scholarly journals IGF binding protein-6 expression in vascular endothelial cells is induced by hypoxia and plays a negative role in tumor angiogenesis

2011 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 2003-2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyang Zhang ◽  
Ling Lu ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Xianlei Wang ◽  
Jianfeng Zhou ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Yan ◽  
Qiang Song ◽  
Li Yao ◽  
Liang Zhao ◽  
Hui Cai

Abstract Background:The YAP signaling pathway is altered and implicated as oncogenic in human mammary cancers.However, roles of YAP signaling that regulate the breast tumor angiogenesis have remained elusive. Tumor angiogenesis is coordinated by the activation of both cancer cells and vascular endothelial cells. Whether the YAP signalingpathway can regulate the intercellular interaction between cancer cells and endothelial cellsis essentially unknown.Results: We showed here that conditioned media from YAP overexpressed breast cancer cells (CM-YAP+) could promote angiogenesis, accompanied byincreased tube formation, migration, and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Down regulation of YAP in HUVECs reversed CM-YAP+ induced angiogenesis.CM-YAP+ time-dependently activated YAP inHUVECs by dephosphorylating YAP and increasing nuclear translocation.We also identified that both G13-RhoA and PI3K/Akt signaling pathway were necessary for CM-YAP+ induced activation of YAP.Besides, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and angiopoietin-2 (ANG-2)actedas down-stream of YAP in HUVECs to promote angiogenesis.In addition, subcutaneous tumors nude mice model demonstrated that tumors overexpressed YAP revealed moreneovascularization in vivo.Conclusions: YAP-YAP interaction between breastcancer cells and endothelial cellscould promote tumor angiogenesis, supporting that YAP is a potential marker and target fordeveloping novel therapeutic strategies against breast cancer.


1987 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 734-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Bar ◽  
Leonard C. Harrison ◽  
Robert C. Baxter ◽  
Mary Boes ◽  
Brian L. Dake ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Abdellah Akil ◽  
Ana K. Gutiérrez-García ◽  
Rachael Guenter ◽  
J. Bart Rose ◽  
Adam W. Beck ◽  
...  

The Notch signaling pathway plays an essential role in a wide variety of biological processes including cell fate determination of vascular endothelial cells and the regulation of arterial differentiation and angiogenesis. The Notch pathway is also an essential regulator of tumor growth and survival by functioning as either an oncogene or a tumor suppressor in a context-dependent manner. Crosstalk between the Notch and other signaling pathways is also pivotal in tumor progression by promoting cancer cell growth, migration, invasion, metastasis, tumor angiogenesis, and the expansion of cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this review, we provide an overview and update of Notch signaling in endothelial cell fate determination and functioning, angiogenesis, and tumor progression, particularly in the development of CSCs and therapeutic resistance. We further summarize recent studies on how endothelial signaling crosstalk with the Notch pathway contributes to tumor angiogenesis and the development of CSCs, thereby providing insights into vascular biology within the tumor microenvironment and tumor progression.


1989 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Gopinath ◽  
P. E. Walton ◽  
T. D. Etherton

ABSTRACT The effects of a porcine insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein on binding of IGF-I and IGF-II to porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) were determined. Binding of 125I-labelled IGF-I and -II to IGF receptors was inhibited by IGF-binding protein. IGF-binding protein inhibited binding of IGF-I and -II in a dose-dependent manner with half-maximal inhibition occurring at 5·43 and 108 μg/l respectively. A125I-labelled IGF-I–IGF-binding protein complex, formed by incubating 125I-labelled IGF-I with IGF-binding protein overnight at 4 °C, did not effectively bind to endothelial IGF receptors. Addition of IGF-binding protein to PAEC previously incubated with IGF-I caused a marked dissociation of bound IGF-I (47% dissociation within 12 h). These results indicate that the acid-stable IGF-binding protein which appears to be a part of the 150 kDa GH-dependent binding protein, blocks binding of IGF-I and -II by the IGF receptors and appears to exhibit a higher affinity for IGF-I than the endothelial type-I IGF receptor. The ramifications of this latter point with respect to transfer of circulating IGFs (bound to their IGF-binding proteins) across the vascular endothelium are not clear. Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 120, 231–236


Physiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-93
Author(s):  
Dietmar Vestweber

Vascular endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase (VE-PTP) is a receptor-type PTP (RPTP), predominantly expressed in vascular endothelial cells. It regulates embryonic and tumor angiogenesis and controls vascular permeability and homeostasis in inflammation. Major substrates are the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie-2 and the adhesion molecule VE-cadherin. This review describes how VE-PTP controls vascular functions by its various substrates and the therapeutic potential of VE-PTP in various pathophysiological settings.


Endocrinology ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
pp. 3749-3755 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Knudtson ◽  
M. Boes ◽  
A. Sandra ◽  
B. L. Dake ◽  
B. A. Booth ◽  
...  

Abstract IGF binding proteins-3 and -4, whether given in the perfused rat heart or given iv in the intact animal, cross the microvascular endothelium of the heart and distribute in subendothelial tissues. IGF binding protein-3, like IGF-I/II, localizes in cardiac muscle, with lesser concentrations in CT elements. In contrast, IGFBP-4 preferentially localizes in CT. In this study, chimeric IGF binding proteins were prepared in which a basic 20-amino-acid C-terminal region of IGF binding protein-3 was switched with the homologous region of IGF binding protein-4, and vice-versa, to create IGF binding protein-34 and IGF binding protein-43. Perfused IGF binding protein-34 behaved like IGF binding protein-4, localizing in connective tissue elements, whereas IGF binding protein-43 now localized in cardiac muscle at concentrations identical to perfused IGF binding protein-3. To determine whether these small mutations altered the affinity of the chimera for cells, the ability of 125I-IGF binding protein-34 and 125I-IGF binding protein-43 to bind to microvascular endothelial cells was determined and compared with IGF binding protein-3. IGF binding protein-34 retained 15% of the binding capacity of IGF binding protein-3, whereas IGF binding protein-43 bound to microvessel endothelial cells with higher affinity and greater total binding than that of IGF binding protein-3. We conclude that small changes in the C-terminal basic domain of IGF binding protein-3 and the corresponding region of IGF binding protein-4 can alter their affinity for cultured cells and influence their tissue distribution in the rat heart.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document