Pragmatic options for dose optimization of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam in complex patients

Background Avibactam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that is combined with aztreonam against Enterobacterales co-expressing serine- and metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Optimal dosing of aztreonam with avibactam is not well-defined in critically ill patients and contingent on ceftazidime/avibactam product labelling. Objectives To identify a pragmatic dosing strategy for aztreonam with avibactam to maximize the probability of target attainment (PTA). Methods We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study. Five blood samples were collected around the fourth dose of aztreonam or ceftazidime/avibactam and assayed for all three drugs. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis coupled with Monte Carlo simulations were used to create a dosing nomogram for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam based on drug-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) targets. Results A total of 41 participants (59% male) median age of 75 years (IQR 63–79 years) were enrolled. They were critically ill (46%) with multiple comorbidities and complications including burns (20%). Population PK analysis identified higher volume of distribution and lower clearance (CL) compared with typical value expectations for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam. Estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate using the CKD-EPI equation predicted CL for all three drugs. The need for high doses of aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam above those in the existing product labels are not predicted by this analysis with the exception of ceftazidime/avibactam for patients with eGFR of 6–15 mL/min, in whom suboptimal PTA of ≤71% is predicted. Conclusions Pragmatic and lower daily-dose options are predicted for aztreonam and ceftazidime/avibactam when the eGFR is <90 mL/min. These options should be tested prospectively.

Evaluation of a Pediatric Enoxaparin Dosing Protocol and the Impact on Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES Enoxaparin has been studied for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolism in the pediatric population. Dose-finding studies have suggested higher mean maintenance dose requirements in younger children; however, the current recommended dosing schema endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians remains conservative, likely secondary to limited data on the safety and efficacy of escalated starting doses. Primary objectives of this study included the identification of patient characteristics and risk factors with associations to anti–factor Xa (anti-Xa) values. The secondary objective was to determine an association between the initial anti-Xa value and thrombus resolution. Safety outcomes related to bleeding were also assessed. METHODS This retrospective cohort study reviewed records of all pediatric patients ≤18 years of age who were initiated on therapeutic subcutaneous enoxaparin between October 1, 2008, and October 1, 2018, at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota for an indication of incident thrombus (N = 283). RESULTS Successful resolution of thrombus was directly associated with attaining a therapeutic anti-Xa concentration upon first laboratory evaluation. Other characteristics with associations to initial anti-Xa values included age, body mass index, and certain diagnoses. The rate of composite bleeding was consistent across concentrations of anti-Xa (p = 0.4944). CONCLUSIONS Despite adherence to protocol, the current enoxaparin dosing nomogram is only successful at achieving a therapeutic anti-Xa concentration (0.5–1.0 unit/mL) 55.8% of the time. A more aggressive enoxaparin dosing nomogram is warranted, as delaying time to therapeutic anti-Xa values impacts clinical outcomes, specifically thrombus resolution. Further investigation into characteristics with association to anti-Xa concentrations is needed.

Development and validation of a dosing nomogram for amoxicillin in infective endocarditis

Background Amoxicillin is the first-line treatment for streptococcal or enterococcal infective endocarditis (IE) with a dose regimen adapted to weight. Objectives Covariates influencing pharmacokinetics (PK) of amoxicillin were identified in order to develop a dosing nomogram based on identified covariates for individual adaptation. Patients and methods Patients treated with amoxicillin administered by continuous infusion for IE were included retrospectively. The population PK analysis was performed using the Pmetrics package for R (NPAG algorithm). Influence of weight, ideal weight, height, BMI, body surface area, glomerular filtration rate adapted to the body surface area and calculated by the CKD-EPI method (mL/min), additional ceftriaxone treatment and serum protein level on amoxicillin PK was tested. A nomogram was then developed to determine the daily dose needed to achieve a steady-state free plasma concentration above 4× MIC, 100% of the time, without exceeding a total plasma concentration of 80 mg/L. Results A total of 160 patients were included. Population PK analysis was performed on 540 amoxicillin plasma concentrations. A two-compartment model best described amoxicillin PK and the glomerular filtration rate covariate significantly improved the model when included in the calculation of the elimination constant Ke. Conclusions This work allowed the development of a dosing nomogram that can help to increase achievement of the PK/pharmacodynamic targets in IE treated with amoxicillin.

Development of a vancomycin dosing approach for critically ill patients receiving hybrid hemodialysis using Monte Carlo simulation

Objectives: Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy is an increasingly popular treatment for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients that runs at different flow rates and durations than conventional hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapies. Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy are scarce; consequently, clinicians are challenged to dose antibiotics effectively. The purpose of this study was to develop vancomycin dosing recommendations for patients receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy. Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed in thousands of virtual patients derived from previously published demographic, pharmacokinetic, and dialytic information derived from critically ill patients receiving vancomycin and other forms of renal replacement therapy. We conducted “in silico” vancomycin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics analyses in these patients receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy to determine what vancomycin dose would achieve vancomycin 24-h area under the curve (AUC24h) of 400–700 mg·h/L, a target associated with positive clinical outcomes. Nine different vancomycin dosing regimens were tested using four different, commonly used prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy modalities. A dosing nomogram based on serum concentration data achieved after the third dose was developed to individualize vancomycin therapy. Results: An initial vancomycin dose of 15 or 20 mg/kg immediately followed by 15 mg/kg after subsequent prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy treatments achieved AUC24h of ≥400 mg·h/L for ≥90% of patients regardless of prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy duration, modality, or time of vancomycin dose relative to prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy. Many patients experienced AUC24h of ≥700 mg·h/L, but once the dosing nomogram was applied to serum concentrations obtained after the third vancomycin dose, 67%–88% of patients achieved AUC24h of 400–700 mg·h/L. Conclusion: An initial loading dose of 15–20 mg/kg followed by a maintenance regimen of 15 mg/kg after every prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy session coupled with serum concentration monitoring should be used to individualize vancomycin dosing. These predictions need clinical verification.