Supplemental Security Income enrollment and health care and social assistance employment and wages

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1319-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence C. Pellegrini ◽  
Kimberley H. Geissler
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-152
Author(s):  
Silvio Bologna

This contribution deals with the internal coordination of health care, long-term social care and social assistance schemes – covered by EU regulation no. 883/2004 – in Italy after the constitutional reform enacted in 2001, which significantly decentralised legislative and administrative machinery by strengthening the prerogatives of the Regions, especially in terms of organisation and funding of the services. This article seeks to demonstrate that, although the decentralisation of health care and long-term social care has been accompanied by mechanisms of internal coordination among the Regions (particularly in the field of inter-regional mobility), regional social assistance schemes providing money transfers lack any form of coordination.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-608
Author(s):  

The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program for children is an important part of the federal government's social benefits program for children with special needs. The SSI program is a nationwide program administered by the Social Security Administration (SSA) that does the following: • provides monthly cash payments based on family income, • qualifies the child for Medicaid health care services in many states, and • assures referral of SSI child beneficiaries into the state Title V Children With Special Health Care Needs program's system of care. The SSA considers a child to be disabled if: • the impairment-physical or mental, or chronic medical condition-is as severe as a condition that would keep an adult from working, • the condition is expected to last a long time or is life threatening, and • the child is unable to engage in the everyday activities that most children the same age can do. Congress implemented the children's component of the SSI program in 1974 in recognition that disabled children who live in low-income households are among the most disadvantaged of all Americans and therefore deserve special assistance. The cost of caring for a child with special needs is an especially heavy burden for families with limited resources. The intent of the SSI program is to reduce the additional deleterious environmental effects that a low family income can have on the growth and development of the disabled child and thereby help these children become self-supporting members of society. The SSI program provides cash benefits.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Rose-Jacobs ◽  
Jennifer Goodhart Fiore ◽  
Stephanie Ettinger de Cuba ◽  
Maureen Black ◽  
Diana B. Cutts ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
VOLKAN YILMAZ

AbstractThis paper explores the key features of the emerging welfare mix for Syrian refugees in Turkey and identifies the modes of interaction between humanitarian assistance programmes, domestic policy responses and the Turkish welfare system. The welfare mix for Syrian refugees is a joint product of humanitarian assistance programmes implemented by international and domestic non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and domestic social policy programmes. Three policy domains are considered: social assistance schemes, employment and health care services. The paper suggests that granting of temporary protection status to Syrian migrants in Turkey and the agreement between Turkey and the EU shaped the welfare mix by empowering the public sector mandate vis-à-vis the humanitarian actors. As a result, the role of the public sector increases at the expense of NGOs, especially in social assistance and health care, while NGOs are increasingly specialised in protection work (especially in mental health support), where the Turkish welfare system has been weak. Employment has been essentially disregarded, in both humanitarian and social policy programmes, which casts doubt on the prospect of successful economic integration. Finally, this paper argues that the convergence of the rights of immigrants and citizens may well occur in mature components of less comprehensive welfare systems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2021201
Author(s):  
Emilia H. De Marchis ◽  
Danielle Hessler ◽  
Caroline Fichtenberg ◽  
Eric W. Fleegler ◽  
Amy G. Huebschmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 977-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy J. Solinger

To situate today's social assistance program conceptually and historically, this paper presents three ideal-typical stances states may adopt in welfare provision, especially for indigent populations: (1) extend assistance to accord with social citizenship rights—or to fulfill the Confucian concept of the rite of benevolence; (2) offer subsidies to attain support or to pacify anger and silence demands from the poor; or (3) grant benefits (education, health care) to enhance the nation's productivity. The intended beneficiaries of these projects are, respectively, individuals, society and the state, and politicians. This categorization can distinguish, in broad-brush fashion, official handouts at diverse historical moments; the models are meant not so much to characterize entire eras as to illustrate differential styles of allocation. Moreover, each era justifies its practice with reference to Confucian dicta. In this comparative context, today's political elite bestows financial aid—but just a conditional kind—mainly to preempt disturbances and prevent “instability,” in line with the third of the types.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document