athletic fields
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

106
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

EDIS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie E. Trenholm ◽  
Marco Schiavon ◽  
J. Bryan Unruh ◽  
Travis W. Shaddox

Bermudagrasses are among the most widely used warm-season grasses. Improved, fine-textured bermudagrasses are used throughout the South on golf courses, athletic fields, and in high-profile residential and commercial landscapes where a fine-textured, dense ground cover is desired. This publication reviews current cultivars available in Florida and best management practices for maintaining bermudagrass lawns in Florida. Minor revision by L. Trenholm, M. Schiavon, J.B. Unruh, and T. Shaddox; 5 pp.https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/lh007



Author(s):  
Wendell Joseph Hutchens ◽  
Caleb Henderson ◽  
Elizabeth A Bush ◽  
James Kerns ◽  
David McCall

Spring dead spot (SDS) of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) is primarily caused by Ophiosphaerella herpotricha and Ophiosphaerella korrae in North America. These two species respond differently to numerous management practices, grow optimally at different soil pH ranges, and differ in aggressiveness. Understanding the Ophiosphaerella species distribution in regions where SDS occurs will allow turfgrass managers to tailor their management practices toward the predominant species present. A survey was conducted in the Mid-Atlantic United States in which one to 14 samples of bermudagrass expressing SDS symptoms were taken from 51 athletic fields, golf courses, or sod farms across Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia. DNA was isolated from necrotic root and stolon tissue, amplified using species-specific primers, and detected in a real-time PCR assay. At least one isolate of O. herpotricha was recovered from 76% of the locations and O. korrae was recovered from 73% of the locations. Ophiosphaerella herpotricha was amplified from 55% of the samples while O. korrae was amplified from 37% of the samples. There were distinct regions in the Mid-Atlantic in which either O. herpotricha or O. korrae was predominant. Ophiosphaerella herpotricha was predominant in western Virginia, central North Carolina as well as Delaware and eastern Maryland. However, O. korrae was predominant in central Maryland and Virginia as well as eastern Virginia and North Carolina. Ophiosphaerella herpotricha was isolated from certain cultivars more frequently than O. korrae and vice versa. These survey results elucidate the geographic distribution of O. herpotricha and O. korrae throughout the Mid-Atlantic United States.



Author(s):  
Kyley H Dickson ◽  
Chase M Straw ◽  
Adam W Thoms ◽  
Troy D Carson ◽  
John C Sorochan

The use of synthetic turf (ST) has become a popular option for many athletic fields. Little is known about how surface hardness and infill depth spatial variability changes over time on third generation (3G) ST athletic fields. A research study was conducted to investigate the impact of field age on surface hardness and infill depth spatial variability from 12 3G ST athletic fields in Tennessee and Georgia (USA) between March 5, 2014 and April 8, 2014. The 3G ST athletic fields tested varied in fiber type including monofilament, slit film, and a combination of monofilament with slit film fibers. All 3G ST athletic fields were directly over gravel with no shockpad present. Surface hardness and infill depth were collected in the same location on all fields. Surface hardness was collected with the Toro Mobile Tester (400–450 samples/field) and infill depth was collected manually with a three-prong infill depth gauge (200–225 samples/field). As field age increased, surface hardness and spatial variability of the surface hardness increased significantly. Surface hardness and infill depth also had a significant negative relationship with one another. The increase in mean surface hardness and variability is partially attributed to infill depth loss and compaction of the remaining infill. Infill depth did not have a significant relationship with age, unless plots were outside the manufacturer’s recommendation for infill depth. Considering the nearly 3000 samples collected in this study, maintaining a minimum infill depth between 30 and 35 mm kept 90% of surface hardness data points below the National Football League limit of 100 Gmax. Results from this study highlight how 3G ST athletic fields can change with age, which may indicate the need for targeted infill applications and decompaction to improve field uniformity over time.



itsrj ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett L. Maxey ◽  
Victoria H. Wallace ◽  
Karl Guillard ◽  
Jason J. Henderson


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Xiaoran Zhang ◽  
Yinrui Wang ◽  
Junfeng Liu ◽  
Yucheng Jiang ◽  
Yiran Tian ◽  
...  

Environmental risk of heavy metals and metalloids in athletic fields has raised people’s attention in the recent years. Seven trace elements, including metals and metalloids, were detected in the runoff of five typical athletic fields in the university campus under three rainfall events. Except for Cr, the total concentrations of Zn, Pb, Cu, Mn, Cd, and As in artificial turf runoff are the highest among five athletic fields, followed by that of plastic runway. The concentration and first flush effect of trace elements are followed in the order of 1st > 2nd > 3rd rainfall events. The strongest correlations between metals and metalloids were observed in the tennis court runoff, while the artificial turf shows the least. The release of trace elements could be directly from the surface materials and particles on the athletic field and influenced by the comprehensive factors including surface materials, rainfall events, and pollutant characters. Pollution risk assessment shows that the pollution extent of the five types of athletic field is at least “moderate” and follows the order of artificial turf > basketball court > plastic runway > badminton court > tennis court. Pb shows the highest pollution level, while Cr shows the highest healthy risk. The results can provide a theoretical basis for runoff pollution control and safety use of athletic fields.



itsrj ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. H. Dickson ◽  
J. C. Sorochan ◽  
W.D. Strunk




2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Driez ◽  
Deying Li ◽  
Huishen Zhu ◽  
Zhihui Chang


Author(s):  
Patricia J. Vittum

This chapter describes two invasive crane fly species which are pests of turfgrass, particularly in the northwestern and northeastern United States, as well as southern British Columbia and the metropolitan Toronto area in Canada. The European crane fly and the common or marsh crane fly, order Diptera, family Tipulidae, subfamily Tipulinae, have elongated maxillary palpi that distinguish members of this subfamily from other subfamilies. Larvae of invasive crane flies are sometimes called leatherjackets, in part because the pupae are leathery in appearance. Invasive crane flies have a relatively limited distribution in North America, but can cause considerable damage on golf courses, lawns, athletic fields, and sod farms, as well as forage fields and hayfields. The chapter also looks at the frit fly, which belongs to the family Chloropidae.



Author(s):  
Patricia J. Vittum

This chapter provides an overview of turfgrasses. Turfgrass typically refers to an individual plant or species and turf refers to a uniform stand of grass or a mixture of grasses mowed at a relatively low height, usually less than 10 cm and serving various ornamental, recreational, and functional uses. Residential lawns, golf courses, athletic fields, cemeteries, parks, and arboretums all benefit from healthy, lush stands of turf. Many grass species used for turf are also found in pasture, field, and forage production associated with the livestock industry. The chapter then details the structure and climatic adaptations of turfgrasses, and identifies the major turfgrasses in the United States and Canada. It also describes dichondra lawns and considers the relationship between drought dormancy and turfgrass insect damage, as well as the economic impact of turgrass culture.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document