Influenza A virus antagonizes type I and type II interferon responses via SOCS1-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1

BACKGROUND: Although influenza A virus (IAV) employs diverse strategies to evade IFN responses by inhibiting the synthesis of IFN, how IAV regulates signaling downstream of IFN is incompletely understood.METHODS: In this study, we used Western blot-based protein analysis coupled with RT-qPCR, overexpression and RNA interference to investigate the regulation of JAK1 by IAV infection.RESULTS: The results indicated that JAK1 was ubiquitinated and degraded, resulting in inhibition of type I and type II IFN responses, demonstrating that IAV antagonizes the IFN-activated JAK/STAT signaling pathway by inducing the degradation of JAK1. Furthermore. IAV infection upregulated the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein SOCS1, and SOCS1 mediated the ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that IAV infection induces SOCS1 expression to promote JAK1 degradation, which in turn inhibits host innate immune responses.

Influenza A virus antagonizes type I and type II interferon responses via SOCS1-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1

BACKGROUND Although influenza A virus (IAV) employs diverse strategies to evade IFN responses by inhibiting the synthesis of IFN, how IAV regulates signaling downstream of IFN is incompletely understood. METHODS In this study, we used Western blot-based protein analysis coupled with RT-qPCR, overexpression and RNA interference to investigate the regulation of JAK1 by IAV infection. RESULTS The results indicated that JAK1 was ubiquitinated and degraded, resulting in inhibition of type I and type II IFN responses, demonstrating that IAV antagonizes the IFN-activated JAK/STAT signaling pathway by inducing the degradation of JAK1. Furthermore. IAV infection upregulated the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein SOCS1, and SOCS1 mediated the ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1. CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that IAV infection induced SOCS1 expression promotes JAK1 degradation, which in turn inhibits host innate immune responses.

Influenza A virus antagonizes type I and type II interferon responses via SOCS1-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1

BACKGROUND Although influenza A virus (IAV) employs diverse strategies to evade IFN responses by inhibiting the synthesis of IFN, how IAV regulates signaling downstream of IFN is incompletely understood. METHODS In this study, we used Western blot-based protein analysis coupled with RT-qPCR, overexpression and RNA interference to investigate the regulation of JAK1 by IAV infection in 293T cells. RESULTS The results indicated that JAK1 was ubiquitinated and degraded, resulting in inhibition of type I and type II IFN responses, demonstrating that IAV antagonizes the IFN-activated JAK/STAT signaling pathway by inducing the degradation of JAK1. Furthermore. IAV infection upregulated the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein SOCS1, and SOCS1 mediated the ubiquitination and degradation of JAK1.CONCLUSION Collectively, our findings suggest that IAV infection induced SOCS1 expression promotes JAK1 degradation, which in turn inhibits host innate immune responses.

Unbiased identification of substrates for the Epac1-inducible E3 ubiquitin ligase component SOCS-3

The anti-inflammatory effects of the prototypical second messenger cAMP have been extensively documented in multiple cell types. One mechanism by which these effects are achieved is via Epac1 (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 1)-dependent induction of SOCS-3 (suppressor of cytokine signalling 3), which binds and inhibits specific class I cytokine receptors. One important aspect of SOCS-3 functionality is its role as the specificity determinant within an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex which targets cellular substrates for polyubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. In the present review, we describe key inhibitory processes that serve to reduce cytokine receptor signalling, focusing primarily on SOCS protein function and regulation. We also outline a strategy we have developed to identify novel ubiquitylated substrates for the Epac1-inducible SOCS-3 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex following purification of the ubiquitinome. It is anticipated that identifying substrates for the Epac1-regulated SOCS-3 E3 ubiquitin ligase, and assessment of their functional significance, may pinpoint new sites for therapeutic intervention that would achieve therapeutic efficacy of cAMP-elevating drugs while minimizing the adverse effects usually associated with these agents.

The effect of GH and IGF1 on linear growth and skeletal development and their modulation by SOCS proteins

Circulating signalling proteins have often been divided into hormones and cytokines, but it is increasingly being recognised that these substances have a number of common characteristics and mechanisms of action. This is clearly illustrated by the suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS) proteins which are increasingly seen as a central component of the regulation of the action of hormones and cytokines that signal through the cytokine receptor complex. The SOCS protein family is probably more extensive than currently recognised; its members may have differential tissue expression and their potency for suppressing cytokine signalling may vary. Recent knockout and transgenic studies in mice have highlighted the role that these proteins play in growth and skeletal development as well as in inflammation. Chronic inflammation is associated with altered growth and skeletal development, and it is possible that SOCS proteins may have an important role to play in mediating these effects.

Negative Regulation of Growth Hormone Receptor Signaling

GH has been of significant scientific interest for decades because of its capacity to dramatically change physiological growth parameters. Furthermore, GH interacts with a range of other hormonal pathways and is an established pharmacological agent for which novel therapeutical applications can be foreseen. It is easy to see the requirement for a number of postreceptor mechanisms to regulate and control target tissue sensitivity to this versatile hormone. In recent years, some of the components that take part in the down-regulatory mechanism targeting the activated GH receptor (GHR) have been defined, and the physiological significance of some of these key components has begun to be characterized. Down-regulation of the GHR is achieved through a complex mechanism that involves rapid ubiquitin-dependent endocytosis of the receptor, the action of tyrosine phosphatases, and the degradation by the proteasome. The suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein family, particularly SOCS2, plays an important role in regulating GH actions. The aim of this review is to summarize collected knowledge, including very recent findings, regarding the intracellular mechanisms responsible for the GHR signaling down-regulation. Insights into these mechanisms can be of relevance to several aspects of GH research. It can help to understand growth-related disease conditions, to explain GH resistance, and may be used to develop pharmaceuticals that enhance some the beneficial actions of endogenously secreted GH in a tissue-specific manner.

The SPRY Domain-containing SOCS Box Protein 1 (SSB-1) Interacts with MET and Enhances the Hepatocyte Growth Factor-induced Erk-Elk-1-Serum Response Element Pathway

The suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) protein family includes a SPRY (repeats insplA andRyR) domain-containing SOCS box protein (SSB) subfamily, which consists of four members, SSB-1, SSB-2, SSB-3, and SSB-4. These proteins contain a central SPRY domain and a C-terminal SOCS box. Although some of the SOCS protein subfamilies function as adaptors for a large family of ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligases to regulate certain signaling pathways, the function of the SSB subfamily remains to be determined. In our previous studies, we have found that two SPRY domain-containing proteins, RanBP9 and RanBP10, interact with MET through the SPRY domain. In the present study, we explored the function of SSB proteins in the regulation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-MET signaling. Our results showed that all four SSB proteins also interacted with the MET. The MET interaction with SSB-1 was further investigated. We demonstrated that SSB-1 bound to MET tyrosine kinase domain through its SPRY domain. MET interacted with SSB-1 in both the absence and the presence of HGF, but HGF treatment resulted in the recruitment of more SSB-1 by MET. We showed that overexpression of SSB-1 but not other SSB proteins enhanced the HGF-induced serum response element (SRE)-luciferase activity. Overexpression of SSB-1 exhibited no effect on the basal level or epidermal growth factor-induced SRE-luciferase activity. SSB-1 also enhanced HGF-induced Erk phosphorylation. Suppression of SSB-1 by the RNA interference method down-regulated HGF-induced SRE-luciferase activity and decreased Elk-1 activation. These results suggest that SSB-1 may play an important role in enhancing the HGF-induced Erk-Elk-1-SRE pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrated that in response to HGF stimulation, the SSB-1 protein became phosphorylated at tyrosine residue 31. The phosphorylated SSB-1 protein bound to p120Ras-GTPase-activating protein (GAP) but did not promote the degradation of p120RasGAP, indicating that enhanced HGF-MET signaling by overexpression of SSB-1 was not dependent on p120RasGAP degradation.