The SIRPα–CD47 immune checkpoint in NK cells

Here we report on the existence and functionality of the immune checkpoint signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) in NK cells and describe how it can be modulated for cell therapy. NK cell SIRPα is up-regulated upon IL-2 stimulation, interacts with target cell CD47 in a threshold-dependent manner, and counters other stimulatory signals, including IL-2, CD16, or NKG2D. Elevated expression of CD47 protected K562 tumor cells and mouse and human MHC class I–deficient target cells against SIRPα+ primary NK cells, but not against SIRPα− NKL or NK92 cells. SIRPα deficiency or antibody blockade increased the killing capacity of NK cells. Overexpression of rhesus monkey CD47 in human MHC-deficient cells prevented cytotoxicity by rhesus NK cells in a xenogeneic setting. The SIRPα–CD47 axis was found to be highly species specific. Together, the results demonstrate that disruption of the SIRPα–CD47 immune checkpoint may augment NK cell antitumor responses and that elevated expression of CD47 may prevent NK cell–mediated killing of allogeneic and xenogeneic tissues.

Autophosphorylation is sufficient to release Mps1 kinase from native kinetochores

Accurate mitosis depends on a surveillance system called the spindle assembly checkpoint. This checkpoint acts at kinetochores, which attach chromosomes to the dynamic tips of spindle microtubules. When a kinetochore is unattached or improperly attached, the protein kinase Mps1 phosphorylates kinetochore components, catalyzing the generation of a diffusible “wait” signal that delays anaphase and gives the cell time to correct the error. When a kinetochore becomes properly attached, its checkpoint signal is silenced to allow progression into anaphase. Recently, microtubules were found to compete directly against recombinant human Mps1 fragments for binding to the major microtubule-binding kinetochore element Ndc80c, suggesting a direct competition model for silencing the checkpoint signal at properly attached kinetochores. Here, by developing single-particle fluorescence-based assays, we tested whether such direct competition occurs in the context of native kinetochores isolated from yeast. Mps1 levels were not reduced on kinetochore particles bound laterally to the sides of microtubules or on particles tracking processively with disassembling tips. Instead, we found that Mps1 kinase activity was sufficient to promote its release from the isolated kinetochores. Mps1 autophosphorylation, rather than phosphorylation of other kinetochore components, was responsible for this dissociation. Our findings suggest that checkpoint silencing in yeast does not arise from a direct competition between Mps1 and microtubules, and that phosphoregulation of Mps1 may be a critical aspect of the silencing mechanism.

A stochastic model for error correction of kinetochore-microtubule attachments and its coupling to the spindle assembly checkpoint

To divide replicated chromosomes equally between daughter cells kinetochores must attach to microtubules emanating from opposite poles of the mitotic spindle. Two mechanisms, namely, error correction and ‘spindle assembly checkpoint’ work together to facilitate this process. The error correction mechanism recognizes and detaches erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments, and the spindle assembly checkpoint delays the onset of anaphase until all the kinetochores are properly attached. Kinases and phosphatases at the kinetochore play a key role in proper functioning of these two mechanisms. Here we present a stochastic model to study how the opposing activities of kinases and phosphatases at the kinetochore affect error correction of kinetochore-microtubule attachments and checkpoint signaling in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that error correction and biorientation of chromosomes occurs efficiently when the ratio between kinase activity of Ipl1 and the activity of an opposing phosphatase is a constant (balance point), and derive an approximate analytical formula that defines the balance point. Analysis of the coupling of the spindle assembly checkpoint signal to error correction shows that its strength remains high when the Ipl1 activity is equal to (or larger than) the value specified by the balance point, and the activity of another kinase, Mps1, is much larger (approximately 30 times larger) than its opposing phosphatase (PP1). We also find that the geometrical orientation of sister chromatids does not significantly improve the probability of their reaching biorientation, which depends entirely on Ipl1-dependent microtubule detachment.Author summaryThe kinetochore, the master regulator of chromosome segregation, integrates signals from different chromosome attachment states to generate an appropriate response, like the destabilization of erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments, stabilization of correct attachments, maintenance of the spindle assembly checkpoint signal until all kinetochores are properly attached, and finally silencing of checkpoint when biorientation is achieved. At a molecular level the job is carried out by kinases and phosphatases. The complexity of the interactions between these kinases and phosphatases makes intuitive analysis of the control network impossible, and a systems-level model is needed to put experimental information together and to generate testable hypotheses. Here we present such a model for the process of error correction and its coupling to the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. Using the model, we characterize the balance between kinase and phosphatase activities required for removing erroneous attachments and then establishing correct stable attachments between kinetochore and microtubule. We also analyze how the balance affects the strength of the spindle assembly checkpoint signal.

Response of alternative splice isoforms of OsRad9 gene from Oryza sativa to environmental stress

Rad9protein plays an important role in cell-cycle checkpoint signal transduction in human and yeast cells, but knowledge aboutRad9in plants is limited. This study reports that theRad9gene of rice can generate the transcript productsOsRad9.1andOsRad9.2through alternative splicing.OsRad9.1, with all nine exons, is the main cell-cycle checkpoint protein involved in the response of rice to genotoxic stresses (ultraviolet radiation and antibiotic stress), environmental stresses (drought, salt, and heavy metal stress), and auxin stimuli (2,4-D, IAA, and IBA). Meanwhile, transcript isoformOsRad9.2, which lost exon7 and exon8, showed different preferential stimulation effects on these stresses and pollen development duration. These results might indicat that besides the monitoring and repair of DNA damage,Rad9might involve in the development of pollen.

CENP-I and Aurora B act as a molecular switch that ties RZZ/Mad1 recruitment to kinetochore attachment status

The RZZ (Rod, ZW10, and Zwilch) complex and Mad1 proteins tightly associate with kinetochores to generate the spindle checkpoint signal, but they are released when a kinetochore forms mature microtubule attachments. Here we demonstrate that the centromere protein CENP-I is required to generate a stable association of RZZ and Mad1 with kinetochores. CENP-I also inhibits their removal by dynein stripping. This regulation of Mad1 and RZZ dissociation functions independently of Aurora B, which regulates their association. We show that the microtubule status of each kinetochore independently dictates the recruitment of Aurora B kinase, kinase activity on a kinetochore substrate, and loading of spindle checkpoint proteins. This dynamic regulation of Mad1 association by Aurora B is only uncovered when CENP-I is depleted, consistent with our finding that CENP-I inhibits the dissociation of Mad1. We conclude that the dual activities of Aurora B and CENP-I generate a molecular switch that maintains a robust spindle checkpoint signal at prometaphase kinetochores until they attain mature attachments to microtubules.

Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore

Accurate chromosome segregation requires coordination between microtubule attachment and spindle checkpoint signaling at the kinetochore. The kinetochore-localized KMN (KNL-1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 complex) network, which mediates microtubule attachment and scaffolds checkpoint signaling, harbors two distinct microtubule-binding activities: the load-bearing activity of the Ndc80 complex and a less well-understood activity in KNL-1. In this paper, we show that KNL-1 microtubule-binding and -bundling activity resides in its extreme N terminus. Selective perturbation of KNL-1 microtubule binding in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos revealed that this activity is dispensable for both load-bearing attachment formation and checkpoint activation but plays a role in checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. Perturbation of both microtubule binding and protein phosphatase 1 docking at the KNL-1 N terminus additively affected checkpoint silencing, indicating that, despite their proximity in KNL-1, these two activities make independent contributions. We propose that microtubule binding by KNL-1 functions in checkpoint silencing by sensing microtubules attached to kinetochores and relaying their presence to eliminate generation of the checkpoint signal.