scholarly journals Deleted in malignant brain tumor 1 genetic variation confers urinary tract infection risk in children and mice

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Hains ◽  
Shamik Polley ◽  
Dong Liang ◽  
Vijay Saxena ◽  
Samuel Arregui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Brain Tumor ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Malignant Brain Tumor

scholarly journals Urinary microbes and postoperative urinary tract infection risk in urogynecologic surgical patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1797-1805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystal J. Thomas-White ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Huaiying Lin ◽  
Cynthia S. Fok ◽  
Kathryn Ghanayem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Surgical Patients

scholarly journals The Difference of Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infection Risk Based on Chateterization Urine, Age, and Diabetes Mellitus

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edel Weisela Permata Sari ◽  
Prijono Satyabakti
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
The Difference

Nosocomial urinary tract infection is common occurs in patients with indwelling urinary chateter. Factors that caused nosocomial urinary tract infection are host, agent, and chateterization urine. The aim of this research was to analyze risk difference nosocomial urinary tract infection based on chateterization urine, age, and diabetes mellitus (DM). This study used case control with sample size 20 for each group. Case sample was patients who diagnosed urinary tract infection, while control sampel was patients who not diagnosed urinary tract infection in Haji Hospital Surabaya on 2013 until 2014. The independent variables were duration of chateterization, frequency of chateterization, age, and DM, while dependent variable was nosocomial urinary tract infection. Those variables was analyze with risk difference (RD) in Epi Info. The result showed that risk difference nosocomial urinary tract infection based on duration of chateterization is RD = 0,52 it means if changing chateter was done every seven days used, it can prevent 0,52 from 0,71 or 73,53% urinary tract infection cases, frequency of chateterization is RD = 0,43956 it means if decrease frequency of chateterization until one time used, it can prevent 0,44 from 0,79 or 55,94% urinary tract infection cases, age is RD = 0,40 it means if insertion of urine catheter as indicated and right procedure in patient with >55 old it can prevent 0,40 from 0,68 or 59,26% urinary tract infection cases, and DM is RD = 0,42 it means if preventing toward DM, it can prevent 0,42 from 0,75 or 55,56% urinary tract infection cases.Keyword: chateterization urine, age, diabetes mellitus, nosocomial urinary tract infection

scholarly journals Factores asociados y descripción general de infección del tracto urinario en niños

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-171
Author(s):  
Yolanda Mueses Guerrero ◽  
John Jamer Paz Montañez ◽  
Jaime Manuel Restrepo Restrepo ◽  
Roberth Alirio Ortiz Martínez ◽  
María Amparo Acosta Aragón
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Infection Risk

La infección del tracto urinario (ITU) es una patología frecuente en la infancia, reconocida como precipitante de enfermedades agudas y crónicas con un gran índice de morbilidad. Es importante el diagnóstico apropiado para minimizar la instauración de cicatrices renales, falla renal e hipertensión arterial en la edad adulta. Las indicaciones de profilaxis han cambiado en los últimos años. Objetivo: Dar a conocer los conocimientos actuales en patogénesis diagnóstico y manejo posterior en ITU. Metodología: Se realizó una revisión bibliográ- fica entre los años 1995 al 2016, en las bases de datos de Scielo, Elsevier, Pubmed, Redalyc, ScienceDirect, Medwave, Nature Reviews, EBSCO, Naxos, Bases de datos que ofrece la Universidad del Cauca. Se utilizó los términos MeSH y DeSC -“Urinary Tract Infectión, Risk factor, children, diagnostic, treatment”, en inglés y español con un total de 276 documentos. Posteriormente fueron evaluados con los respectivos instrumentos de lectura crítica de artículos así: Consort para ensayos clínicos, Strobe, para estudios observacionales, Prisma para meta-análisis y Agree para guía de práctica clínica, filtrando un total de 58 documentos. Para la gestión de la información se utilizó el programa Mendeley de libre acceso. Resultados: Los conocimientos en ITU en pediatría han avanzado más hacia la prevención de cicatrices y prevención de enfermedades en la etapa adulta. Las indicaciones de profilaxis han cambiado y son más escuetas. Conclusiones: La ITU es frecuente en pediatría. Han cambiado los manejos, por ahora se necesitan más estudios en nuestra población.

scholarly journals COMPARATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF NORMAL SALINE AND 10% POVIDONE IODINE IN PERIURETHRAL CLEANING

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Awaluddin Awaluddin
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Indwelling Urinary Catheter

Currently, urinary tract infection incidence in patients with indwelling urinary catheter ranges between 10-80%. They are at risk for other problems that can cause death. Appropriate action is required to decrease urinary tract infection risk by periurethral area cleaning. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences of the effectiveness of the use of normal saline and 10% povidone iodine for periurethral area cleaning in decreasing urinary tract infection risk. Research methods uses experimental design with the population of patients who used indwelling urinary catheter. Samples were obtained by consecutive and allocation by randomization which were divided into 2 groups, each group were 17 respondents. In the treatment group, periurethral area was cleaned with normal saline and in the control group with 10% povidone iodine. Urinary tract infection risk assessment was carried out by the leukocyte esterase dipstick test at 8 hours after insertion. The results indicate that the incidence of urinary tract infections risk in the group using normal saline smaller than 10% povidone iodine  with a comparison of 1:1.3. Number need to treat in this study was 6. The conclusion of this study is normal saline is more effective in reducing urinary tract infection risk.

scholarly journals COMPARATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF NORMAL SALINE AND 10% POVIDONE IODINE IN PERIURETHRAL CLEANING

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Awaluddin Awaluddin
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Urinary Catheter ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Indwelling Urinary Catheter

Currently, urinary tract infection incidence in patients with indwelling urinary catheter ranges between 10-80%. They are at risk for other problems that can cause death. Appropriate action is required to decrease urinary tract infection risk by periurethral area cleaning. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences of the effectiveness of the use of normal saline and 10% povidone iodine for periurethral area cleaning in decreasing urinary tract infection risk. Research methods uses experimental design with the population of patients who used indwelling urinary catheter. Samples were obtained by consecutive and allocation by randomization which were divided into 2 groups, each group were 17 respondents. In the treatment group, periurethral area was cleaned with normal saline and in the control group with 10% povidone iodine. Urinary tract infection risk assessment was carried out by the leukocyte esterase dipstick test at 8 hours after insertion. The results indicate that the incidence of urinary tract infections risk in the group using normal saline smaller than 10% povidone iodine  with a comparison of 1:1.3. Number need to treat in this study was 6. The conclusion of this study is normal saline is more effective in reducing urinary tract infection risk.

scholarly journals Importance of Site of Infection and Antibiotic Selection in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sepsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas S. Britt ◽  
David J. Ritchie ◽  
Marin H. Kollef ◽  
Carey-Ann D. Burnham ◽  
Michael J. Durkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Urinary Tract Infection ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Tract Infection ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Infection Risk ◽  
Antibiotic Selection ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Risk Of Mortality

ABSTRACT In a retrospective analysis of 215 patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis, we observed a significantly higher risk of mortality associated with respiratory tract infection (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.39; P = 0.010) and lower risk with urinary tract infection (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.90; P = 0.004). Aminoglycoside monotherapy was associated with increased mortality, even after adjusting for confounders (adjusted RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.85; P = 0.037), consistent across multiple sites of infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document