impact cratering
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

252
(FIVE YEARS 51)

H-INDEX

39
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 003685042110642
Author(s):  
James Lawrence Powell

The progress of science has sometimes been unjustifiably delayed by the premature rejection of a hypothesis for which substantial evidence existed and which later achieved consensus. Continental drift, meteorite impact cratering, and anthropogenic global warming are examples from the first half of the twentieth century. This article presents evidence that the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH) is a twenty-first century case. The hypothesis proposes that the airburst or impact of a comet ∼12,850 years ago caused the ensuing ∼1200-year-long Younger Dryas (YD) cool period and contributed to the extinction of the Pleistocene megafauna in the Western Hemisphere and the disappearance of the Clovis Paleo-Indian culture. Soon after publication, a few scientists reported that they were unable to replicate the critical evidence and the scientific community at large came to reject the hypothesis. By today, however, many independent studies have reproduced that evidence at dozens of YD sites. This article examines why scientists so readily accepted the early false claims of irreproducibility and what lessons the premature rejection of the YDIH holds for science.


Geology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnese Fazio ◽  
Luigi Folco ◽  
Falko Langenhorst

Since its discovery, the Kamil crater (Egypt) has been considered a natural laboratory for studying small-scale impact cratering. We report on a previously unknown shock-related phenomenon observed in impact melt masses from Kamil; that is, the shock-triggered formation of skeletal quartz aggregates from silica-rich fluids. These aggregates are unshocked and characterized by crystallographically oriented lamellar voids and rounded vesicles. The distribution of the aggregates can be correlated with former H2O- and impurity-rich heterogeneities in precursor quartz; i.e., fluid inclusions. The heterogeneities acted as hot spots for local melting. Due to the presence of H2O and the high impact pressure and temperature, the formation of a localized supercritical fluid is plausible. Below the upper critical end point of the SiO2–H2O system (temperature <1100 °C and pressure <1 GPa), SiO2 melt and H2O fluid become immiscible, leading to the rapid and complete crystallization of skeletal quartz.


Icarus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 114812
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Huber ◽  
Elizaveta Kovaleva ◽  
Martin D. Clark ◽  
Ulrich Riller ◽  
Francois D. Fourie
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Miljković ◽  
M. A. Wieczorek ◽  
M. Laneuville ◽  
A. Nemchin ◽  
P. A. Bland ◽  
...  

AbstractThe lunar cratering record is used to constrain the bombardment history of both the Earth and the Moon. However, it is suggested from different perspectives, including impact crater dating, asteroid dynamics, lunar samples, impact basin-forming simulations, and lunar evolution modelling, that the Moon could be missing evidence of its earliest cratering record. Here we report that impact basins formed during the lunar magma ocean solidification should have produced different crater morphologies in comparison to later epochs. A low viscosity layer, mimicking a melt layer, between the crust and mantle could cause the entire impact basin size range to be susceptible to immediate and extreme crustal relaxation forming almost unidentifiable topographic and crustal thickness signatures. Lunar basins formed while the lunar magma ocean was still solidifying may escape detection, which is agreeing with studies that suggest a higher impact flux than previously thought in the earliest epoch of Earth-Moon evolution.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Neidhart ◽  
Katarina Miljković ◽  
Eleanor K. Sansom ◽  
Ingrid J. Daubar ◽  
Gareth S. Collins ◽  
...  

<p>An increasing number of newly formed impact craters on Mars have been detected in the last 15 years. These small craters are normally identified via dark spots in lower resolution images that formed during the impact process, presumably through the removal or disturbance of bright surface material [1]. Later higher resolution images revealed single craters or crater clusters, which form when impactors fragment in the atmosphere, within those halos [1,2]. Due to this detection method, most of the new impact sites found are in dusty regions, which imposes an observational bias [3]. Newly formed clusters consist of two to thousands of individual craters and can be tightly clustered or spread out over hundreds of meters [2]. Since the InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) mission landed on Mars in 2018 [4], the search for newly formed impact craters has become even more important, because identifying impacts in seismic signals could provide further constraints on both the atmospheric and solid-body effects of impact cratering process on Mars, as well as help place further constraints on the properties of the uppermost layer of the crust. As one of InSight’s mission goals is to estimate the current impact rate on Mars, the seismic detection of impacts is also crucial [4].</p> <p>The aim of this new study is to describe the properties of the complete catalog of known newly formed craters on Mars and examine correlations between different crater cluster properties. We investigated 559 crater clusters and 493 single craters detected between 2008 and 2020 using 25 cm/px HiRISE images. The locations and diameters were noted for each single crater, as well as for every individual crater within a cluster down to 1 m diameter. This was done using ArcMap (ArcGIS) software with the three-point method of the CraterTools add-in [5]. We describe the cluster characteristics, such as the number of craters within a cluster, largest crater in a cluster, cluster effective diameter, cluster dispersion, elevation of the impact sites, and the variation in sizes of craters within a cluster.</p> <p>More than half of the new impact sites form as clusters. We did not find any differences between the spatial distribution of single and crater clusters across Mars. The mapped crater clusters from this study consist of 2 to 2334 individual craters. More than half of all clusters (58%) consist of 10 craters or less. Crater clusters containing more than 100 craters are rare. With regard to the sizes of craters within crater clusters, we found that for highly populated clusters, the majority of craters are very small, and clusters with few craters have a tendency for craters that are more equal in size. Clusters having large effective diameters contain more equally sized craters. Our results show the full range of parameter spaces that are possible for cluster properties, which can help validate theoretical atmospheric fragmentation models.</p> <p><strong>References:</strong></p> <p>[1] Malin M. C. et al. (2006) Science, 314, 1573-1577.</p> <p>[2] Daubar I. J. et al. (2019) JGR, 124, 958-969.</p> <p>[3] Daubar I. J. et al. (2013) Icarus, 225, 506-516.</p> <p>[4] Banerdt B. W. et al. (2020) Nature, 13, 183-189.</p> <p>[5] Kneissl T. et al. (2011) Planet. Space Sci., 59, 1243-1254.</p>


Author(s):  
Raiza R. Quintero ◽  
Aaron J. Cavosie ◽  
Morgan A. Cox ◽  
Katarina Miljković ◽  
Allison Dugdale

ABSTRACT There are currently 31 confirmed structures of impact origin in Australia. More than 49 additional structures have been proposed to have formed due to asteroid impact but await confirmation. Many discoveries have been made in Australia in the time since the last comprehensive review of the Australian impact cratering record was published in a peer-reviewed journal in 2005. These include further expanding the record of confirmed craters, and providing new insights into a variety of impact-related processes, such as shock deformation, phase transitions in accessory minerals, new impact age determinations, studies of oblique impacts, and more. This update is a review that focuses principally on summarizing discoveries made since 2005. Highlights since then include confirmation of five new Australian impact structures, identification of Earth’s oldest recognized impact structure, recognition of shock deformation in accessory minerals, discovery of the high-pressure phase reidite in Australia, determination of the links between impact craters and some ore deposits, and publication of the first generation of numerical hydrocode models for some Australian craters.


Author(s):  
Wolf Uwe Reimold ◽  
Christian Koeberl

ABSTRACT This paper does not have an abstract. CONFERENCE The Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution Conference VI (LMI VI) took place between 30 September and 3 October 2019 on the campus of the University of Brasília (UnB) in Brasília, Brazil. This series of essentially quintennial conferences has been a mainstay for three decades. It was initiated with the aim to review major research outcomes, share ideas, and fertilize new collaborations in the impact cratering and planetary science fields. The timing for LMI VI, related to the state of impact cratering research, was a good one. For example, the studies resulting from the important IODP-ICDP (International Ocean Discovery Program–International Continental Scientific Drilling Program) project, in which a deep drill core was retrieved from the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact structure—the smoking gun for the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) boundary impact event coincident with the mass extinction at that time—were nearing completion and could be presented, in part, at LMI VI. Numerous other advances in impact research had been made in the preceding years (for example, state-of-the-art microstructural studies on accessary minerals with electron backscatter diffraction [EBSD]) and were extensively discussed at the conference. And, finally, interest in impact cratering has significantly increased in recent years, not only...


Author(s):  
Sanna Holm-Alwmark

ABSTRACT Studies of impact structures in Sweden date back almost 60 years. They have so far resulted in the confirmation and understanding of eight impact structures and one impact-derived breccia layer, including the largest confirmed impact structure in the western part of Europe, the Siljan impact structure. Several additional structures have been proposed as impact derived, but they have to date not been confirmed. In this contribution, I summarize the current state of knowledge about the impact cratering record of Sweden. This is an up-to-date, comprehensive review of the features of known impact structures (and impact-related deposits) in Sweden. The described impact structures formed over a time period spanning from the Cambrian to the Cretaceous, and the preservation of several small (~1–2 km in diameter) Paleozoic impact structures indicates that the conditions securing their protection were close to optimal, with formation in a shallow epicontinental sea and rapid cover by protective sediments followed by a regional geologic evolution permitting their preservation. The generally well-preserved state of some of these crater structures contradicts the general assumption that such small impact structures can only be preserved for approximately a couple of thousand to a few million years. The Lockne-Målingen, Tvären, Granby, and Hummeln impact structures all have ages that place their formation in a period of proposed increased cratering rate on Earth following the breakup event of the L-chondrite parent body in the asteroid belt. However, to date, evidence other than a temporal correlation is missing for all of these structures except for Lockne (and Målingen), which has been shown to have formed by the impact of an L-chondritic body.


Author(s):  
Wolf Uwe Reimold ◽  
Christian Koeberl

ABSTRACT This paper does not have an abstract. Originally, Álvaro Penteado Crósta (born on 7 August 1954) intended to be one of the volume editors of this GSA Special Paper. He was also looking forward to participating in the Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution VI conference in October 2019, for which he had long served on the organizing committee. Unfortunately, a long and serious illness derailed both these plans. Therefore, we are instead honoring our dear friend and valued colleague, Álvaro Crósta, for his longstanding and successful impact cratering work, as the mainstay of impact cratering studies in Brazil and indeed in South America, by dedicating this Special Paper to him. Álvaro Crósta has been a Full Professor (Professor Titular) of Geoscience in the fields of remote sensing, mineral exploration, and planetary geology at the Instituto de Geociências of the Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) in Brazil. He has had a highly distinguished academic career, culminating in his tenure (2012–2017) as vice-rector of his university. In 2017, Álvaro was inducted as a Full Member (Membro Titular) into the Academia Brasileira de Ciências...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document