Crystal Structure of a Retroviral Polyprotein: Prototype Foamy Virus Protease-Reverse Transcriptase (PR-RT)

In most cases, proteolytic processing of the retroviral Pol portion of the Gag-Pol polyprotein precursor produces protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN). However, foamy viruses (FVs) express Pol separately from Gag and, when Pol is processed, only the IN domain is released. Here, we report a 2.9 Å resolution crystal structure of the mature PR-RT from prototype FV (PFV) that can carry out both proteolytic processing and reverse transcription but is in a configuration not competent for proteolytic or polymerase activity. PFV PR-RT is monomeric and the architecture of PFV PR is similar to one of the subunits of HIV-1 PR, which is a dimer. There is a C-terminal extension of PFV PR (101-145) that consists of two helices which are adjacent to the base of the RT palm subdomain, and anchors PR to RT. The polymerase domain of PFV RT consists of fingers, palm, thumb, and connection subdomains whose spatial arrangements are similar to the p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT. The RNase H and polymerase domains of PFV RT are connected by flexible linkers. Significant spatial and conformational (sub)domain rearrangements are therefore required for nucleic acid binding. The structure of PFV PR-RT provides insights into the conformational maturation of retroviral Pol polyproteins.

Paradox of Nonpathogenicity and Cytopathic Effects：Characterization of Regulator Tas in Foamy Virus Evolution and De-Ubiquitylation of Tas in Virus Duplication

Background: Foamy virus, which belong to the Spumaretrovirinae subfamily of Retroviridae, bridge the gap between Orthoretrovirinae and Hepadnaviridae, and display a long co-evolution with their hosts. Like other retroviruses, FVs encode a transactivator, Tas, which governs the levels of viral transcripts initiated through binding to the conserved promoters in 5’ long terminal repeat (LTR) and a unique internal promoter (IP). Unlike the other retrovirus, HIV, foamy viruses induced significant cytopathic effects in vitro, but has no significant disease association at the infection level in vivo. The characterization of regulator Tas in the Paradox of nonpathogenicity and cytopathic effects was still unknown.Results: Foamy virus separated from different hosts could form three groups which paralleled with the worldwide distribution of hosts due to geographical isolation. Although the physicochemical properties of different Tas were mainly in line with each other, the conserved motifs analyses still suggested divergences in protein functions. The proteins identified to interact with Tas of PFV, SFVora and SFVagm displayed that the three kinds of foamy viruses regulated different signal pathways and impacted virus-host immune interaction. Interestingly, predictions of interactional factors based on protein sequence showed USP7, a kind of deubiquitinating enzyme, could binding directly to Tas which led to its ubiquitin-dependent proteasome degradation. And this results also implyed that fomay virus could hijacked cytokine USP7 to stabilize the transcriptional activator Tas by de-ubiquitylation and thereby regulate the viral life cycle.Conclusion: Our experiments help to understand the survival strategy of foamy viruses in their hosts.

Multiple infiltration and cross-species transmission of foamy viruses across Paleozoic to Cenozoic era

Foamy viruses (FVs) are complex retroviruses that can infect humans and other animals. In this study, by integrating transcriptomic and genomic data, we discovered 412 FVs from 6 lineages in amphibians, which significantly increased the known set of FVs in amphibians. Among these lineages, salamander FVs maintained a co-evolutionary pattern with their hosts that could be dated back to the Paleozoic era, while, on the contrary, frog FVs were much more likely acquired from cross-species (class level) transmission in the Cenozoic era. In addition, we found three distinct FV lineages had integrated into the genome of a salamander. Unexpectedly, we identified a lineage of endogenous FV in caecilian expressed all complete major genes, demonstrating the potential existence of exogenous form of FV outside of mammals. Our discovery of rare phenomena in amphibian FVs has significantly increased our understanding of the macroevolution of the complex retrovirus. Importance Foamy viruses (FVs) represent, more so than other viruses, the best model of co-evolution between a virus and a host. This study represents so far, the largest investigation of amphibian FVs and revealed 412 FVs of 6 distinct lineages from three major orders of amphibians. Besides co-evolutionary pattern, cross-species and repeated infection were also observed during evolution of amphibian FVs. Remarkably, expressed FVs including a potential exogenous form were discovered, suggesting active FVs could be underestimated in nature. These findings revealed the multiple origin and complex evolution of amphibian FVs started from the Paleozoic era.

Coelacanth SERINC2 inhibits HIV-1 infectivity and is counteracted by envelope glycoprotein from foamy virus

SERINC5 restricts nef-defective HIV-1 by affecting early steps of the virus life cycle. Distant retroviruses with a wide host-range encode virulent factors in response to the challenge by SERINC5. Yet, the evolutionary origins of this anti-retroviral activity, its prevalence among the paralogs, and its ability to target retroviruses remain understudied. In agreement with previous studies, we find that four human SERINC paralogs inhibit nef-defective HIV-1, with SERINC2 being an exception. Here, we demonstrate that this lack of activity in human SERINC2 is associated with its post-whole genome duplication (WGD) divergence, as evidenced by the ability of pre-WGD orthologs from yeast, fly, and a post-WGD-proximate SERINC2 from coelacanth to inhibit the virus. Intriguingly, Nef is unable to counter coelacanth SERINC2, indicating that such activity was directed towards other retroviruses found in coelacanth (like foamy viruses). However, foamy-derived vectors are intrinsically resistant to the action of SERINC2, and we show that the foamy virus envelope confers this resistance by affecting its steady-state levels. Our study highlights an ancient origin of anti-retroviral activity in SERINCs and a hitherto unknown interaction with a foamy virus. Importance SERINC5 constitutes a critical barrier to the propagation of retroviruses as highlighted by parallel emergence of anti-SERINC5 activities among distant retroviral lineages. Therefore, understanding the origin and evolution of these host factors will provide key information about virus-host relationships that can be exploited for future drug development. Here we show that SERINC5-mediated nef-defective HIV-1 infection inhibition is evolutionarily conserved. SERINC2 from coelacanth restricts HIV-1 and it was functionally adapted to target foamy viruses. Our findings provide insights into the evolutionary origin of anti-retroviral activity in SERINC gene family and uncover the role of SERINCs in shaping the long-term conflicts between retroviruses and their hosts.

Foamy Viruses, Bet, and APOBEC3 Restriction

Non-human primates (NHP) are an important source of viruses that can spillover to humans and, after adaptation, spread through the host population. Whereas HIV-1 and HTLV-1 emerged as retroviral pathogens in humans, a unique class of retroviruses called foamy viruses (FV) with zoonotic potential are occasionally detected in bushmeat hunters or zookeepers. Various FVs are endemic in numerous mammalian natural hosts, such as primates, felines, bovines, and equines, and other animals, but not in humans. They are apathogenic, and significant differences exist between the viral life cycles of FV and other retroviruses. Importantly, FVs replicate in the presence of many well-defined retroviral restriction factors such as TRIM5α, BST2 (Tetherin), MX2, and APOBEC3 (A3). While the interaction of A3s with HIV-1 is well studied, the escape mechanisms of FVs from restriction by A3 is much less explored. Here we review the current knowledge of FV biology, host restriction factors, and FV–host interactions with an emphasis on the consequences of FV regulatory protein Bet binding to A3s and outline crucial open questions for future studies.

The Unique, the Known, and the Unknown of Spumaretrovirus Assembly

Within the family of Retroviridae, foamy viruses (FVs) are unique and unconventional with respect to many aspects in their molecular biology, including assembly and release of enveloped viral particles. Both components of the minimal assembly and release machinery, Gag and Env, display significant differences in their molecular structures and functions compared to the other retroviruses. This led to the placement of FVs into a separate subfamily, the Spumaretrovirinae. Here, we describe the molecular differences in FV Gag and Env, as well as Pol, which is translated as a separate protein and not in an orthoretroviral manner as a Gag-Pol fusion protein. This feature further complicates FV assembly since a specialized Pol encapsidation strategy via a tripartite Gag-genome–Pol complex is used. We try to relate the different features and specific interaction patterns of the FV Gag, Pol, and Env proteins in order to develop a comprehensive and dynamic picture of particle assembly and release, but also other features that are indirectly affected. Since FVs are at the root of the retrovirus tree, we aim at dissecting the unique/specialized features from those shared among the Spuma- and Orthoretrovirinae. Such analyses may shed light on the evolution and characteristics of virus envelopment since related viruses within the Ortervirales, for instance LTR retrotransposons, are characterized by different levels of envelopment, thus affecting the capacity for intercellular transmission.

Identification of an Intermediate Step in Foamy Virus Fusion

Viral glycoprotein-mediated membrane fusion is an essential step for productive infection of host cells by enveloped viruses; however, due to its rarity and challenges in detection, little is known about the details of fusion events at the single particle level. Here, we have developed dual-color foamy viruses (FVs) composed of eGFP-tagged prototype FV (PFV) Gag and mCherry-tagged Env of either PFV or macaque simian FV (SFVmac) origin that have been optimized for detection of the fusion process. Using our recently developed tracking imaging correlation (TrIC) analysis, we were able to detect the fusion process for both PFV and SFVmac Env containing virions. PFV Env-mediated fusion was observed both at the plasma membrane as well as from endosomes, whereas SFVmac Env-mediated fusion was only observed from endosomes. PFV Env-mediated fusion was observed to happen more often and more rapidly than as for SFVmac Env. Strikingly, using the TrIC method, we detected a novel intermediate state where the envelope and capsids are still tethered but separated by up to 400 nm before final separation of Env and Gag occurred.

Multiple infiltration and cross-species transmission of foamy viruses across Paleozoic to Cenozoic era

Foamy viruses (FVs) are complex retroviruses that can infect humans and other animals. In this study, by integrating transcriptomic and genomic data, we discovered 412 FVs from 6 lineages in amphibians, which significantly increased the known set of FVs in amphibians. Among these lineages, salamander FVs maintained a co-evolutionary pattern with their hosts that could be dated back to the Paleozoic era, while, on the contrary, frog FVs were much more likely acquired from cross-species (class level) transmission in the Cenozoic era. In addition, we found three distinct FV lineages had integrated into the genome of a salamander. Unexpectedly, we identified a potential exogenous form of FV circulated in caecilian, demonstrating the existence of exogenous form of FV besides mammals. Our discovery of rare phenomena in amphibian FVs has overturned our collective understanding of the macroevolution of the complex retrovirus.ImportanceFoamy viruses (FVs) represent, more so than other viruses, the best model of co-evolution between a virus and a host. This study represents so far, the largest investigation of amphibian FVs and revealed 412 FVs of 6 distinct lineages from three major orders of amphibians. Besides co-evolutionary pattern, cross-species and repeated infection were also observed during evolution of amphibian FVs. Remarkably, expressed FVs including a potential exogenous form were discovered, suggesting live FVs could be underestimated in nature. These findings revealed the multiple origin and complex evolution of amphibian FVs started from the Paleozoic era.

Crystal structure of prototype foamy virus (PFV) protease-reverse transcriptase fusion (PR-RT) reveals conformational plasticity: implications for function

Proteolytic processing of the retroviral Pol polyprotein precursor produces protease (PR), reverse transcriptase (RT), and integrase (IN), except in foamy viruses (FVs) where only the IN domain is released. Here, we report the 2.9 Å resolution crystal structure of the mature PR-RT from prototype FV (PFV) needed for processing and reverse transcription. The monomeric PFV PR exhibits similar architecture as the HIV-1 PR but the N- and C-terminal residues are unstructured. A C-terminal extension of the PR folds into two helices that supports the RT palm subdomain and anchors the PR next to the RT. The subdomains of RT: fingers, palm, thumb, and connection, and the RNase H domain, are connected by flexible linkers and spatially arranged similarly to those in the HIV-1 RT p51 subunit. Significant spatial and conformational domain rearrangements are required for nucleic acid binding. This offers structural insight into retroviral RT conformational maturation and architecture of immature enzymes.

The Potential Role of Endogenous Viral Elements in the Evolution of Bats as Reservoirs for Zoonotic Viruses

Despite a small genome size, bats have comparable diversity of retroviral and non-retroviral endogenous sequences to other mammals. These include Class I and Class II retroviral sequences, foamy viruses, and deltaretroviruses, as well as filovirus, bornavirus, and parvovirus endogenous viral elements. Some of these endogenous viruses are sufficiently preserved in bat genomes to be expressed, with potential effects for host biology. It is clear that the bat immune system differs when compared with other mammals, yet the role that virus-derived endogenous elements may have played in the evolution of bat immunity is poorly understood. In this review, we discuss some of the bat-specific immune mechanisms that may have resulted in a virus-tolerant phenotype and link these to the long-standing virus-host coevolution that may have allowed a large diversity of endogenous retroviruses and other endogenous viral elements to colonize bat genomes. We also consider the possible effects of endogenization in the evolution of the bat immune system.