Abstract
BackgroundProphylactic indomethacin has been widely used as an effective intervention for reducing mortalities and morbidities in preterm infants including the cardiopulmonary and neurodevelopmental morbidities as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), but many studies have reported contraindicated outcomes of its significance. Therefore, we aim to systematically review and meta-analyze the data of prophylactic indomethacin on preterm infants. MethodsOur systematic search included the following databases: Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, The New York Academy of Medicine (NYAM), Virtual health library (VHL), and the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) to include studies that assessed the use of prophylactic indomethacin in preterm infants until August 12, 2020. ResultsThe final list of our included studies is comprised of 22 randomized trials and cohort studies. Our analysis of observational data showed that intubation in the delivery room/first day (74%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) (33.2%), and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) (32.2%) were the most prevalent outcomes in infants that received prophylactic indomethacin. Among all the studies outcomes, the only significant favorable outcome was lowering the rate of PDA (P< 0.001) while no significance was recorded with BPD, pulmonary hemorrhage, neurodevelopmental delays (IVH), mortality, length of hospital stays, and time spent on ventilators outcomes (P = 0.106, 0.123, 0.460, 0.340, 0.625, and 0.732, respectively). Moreover, necrotizing enterocolitis was significantly increased when applying prophylactic indomethacin in these infants (P< 0.001). ConclusionThe use of prophylactic indomethacin in preterm infants should be generally discouraged due to its neutral effect on most of the mortality and morbidity outcomes and the significant occurrence of its adverse events despite the positive effect on ductal closure.