Signalling centre vortices coordinate collective behaviour in social amoebae

Self-sustaining signalling waves provide a source of information in living systems. A classic example is the rotating spiral waves of cAMP (chemoattractant) release that encode Dictyostelium morphogenesis. These patterns remain poorly characterised due to limitations in tracking the signalling behaviour of individual cells in the context of the whole collective. Here, we have imaged Dictyostelium populations over millimetre length scales and track the emergence, structure, progression and biological effects of cAMP waves by monitoring the signalling states and motion of individual cells. Collective migration coincides with a decrease in the period and speed of waves that stem from an increase in the rotational speed and curvature of spiral waves. The dynamics and structure of spiral waves are generated by the vortex motion of the spiral tip. Spiral tip circulation spatially organises a small group of cells into a ring pattern, which also constrains spiral tip motion. Both the cellular ring and tip path gradually contract over time, resulting in the acceleration of spiral rotation and change in global wave dynamics. Aided by mathematical modelling, we show that this contraction is due to an instability driven by a deflection in cell chemotaxis around the spiral tip cAMP field, resulting in a deformation of the cellular ring pattern towards its centre. That is, vortex contraction modulates the source of information which, upon dissemination (excitable signal relay) and decoding (chemotaxis), triggers morphogenesis. By characterising rotating spiral waves at this level of detail, our results describe a mechanism by which information generated by a self-sustaining signal, and disseminated across the population, is modulated at the organisational source.

Differential requirement for the EDS1 catalytic triad in A. thaliana and N. benthamiana

- Heterodimeric complexes incorporating the lipase-like proteins EDS1 with PAD4 or SAG101 are central hubs in plant innate immunity. EDS1 functions encompass signal relay from TIR domain-containing intracellular NLR-type immune receptors (TNLs) towards RPW8-type helper NLRs (RNLs) and, in A. thaliana, bolstering of signaling and resistance mediated by cell-surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). Biochemical activities underlying these mechanistic frameworks remain unknown. - We used CRISPR/Cas-generated mutant lines and agroinfiltration-based complementation assays to interrogate functions of EDS1 complexes in N. benthamiana. - We do not detect impaired PRR signaling in N. benthamiana lines deficient in EDS1 complexes or RNLs. Intriguingly, mutations within the catalytic triad of Solanaceae EDS1 can abolish or enhance TNL immunity in N. benthamiana. Furthermore, nuclear EDS1 accumulation is sufficient for N. benthamiana TNL (Roq1) immunity. - Reinforcing PRR signaling in Arabidopsis might be a derived function of the TNL/EDS1 immune sector. Dependency of Solanaceae but not A. thaliana EDS1 on catalytic triad residues raises the possibility that a TNL-derived small molecule binds to the Solanaceae EDS1 lipase-like domain, and that EDS1 lipase-like domain pocket contributions to TNL immune responses vary between lineages. Whether and how nuclear EDS1 activity connects to membrane pore-forming RNLs remains unknown.

Functional Amino Acids and Autophagy: Diverse Signal Transduction and Application

Functional amino acids provide great potential for treating autophagy-related diseases by regulating autophagy. The purpose of the autophagy process is to remove unwanted cellular contents and to recycle nutrients, which is controlled by many factors. Disordered autophagy has been reported to be associated with various diseases, such as cancer, neurodegeneration, aging, and obesity. Autophagy cannot be directly controlled and dynamic amino acid levels are sufficient to regulate autophagy. To date, arginine, leucine, glutamine, and methionine are widely reported functional amino acids that regulate autophagy. As a signal relay station, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) turns various amino acid signals into autophagy signaling pathways for functional amino acids. Deficiency or supplementation of functional amino acids can immediately regulate autophagy and is associated with autophagy-related disease. This review summarizes the mechanisms currently involved in autophagy and amino acid sensing, diverse signal transduction among functional amino acids and autophagy, and the therapeutic appeal of amino acids to autophagy-related diseases. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of amino acid regulation of autophagy and the role of functional amino acids in clinical autophagy-related diseases and to further convert these mechanisms into feasible therapeutic applications.

Kinase-anchoring proteins in ciliary signal transduction

Historically, the diffusion of chemical signals through the cell was thought to occur within a cytoplasmic soup bounded by the plasma membrane. This theory was predicated on the notion that all regulatory enzymes are soluble and moved with a Brownian motion. Although enzyme compartmentalization was initially rebuffed by biochemists as a ‘last refuge of a scoundrel', signal relay through macromolecular complexes is now accepted as a fundamental tenet of the burgeoning field of spatial biology. A-Kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) are prototypic enzyme-organizing elements that position clusters of regulatory proteins at defined subcellular locations. In parallel, the primary cilium has gained recognition as a subcellular mechanosensory organelle that amplifies second messenger signals pertaining to metazoan development. This article highlights advances in our understanding of AKAP signaling within the primary cilium and how defective ciliary function contributes to an increasing number of diseases known as ciliopathies.

Inverse regulation of Vibrio cholerae biofilm dispersal by polyamine signals

The global pathogen Vibrio cholerae undergoes cycles of biofilm formation and dispersal in the environment and the human host. Little is understood about biofilm dispersal. Here, we show that MbaA, a periplasmic polyamine sensor, and PotD1, a polyamine importer, regulate V. cholerae biofilm dispersal. Spermidine, a commonly produced polyamine, drives V. cholerae dispersal, whereas norspermidine, an uncommon polyamine produced by vibrios, inhibits dispersal. Spermidine and norspermidine differ by one methylene group. Both polyamines control dispersal via MbaA detection in the periplasm and subsequent signal relay. Our results suggest that dispersal fails in the absence of PotD1 because endogenously produced norspermidine is not reimported, periplasmic norspermidine accumulates, and it stimulates MbaA signaling. These results suggest that V. cholerae uses MbaA to monitor environmental polyamines, blends of which potentially provide information about numbers of ‘self’ and ‘other’. This information is used to dictate whether or not to disperse from biofilms.

Inverse regulation of Vibrio cholerae biofilm dispersal by polyamine signals

The global pathogen Vibrio cholerae undergoes cycles of biofilm formation and dispersal in the environment and the human host. Little is understood about biofilm dispersal. Here, we show that MbaA, a periplasmic polyamine sensor, and PotD1, a polyamine importer, regulate V. cholerae biofilm dispersal. Spermidine, a commonly produced polyamine, drives V. cholerae dispersal, whereas norspermidine, an uncommon polyamine produced by vibrios, inhibits dispersal. Spermidine and norspermidine differ by one methylene group. Both polyamines function to control dispersal via periplasmic detection by MbaA and subsequent signal relay. Biofilm dispersal fails in the absence of PotD1 because reuptake of endogenously produced norspermidine does not occur, so it accumulates in the periplasm where it stimulates MbaA. These results suggest that V. cholerae uses MbaA to monitor environmental polyamines, blends of which potentially provide information about numbers of ‘self’ and ‘other’. This information is used to dictate whether or not to disperse from biofilms.

Infected macrophages engage alveolar epithelium to metabolically reprogram myeloid cells and promote antibacterial inflammation

Alveolar macrophages are the primary immune cells that first detect lung infection. However, only one macrophage patrols every three alveoli. How this limited number of macrophages provides protection is unclear, as numerous pathogens block cell-intrinsic immune responses. The intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila inhibits host translation, thereby impairing the ability of infected macrophages to produce critical cytokines. Nevertheless, infected macrophages induce an IL-1-dependent inflammatory response by recruited myeloid cells that controls infection. Here, we show that collaboration with the alveolar epithelium is critical, in that IL-1 instructs the alveolar epithelium to produce GM-CSF. Intriguingly, GM-CSF drives maximal cytokine production in bystander myeloid cells by enhancing PRR-induced glycolysis. Our findings reveal that alveolar macrophages engage alveolar epithelial signals to metabolically reprogram myeloid cells and amplify antibacterial inflammation.One Sentence SummaryThe alveolar epithelium is a central signal relay between infected and bystander myeloid cells that orchestrates antibacterial defense.