Transcription Factors Active in the Anterior Blastema of Schmidtea mediterranea

Regeneration, the restoration of body parts after injury, is quite widespread in the animal kingdom. Species from virtually all Phyla possess regenerative abilities. Human beings, however, are poor regenerators. Yet, the progress of knowledge and technology in the fields of bioengineering, stem cells, and regenerative biology have fostered major advancements in regenerative medical treatments, which aim to regenerate tissues and organs and restore function. Human induced pluripotent stem cells can differentiate into any cell type of the body; however, the structural and cellular complexity of the human tissues, together with the inability of our adult body to control pluripotency, require a better mechanistic understanding. Planarians, with their capacity to regenerate lost body parts thanks to the presence of adult pluripotent stem cells could help providing such an understanding. In this paper, we used a top-down approach to shortlist blastema transcription factors (TFs) active during anterior regeneration. We found 44 TFs—31 of which are novel in planarian—that are expressed in the regenerating blastema. We analyzed the function of half of them and found that they play a role in the regeneration of anterior structures, like the anterior organizer, the positional instruction muscle cells, the brain, the photoreceptor, the intestine. Our findings revealed a glimpse of the complexity of the transcriptional network governing anterior regeneration in planarians, confirming that this animal model is the perfect playground to study in vivo how pluripotency copes with adulthood.

Cellular proliferation dynamics during regeneration in Syllis malaquini (Syllidae, Annelida)

Background In syllids (Annelida, Syllidae), the regenerative blastema was subject of many studies in the mid and late XXth century. This work on syllid regeneration showed that the blastema is developed by a process of dedifferentiation of cells near the wound, followed by their proliferation and redifferentiation (cells differentiate to the original cell type) or, in some specific cases, transdifferentiation (cells differentiate to a cell type different from the original). Up to date, participation of stem cells or pre-existing proliferative cells in the blastema development has never been observed in syllids. This study provides the first comprehensive description of Syllis malaquini’s regenerative capacity, including data on the cellular proliferation dynamics by using an EdU/BrdU labelling approach, in order to trace proliferative cells (S-phase cells) present before and after operation. Results Syllis malaquini can restore the anterior and posterior body from different cutting levels under experimental conditions, even from midbody fragments. Our results on cellular proliferation showed that S-phase cells present in the body before bisection do not significantly contribute to blastema development. However, in some specimens cut at the level of the proventricle, cells in S-phase located in the digestive tube before bisection participated in regeneration. Also, our results showed that nucleus shape allows to distinguish different types of blastemal cells as forming specific tissues. Additionally, simultaneous and sequential addition of segments seem to occur in anterior regeneration, while only sequential addition was observed in posterior regeneration. Remarkably, in contrast with previous studies in syllids, sexual reproduction was not induced during anterior regeneration of amputees lacking the proventricle, a foregut organ widely known to be involved in the stolonization control. Conclusions Our findings led us to consider that although dedifferentiation and redifferentiation might be more common, proliferative cells present before injury can be involved in regenerative processes in syllids, at least in some cases. Also, we provide data for comparative studies on resegmentation as a process that differs between anterior and posterior regeneration; and on the controversial role of the proventricle in the reproduction of different syllid lineages.

Expression of Piwi Genes during the Regeneration of Lineus sanguineus (Nemertea, Pilidiophora, Heteronemertea)

The transposon silencer piwi genes play important roles in germline determination and maintenance, gametogenesis, and stem-cell self-renewal, and the expression of certain piwi genes is indispensable for regeneration. Knowledge about piwi genes is needed for phylum Nemertea, which contains members (e.g., Lineus sanguineus) with formidable regeneration capacity. By searching the L. sanguineus genome, we identified six Argonaute genes including three ago (Ls-Ago2, Ls-Ago2a, and Ls-Ago2b) and three piwi (Ls-piwi1, Ls-piwi2, and Ls-piwi3) genes. In situ hybridization revealed that, in intact females, Ls-piwi2 and Ls-piwi3 were not expressed, while Ls-piwi1 was expressed in ovaries. During regeneration, Ls-piwi1 and Ls-pcna (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) had strong and similar expressions. The expression of Ls-piwi1 became indetectable while Ls-pcna continued to be expressed when the differentiation of new organs was finished. During anterior regeneration, expression signals of Ls-piwi2 and Ls-piwi3 were weak and only detected in the blastema stage. During posterior regeneration, no expression was observed for Ls-piwi2. To date, no direct evidence has been found for the existence of congenital stem cells in adult L. sanguineus. The “pluripotent cells” in regenerating tissues are likely to be dedifferentiated from other type(s) of cells.

Canonical Wnt signaling Is Involved in Anterior Regeneration of the Annelid Aeolosoma viride

Annelids are regenerative animals, but the underlying mechanisms await to be discovered. Because Wnt pathway is involved in animal regeneration to varying extents, we used Aeolosoma viride to interrogate whether and how this pathway plays a role in annelid anterior regeneration. We found that the expression of wnt4, β-catenin and nuclear-localized β-catenin protein were up-regulated during blastemal formation and down-regulated as anterior structures gradually reformed. Consistent with potential Wnt activities in the blastema, treatments with either Wnt pathway activator (azakenpaullone) or inhibitor (XAV939) inhibited head regeneration, which further supports a role of Wnt pathway during anterior regeneration. Detailed tissue-level examines demonstrated that wound closure and blastemal cell proliferation were impaired by over-activating the pathway, and that neuronal and musculature differentiation were affected under Wnt inhibition. Combined, gene expression and chemical inhibitor data suggest the presence of dynamic Wnt activities at different anterior regeneration stages: an initial low activity may be required for wound closure, and the following activation may signal blastemal formation and cell differentiation. In a nutshell, we propose that the canonical Wnt signaling regulates blastemal cellular responses during annelid regeneration.

Comparative transcriptomics in Syllidae (Annelida) indicates that posterior regeneration and regular growth are comparable, while anterior regeneration is a distinct process

Background Annelids exhibit remarkable postembryonic developmental abilities. Most annelids grow during their whole life by adding segments through the action of a segment addition zone (SAZ) located in front of the pygidium. In addition, they show an outstanding ability to regenerate their bodies. Experimental evidence and field observations show that many annelids are able to regenerate their posterior bodies, while anterior regeneration is often limited or absent. Syllidae, for instance, usually show high abilities of posterior regeneration, although anterior regeneration varies across species. Some syllids are able to partially restore the anterior end, while others regenerate all lost anterior body after bisection. Here, we used comparative transcriptomics to detect changes in the gene expression profiles during anterior regeneration, posterior regeneration and regular growth of two syllid species: Sphaerosyllis hystrix and Syllis gracilis; which exhibit limited and complete anterior regeneration, respectively. Results We detected a high number of genes with differential expression: 4771 genes in S. hystrix (limited anterior regeneration) and 1997 genes in S. gracilis (complete anterior regeneration). For both species, the comparative transcriptomic analysis showed that gene expression during posterior regeneration and regular growth was very similar, whereas anterior regeneration was characterized by up-regulation of several genes. Among the up-regulated genes, we identified putative homologs of regeneration-related genes associated to cellular proliferation, nervous system development, establishment of body axis, and stem-cellness; such as rup and JNK (in S. hystrix); and glutamine synthetase, elav, slit, Hox genes, β-catenin and PL10 (in S. gracilis). Conclusions Posterior regeneration and regular growth show no significant differences in gene expression in the herein investigated syllids. However, anterior regeneration is associated with a clear change in terms of gene expression in both species. Our comparative transcriptomic analysis was able to detect differential expression of some regeneration-related genes, suggesting that syllids share some features of the regenerative mechanisms already known for other annelids and invertebrates.

A morphological and histological investigation of the regeneration in Myxicola infundibulum (Montagu, 1808) (Sabellida, Annelida)

Anterior regeneration of the annelid polychaete, Myxicola infundibulum (Montagu, 1808) is described from histological and SEM perspectives. This article provides additional evidence that anterior and posterior regeneration of isolated worm pieces does occur in this species, but that regenerative ability is restricted to abdominal pieces obtained from small individuals (less than 5 mm in thorax diameter and 10–20 mm in length). New cartilage tissue forms within the regenerating crown, but thoracic regeneration is limited to three segments. Anterior and posterior regeneration occurred within isolated pieces excised from the abdomen, resulting in the formation of 13 clones, with up to five individuals per clone.