Physiological and nutritional constraints on zooplankton productivity due to eutrophication and climate change predicted using a resource-based modeling approach

Emerging evidence suggests that zooplankton production is affected by physiological and nutritional constraints due to climate change and eutrophication, which in turn could have broad implications for food-web dynamics and fisheries production. In this study, we developed a resource-based zooplankton production dynamics model that causally links freshwater cladoceran and copepod daily production-to-biomass (P/B) ratios with water temperature, phytoplankton biomass and community composition, and zooplankton feeding selectivity. This model was used to evaluate constraints on zooplankton growth under four hypothetical scenarios: involving natural plankton community seasonal succession; lake fertilization to enhance fisheries production; eutrophication; and climatic warming. Our novel modeling approach predicts zooplankton production is strongly dependent on seasonal variation in resource availability and quality, which results in more complex zooplankton dynamics than predicted by simpler temperature dependent models. For mesotrophic and hypereutrophic lakes, our study suggests that the ultimate control over zooplankton P/B ratios shifts from physiological control during colder periods to strong resource control during warmer periods. Our resource-based model provided important insights into the nature of biophysical control of zooplankton under a changing climate that has crucial implications for food web energy transfer and fisheries production.

Comparison of mesozooplankton production estimates from Saanich Inlet (British Columbia, Canada) using the chitobiase and biomass size spectra approaches

Zooplankton production estimates are necessary to understand the availability and transfer of energy to higher trophic levels in marine food webs. Methods have been developed to quantify zooplankton production; however, they are difficult to compare as they focus on single species, groups, stages, or size classes of zooplankton. We compared 2 methods for estimating crustacean production: the chitobiase method (based on a crustacean moulting enzyme), and 3 empirical growth rate models (Huntley-Lopez, Hirst-Lampitt, and Hirst-Bunker) applied to optically resolved mesozooplankton normalized biomass size spectra (NBSS). Mesozooplankton net samples were collected between March and August of 2010 and 2011 in Saanich Inlet (British Columbia, Canada) and analyzed in the laboratory using microscopy and a bench-top laser optical particle counter (lab-LOPC). Microscope and lab-LOPC estimates of abundance and biomass were in close agreement. Crustacean production estimates were highest using Huntley-Lopez (0.20-185.3 mg C m-3 d-1), followed by Hirst-Bunker (0 .01-18.3 mg C m-3 d-1), chitobiase (0.05-15.6 mg C m-3 d-1), and Hirst-Lampitt (0.03-14.3 mg C m-3 d-1). Hirst-Lampitt-, Hirst-Bunker-, and chitobiase-based estimates of crustacean production and trophic transfer efficiency (TTE) yielded similar patterns/magnitude, while the Huntley-Lopez model was more variable. Estimates showed stronger agreement in 2011 than in 2010, attributed to the shift from El Niño to La Niña conditions. We highlight similarities/differences associated with these techniques and suggest that Hirst-Bunker estimates of production and TTE are most consistent with chitobiase-based values.

Effects of the Level and Frequency of Fertilization with hen Droppings on Zooplanktonic Density and Growth Performance of Common Carp Post-Larvae (CyprinusCarpio)

Zooplankton production and growth performance of post-larvae of common carp according to the level and frequency of fertilization with chicken droppings were studied between May and October 2017 at the IRAD pisciculture station in Foumban. To this end, two doses of hen droppings, namely 450 g/m3 (D450) and 600 g/m3 (D600), were each applied at two application frequencies (weekly (F2) and bimonthly (F1)). Thus, 1200 post-carp larvae were distributed in 12 identical concrete tanks (1.2m x 0.75m x 1m) each filled with 400 liters of water. The 2 doses applied at 2 frequencies were applied randomly in the 12 tanks in a complete random device comprising 3 treatments and 2 repetitions. Six days after fertilization, each tank was sown with zooplankton at a density of 7 individuals per liter (ind/l). The loading was carried out 12 days after fertilization at a density of 100 ind/m2. The results show that regardless of the dose and the frequency of droppings applied, the production of zooplankton was optimal 10 to 12 days after fertilization. Considering the growth performance, the tanks receiving the 600 g/m3 dose every 2 weeks presented the highest significant values ​​(p <0.05). On the other hand, the survival rate (36% on average) was not significantly influenced (p˃0.05) by the dose and the frequency of fertilization. The 600 g/m3 dose applied every two weeks can be recommended for the rearing of post-larvae common carp.

Effects of salinity on species composition of zooplankton on Hau River, Mekong Delta, Vietnam

The area surrounding the Hau River is one of the most important aquaculture and fisheries areas in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Fish, shrimp farms and fishers rely of the natural zooplankton production in the incoming water to sustain production. Zooplankton samples were collected from July 2017 to June 2018 using a zooplankton net with mesh size of 60 μm at 3 sites on Hau river at Tran De (river mouth), Dai Ngai (midpoint) and Cai Con (farthest salt intrusion area on Hau river). Qualitative and quantitative samples of zooplankton together with salinity level were determined monthly at each sites. The salinity was found to fluctuate from 0 to 20‰ in the study area. A total of 137 zooplankton species were recorded including 26 species of Protozoa (19%), 47 species of Rotifera (34%), 12 species of Cladocera (9%), 44 species of Copepoda (32%) and 8 other taxon (6%). Copepod and rotifer prevailed with high densities (19.9 × 103 ind m−3 and 19.7 × 103 ind m−3, respectively), whereas protozoa and cladocera were less abundant with 6.8 × 103 ind m−3 and 4.9 × 103 ind m−3, respectively. When salinity increased to more than 5, protozoa and copepods were more abundant and reached a peak at 20 with 25.0 × 1036 ind m−3 and 53.0 × 103 ind m−3, respectively. Regression analysis indicated that the density of zooplankton was significantly correlated to salinity variation. Protozoa and copepod were positively correlated with salinity, whereas cladocera and rotifer were negatively correlated with salinity. The impacts of climate change could exacerbate the seasonal fluctuations in salinity and zooplankton composition.

TROPHODYNAMICS OF MARINE ORGANISMS IN THE EPIPELAGIC LAYER OF THE OKHOTSK SEA IN 2000S

New data on matter and energy transfer between major components of the Okhotsk Sea ecosystem are obtained on the base of trophodynamic modeling, taking into consideration their production and food consumption rates. The main trophodynamic relationships in the pelagic and bottom communities are determined from observations on zooplankton and nekton abundance, organic carbon content, food habits of marine organisms, and their isotope composition in 2000–2014. The total zooplankton production in the entire Okhotsk Sea in these years is assessed as 2616 . 106 t in raw weight, including 2275 . 106 t for non-predatory plankton, and 341 . 106 t for predatory plankton. So high total production of zooplankton is conditioned by favorable environmental conditions and dominance of high-productive species. Taking into account the rate of zooplankton consumption by predators, only 22.4 % of the total annual zooplankton production was consumed annually, with 16.2 % grazed by predatory plankton and 6.2 % by nekton. In carbon units, 831.0 . 106 tC was produced annually in the Okhotsk Sea at the first trophic level, 177.4 . 106 tC at the second trophic level, 18.1 . 106 tC at the third trophic level, 0.74 . 106 tC at the fourth trophic level, and 0.016 . 106 tC at the fifth trophic level. Pelagic nekton consumed 159 . 106 tC annually. The nekton prey included 85.5 % of zooplankton, 12.8 % of nekton, and 1.7 % of zoobenthos, by biomass. The main part of zooplankton consumed by nekton (50.7 %) was grazed by walleye pollock, 18.9 % by herring, 16.6 % by squids, 7.6 % by capelin, 5.3 % by deep-sea smelt, and 0.9 % by salmons. The total annual production of organisms in the epipelagic layer of the Okhotsk Sea exceeded 109 tons of C (1027.4 . 106 tC/year equal to the biomass of 17.85 . 109 t in wet weight). Primary production is estimated as 67.60 % of gross production in carbon units, microheterotrophic organisms produce 13.30 %, dominant zooplankton groups — 18.60 % (copepods 11.40 %, euphausiids 5.50 %, sagittas 1.20 %, and hyperiids 0.50 %), the portion of nekton production is estimated as 0.13 % of gross production.

Study of vertical distribution of zooplankton in Zaporozhskoye Reservoir aiming to calculate bighead carp stocking

The article focuses on the vertical distribution of zooplankton because of its importance for calculation of bighead carp stocking the Zaporozhskoye Reservoir. The reservoir is a water-body of complex use with fish catching being one of the priorities of the reservoir. Zooplankton is an important component of fish forage base, so accurate quantitation of zooplankton development is necessary for improving efficiency of forage base use of the reservoir by means of appropriate stocking with fish. These indicators depend significantly on the depth of the reservoir and can vary through the vertical section. At the same time, almost all investigations of the reservoir were aimed at studying the indicators of zooplankton development in the surface layer which can led to inaccurate calculations concerning the stocking of the reservoir with planktivorous fish. Therefore, the purpose of this work was not only to study the vertical distribution of zooplankton of the Zaporozhskoye Reservoir, but also to calculate the zooplankton production and the corresponding rates of stocking the reservoir with bighead carp. In summer and autumn periods, the heterogeneous vertical distribution of zooplankton was found in both parts of the reservoir. In the upper part of the reservoir, the maximum values of zooplankton development were observed in the surface and near-bottom layers whereas in the lower part of the reservoir – in the surface layer and at the depth of 10 m. Since conditions of the upper part of the reservoir are unfavorable for bighead carp, and the estimated value of the stocking density (0.3 spec.·ha-1) is negligible, no stocking of this part of the reservoir with the indicated planktivorous fish is expected. When calculating the stocking based on the zooplankton production in the surface layer only, but not in the whole water column, almost double overvaluation obtained (excess would be 246.8 thousand specimens) would lead to economic losses because of the wasteful expenditure of stocked material due to a lack of food resources. For effective utilization of zooplankton as the food base it is advisable to stock the lower part of the reservoir with two-year-old bighead carps with the stocking density of 19.1 spec.·ha-1.

Influence of river discharge on zooplankton diet in the Godavari estuary (Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean)

In estuaries, detrital (i.e., non-living) organic matter (OM) contributes significantly to the particulate organic matter (POM) pool and we hypothesize that it may be a major source of estuarine zooplankton diet. To test this hypothesis, the isotopic composition of carbon (d13C) and nitrogen (d15N) of phytoplankton, zooplankton, and POM was assessed in the Godavari estuary (Bay of Bengal, Indian Ocean) during wet (November) and dry periods (January). As a result of higher riverine discharge, POM concentrations and values of the C/Chl-a ratio during the wet period were higher than those measured during the dry one. Relatively lower δ13CPOM values were observed during wet than dry period and contrasting to that was found for δ15NPOM. Detritus from fresh water algae and C3 plants contributed significantly to the POM pool during the wet and dry period, respectively. Based on isotopic mixing model, detrital OM and phytoplankton mostly characterized the POM pools during the wet and dry periods, respectively. Accordingly, our results suggest also that the zooplankton diet was mostly supported by detrital OM during the wet period and by both phytoplankton and detrital OM during the dry one. The zooplankton trophic level (TL, 2.7) during the wet period was relatively higher than that (1.9) during the dry one, suggesting a relative higher preference for detritus than phytoplankton during the wet period. The results of this study allowed us confirming that detrital OM can significantly support zooplankton production in the Godavari estuary.