Mediating effect of the parent-child relationship on the association between parenting stress and children’s eating behaviors

Background Emerging evidence suggests that parenting stress plays a significant role in children’s eating behavior. However, the nature of the relationship between parenting stress and children’s health behaviors is still not well understood, possibly because there is limited understanding of the mediating factors. The purpose of this study was to examine the mediating effect of the parent–child relationship on the association between parenting stress and children’s eating behaviors in families with young children. Methods Using a cross-sectional study design, we recruited mothers of families with children aged four to six years in the United States. We asked the mothers select one child if she has more than one eligible child. Mothers answered well-validated questionnaires regarding parenting stress, the parent–child relationship, and children’s eating behaviors. We utilized a structural equation model to analyze the mediating factors. Results A total of 172 mothers of children participated in this study. The children’s mean age was 4.92 (SD 0.89) years; 50% of children were female and 71.2% were non-Hispanic Whites. Parenting stress was associated with subcategories of the parent–child relationship (satisfaction with parenting [b* = − 0.69, p < .01], communication [b* = 0.45, p < 0.01], and limit setting [b* = − 0.82, p < .01]). The subcategories of communication and limit setting were negatively associated with food responsiveness in children (b* = − 0.24, p < .01; b* = − 0.46, p < .01, respectively). Limit setting was negatively associated with emotional overeating in children (b* = − 0.49, p < .01). Communication mediated the association between parenting stress and food responsiveness in children (b* = − 0.11, p < .01). The mediating role of limit setting was established in the association between parenting stress and food responsiveness as well as in the association between parenting stress and emotional overeating (b* = 0.38, p < .01; b* = 0.40, p < .01, respectively). Conclusions The parent–child relationship is an important component in improving children’s eating behaviors in families that have parents with higher parenting stress levels.

A scoping review of hard systems and tools that restrict money and cash for gambling

BackgroundGamblers engage in a range of “soft” financial options to limit access to money or cash for gambling (e.g., family looks after cash). Such barriers are easily overturned, resulting in a demand for financial systems and tools that offer “hard” restrictions on access to money and cash in a gambling context. The aim of this scoping review was to determine the attitudes and preferences of gamblers and their families on systems or tools to restrict access to money and cash, as well as the effectiveness of systems and tools that can be used to accomplish that goal.MethodsA systematic search of articles related to financial restrictions and gambling was conducted. Eligibility criteria included samples of gamblers or affected others and interventions targeted at money or cash restrictions in a gambling context. Soft financial barriers such as family involvement were excluded, as were limit-setting systems which focused on gambling expenditure in gambling venues.ResultsNine studies met the eligibility criteria, with three focused on financial systems (e.g., ban on credit betting) and six focused on removal of cash machines from gambling venues. The included literature was generally of low quality, with just two pre-post studies and seven cross-sectional or qualitative ones.ConclusionsThe included studies provided strong support for financial mechanisms to support gamblers and their families. Future studies need to involve multiple stakeholders to provide this type of support as well as to evaluate the holistic impact that such hard barriers can have on gambling and gambling-related harms.

Ephemerality in Social Media: Unpacking the Personal and Social Characteristics of Time Limit Users on WeChat Moments

Social media platforms increasingly give users the option of ephemerality through settings that delete or hide posted content after a set period of time. Many individuals apply these settings to manage their posting history and, in turn, reduce concerns about self-presentation. Despite the growing popularity of this feature, few studies have empirically explored it. This study examines the Time Limit setting on WeChat Moments as an example and investigates how users using the Time Limit setting differ from nonusers in terms of personal characteristics (demographics, personality traits, psychological factors, and previous behavioral patterns) and social characteristics (audience size and audience diversity). Compared with nonusers, users using Time Limit setting scored significantly higher on posting frequency and privacy setting use and scored significantly lower on audience size. We also examine how personal and social characteristics vary between user groups with different degrees of ephemerality (i.e., low, medium, or high). Our findings show that users using the Time Limit setting who scored higher on measures of life changes, self-monitoring, posting frequency, and audience size and lower on perceived stress were more likely to opt for the low (i.e., 6months) rather than the medium (i.e., 1month) or high (i.e., 3days) degree of ephemerality. Our work contributes to the understanding of ephemerality settings on social media platforms and provides insights that help practitioners design more effective platforms.

Abstract P151: Acculturation Predicts Activity-specific Parenting Practices In Hispanic/Latino Youth

Background: Hispanic youth are less physically active and more sedentary than non-Hispanic youth, contributing to relatively high rates of obesity among the nation’s largest ethnic minority group. Though parents can influence children’s behavior, it is unclear whether parenting practices related to the child’s physical activity are associated with activity in Hispanic/Latino youth, and whether cultural and environmental contexts predict the use of these parenting practices. Objective: We assessed 1) whether activity-specific parenting practices (ASPPs) are associated with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary activity among Hispanic/Latino youth, and 2) if higher parental acculturation and greater perceived neighborhood-level socioeconomic challenges are associated with the use of less effective ASPP patterns. Methods: Youth from the Hispanic Community Children’s Health Study/Study of Latino Youth (SOL Youth; n=976) were examined. Activity was assessed using 7-day accelerometer data. ASPPs were identified from the Parenting strategies for Eating and Activity Scale (PEAS) using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the ten items on activity. We used survey-weighted linear regression models to assess whether derived ASPPs predicted mean daily MVPA and sedentary time. K-means cluster analysis was used to group individuals based on ASPP use. Finally, we used survey-weighted multinomial logistic regression models to examine the association of parent acculturation-related measures and perceived neighborhood socioeconomic status and barriers to activity with ASPP cluster membership. Results: Factor analysis of the activity-specific PEAS items identified three ASPPs: Limit Setting, Discipline, and Monitoring/Reinforcement. Discipline predicted higher MVPA in females only (β 1.89 [95% CI 0.11-3.67]), and Monitoring/Reinforcement predicted higher MVPA in males only (β 4.71 [95% CI 0.68-8.74]). There was no association between Limit Setting and MVPA or any ASPPs and sedentary activity. K-cluster analysis revealed three ASPP patterns: Restrictive (high scores for Limit Setting and Discipline), Supportive (high scores for Limit Setting and Monitoring/Reinforcement) and Permissive (low score across ASPPs). Higher Anglo-orientation on the Brief ARSMA-II acculturation measure predicted membership in the Supportive compared to Permissive cluster (p= 0.03), while perceived neighborhood characteristics did not predict ASPP cluster membership. Conclusions: ASPPs are associated with MVPA in sex-specific ways but have no association with sedentary activity in Hispanic/Latino youth. Among acculturation and neighborhood characteristics, only Anglo-orientation predicted ASPPs patterns. More research is needed to understand how acculturation is influencing ASPPs and if ASPPs can be leveraged to change children’s activity.

How do forensic inpatients’ interpersonal sensitivity to dominance and perceptions of staff coercion impact upon anger and rates of aggression?

Purpose Coercive practices – which are used as means to manage violent/aggressive behaviour in secure forensic settings – have come under scrutiny in recent years due to their paradoxical effects on provoking further service user aggression and violence. Previous research has found relationships between increased service user aggression with both service users’ interpersonal styles and perceptions of staff coercion (i.e. staff limit setting). This paper aims to investigate whether forensic service users’ levels of interpersonal sensitivity to dominance increase levels of self-reported anger and rates of aggression towards staff through perceptions of staff coercion. Design/methodology/approach In a cross-sectional quantitative study design, 70 service users were recruited from one high and two medium secure forensic hospitals. Standardised measures were completed by service users and recorded incident data was collected within the past year. Correlation and mediation analyses were run to investigate the relationship between study variables. Findings A significant relationship was found between service users’ interpersonal sensitivity to dominance and self-reported rates of anger, where forensic service users’ who had higher levels of interpersonal sensitivity to others’ dominance were likely to report higher rates of anger. No significant relationships were found between all other study variables. Practical implications The findings from this study contradict previous research where coercive practices may not necessarily increase rates of aggression towards staff but, in the context of service users’ interpersonal sensitivities to dominance, it may be more useful to consider the way in which coercive practices are implemented. Originality/value There is a gap in the literature, which looks at the way in which forensic service users perceive coercive practices in relation to their interpersonal sensitivities and whether this too has an impact upon service user aggression.

Considering Roadway Context in Setting Posted Speed Limits

The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 17-76 investigated factors that influence operating speed and safety through a review of the literature and an analysis of the relationships for speed, safety, and roadway characteristics on urban/suburban streets. That knowledge, along with a review of existing speed limit setting practices, was used to develop a Speed Limit Setting Procedure (SLS-Procedure) as well as a user manual to explain the SLS-Procedure. In addition, the SLS-Procedure was automated via a spreadsheet-based Speed Limit Setting Tool (SLS-Tool). These products will permit engineers to make informed decisions about the setting of speed limits. The SLS-Procedure is fact based and transparent, relying on a set of decision rules that consider both driver speed choice and safety associated with the roadway. The SLS-Procedure was designed to be applicable across different roadway types and contexts by having a set of unique decision rules for four combinations of roadway types and contexts: limited-access, undeveloped, developed, and full-access facilities. The SLS-Procedure uses the operating speed distribution as a starting point for the suggested speed limit, with the resulting suggested value based on consideration of roadway type, context, safety performance, and other characteristics.

Video-feedback promotes sensitive limit-setting in parents of twin preschoolers: a randomized controlled trial

Background Primary aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to test the effectiveness of the parenting intervention ‘Video-feedback to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline’ (VIPP-SD) in a sample of parents of preschool-aged twins, as well as differential susceptibility to intervention efforts, that is, whether more temperamentally reactive parents would profit more from the VIPP-SD than parents with lower reactivity. Methods The sample consisted of 202 families with same-sex twins [N = 404 children, mean age 45 months (SD = 6.81)]. Randomization was done at the family level in a 2:3 ratio, with 83 families (41%) randomized to the VIPP-SD group, and 119 families (59%) to the control group. After two pre-tests in year 1 and year 2 of the study, the VIPP-SD was implemented in the third year, with a post-test assessment 1 month after the five intervention sessions. Parental sensitivity was observed during structured play in which parent and child copied a drawing together in a computerized Etch-A-Sketch paradigm. Parental limit-setting was observed in a ‘don’t touch’ task in which the parent required from the child to abstain from playing with attractive toys. Parents interacted with each of their twins in separate sessions. Results The VIPP-SD intervention had a positive impact on the level of parents’ positive limit-setting in interaction with their preschool twins, and this positive effect was most pronounced when the parents completed at least five intervention sessions. However, the intervention did not enhance parental sensitivity during structured play. Parents with higher reactivity were not more open to the impact of the intervention, thus for this temperamental marker differential susceptibility in adults was not supported. Conclusions The current study is unique in targeting families with twin preschoolers, providing proof of principle that coaching parents with video-feedback promotes parental sensitive limit-setting to both children. It remains to be seen whether this finding can be replicated in families with non-twin siblings, or other parental susceptibility markers. Trial registration Trial NL5172 (NTR5312), 2015-07-20.