A Ponceau S Staining-Based Dot Blot Assay for Rapid Protein Quantification of Biological Samples

Despite the availability of a wide range of commercial kits, protein quantification is often unreliable, especially for tissue-derived samples, leading to uneven loading in subsequent experiments. Here we show that the widely used Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) assay tends to underestimate protein concentrations of tissue samples. We present a Ponceau S staining-based dot-blot assay as an alternative for protein quantification. This method is simple, rapid, more reliable than the BCA assay, compatible with biological samples lysed in RIPA or 2x SDS gel-loading buffer, and also inexpensive.

Measuring the Concentration of Protein Nanoparticles Synthesized by Desolvation Method: Comparison of Bradford Assay, BCA Assay, hydrolysis/UV Spectroscopy and Gravimetric Analysis

Research paper on sunthesis of protein nanoparticles<div><br><div><b>Abstract</b></div><div>The desolvation technique is one of the most popular methods for preparing protein nanoparticles for medicine, biotechnology, and food applications. We fabricated 11 batches of BSA nanoparticles and 2 batches of gelatin nanoparticles by desolvation method. BSA nanoparticles from 2 batches were cross-linked by heating at +70 °C for 2 h; other nanoparticles were stabilized by glutaraldehyde. We compared several analytical approaches to measuring their concentration: gravimetric analysis, bicinchoninic acid assay, Bradford assay, and alkaline hydrolysis combined with UV spectroscopy. We revealed that the cross-linking degree and method of cross-linking affect both Bradford and BCA assay. Direct measurement of protein concentration in the suspension of purified nanoparticles by dye-binding assays can lead to significant (up to 50-60%) underestimation of nanoparticle concentration. Quantification of non-desolvated protein (indirect method) is affected by the presence of small nanoparticles in supernatants and can be inaccurate when the yield of desolvation is low. The reaction of cross-linker with protein changes UV absorbance of the latter. Therefore pure protein solution is an inappropriate calibrator when applying UV spectroscopy for the determination of nanoparticle concentration. Our recommendation is to determine the concentration of protein nanoparticles by at least two different methods, including gravimetric analysis.<div><br></div></div></div>

Measuring the Concentration of Protein Nanoparticles Synthesized by Desolvation Method: Comparison of Bradford Assay, BCA Assay, hydrolysis/UV Spectroscopy and Gravimetric Analysis

Research paper on sunthesis of protein nanoparticles<div><br><div><b>Abstract</b></div><div>The desolvation technique is one of the most popular methods for preparing protein nanoparticles for medicine, biotechnology, and food applications. We fabricated 11 batches of BSA nanoparticles and 2 batches of gelatin nanoparticles by desolvation method. BSA nanoparticles from 2 batches were cross-linked by heating at +70 °C for 2 h; other nanoparticles were stabilized by glutaraldehyde. We compared several analytical approaches to measuring their concentration: gravimetric analysis, bicinchoninic acid assay, Bradford assay, and alkaline hydrolysis combined with UV spectroscopy. We revealed that the cross-linking degree and method of cross-linking affect both Bradford and BCA assay. Direct measurement of protein concentration in the suspension of purified nanoparticles by dye-binding assays can lead to significant (up to 50-60%) underestimation of nanoparticle concentration. Quantification of non-desolvated protein (indirect method) is affected by the presence of small nanoparticles in supernatants and can be inaccurate when the yield of desolvation is low. The reaction of cross-linker with protein changes UV absorbance of the latter. Therefore pure protein solution is an inappropriate calibrator when applying UV spectroscopy for the determination of nanoparticle concentration. Our recommendation is to determine the concentration of protein nanoparticles by at least two different methods, including gravimetric analysis.<div><br></div></div></div>

Codelivery of Emodin and Diammonium Glycyrrhizinate by Anti-alpha8 Integrin-Conjugated Immunoliposomes for the Treatment of Renal Fibrosis

The targeted delivery of therapeutics to the kidneys has a profound potential for the management of renal fibrosis. Thus, we developed a drug delivery system that targets mesangial cells by conjugating anti-alpha8 integrin to the surface of liposomes. We coloaded emodin (EMO) and diammonium glycyrrhizinate (DAG) to the immunoliposomes for combined therapy. The coloaded immunoliposomes were small size (92.4±0.4 nm), narrowly distributed, and with nearly neutral zeta potential and good stability. The encapsulation rate of EMO and DAG in immunoliposomes was 45.5±2.0% and 44.3±1.1%, respectively. Using a BCA assay, the actual number of antibody molecules attached to a single liposome was determined as being approximately 41. An in vitro release study showed that EMO and DAG could be ratiometrically released from the immunoliposomes, which means that an optimized synergistic ratio of the two drugs could be achieved. Studies on cellular uptake studies demonstrated an approximately 3-fold increase for immunoliposomes in HBZY-1 cells compared to nonconjugated liposomes. In vitro cell growth inhibition and Western Blot assay revealed that the coloaded immunoliposomes exhibited a stronger and synergistic in vitro antifibrosis effect against NIH3T3 and HBZY-1 cells in vitro. Taken together, it indicated that anti-alpha8 integrin-modified immunoliposomes for codelivery of EMO and DAG have great potential for targeting the kidneys for the treatment of renal fibrosis.

A Ponceau Staining based Dot-Blot Assay for reliable and cost-effective Protein Quantification

Reliable quantification of protein extracts from tissues can be a challenge e.g. due to interference of the high fat content in tissues of the nervous system. Further problems like under- or overerstimation of protein concentrations in protein quantification kits like the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay can occur. In addition, common lysis buffers such as RIPA buffer are known to be unable to solubilize a large amount of proteins (~10-30%) leading to unsatisfactory and unreliable experimental results with techniques such as immunoblotting. In this work, we have developed a Ponceau S staining based protein quantification assay. This assay is compatible with tissues or cells directly lysed in 2x SDS gel loading buffer, containing bromophenolblue, leading to more complete protein extraction. Protein concentrations of several samples can be determined in a fast and cost-effective manner and subsequent experiments (e.g. Western blot) can be performed without loss of proteins. The presented protein quantification method is highly reliable, fast and economical. Using this method, it is possible to save between 2300 to 3200€ per 1000 lysates as compared to the costs of a commercial BCA kit.

Comparative Analysis of Protein Quantification Methods for the Rapid Determination of Protein Loading in Liposomal Formulations

Advances in manufacturing processes provide the ability for the high throughput production of liposomes containing a range of moieties, from small molecules to large biologicals (including proteins and nucleic acids for prophylactic and therapeutic applications). Whilst rapid quantification methods for small molecules are generally well established, the ability to rapidly quantify liposomal entrapment of proteins is limited. Indeed, most standard protein quantification techniques (including the BCA assay and Reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC)) measure protein encapsulation indirectly, by measuring the amount of non-incorporated drug, and subtracting from the initial amount of protein added. However, this can give inaccurate and misrepresentative results. To address this, we have developed a range of methods to directly quantify protein entrapment within liposomes. The encapsulation efficiency within neutral, anionic and cationic liposome formulations was determined by three techniques; BCA assay, RP-HPLC and HPLC coupled to an evaporative light scattering detector, (HPLC-ELSD). All three methods are reliable for the quantification of protein, with linear responses and correlation coefficients of 0.99, and LOQ for all three methods being less than 10 µg/mL. Here within, we provide three methods for the rapid and robust quantification of protein loading within liposomal (and other bilayer) vesicle systems.