box cox transformation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

226
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

19
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 108120
Author(s):  
Xiao-Sheng Si ◽  
Tianmei Li ◽  
Jianxun Zhang ◽  
Yaguo Lei

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Liang Fang ◽  
Zaiying Zhou ◽  
Yiping Hong

The asymmetry of residuals about the origin is a severe issue in estimating a Box-Cox transformed model. In the framework of uncertainty theory, there are such theoretical issues regarding the least-squares estimation (LSE) and maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the linear models after the Box-Cox transformation on the response variables. Heretofore, only weighting methods for least-squares analysis have been available. This article proposes an uncertain alternative Box-Cox model to alleviate the asymmetry of residuals and avoid λ tending to negative infinity for uncertain LSE or uncertain MLE. Such symmetry of residuals about the origin is reasonable in applications of experts’ experimental data. The parameter estimation method was given via a theorem, and the performance of our model was supported via numerical simulations. According to the numerical simulations, our proposed ‘alternative Box-Cox model’ can overcome the problems of a grossly underestimated lambda and the asymmetry of residuals. The estimated residuals neither deviated from zero nor changed unevenly, in clear contrast to the LSE and MLE for the uncertain Box-Cox model downward biased residuals. Thus, though the LSE and MLE are not applicable on the uncertain Box-Cox model, they fit the uncertain alternative Box-Cox model. Compared with the uncertain Box-Cox model, the issue of a systematically underestimated λ is not likely to occur in our uncertain alternative Box-Cox model. Both the LSE and MLE can be used directly without constructing a weighted estimation method, offering better performance in the asymmetry of residuals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 583
Author(s):  
Tao Li ◽  
Anthony F. Desmond ◽  
Thanasis Stengos

We fit U.S. stock market volatilities on macroeconomic and financial market indicators and some industry level financial ratios. Stock market volatility is non-Gaussian distributed. It can be approximated by an inverse Gaussian (IG) distribution or it can be transformed by Box–Cox transformation to a Gaussian distribution. Hence, we used a Box–Cox transformed Gaussian LASSO model and an IG GLM LASSO model as dimension reduction techniques and we attempted to identify some common indicators to help us forecast stock market volatility. Via simulation, we validated the use of four models, i.e., a univariate Box–Cox transformation Gaussian LASSO model, a three-phase iterative grid search Box–Cox transformation Gaussian LASSO model, and both canonical link and optimal link IG GLM LASSO models. The latter two models assume an approximately IG distributed response. Using these four models in an empirical study, we identified three macroeconomic indicators that could help us forecast stock market volatility. These are the credit spread between the U.S. Aaa corporate bond yield and the 10-year treasury yield, the total outstanding non-revolving consumer credit, and the total outstanding non-financial corporate bonds.


Forecasting ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 884-919
Author(s):  
Ulrich Gunter

The present study employs daily data made available by the STR SHARE Center covering the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 January 2020 for six Viennese hotel classes and their total. The forecast variable of interest is hotel room demand. As forecast models, (1) Seasonal Naïve, (2) Error Trend Seasonal (ETS), (3) Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA), (4) Trigonometric Seasonality, Box–Cox Transformation, ARMA Errors, Trend and Seasonal Components (TBATS), (5) Seasonal Neural Network Autoregression (Seasonal NNAR), and (6) Seasonal NNAR with an external regressor (seasonal naïve forecast of the inflation-adjusted ADR) are employed. Forecast evaluation is carried out for forecast horizons h = 1, 7, 30, and 90 days ahead based on rolling windows. After conducting forecast encompassing tests, (a) mean, (b) median, (c) regression-based weights, (d) Bates–Granger weights, and (e) Bates–Granger ranks are used as forecast combination techniques. In the relative majority of cases (i.e., in 13 of 28), combined forecasts based on Bates–Granger weights and on Bates–Granger ranks provide the highest level of forecast accuracy in terms of typical measures. Finally, the employed methodology represents a fully replicable toolkit for practitioners in terms of both forecast models and forecast combination techniques.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 321-328
Author(s):  
Sergiy Prykhodko ◽  
Ivan Shutko ◽  
Andrii Prykhodko

We have performed early LOC estimation of Web applications (apps) created using the Yii framework by three nonlinear regression models with three predictors based on the normalizing transformations. We used two univariate transformations (the decimal logarithm and the Box-Cox transformation) and the Box-Cox four-variate transformation for constructing nonlinear regression models. The nonlinear regression model constructed by the Box-Cox four-variate transformation has better size prediction results compared to other regression ones based on the univariate transformations.


NDT World ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 4-14
Author(s):  
Vasiliy Chertischev ◽  
Mihail Dalin ◽  
Aleksandr Boychuk ◽  
Ivan Krasnov

The probability of detection (POD) depends on defects size and is an integral part of calculating the resource during non-destructive testing of parts. This article provides an overview of well-established statistical methods for estimating PODs, with a little historical insight into their emergence. An overview of new advances in POD calculation in recent years is given: three- and four-parameter models; nonparametric models; planning the experiment and sampling of defects; applying defect modeling to reduce the number of samples; the application of the Box-Cox transformation; the influence of the variability of the initial data on the result; application of Bayesian statistics. An overview of the tasks that POD specialists still have to solve in the future: nonlinear models, modeling in conjunction with Bayesian statistics, etc


Chemosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 274 ◽  
pp. 129780
Author(s):  
Shijian Xiong ◽  
Shengyong Lu ◽  
Fanjie Shang ◽  
Xiaodong Li ◽  
Jianhua Yan ◽  
...  

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1138
Author(s):  
Tao Hu ◽  
Baosheng Liang

Motivated by the relative loss estimator of the median, we propose a new class of estimators for linear quantile models using a general relative loss function defined by the Box–Cox transformation function. The proposed method is very flexible. It includes a traditional quantile regression and median regression under the relative loss as special cases. Compared to the traditional linear quantile estimator, the proposed estimator has smaller variance and hence is more efficient in making statistical inferences. We show that, in theory, the proposed estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal under appropriate conditions. Extensive simulation studies were conducted, demonstrating good performance of the proposed method. An application of the proposed method in a prostate cancer study is provided.


2021 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 108949
Author(s):  
Z.W. Cai ◽  
X.L. Liu ◽  
W.W. Chen ◽  
Z. Sun ◽  
J. Ding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document