titanium target
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

69
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.V. Ovchinnikov

Abstract. The article presents the results of the influence of the technology of obtaining the material of the cathode of the implanter of the Cu – Fe system on the penetration depth of the titanium alloy VT20. It is shown that the use of 50% Cu – 50% Fe material as the material of the cathode of the implanter, obtained by alloying copper and iron, leads to a better increase in the thickness of the ion-doped layer than the use of the cathode obtained by powder metallurgy.


Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1230
Author(s):  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Puyou Ying ◽  
Changhong Lin ◽  
Tao Yang ◽  
Jianbo Wu ◽  
...  

MoS2–Ti coating is a widely used solid lubricant owing to its low friction coefficient. The mechanical and tribological performance of the coating can be further improved via introducing a multilayer structure, which is closely related to the modulation period and significantly affects the properties of the coating. Herein, the effect of two different modulation periods on the mechanical and tribological performance of the MoS2–TiL/MoS2–TiH multilayer coatings (where L and H represent low and high-powered sputtering of the titanium target) was studied. The performance of the coatings was found to depend on modulation periods of single layer thickness and thickness ratio, respectively. When the thickness ratio of MoS2–TiL layer to MoS2–TiH layer was fixed with different number of layers, the adverse effects of the interface outweighed the beneficial effect; thus, the mechanical and tribological performance of the multilayer coatings were improved with an increase in the single layer thickness. When the effect of the multilayer interfaces on the studied coatings was similar with the same number of layers, the MoS2–TiH layer had more impact on the hardness of the MoS2–TiL/MoS2–TiH multilayer coatings, whereas the MoS2–TiL layer substantially affected the adhesion properties, friction behavior and wear resistance. This study can provide a way to regulate coatings with different performance requirements via building different multilayer microstructures.


2021 ◽  
pp. 204141962110357
Author(s):  
K. Senthil ◽  
Rachit Sharma ◽  
S. Rupali ◽  
Ankush Thakur ◽  
M. A. Iqbal ◽  
...  

The manuscript is focussed on the prediction of superior layer configuration on titanium and aluminium plates through numerical investigations using ABAQUS/Explicit finite element software. The target plate of titanium Ti-6Al-4V (Ti) and aluminium Al 2024-T3 (Al) were studied against 7.62 mm diameter soft lead core projectiles. The Johnson-Cook (JC) material model was employed to simulate the behaviour of the target as well as projectile material. The results thus predicted from the numerical simulations in terms of deformed profile, residual velocity and ballistic limit were compared with the experimental results available in literature. Overall, the results were found in good agreement with the experimental results. The simulations were performed on the target of 10, 12.7 and 15 mm thickness with three, five and ten layers in order to predict the superior layer configuration. In the case of Ti-6Al-4V, the difference in performance between three layers and monolithic was quite high, however the use of five or ten layers of equivalent thickness is not advisable as performance is reduced. For Al2024-T3, the performance of layer targets was quite similar to that of monolithic targets. It is also observed the resistance of TiTiAl target configuration found to be better as compared to AlTiTi target configuration. It is concluded that the Al plate as back layer has more efficiency for ballistic resistance of layered configuration. It is also concluded that with respect to thickness, the capacity of titanium target is approximately 1.5 times higher than aluminium target against given lead core projectile.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1799 (1) ◽  
pp. 012021
Author(s):  
V A Pavlov ◽  
V I Shapovalov ◽  
D S Shestakov ◽  
A V Rudakov ◽  
A E Shabalin

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (18) ◽  
pp. 180701-180701
Author(s):  
Chen Chang-Zi ◽  
◽  
Ma Dong-Lin ◽  
Li Yan-Tao ◽  
Leng Yong-Xiang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrey V. Tyunkov ◽  
Victor A. Burdovitsin ◽  
Efim M. Oks ◽  
Maxim V. Shandrikov ◽  
Yury G. Yushkov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 163 ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Gizawy ◽  
H.A. Shamsel-Din ◽  
Islam M. Abdelmonem ◽  
Mohamed I.A. Ibrahim ◽  
Laila A. Mohamed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document