COVID-19 pandemic, mechanical reperfusion and 30-day mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction

ObjectiveThe initial data of the International Study on Acute Coronary Syndromes - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction COVID-19 showed in Europe a remarkable reduction in primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and higher in-hospital mortality during the initial phase of the pandemic as compared with the prepandemic period. The aim of the current study was to provide the final results of the registry, subsequently extended outside Europe with a larger inclusion period (up to June 2020) and longer follow-up (up to 30 days).MethodsThis is a retrospective multicentre registry in 109 high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centres from Europe, Latin America, South-East Asia and North Africa, enrolling 16 674 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PPPCI in March/June 2019 and 2020. The main study outcomes were the incidence of PPCI, delayed treatment (ischaemia time >12 hours and door-to-balloon >30 min), in-hospital and 30-day mortality.ResultsIn 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared with 2019 (incidence rate ratio 0.843, 95% CI 0.825 to 0.861, p<0.0001). This reduction was significantly associated with age, being higher in older adults (>75 years) (p=0.015), and was not related to the peak of cases or deaths due to COVID-19. The heterogeneity among centres was high (p<0.001). Furthermore, the pandemic was associated with a significant increase in door-to-balloon time (40 (25–70) min vs 40 (25–64) min, p=0.01) and total ischaemia time (225 (135–410) min vs 196 (120–355) min, p<0.001), which may have contributed to the higher in-hospital (6.5% vs 5.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day (8% vs 6.5%, p=0.001) mortality observed during the pandemic.ConclusionPercutaneous revascularisation for STEMI was significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, especially among older patients (about 20%), and longer delays to treatment, which may have contributed to the increased in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic.Trial registration numberNCT04412655.

MO405RISC FACTORS FOR CARDIAC SURGERY-ASSOCIATED ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN A TERTIARY REFERRAL HOSPITAL

Background and Aims cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CS-AKI) is a frequent complication that confers significant increase in morbility and mortality. It is still unclear how to identify patients at high risk to develop it, in order to apply to them early preventive strategies to avoid AKI. The study aimed to explore risk factors associated to CS-AKI. Method to analyze the association between demographic, pre-operative and intraoperative variables with all grades-AKI, we collected baseline characteristics, type of surgery, aortic time of clampage and extracorporeal circulation time, hemodinamic variables during surgery, Euroscore II, Clevelant Clinic Score and Leicester cardiosurgery score. The post-operative variables included monitorization of the first 24 h in the Intensive Care Units (ICU), consistent in: use of vasoactive drugs, total diuresis, use of furosemide, need of transfusions and need and duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Creatinine was collected for all the admision days in order to calculate the incidence of AKI. Also mortality and need of RRT at 30 th day was assessed. The inclusion criteria were: patients over 18 years old who underwent cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. Only valve substitution (VS), Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or a combination of both procedures (not including endocarditis surgery) were included. Patients who were already in dialysis or suffered an AKI just before the surgery were not included in the study. Results we included 130 patients who underwent heart surgery intervention in Hospital Clínic de Barcelona from 1st January to 31 st March 2015. 61,5% were men and the majority of them was 60 - 75 years old (46.9%), with hypertension (80.8%), without diabetes (68.5%), with stage 2-Chronic Kidney Disease (53.1%). Main surgical procedure was CABG (50.8%), followed by valve substitution (36.1%) and combination of both (13.1%). 73,1% of the procedures were done electively and 26.9% urgently. Out of the 130 patients, 60 (46.2%) suffered an AKI (36 AKIN 1, 16 AKIN 2 and 8 AKIN3). The majority of the episodes (55.2%) started between 24 and 48 hours after the intervention and 7 patients required RRT. AKI was not associated with mortality or need of renal replacement therapy at 30 days (OR 1.853, p= 0.397). Regarding risk factors for CS-AKI, basal eGFR &lt;60 ml/min, history of hypertension, age and the clevelant/leicester and euroscore were preoperative risk factors associated with CS-AKI in our cohort (OR 5.571 p=&lt;0.001; OR 2.621 p=0.043; OR 1.036 p&lt;0.001; OR 1.453 p=0.045; OR 1.062 p&lt;0.001; OR 1.351 p=0.006 respectively). Leicester cardiosurgery score &gt;30 was the score who showed the best association with AKI (OR 5.167, p&lt;0.001). Intraoperative significant risk factors that were identified were: ischaemia time over 70 minutes (OR 2.876, p=0.004), and the need to use phenylephrine (3.064, p=0.015); whereas the need to use nitroglycerin was identified as a protector (OR 0.441, p=0.031). Conclusion previous eGFR&lt;60 ml/min, age, hypertension, use of phenylephrine during surgery and long ischaemia time are the main factors associated with CS-AKI. Scores like Leicester score can help physicians to identify people at risk and apply preventive strategies.

A retrospective study of open and endoscopic nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal tumors

Objective: To investigate clinical outcomes of open and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal tumours. Methods: A retrospective case study was conducted. Patients with complex renal tumours admitted to our hospital between January 2018 and September 2019 were enrolled; the included patients (n=40) were divided into the observation group (open partial nephrectomy, n=20) and control group (laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, n=20) according to operation modes. The operation time, renal warm ischaemia time, intraoperative blood loss, renal pedicle blocking time, intestinal function recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: Significant differences were noted regarding renal warm ischaemia time, renal pedicle blocking time, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and postoperative hospital stay between the observation and control groups (P<0.05); however, no significant difference was observed in intestinal function recovery time and postoperative drainage days (P>0.05). Conclusion: Open surgery remains the recommended surgical method for the treatment of few complex tumours in the renal hilus region and has gradually become the renal surgery of choice at present, although laparoscopic surgery has evolved tremendously. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3457 How to cite this:Li TT, Feng J, Li YL, Sun Q. A retrospective study of open and endoscopic nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal tumors. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.4.3457 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract 15874: An Ischaemia Time of Greater Than 6 Hours is Associated With Deleterious Outcomes in Pediatric Heart Transplantation

Introduction: The shortage of available donor organs means we must re-consider our current policies on donor selection. There is a broad variation in practice between centers as to the acceptable limit to ischaemia time (IT) in pediatric cardiac transplantation, with no recommendations in international guidelines. Hypothesis: We hypothesised that a prolonged ischaemia time was not associated with impaired post-transplant outcomes. Methods: Data from the Pediatric Heart Transplantation Society was analysed for all pediatric patients receiving heart transplants (Jan 1993 - June 2019). Transplants were separated into 5 categories depending on the IT (hours): < 2.4, 2.5-3.4, 3.5-4.4, 4.5-6.0, >6. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariable analysis, adjusting for donor, recipient, and peri-operative characteristics. Results: Data for 6,903 transplants were assessed (IT < 2.4 in 980, 2.5-3.4 in 2032, 3.5-4.4 in 2310, 4.5-6.0 in 1162, >6 in 281). In univariate analysis, increasing IT was associated with reduced 1-year survival (90.1%, 87.7% and 84.6%; p<0.001) for the 3.5-4.4, 4.5-6.0 and >6 groups, respectively. Similar findings, of a deleterious association with prolonged IT, were observed for freedom from infection (73.0%, 66.8% and 56.4%; p<0.001), freedom from first rejection (67.4%, 62.6% and 61.0%; p = 0.01) and freedom from haemodynamically compromising rejection (89.1%, 85.4% and 85.3%; p=0.004) at 1-year. No significant differences in the risk of malignancy (p=0.2) and time to first CAV (p=0.08) between the IT groups were noted. We separately analysed the risk of graft failure by multiphase hazards modelling. In adjusted analysis, increasing IT was found to be a risk factor for graft failure (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00-1.16, p=0.04). Within this model, primary diagnosis was a predictor of the outcome (p<0.001). Exploring this association, an IT of > 6 hours was associated with graft failure in cardiomyopathy (HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.34 - 6.15, p=0.007), but not congenital heart disease patients. Conclusions: In this large multi-centre cohort study, we found a deleterious association between prolonged IT and post-transplant outcomes. We recommend that an IT greater than 6 hours should be avoided in pediatric cardiac transplantation.

Relationship between symptom-onset-to-balloon time and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Background Time delay is an important prognostic factor and indicator of quality of care for patients with AMI indicated for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose Assessment of total ischaemia time and its relationship to catheterization findings and the incidence of ischaemic events within 1 year in patients treated with primary PCI. Method The analysis included 1230 patients with AIM and primary PCI randomized in the Prague-18 study (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor). We evaluated the total ischaemia time and two the intermediate intervals: A - from the symptom onset to the arrival to the hospital and B - from the entry the hospital to balloon time. We assessed the time delay in relation to patient characteristics, PCI results and ischaemic endpoints (death, reIM, stroke) within 30 days and 1 year. Results Median total ischaemia time was 3.2 hours. Its prolongation resulted in more frequent incidence of TIMI flow &lt;2 before PCI (p=0.029), TIMI flow &lt;3 after PCI (p=0.004) and suboptimal PCI (p=0.018). The interval A was significantly prolonged in women (p=0.001) and obese patients with BMI ≥30 kg / m2 (p=0.001). The interval B &lt;30 min was achieved in 70% of patients, only 5.3% had interval &gt;90 min. In 717 (61,6%) patients with increased risk (at least 1 criterion: age &gt;70 years, STEMI anterior wall or LBBB, Killip II-IV, history of MI and CABG, SBP &lt;100 mmHG and HR &gt;100 / min), the prolongation of total ischaemia time (≤2 vs. 2.1–4 vs. 4.1–6 vs. &gt;6 hours) resulted in a more frequent incidence of combined ischaemic endpoints within 1 year (p=0.034) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (p=0.028). Conclusion The extension of total ischaemia time in patients treated with primary PCI resulted in a more frequent suboptimal result with TIMI flow &lt;3. Female gender, older age and obesity in women were associated with an increase in total ischaemia time. In patients with increased risk, time delay resulted in a higher incidence of combined ischaemic endpoints within 1 year and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death

Background The donor hypoperfusion phase before asystole in renal transplants from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been considered responsible for worse outcomes than those from donors after brain death (DBD). Methods We included 10 309 adult renal transplants (7128 DBD and 3181 DCD; 1 January 2010–31 December 2016) from the UK Transplant Registry. We divided DCD renal transplants into groups according to hypoperfusion warm ischaemia time (HWIT). We compared delayed graft function (DGF) rates, primary non-function (PNF) rates and graft survival among them using DBD renal transplants as a reference. Results The DGF rate was 21.7% for DBD cases, but ∼40% for DCD cases with HWIT ≤30 min (0–10 min: 42.1%, 11–20 min: 43%, 21–30 min: 38.4%) and 60% for DCD cases with HWIT &gt;30 min (P &lt; 0.001). All DCD groups showed higher DGF risk than DBD renal transplants in multivariable analysis {0–10 min: odds ratio [OR] 2.686 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.352–3.068]; 11–20 min: OR 2.531 [95% CI 2.003–3.198]; 21–30 min: OR 1.764 [95% CI 1.017–3.059]; &gt;30 min: OR 5.814 [95% CI 2.798–12.081]}. The highest risk for DGF in DCD renal transplants with HWIT &gt;30 min was confirmed by multivariable analysis [versus DBD: OR 5.814 (95% CI 2.798–12.081) versus DCD: 0–10 min: OR 2.165 (95% CI 1.038–4.505); 11–20 min: OR 2.299 (95% CI 1.075–4.902); 21–30 min: OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.33–8.197)]. No significant differences were detected regarding PNF rates (P = 0.713) or graft survival (P = 0.757), which was confirmed by multivariable analysis. Conclusions HWIT &gt;30 min increases the risk for DGF greatly, but without affecting PNF or graft survival.

Successful penile replantation after complete amputation and 23 hours ischaemia time: the first in reported literature

Complete penile amputation is a rare and poorly documented injury with severe physical and psychosocial implications. Our institution presents a case of successful penile replantation following 23 hours of ischaemia time in a 34-year-old man with a history of paranoid schizophrenia who sustained a complete penile amputation during an act of deliberate self-harm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest documented ischaemia time for a successful penile replant in literature. The patient was able to achieve a full erection as early as 6 weeks postoperatively. Skin necrosis was noted as a common complication and this was successfully managed with debridement and skin grafting. Penile amputation injuries should be managed in a specialist centre with urological and plastic surgeons with expertise in microsurgical reconstruction. Penile replantation should be attempted, even if ischaemia time is prolonged, despite lower success rates given the significance of the injury to an individual.