coaching styles
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 18)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James H. Ford ◽  
Aaron M. Gilson ◽  
Martha A. Maurer ◽  
Kimberly A. Hoffman ◽  
Bryan R. Garner

Abstract Background The Grasha-Riechmann teaching styles, which includes three didactic and two prescriptive styles, have been shown to help enhance learning within educational settings. Although an adaption of the Grasha-Riechmann style classification has enabled coaching styles to be identified for use as part of quality improvement (QI) initiatives, research has not examined the styles actually utilized by coaches within a QI initiative or how the styles change overtime when the coach is guiding an organization through change implementation. Interactions between coaches and HIV service organization (HSO) staff participating in a large implementation research experiment called the Substance Abuse Treatment to HIV care (SAT2HIV) Project were evaluated to begin building an evidence base to address this gap in implementation research. Methods Implementation & Sustainment Facilitation (ISF) Strategy meetings (n = 137) between coaches and HSO staff were recorded and professionally transcribed. Thematic coding classifications were developed from the Grasha-Riechmann framework and applied to a purposively selected sample of transcripts (n = 66). Four coders independently coded transcripts using NVivo to facilitate text identification, organization, and retrieval for analysis. Coaching style use and changes across the three ISF phases were explored. Results Facilitator and formal authority were the two coaching styles predominately used. Facilitator sub-themes shifted from asking questions and providing support to supporting independent action over time. Coaches’ use of formal authority sub-styles shifted notably across time from setting expectations or ensuring preparation to offering affirmation or feedback about changes that the HSO’s were implementing. The use of the delegator or personal model coaching styles occurred infrequently. Conclusions The current research extends implementation research’s understanding of coaching. More specifically, findings indicate it is feasible to use the Grasha-Riechmann framework to qualitatively identify coaching styles utilized in a facilitation-based implementation strategy. More importantly, results provide insights into how different coaching styles were utilized to implement an evidence-based practice. Further research is needed to examine how coaching styles differ by organization, impact implementation fidelity, and influence both implementation outcomes and client outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02495402. Registered on July 6, 2015.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Immler ◽  
Philipp Rappelsberger ◽  
Arnold Baca ◽  
Juliana Exel

We applied social networks analysis to objectively discriminate and describe interpersonal interaction dynamics of players across different top-coaching styles. The aim was to compare metrics in the passing networks of Jürgen Klopp, Pep Guardiola, and Mauricio Pochettino across the UEFA Champions League seasons from 2017 to 2020. Data on completed passes from 92 games were gathered and average passing networks metrics were computed. We were not only able to find the foundations on which these elite coaches build the passing dynamics in their respective teams, but also to determine important differences that represent their particular coaching signatures. The local cluster coefficient was the only metric not significantly different between coaches. Still, we found higher average shortest-path length for Guardiola's network (mean ± std = 3.00 ± 0.45 a.u.) compared to Klopp's (2.80 ± 0.52 a.u., p = 0.04) and Pochettino's (2.70 ± 0.39 a.u., p = 0.01). Density was higher for Guardiola's (64.16 ± 20.27 a.u.) than for Pochettino's team (51.42 ± 17.28 a.u., p = 0.008). The largest eigenvalue for Guardiola's team (65.95 ± 16.79 a.u.) was higher than for Klopp's (47.06 ± 17.25 a.u., p < 0.001) and Pochettino's (42,62 ± 12.01 a.u., p < 0.001). Centrality dispersion was also higher for Guardiola (0.14 ± 0.02 a.u.) when compared to Klopp (0.12 ± 0.03 a.u., p = 0.008). The local cluster coefficient seems to build the foundation for passing work, however, cohesion characteristics among players in the three teams of the top coaches seems to characterize their own footprint regarding passing dynamics. Guardiola stands out by the high number of passes and the enhanced connection of the most important players in the network. Klopp and Pochettino showed important similarities, which are associated to preferences toward more flexibility of interpersonal linkages synergies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane Pill ◽  
Brendan SueSee ◽  
Joss Rankin ◽  
Mitch Hewitt

2021 ◽  
pp. 14-25
Author(s):  
Shane Pill ◽  
Brendan SueSee ◽  
Joss Rankin
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1446-1451
Author(s):  
Hira Atta ◽  
Muhammad Tahir Nazeer ◽  
Masood Mafooz ◽  
Muhammad Ilyas ◽  
Shams ur Rehman Khan

Purpose of the study: This study was carried out to investigate the relationship between coaching leadership styles and university-level basketball players` achievement motivation. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey research design was used. Data were collected from 150 male and female basketball players. The data were analyzed utilizing regression analysis in SPSS 20. Main Findings: The statistical results of the present study showed that the training and instructors’ behavior had a significant relationship (p < 0.05) with achievement motivation. Applications of this study: This study will be helpful for the coaches who are working with university-level basketball players to know about the most appropriate coaching leadership behavior for effective coaching to enhance achievement motivation among university-level basketball players and prepare them for high demanding competitions.


KINESTETIK ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Rayvin Domingo Pestano

Student-athletes’ performance in sports can be influenced by a lot of factors. The coaching style, behavior, and competency of coaches are critical to the development of athletic talent. Thus, this research examined the relationship that existed between coaching style, behavior, competency of coaches, and student-athletes’ performance in sports. Furthermore, predictors of student-athletes’ performance were also explored. Using descriptive correlational research design, quantitative data were gathered using a questionnaire as the main instrument. The study enlisted a total of 59 purposively selected sport-teachers assigned to coach student-athletes. Results of the study revealed that command style, reciprocal style, problem-solving style, and guided discovery style were the coaching styles highly practiced by the respondents. Coaching behavior such as physical training and planning, technical skill, mental preparation, competition strategy, personal rapport, and negative personal rapport was the coaching behavior that is highly applied by the respondents. Coaching competence like motivation, game strategy, character building, and technique were found to be very high. On the other hand, student-athletes performance in sports in the division level was found to be satisfactory, while it is unsatisfactory in regional and national level. Guided discovery coaching style, competition strategy competency, and motivation competency were found to have a moderate significant relationship with student-athletes performance. Competition strategy competency was found to be a predictor of student-athletes performance. Therefore, it is highly recommended that coaches must consistently sustain their high level of competence in this area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-255
Author(s):  
Jumardin

The research is aimed find out to know whether the pattern of coaching that has been held at the Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran Makassar has been running effectively or not. In addition, this study also finds out what characters the cadets have from the coaching styles that have been implemented in the PIP Makassar environment. This study uses a qualitative research method that produces and process of descriptive data such as interview transcripts, notes field, picture, photos, recordings and videos. The techniques use in selecting the subjects in this study was purposive sampling techniques.The research result of this is pattern of development during this already considered running effectively by cadets for mental shape cadets as a professional sailor. The cadets feel that they are used to the harsh conditions on the boat while sailing and the cadets feel that they are used to the harsh conditions on the boat while sailing. The characters obtained from the coaching patterns have been taking place at PIP Makassar have been considered by both cadets and alumni because they are able to shape cadets and alumni to become individuals who have tough character, have goodself-control and responsibility.


Author(s):  
Seungmo Kim ◽  
Sanghyun Park ◽  
Adam Love ◽  
Tsz Ching Pang

Using situational leadership models, the current study examined direct and indirect relationships between coaching styles (i.e., democratic and autocratic) and athletes’ intent to continue participation via enjoyment in the sport of artistic swimming. Data were collected using an online survey with a snowball sampling method. A total of 202 artistic swimmers at the elite level from 22 countries participated in this study. The findings showed that participants who trained with democratic-style coaches reported higher levels of athletic enjoyment and intent to continue their athletic careers. There was no mediating effect of athletic enjoyment between coaching styles and intent to continue via athletic enjoyment; instead, the results revealed that the direct path between athletic enjoyment and intent to continue was not significant. However, the results supported the direct relationships between both coaching styles and athletic enjoyment and between autocratic coaching style and intent to continue an athletic career.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document