blastemal cell
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Yi Chen ◽  
Wei-Ting Yueh ◽  
Jiun-Hong Chen

AbstractAnnelids are regenerative animals, but the underlying mechanisms await to be discovered. Because Wnt pathway is involved in animal regeneration to varying extents, we used Aeolosoma viride to interrogate whether and how this pathway plays a role in annelid anterior regeneration. We found that the expression of wnt4, β-catenin and nuclear-localized β-catenin protein were up-regulated during blastemal formation and down-regulated as anterior structures gradually reformed. Consistent with potential Wnt activities in the blastema, treatments with either Wnt pathway activator (azakenpaullone) or inhibitor (XAV939) inhibited head regeneration, which further supports a role of Wnt pathway during anterior regeneration. Detailed tissue-level examines demonstrated that wound closure and blastemal cell proliferation were impaired by over-activating the pathway, and that neuronal and musculature differentiation were affected under Wnt inhibition. Combined, gene expression and chemical inhibitor data suggest the presence of dynamic Wnt activities at different anterior regeneration stages: an initial low activity may be required for wound closure, and the following activation may signal blastemal formation and cell differentiation. In a nutshell, we propose that the canonical Wnt signaling regulates blastemal cellular responses during annelid regeneration.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 2981-2991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie A. Tornini ◽  
Alberto Puliafito ◽  
Leslie A. Slota ◽  
John D. Thompson ◽  
Gregory Nachtrab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (3 suppl) ◽  
pp. 889-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
PK. Böckelmann ◽  
IJ. Bechara

When partially amputated or severely injured, teleost fins suffer a regenerative process called epimorphic regeneration characterised by the following stages: the formation of a multistratified epidermal layer, the disorganisation and distal migration of multipotent mesenchymal cells, the proliferation of these cells in order to form the blastema, continuous proliferation of distal blastema to facilitate the growth, and differentiation of the proximal blastema in order to restore its lost structure. The regeneration of the fin is extremely sensitive to the action of some drugs that can interfere in its structure restoration. For this reason, and also based on papers relating that indomethacin can interfere somehow in the tissue restoration of many different organisms, the aim of this work is to evaluate the possible effects of this drug in three different doses in the regeneration of the teleost fish tail fin, taking into consideration the synthesis, the disposition and organisation of lepidotrichial matrix components, the restoration of actinotrichia, as well as the fin area itself. Therefore, histochemical, ultrastructural and morphometric analysis were done and it was observed that indomethacin in doses of 20 and 30 mg.L-1 caused a delay in the regenerative process of the dermal skeleton (lepidotrichia and actinotrichia) of the tail fins. These doses could have interfered, momentarily, in the process of blastemal cell differentiation in the cells responsible for the synthesis and disposition of actinotrichia and lepidotrichia or, even interfered in the signalling necessary for the recent differentiated cells to begin synthesising the components of the dermal skeleton.


Development ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-173
Author(s):  
M. Maden

Using microdensitometry techniques the points in the cycle where blastemal cells become blocked after X-irradiation or denervation of the regenerating amphibian limb have been identified. X-irradiation blocks the cells in both G1 and G2 and those cells that were in S at the time of irradiation presumably proceed to G1. After denervation, however, cells accumulate only in G1 and those that were in S or G1 continue through the cycle to the next G1. The latter results are clearly contradictory to a recent theory proposing a G1 neurotrophic control of blastemal cells and a solution to the contradiction is presented in the light of recent results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document