Biological bases of cancer: a proposal of minimum contents for health schools

Cancer constitutes the second most common cause of death worldwide and is expected to become the leading one, even above cardiovascular diseases. The understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of cancer has led not only to the proper development of chemotherapy but also of target therapies. Although these advances are related with improved survival rates among cancer patients, it has poorly impacted its incidences. In this regard, the lack of knowledge regarding the impact that the several carcinogenic factors and their interactions have on different types of cancers may explain at least in part the difficulties to reduce incidence rates. However, is worth noticing that in several health schools of Chilean universities, cancer does not constitute a formal course, being only partially approached during other courses, such as cell biology, internal medicine, and surgery. Thus, the aim of our work is to provide students a simple and resumed manuscript about essential topics necessary to understand the biological basis of cancer. First, the reader will find some fundamentals about human biology including the cell cycle and the central dogma of molecular biology, which offers an overview of the physiological mechanisms leading to malignant neoplasia. Then, we will provide current definitions of neoplasia, benign and malignant tumors are provided. Finally, the different stages of tumor progression will be approached to allow the understanding of cancer development. These stages include (i) initiation, (ii) promotion, and (iii) progression. For the last one, metastasis, angiogenesis, extracellular matrix degradation, migration, and immune evasion will also be addressed. This work will not consider the metabolic hypothesis of cancer.

Cholesterol and Inflammation in Atherosclerosis: An Immune-Metabolic Hypothesis

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [...]

The metabolic hypothesis is more likely than the epileptogenic hypothesis to explain stroke-like lesions

Stroke-like episodes (SLEs) are a hallmark of mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episode (MELAS) syndrome but occur in other mitochondrial disorders (MIDs) as well. The morphological equivalent of the SLE is the stroke-like lesion (SLL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pathophysiology of SLLs is under debate, but several hypotheses have been raised to explain the phenomenon. Of these, the metabolic, epileptogenic, and vascular hypotheses are the most frequently discussed. There are several arguments for and against these hypotheses, but a consensus has not been reached which of them provides the correct explanation. A recent consensus statement generated by a panel of experts applying the Delphi method, favoured the epileptogenic hypothesis and recommended treatment of SLEs with antiepileptic drugs, irrespective if the patient presented with a seizure or epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) or not. We disagree with this general procedure and provide the following arguments against the epileptogenic hypothesis: 1. not each SLE is associated with seizures. 2. epileptiform discharges may be absent on EEG during a SLE. 3. SLLs are not restricted to the cortex. 4. antiseizure-drugs (ASDs) may not prevent the progression or recurrence of a SLL. 5. ASDs may terminate seizures but no other phenotypic feature of a SLE. 6. patients already under ASDs are not immune from developing a SLL. 7. SLLs usually last longer than seizures. 8. no animal model supports the epileptogenic hypothesis. The strongest arguments for the metabolic hypothesis are that SLLs are not confined to a vascular territory, that the oxygen-extraction fraction within a SLL is reduced, and that there is hypometabolism within a SLL on FDG-PET. SLLs may respond to antioxidants, NO-precursors, steroids, or the ketogenic diet. ASDs should be applied only if there is clinical or electrophysiological evidence of seizure-activity.

The metabolic hypothesis is more likely than the epileptogenic hypothesis to explain stroke-like lesions

Stroke-like episodes (SLEs) are a hallmark of mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episode (MELAS) syndrome but occur in other mitochondrial disorders (MIDs) as well. The morphological equivalent of the SLE is the stroke-like lesion (SLL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pathophysiology of SLLs is under debate, but several hypotheses have been raised to explain the phenomenon. Of these, the metabolic, epileptogenic, and vascular hypotheses are the most frequently discussed. There are several arguments for and against these hypotheses, but a consensus has not been reached which of them provides the correct explanation. A recent consensus statement generated by a panel of experts applying the Delphi method, favoured the epileptogenic hypothesis and recommended treatment of SLEs with antiepileptic drugs, irrespective if the patient presented with a seizure or epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) or not. We disagree with this general procedure and provide the following arguments against the epileptogenic hypothesis: 1. not each SLE is associated with seizures. 2. epileptiform discharges may be absent on EEG during a SLE. 3. SLLs are not restricted to the cortex. 4. antiseizure-drugs (ASDs) may not prevent the progression or recurrence of a SLL. 5. ASDs may terminate seizures but no other phenotypic feature of a SLE. 6. patients already under ASDs are not immune from developing a SLL. 7. SLLs usually last longer than seizures. 8. no animal model supports the epileptogenic hypothesis. The strongest arguments for the metabolic hypothesis are that SLLs are not confined to a vascular territory, that the oxygen-extraction fraction within a SLL is reduced, and that there is hypometabolism within a SLL on FDG-PET. SLLs may respond to antioxidants, NO-precursors, steroids, or the ketogenic diet. ASDs should be applied only if there is clinical or electrophysiological evidence of seizure-activity.

Cortical specificity in neurovascular coupling

Despite mounting contrary evidence, the metabolic hypothesis is viewed as the predominant theory underlying neurovascular coupling, or the link between neural activity and cerebral blood flow. In a recent study, Huo et al. (Huo BX, Smith JB, Drew PJ. J Neurosci 34: 10975–10981, 2014) combined multimodal imaging and electrophysiology in experiments using awake, voluntarily moving mice to explore whether neurovascular coupling is uniform throughout the cortex. Whereas their results can be viewed as demonstrating that neural activity and blood flow are uncoupled in the frontal cortex during movement, the importance of this study is the elucidation that the metabolic hypothesis may not be the principle facilitator of neurovascular coupling in some regions of the cortex.

Current views on cell metabolism in SDHx-related pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Warburg's metabolic hypothesis is based on the assumption that a cancer cell's respiration must be under attack, leading to its damage, in order to obtain increased glycolysis. Although this may not apply to all cancers, there is some evidence proving that primarily abnormally functioning mitochondrial complexes are indeed related to cancer development. Thus, mutations in complex II (succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)) lead to the formation of pheochromocytoma (PHEO)/paraganglioma (PGL). Mutations in one of theSDHgenes (SDHxmutations) lead to succinate accumulation associated with very low fumarate levels, increased glutaminolysis, the generation of reactive oxygen species, and pseudohypoxia. This results in significant changes in signaling pathways (many of them dependent on the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor), including oxidative phosphorylation, glycolysis, specific expression profiles, as well as genomic instability and increased mutability resulting in tumor development. Although there is currently no very effective therapy forSDHx-related metastatic PHEOs/PGLs, targeting their fundamental metabolic abnormalities may provide a unique opportunity for the development of novel and more effective forms of therapy for these tumors.