lipid fatty acid composition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

39
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
Cahide Çiğdem Yığın ◽  
Fikret Çakır ◽  
Koray Cabbar ◽  
Bayram Kızılkaya ◽  
Hasan Basri Ormancı ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Оксана Серебрякова ◽  
Лидия Васильевна Ветчинникова ◽  
Oksana Serebryakova ◽  
Lidia Vetchinnikova

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (22) ◽  
pp. 9624-9638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting-Wen Chen ◽  
Philipp Sandmann ◽  
Ina Schaefer ◽  
Stefan Scheu

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-640
Author(s):  
V.Z. Stanacev ◽  
D. Milic ◽  
N. Milosevic ◽  
V.S. Stanacev ◽  
Z. Pavlovski ◽  
...  

This paper investigates the effect of soybean, flax and rapeseed oil on productive performance and lipid fatty acid composition of broiler chickens. Six groups of 40 one day-old chicks hybrid line Cobb 500, with five replications were formed. Three mixtures with 21, 20 and 18% protein were used. The first 14 days groups were fed with the starter mixture. The control group was based on the 4% and 8% soybean oil while in the experimental groups were included the same concentration of flax and rapeseed oil. The experiment lasted 42 days. At the end of the experiment 10 chickens from each group were sacrificed for examination of fatty acid composition of lipids. The control group achieved weight of 2704g and 2695g, and the experimental group in 2735, 2645, 2735 and 2670g, respectively. Feed conversion was improved with increasing the amount of oil in the diet. The usage of flax and rapeseed oil changed the fatty acid composition of lipids. Substituting soybean oil with rapeseed oil reduces the percentage of palmitic, stearic, and linoleic acids, and increases participation of oleic and linoleic acids in abdominal fat. The inclusion of flaxseed oil in the diet of chickens in the amount of 4% and 8%, increases the amount of linoleic acid by 63% and 203%, which is a statistically high and significant difference for the control group I and II, while the amount of linoleic acid is reduced by 14% and 33 %, which presents a statistically significant difference compared to group II.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document