Adherence to treatment with oral antineoplastic therapy in outpatients

Background Multiple factors have defined the success of treatment with oral antineoplastic, especially adherence to the therapeutic regimen. The aim of this study was to describe the profile of individuals in treatment with oral antineoplastic according to the sociodemographic and clinical epidemiology factors as well as to estimate the association with those to Non-adherence to the treatment with oral antineoplastic. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was performed in the chemotherapy outpatient’s department from December 2015 to March 2016 at a teaching hospital. The outcome Non-adherence was evaluated according to Morisky Green test. The variables which have reached statistical significance in the bivariate analysis were tested in the multivariate model to evaluate if they remained associated to “Non-adherence” according to the Poisson logistic regression and corrected by robust variance. Results In total, 233 patients were analyzed and 60.9% were found in Non-adherence to the treatment with oral antineoplastic according Morisky Green test (MMAS8), in which forgetfulness were often and had driven to non-adherence outcome. Multivariate analysis found three final predictors for Non-adherence which were own income, carer, unease and had needed urgency services in the last year. Conclusion This study reveals several factors associated with nonadherence. Those outcomes show that the patient's journey during antineoplastic treatment must be discussed and addressed in a broad way together with measures in public health policies.

1388. DTaP-containing combination vaccines use and adherence to the recommended infant-toddler vaccination series among privately insured children in the US

Background Despite universal recommendation of the 3 + 1 diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP) vaccine series in infants and toddlers, adherence (i.e. coverage and timeliness) remain suboptimal in the US. DTaP-containing combination vaccines are presumed to improve vaccine coverage rates and timeliness, but research on this topic is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare adherence to the recommended infant-toddler vaccination series between recipients of DTaP-containing combination vaccines (i.e. quadrivalent/pentavalent) and stand-alone vaccines (i.e. trivalent). Methods We used the Optum de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database to create a cohort of children born between 2009 and 2016 with > 24 months of continuous enrollment from birth, and records of > 1 DTaP vaccine receipt. Patients were classified by DTaP-containing vaccine receipt: combination vaccines only, stand-alone vaccines only, or a mixture of both. The primary adherence outcome was completion of the 4-dose series within 20 months of life. We adjusted outcomes for gender, birth year, race, and socioeconomic status via a logistic regression model. Results The cohort contained 200,568 female (48.6%) and 211,882 male (51.4%) children. Of these children, 167,091 received combination vaccines only (40.5%), 61,342 received stand-alone vaccines only (14.9%), and 184,017 received a mixture of both (44.6%). Completion of the 4-dose series was highest among children who received combination vaccines only (75.5%), followed by those who received a mixture of vaccines (72.7%) and those who received stand-alone vaccines only (54.5%). Relative to those who received stand-alone vaccines only, adjusted odds of completion were approximately 2.9 times higher among combination vaccine recipients (odds ratio, OR = 2.93 [95% CI: 2.87, 2.98]) and 2.5 times higher among those who received a mixture of vaccines (OR = 2.54 [2.49, 2.59]). Conclusion DTaP-containing combination vaccine use was associated with significantly greater adherence. Although these results warrant further investigation to better understand the determinants of infant vaccination adherence, such evidence may further support preferential recommendations for combination vaccine use. Disclosures Matthew M. Loiacono, MSc, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Vitali Pool, MD, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Robertus Van Aalst, MSc, Sanofi Pasteur (Employee)

How and why a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence post-MI worked for some (and could work better for others): an outcome-driven qualitative process evaluation

ObjectivesTo explore (1) the extent to which a multicomponent intervention addressed determinants of the desired behaviours (ie, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and cardiovascular medications), (2) the associated mechanism(s) of action and (3) how future interventions might be better designed to meet the needs of this patient population.DesignA qualitative evaluation embedded within a multicentre randomised trial, involving purposive semistructured interviews.SettingNine cardiac centres in Ontario, Canada.ParticipantsPotential participants were stratified according to the trial’s primary outcomes of engagement and adherence, resulting in three groups: (1) engaged, adherence outcome positive, (2) engaged, adherence outcome negative and (3) did not engage, adherence outcome negative. Participants who did not engage but had positive adherence outcomes were excluded. Individual domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework were applied as deductive codes and findings were analysed using a framework approach.ResultsThirty-one participants were interviewed. Participants who were engaged with positive adherence outcomes attributed their success to the intervention’s ability to activate determinants including behavioural regulation and knowledge, which encouraged an increase in self-monitoring behaviour and awareness of available supports, as well as reinforcement and social influences. The behaviour of those with negative adherence outcomes was driven by beliefs about consequences, emotions and identity. As currently designed, the intervention failed to target these determinants for this subset of participants, resulting in partial engagement and poor adherence outcomes.ConclusionThe intervention facilitated CR adherence through reinforcement, behavioural regulation, the provision of knowledge and social influence. To reach a broader and more diverse population, future iterations of the intervention should target aberrant beliefs about consequences, memory and decision-making and emotion.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov registry; NCT02382731

What interventions are used to improve exercise adherence in older people and what behavioural techniques are they based on? A systematic review

ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review of interventions used to improve exercise adherence in older people, to assess the effectiveness of these interventions and to evaluate the behavioural change techniques underpinning them using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT).DesignSystematic review.MethodsA search was conducted on AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsychINFO databases. Randomised controlled trials that used an intervention to aid exercise adherence and an exercise adherence outcome for older people were included. Data were extracted with the use of a preprepared standardised form. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias. Interventions were classified according to the BCTT.ResultsEleven studies were included in the review. Risk of bias was moderate to high. Interventions were classified into the following categories: comparison of behaviour, feedback and monitoring, social support, natural consequences, identity and goals and planning. Four studies reported a positive adherence outcome following their intervention. Three of these interventions were categorised in the feedback and monitoring category. Four studies used behavioural approaches within their study. These were social learning theory, socioemotional selectivity theory, cognitive behavioural therapy and self-efficacy. Seven studies did not report a behavioural approach.ConclusionsInterventions in the feedback and monitoring category showed positive outcomes, although there is insufficient evidence to recommend their use currently. There is need for better reporting, use and the development of theoretically derived interventions in the field of exercise adherence for older people. Robust measures of adherence, in order to adequately test these interventions would also be of use.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42015020884.

Religion, Spirituality, and Schizophrenia: A Review

Religion and spirituality exert a significant role in the lives of many individuals, including people with schizophrenia. However, the contribution of religion and spirituality to various domains (psychopathology, explanatory models, treatment seeking, treatment adherence, outcome, etc.) has not received much attention. In this article, we review the exiting data with regards to the relationship of religion, spirituality, and various domains in patients with schizophrenia. Available evidence suggests that for some patients, religion instills hope, purpose, and meaning in their lives, whereas for others, it induces spiritual despair. Patients with schizophrenia also exhibit religious delusions and hallucinations. Further, there is some evidence to suggest that religion influences the level of psychopathology. Religion and religious practices also influence social integration, risk of suicide attempts, and substance use. Religion and spirituality also serves as an effective method of coping with the illness. Religion also influences the treatment compliance and outcome in patients with schizophrenia