated cold recycled pavement process/material combinations were tested by three entities to develop precision estimates and statements (i.e., repeatability and reproducibility) for the new test methods. Tools and information from this study provide a rational basis for establishing specifications, which will help reduce pavement damage from early traffic and minimize roadway closures and delays.

Input Parameters for the Mechanistic-Empirical Design of Full-Depth Reclamation Projects

Cold recycling technologies such as full-depth reclamation (FDR) are sustainable and cost-effective techniques for pavement rehabilitation that reduce environmental impacts and construction costs and time. The limited information available on the material properties of FDR mixtures and their characterization in mechanistic-empirical (M-E) pavement design hinders the full deployment of FDR. Previous research has found current M-E default values to be non-representative and overly conservative, leading to an underestimation of the true performance capabilities of FDR materials. To address this gap, this paper analyzes the performance of 11 FDR sites constructed throughout Colorado, U.S., and compares their long-term performance with M-E predictions. The objective of this paper is to recommend input values for the M-E design of FDR base materials that result in reliable predictions of FDR long-term performance. The analysis includes both non-stabilized and emulsion-stabilized FDR projects. Both initial International Roughness Index (IRI) and resilient modulus were found to have a significant impact on M-E predictions and were calibrated in a two-step process. The proposed input parameters lead to a conservative design of FDR projects and result in improved IRI predictions compared with the ones derived from current design criteria. With the current design parameters, IRI predictions were, on average, overestimated by 51 in./mi, whereas the proposed input parameters make it possible to reduce this difference to 17 in./mi. Future research is needed to improve current models in M-E pavement design software to adequately model cold in-place recycled layers such as FDR.

Flexible Pavement Recycling Techniques: A Summary of Activities

Cold in-place recycling (CIR) involves the recycling of the asphalt portions (including hot-mix asphalt and chip, slurry, and cape seals, as well as others) of a flexible or composite pavement with asphalt emulsion or foamed asphalt as the binding agent. Full-depth reclamation (FDR) includes the recycling of the entire depth of the pavement and, in some cases, a portion of the subgrade with asphalt, cement, or lime products as binding agents. Both processes are extensively utilized in Illinois. This project reviewed CIR and FDR projects identified by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) from the Transportation Bulletin and provided comments on pavement designs and special provisions. The researchers evaluated the performance of existing CIR/FDR projects through pavement condition surveys and analysis of falling weight deflectometer data collected by IDOT. They also reviewed CIR/FDR literature and updated/modified (as appropriate) previously provided inputs concerning mix design, testing procedures, thickness design, construction, and performance as well as cold central plant recycling (CCPR) literature related to design and construction. The team monitored the performance of test sections at the National Center for Asphalt Technology and Virginia Department of Transportation. The researchers assisted IDOT in the development of a CCPR special provision as well as responded to IDOT inquiries and questions concerning issues related to CIR, FDR, and CCPR. They attended meetings of IDOT’s FDR with the Cement Working Group and provided input in the development of a special provision for FDR with cement. The project’s activities confirmed that CIR, FDR, and CCPR techniques are successfully utilized in Illinois. Recommendations for improving the above-discussed techniques are provided.

Experimental study of base stabilization with fibrillated fiber

Potential benefits in applying polypropylene fiber to stabilize expansive soils and cement treated bases is already been reported in previous studies. So a critical need exists to incorporate the use of fiber into the Texas Department of Transportation’s (TxDOT’s) Guidelines for Modification and Stabilization of Soils and Base for Use in Pavement Structures. The present paper discusses the results collected from the first experimental test section on FM897 in the TxDOT Paris District. Three 500-ft (152.4m) test sections were constructed with 2 percent cement on FM897 in February 2020 in the north bound lane loaded truck direction which includes a new sandstone base, full depth reclamation (FDR), and control. However, only the new sandstone base and FDR sections were built with fiber. In this project, two types of fibers were used —(a) fibrillated fiber Fibermesh300, and (b) macro-synthetic fiber Enduro 600. The surface and base layers from the new sandstone base section were removed and used for the edge widening area of the FDR and control sections. Based on the laboratory tests, the optimum fiber contents were found to be 0.6 percent and 0.4 percent for a new sandstone base and FDR, respectively. The laboratory Unconfine Compression Strength (UCS) results showed significant improvements (<112.36 percent) when fibers were added to the sandstone base. To have better control, fiber and cement were manually distributed, following the US Army Corps of Engineers’ recommendations. Becaus e of unexpected construction equipment failure that caused compaction delays of approximately 5 hours, cement was in contact with moisture for approximately 5 hours before compaction. UCS results showed an approximate 55 percent reduction when there was a 5-hour delay from the time water was introduced (resulting in the start of the hydration process) until the time of compaction. It indicated that there are detrimental effects on UCS if there is delay on compaction. There were significant reductions on the normalized W1 deflections at 5 months after construction. In particular, the FDR and new sandstone base sections (with fiber) experienced over 52 percent reduction as compared to 1 week after construction FWD data. Furthermore, the averaged W1 deflections were lower than before construction for both FDR and new sandstone base sections (with fiber). This indicates that there were rapid increases in structural capacity and significant strength developed in the fiber sections between 1 week and 5 months. Further research is needed to explain the mechanism and phenomena.

Review of Agency Pavement Recycling Construction Specifications

Cold in-place recycling, cold central plant recycling, and full depth reclamation are cost-effective, environmentally conscious pavement rehabilitation or reconstruction techniques. Although these techniques are not new, they have not been widely adopted among state agencies. There has, however, been a recent resurgence in interest in these techniques. To date there are no national specification guidelines for these processes to assist in their widespread implementation, and those specifications that do exist often have a wide range of requirements. This paper presents the results of a review of state and local agency specifications for pavement recycling techniques and offers suggestions to help agencies achieve a better and longer-lasting product when specifying pavement recycling techniques.