Anti-hormone Therapy: Principles of Endocrine Therapy of Cancer

Author(s):  
Jens Hoffmann ◽  
Anette Sommer

2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-9
Author(s):  
Marzena Kamińska ◽  
Tomasz Ciszewski ◽  
Agnieszka Bronikowska ◽  
Maria Ferańska ◽  
Agnieszka Pawlak-Warszawska ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction. Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women. Its treatment is a combined therapy and the sequence and time are established according to the accepted standards in Poland. Consequences posed by this disease include disorder in the physical, mental and social spheres in women. Adapting to cancer is very important for the process of treatment, and the acceptance of the disease is the determinant. Aim. The aim of the study was to determine and compare the degree of acceptance of the illness and the assessment of quality of life among breast cancer patients during cancer treatment. Material and methods. The survey included 85 ill people treated in a conserving way and 94 ill people treated by breast amputation. Patients after the surgical procedure were subjected to adjuvant treatment involving chemotherapy (90 women) and/or endocrine therapy (87 women). The study used standardized questionnaires EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer): QLQC-30 and the scale (AIS Approval IIIness Scale). Results. The highest level of acceptance of the disease, so the best ability to adapt to cancer have those women who have undergone radical mastectomy and adjuvant hormone therapy during the treatment. The lowest level of acceptance of the illness, expressed as a negative assessment was observed in women after BCT and during chemotherapy treatment. The use of the EORTC QLQC-30 to assess the overall health and quality of life of patients allowed us to capture statistically significant differences in the percentages stating good health, with the relatively highest negative response rates which were observed in the subgroups treated with chemotherapy and hormone therapy. With regard to the highest quality of life, the percentage of negative responses was observed in subgroups treated with the use of hormone therapy and after mastectomy. Conclusions. Good acceptance of the disease was obtained by women treated for breast cancer who have undergone mastectomy in the course of adjuvant endocrine therapy. The assessment of general health and quality of life was influenced by oncological treatment. Patients during chemotherapy and hormone therapy showed a negative impact of this form of treatment on overall well-being and functioning.Patients after mastectomy and during hormone therapy treatment showed a comparatively lower quality of life compared to a group of patients after BCT and during treatment with chemotherapy



2020 ◽  
pp. 40-46
Author(s):  
A. F. Nasretdinov ◽  
N. I. Sultanbaeva ◽  
Sh. I. Musin ◽  
O. N. Lipatov ◽  
A. A. Izmailov ◽  
...  

Introduction. Breast cancer is the leader in cancer incidence in theRussian Federation. The tumor is considered extremely heterogeneous and the luminal subtypes of breast tumors occupy a special place, since they are considered relatively favorable in therapy and control of the disease.Drug therapy for hormone-positive cancer has undergone significant evolution and new anticancer agents have appeared in the arsenal of the oncologist and have shown promising results compared to classical therapy. The search for predictive markers of the effectiveness of new therapy has become of great importance. This marker turned out to be a mutation in the PIK3CA gene – one of the most frequent genetic disorders in breast cancer cells. According to the literature, the presence of this mutation negatively effects on endocrine therapy for breast tumors.The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of mutations in the PIK3CA gene among patients with hormone-positive tumors, and the effectiveness of therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors in this group of patients.Materials and methods. The material for the study of the mutation in the PIK3CA gene was tumor biopsies of 31 patients and clinical data on the response to therapy with CDK4/6 inhibitors and classical hormone therapy.Results and discussion. The results of the work showed a high incidence of the PIK3CA mutation among hormone-positive tumors (45%). The mutation resulted in a decrease in both the median time to progression after radical surgery (from 48.4 ± 7.8 months to 30.1 ± 6.0 months) in patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy and progression-free survival in patients receiving therapy with CDK4 /6 inhibitors (4.2 months versus 9 months). This confirmed the theory that the PIK3CA mutation negatively affects the outcome of hormone therapy.Conclusions. PIK3CA is an important predictive marker in endocrine therapy for hormone-positive tumors. Its presence not only determines the relatively worse results of treatment, but can also serve as an indication for the appointment of a special series of drugs – inhibitors of this mutation.



Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rodriguez ◽  
Marc Ramkairsingh ◽  
Xiaozeng Lin ◽  
Anil Kapoor ◽  
Pierre Major ◽  
...  

Breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) play critical roles in the acquisition of resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER + ve) breast cancer (BC). The resistance results from complex alterations involving ER, growth factor receptors, NOTCH, Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog, YAP/TAZ, and the tumor microenvironment. These mechanisms are likely converged on regulating BCSCs, which then drive the development of endocrine therapy resistance. In this regard, hormone therapies enrich BCSCs in ER + ve BCs under both pre-clinical and clinical settings along with upregulation of the core components of “stemness” transcriptional factors including SOX2, NANOG, and OCT4. SOX2 initiates a set of reactions involving SOX9, Wnt, FXY3D, and Src tyrosine kinase; these reactions stimulate BCSCs and contribute to endocrine resistance. The central contributions of BCSCs to endocrine resistance regulated by complex mechanisms offer a unified strategy to counter the resistance. ER + ve BCs constitute approximately 75% of BCs to which hormone therapy is the major therapeutic approach. Likewise, resistance to endocrine therapy remains the major challenge in the management of patients with ER + ve BC. In this review we will discuss evidence supporting a central role of BCSCs in developing endocrine resistance and outline the strategy of targeting BCSCs to reduce hormone therapy resistance.



2020 ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
I. A. Koroleva ◽  
M. V. Kopp

The review presents the results of studies of fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Hormone therapy is an effective method of treating hormone-positive metastatic breast cancer even in the presence of visceral metastases in the absence of a visceral crisis and without detected resistance to endocrine therapy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hormone therapy is safer for patients with hormone-positive MBC than chemotherapy, since it does not lead to immunosuppression. Fulvestrant is a “pure antiestrogen”, it has a greater affinity for estrogen receptors than tamoxifen. Fulvestrant is both a competitive antagonist and a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), this mechanism of action provides complete blocking of the estrogen signaling pathway. In the phase III CONFIRM study, the optimal dose of fulvestrate was determined to be 500 mg once every 28 days, with a loading dose of 500 mg on day 15 of the first month of therapy. In the FALCON phase III study (n = 462), which included postmenopausal MBC patients who had not previously received any endocrine therapy, fulvestrant 500 mg was compared with the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. Significant improvement in PFS was achieved with fulvestrant therapy compared to anastrozole: 16.6 months in the fulvestrant group versus 13.8 months with anastrozole [OR = 0.797; 95% CI 0.637–0.999; p = 0.0486]. A subgroup analysis showed that patients without visceral metastases can benefit most from taking fulvestrant. In all studies fulvestrant 500 mg has demonstrated a good toxicity profile, so it is being studied as a component of combined endocrine therapy. In the PALOMA-3 study the combination of fulvestrant with palbociclib (CDK4/6 inhibitor) demonstrated a median PFS 9.5 months, compared with monotherapy with fulvestrant – 4.6 months (HR = 0.46, p < 0.0001). In the MONALEESA-3 study, the median PFS in patients receiving ribociclib with fulvestrant was significantly higher compared to those taking placebo with fulvestrant: 20.5 months and 12.8 months, respectively (HR = 0.593; 95% CI: 0.480–0.732; p < 0.001). In the MONARCH-2 study the combination of fulvestrant and abemaciclib was studied in the second line of therapy, the median PFS was 16.4 months in the group of fulvestrant and abemaciclib, and 9.3 months in the group of fulvestrant and placebo (HR = 0.553; 95% CI 0.449-0.681; p < 0.0001). Fulvestrant has a satisfactory toxicity profile, does not require supporting therapy, and is included in the clinical recommendations for monotherapy and combination therapy.



2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Peter Ordentlich ◽  
William McCulloch ◽  
Susanne Flechsig ◽  
Jens Hoffmann

130 Background: Primary and acquired resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer presents a significant barrier to maximizing the clinical effectiveness of these agents. We recently reported in a randomized, placebo controlled phase II study that entinostat (ENT), a class 1 selective HDAC inhibitor, combined with exemestane extended PFS and OS in postmenopausal women with ER+ positive breast cancer that had progressed on a prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Likewise, everolimus (EVE), a mTORi, combined with exemestane or tamoxifen (TAM) also significantly extended PFS in a similar patient population. In order to determine the potential benefit of combining ENT with EVE plus hormone therapy we have piloted a series of xenograft studies in primary human tumor models of TAM sensitivity and resistance. Methods: Athymic nude mice bearing xenografts of tissue derived directly from patient tumors (MaCa4049 – TAM sensitive; MaCa3366/TAM – TAM resistant) were treated with A) vehicle B) 2 mg/kg EVE C) 2 mg/kg EVE + 10 mg/kg TAM D) 15 mg/kg ENT E) 2 mg/kg EVE + 10 mg/kg TAM + 15 mg/kg ENT. Tumor samples taken at the end of the study were cryoconserved for analysis of gene and protein expression and protein phosphorylation. Results: Growth of MaCa4049 tumors was inhibited in all treatment groups relative to vehicle in two independent studies conducted in this tumor model. Groups B, C and D demonstrated a similar level of activity while maximal inhibition was observed in Group E. All treatments were generally well tolerated with weight loss similar in groups C and E. Treatment of MaCa3366/TAM tumors is ongoing with similar levels of tumor growth inhibition in all groups observed relative to vehicle at week 7. Analysis of tumor samples from completed studies will be presented to provide insight into mechanism of action for the enhanced activity observed with the triple combination. Conclusions: Preclinical data demonstrating enhanced activity of entinostat combined with everolimus and hormone therapy provides the rationale for clinical investigation of this novel therapeutic approach to targeting hormone therapy resistance.



2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk-young Lee ◽  
Jae Hong Seo

Currently, the growing population of the elderly is one of biggest problems in terms of increase in geriatric diseases. Lack of data from large prospective studies on geriatric breast cancer patients often makes it difficult for clinicians to make treatments decisions for them. Because both benefit and risk of treatment should be taken into account, treatment is usually determined considering life expectancy or comorbidities in elderly patients. Treatment of breast cancer is differentiated according to histologic classifications, and hormone therapy is even adopted for patients with metastatic breast cancer if tumor tissue expresses hormone receptors. Endocrine therapy can offer great benefit to elderly patients considering its equivalent efficacy to chemotherapy with fewer toxicities if it is appropriately used. Aromatase inhibitors are usually prescribed agents in hormone therapy for elderly breast cancer patients due to their physiology after menopause. Here, endocrine therapy for elderly patients with breast cancer in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative setting is reviewed along with predictive adverse events resulting from the use of hormone agents.



2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paule Augereau ◽  
Anne Patsouris ◽  
Emmanuelle Bourbouloux ◽  
Carole Gourmelon ◽  
Sophie Abadie Lacourtoisie ◽  
...  

Endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment of estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer with an overall survival benefit. However, some adaptive mechanisms in the tumor emerge leading to the development of a resistance to this therapy. A better characterization of this process is needed to overcome this resistance and to develop new tailored therapies. Mechanisms of resistance to hormone therapy result in activation of transduction signal pathways, including the cell cycle regulation with cyclin D/CDK4/6/Rb pathway. The strategy of combined hormone therapy with targeted agents has shown an improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) in several phase II or III trials, including three different classes of drugs: mTOR inhibitors, PI3K and CDK4/6 inhibitors. A recent phase III trial has shown that fulvestrant combined with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor doubles PFS in aromatase inhibitor-pretreated postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer. Other combinations are ongoing to disrupt the interaction between PI3K/AKT/mTOR and cyclin D/CDK4/6/Rb pathways. Despite these successful strategies, reliable and reproducible biomarkers are needed. Tumor genomics are dynamic over time, and blood-based biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA represent a major hope to elucidate the adaptive mechanisms of endocrine resistance. The optimal combinations and biomarkers to guide this strategy need to be determined.



Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Michael Oakes ◽  
Catherine Kato ◽  
Shafagh Yazdani ◽  
Thomas G. Deloughery ◽  
Christina Milano ◽  
...  

Background:Gender-affirming hormone therapy is integral to the care of transgender individuals, but the hematologic complications of this therapy are not entirely understood. While secondary erythrocytosis is a widely recognized complication of testosterone administration, the exact prevalence of erythrocytosis in patients receiving exogenous testosterone for gender transition and the optimal management of this condition remain unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of transgender individuals undergoing masculinizing therapy with testosterone at our institution to assess the prevalence of secondary erythrocytosis and review the management techniques utilized. Methods:We performed a retrospective observational study of transgender individuals over the age of 18 years undergoing masculinizing therapy with exogenous testosterone between June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020 at Oregon Health & Science University Hospital in Portland, Oregon. We collected data on average pre-testosterone hemoglobin and hematocrit values, formulation of testosterone and route of administration, peak hemoglobin and hematocrit values after the initiation of endocrine therapy, management of secondary erythrocytosis, and thrombotic events in those with secondary erythrocytosis. Descriptive statistics were employed to determine the prevalence of erythrocytosis using the reference ranges for cisgender males and to quantify average increase in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels from pre-therapy levels. Seaborn and Matplotlib libraries in Python were used for data visualization and pandas library in Python was used for statistical analysis. Results:A total of 234 individuals were included in this study with a mean age of 29 years. Testosterone cypionate was the most commonly administered formulation at 77.8% of cases, followed by transdermal testosterone formulations 14.5%, testosterone enanthate 4.2%, and combination transdermal testosterone plus cypionate 2.1%. Intramuscular injection was the most common route of administration at 65.4% followed by subcutaneous injection 15.8% and transdermal gel 12% and patch 2.1%. The mean pre-testosterone hemoglobin was 13.5 g/dL and hematocrit was 40.3%. After initiation of hormone therapy, the mean hemoglobin peak was 15.7 g/dL and hematocrit peak was 47.2% (Figures 1 and 2). It took an average of 21 months after initiation of therapy to reach peak hemoglobin and hematocrit levels. 23.5% of patients met the definition of erythrocytosis using our institutional cisgender male reference range for hematocrit above 50%, and 8.5% exceeded a hemoglobin threshold of 17.5 g/dL. Only one thrombotic event, a superficial venous thrombosis, occurred in those with secondary erythrocytosis. Dose reduction of testosterone was performed for 14.5% of patients who developed erythrocytosis, and no other management strategies, including therapeutic phlebotomy, were documented. 88.9% of patients with erythrocytosis had received testosterone cypionate, with other formulations infrequently associated with polycythemia-range hematocrit levels. Discussion:Our analysis of transgender individuals undergoing masculinizing therapy with testosterone revealed an average increase in hemoglobin of 2.2 g/dL and in hematocrit of 6.9% after the onset of endocrine therapy. In total, 23.5% of patients met the threshold for secondary erythrocytosis using the hematocrit reference range for cisgender men after initiation of testosterone while only 8.5% met the hemoglobin threshold of 17.5 g/dL. The clinical consequences of this hematologic shift are unclear, with only one patient documented as developing a superficial venous thrombosis, and no occurrences of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other thrombotic events. It also remains uncertain if utilizing the reference range for cisgender men is an appropriate method of predicting thrombotic risk in this population. The sole management strategy recorded was testosterone dose reduction as no patients had documentation of any therapeutic phlebotomy to lower their hematocrit levels. Of note, some providers recommended that their patients with erythrocytosis donate blood, which was not able to be documented in the medical record. Further studies are required to better define the clinical sequelae of erythrocytosis in this patient population and to determine optimal management of this condition. Figure Disclosures Shatzel: Aronora, Inc.:Consultancy.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document