scholarly journals Endocrinology and hormone therapy in breast cancer: Endocrine therapy in premenopausal women

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Pritchard
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women

scholarly journals Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 3069-3103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
R. Bryan Rumble ◽  
Erin Macrae ◽  
Debra L. Barton ◽  
Hannah Klein Connolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
American Society

Purpose To develop recommendations about endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor (HR) –positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of evidence from 2008 through 2015 to create recommendations informed by that evidence. Outcomes of interest included sequencing of hormonal agents, hormonal agents compared with chemotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and treatment of premenopausal women. This guideline puts forth recommendations for endocrine therapy as treatment for women with HR-positive MBC. Recommendations Sequential hormone therapy is the preferential treatment for most women with HR-positive MBC. Except in cases of immediately life-threatening disease, hormone therapy, alone or in combination, should be used as initial treatment. Patients whose tumors express any level of hormone receptors should be offered hormone therapy. Treatment recommendations should be based on type of adjuvant treatment, disease-free interval, and organ function. Tumor markers should not be the sole criteria for determining tumor progression; use of additional biomarkers remains experimental. Assessment of menopausal status is critical; ovarian suppression or ablation should be included in premenopausal women. For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred first-line endocrine therapy, with or without the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor palbociclib. As second-line therapy, fulvestrant should be administered at 500 mg with a loading schedule and may be administered with palbociclib. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may be administered with exemestane to postmenopausal women with MBC whose disease progresses while receiving nonsteroidal AIs. Among patients with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive MBC, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–targeted therapy plus an AI can be effective for those who are not chemotherapy candidates.

Effects of zoledronic acid on hormone levels in premenopausal women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy: Probone II Study

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peyman Hadji ◽  
Anette Kauka ◽  
Thomas Bauer ◽  
May Ziller ◽  
Katrin Birkholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Hormone Levels

Endocrine Treatment of Breast Cancer: Current Perspectives, Future Directions

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tazia Irfan ◽  
Mainul Haque ◽  
Sayeeda Rahman ◽  
Russell Kabir ◽  
Nuzhat Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Estrogen Production ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

Breast cancer remains one of the major causes of death in women, and endocrine treatment is currently one of the mainstay of treatment in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapy either slows down or stops the growth of hormone-sensitive tumors by blocking the body’s capability to yield hormones or by interfering with hormone action. In this paper, we intended to review various approaches of endocrine treatments for breast cancer highlighting successes and limitations. There are three settings where endocrine treatment of breast cancer can be used: neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or metastatic. Several strategies have also been developed to treat hormone-sensitive breast cancer which include ovarian ablation, blocking estrogen production, and stopping estrogen effects. Selective estrogen-receptor modulators (SERMs) (e.g. tamoxifen and raloxifene), aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (e.g. anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH) (e.g. goserelin), and selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) (e.g. fulvestrant) are currently used drugs to treat breast cancer. Tamoxifen is probably the first targeted therapy widely used in breast cancer treatment which is considered to be very effective as first line endocrine treatment in previously untreated patients and also can be used after other endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. AIs inhibit the action of enzyme aromatase which ultimately decrease the production of estrogen to stimulate the growth of ER+ breast cancer cells. GnRH agonists suppress ovarian function, inducing artificial menopause in premenopausal women. Endocrine treatments are cheap, well-tolerated and have a fixed single daily dose for all ages, heights and weights of patients. Endocrine treatments are not nearly as toxic as chemotherapy and frequent hospitalization can be avoided. New drugs in preliminary trials demonstrated the potential for improvement of the efficacy of endocrine therapy including overcoming resistance. However, the overall goals for breast cancer including endocrine therapy should focus on effective control of cancer, design personalized medical therapeutic approach, increase survival time and quality of life, and improve supportive and palliative care for end-stage disease.

scholarly journals The Modern Landscape of Endocrine Therapy for Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer

Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Rossi ◽  
Olivia Pagani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Ovarian Function ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Ovarian Function Suppression

The optimal endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with early and advanced breast cancer still remains an important and controversial issue. For over 30 years, tamoxifen has been the gold standard in the adjuvant setting. New therapeutic options, such as the addition of ovarian function suppression to oral endocrine therapy (either tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors), can improve outcomes over tamoxifen alone in well-selected patients. Treatment duration has also been revisited, and extended therapy is becoming a new standard of care, especially in high-risk patients. Endocrine therapy for advanced disease still represents a challenge and a research priority. New drugs and combinations able to overcome endocrine resistance are at the horizon, and their role in premenopausal women should be better elucidated. Side effects and quality of life (including family planning considerations) play an important role in treatment selection and in the patients' treatment adherence and should always be discussed before start of treatment. The paper will specifically focus on how to integrate all new treatment options in the current armamentarium of endocrine therapy of premenopausal women, with the aim of best fine-tuning treatment selections according to the individual risk/benefit evaluation.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Degarelix Versus Triptorelin in Premenopausal Patients Who Receive Letrozole for Locally Advanced Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Dellapasqua ◽  
Kathryn P. Gray ◽  
Elisabetta Munzone ◽  
Daniela Rubino ◽  
Lorenzo Gianni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Endocrine Activity ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Premenopausal Patients ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms. RESULTS Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected. CONCLUSION In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.

scholarly journals Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1148-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amye J. Tevaarwerk ◽  
Kari B. Wisinski ◽  
Ruth M. O’Regan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Systemic therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer has evolved in the last 5 years, but critical questions remain. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for the addition of ovarian suppression to endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancers considered to be at high risk for recurrence, whereas those with lower-risk cancers seem to have a favorable outcome with tamoxifen alone. Two large randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for extending adjuvant tamoxifen beyond 5 years. Currently the choice of systemic therapy is selected empirically but molecular profiling may, in the near future, provide a more conclusive means of selecting an endocrine therapeutic approach for premenopausal patients. Given that a significant subset of hormone receptor–positive cancers are intrinsically resistant to endocrine agents, as well as the finding that inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 and mammalian target of rapamycin appears to potentially reverse this resistance in patients with metastatic disease, evaluation of these agents in the early-stage setting is ongoing.

A validated model to predict low recurrence risk distinguished by 21-gene recurrence score in hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 532-532
Author(s):  
Yasue Tsuchida ◽  
Sachiko Ohde ◽  
Ryota Nakamura ◽  
Yoko Kanada ◽  
Sakiko Miura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Derivation Cohort

532 Background: In the prospective TAILORx and RxPONDER trials, the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) showed endocrine therapy alone was non-inferior to chemo-endocrine therapy in the analysis of invasive disease-free survival in postmenopausal hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients with RS < = 25. They also indicated chemotherapy was associated with benefit for women 50 years or younger with RS 11 to 25. However, in Japan, the test is not conventionally available because of non-coverage by national insurance. We aimed to develop and validate a model to predict RS using clinicopathological factors that identify patients who would have low risk shown by testing the 21-gene RS and can avoid chemotherapy. Methods: Four hundred patients, including 187 N0/1 postmenopausal, and 213 N0 premenopausal women who underwent surgery and had the RS from St. Luke’s International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, were included in derivation cohort. Derivation cohort was divided into 2 groups by RS 25; patients with RS of 0 to 25 (n = 321) and with RS over 26 (n = 79). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using candidate factors for all patients and pre- or postmenopausal patients. The prediction model was validated using an external cohort of 70 patients from Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Results: Nuclear grade (NG) (adjusted OR, 5.28, 95% CI, 2.47–11.30), high Progesterone receptor (PgR) expression (Allred score 7-8) (adjusted OR, 10.62, 95% CI, 5.34–21.13) and low Ki67 level ( < = 20%) (adjusted OR, 5.29, 95% CI, 2.33-12.01) were significant independent predictors of RS of 0 to 25. With these factors could predict RS of 0 to 25 (AUC of 0.848, 95% CI, 0.803-0.893) with the highest probability of low-RS for 100%. The prediction model of the validation cohort had same discriminatory ability having an AUC of 0.812 (95% CI, 0.701-0.923). In postmenopausal patients, NG (adjusted OR, 4.81, 95% CI, 1.72–13.42), high PgR expression (adjusted OR, 10.62, 95% CI, 4.52–37.72), and low Ki67 level (adjusted OR, 4.94, 95%CI, 1.87-13.04) were significantly associated with RS of 0 to 25 in multivariate analysis. A regression model with these 4 factors could predict RS of 0 to 25 (AUC of 0.842, 95%CI, 0.782-0.902). In premenopausal patients, NG (adjusted OR, 8.76, 95% CI, 1.14–67.40), high PgR expression (adjusted OR, 3.22, 95% CI, 1.61–6.43), and low Ki67 level (adjusted OR, 2.87, 95% CI, 1.20–6.87) were significantly associated with RS of 0 to 10 in multivariate analysis. These factors could predict RS of 0 to 10 (AUC of 0.811, 95% CI, 0.731-0.891). However, the highest probability of low-RS provided this model for premenopausal women was 46.8%. Conclusions: Our validated model could provide useful information to distinguish low-RS especially for postmenopausal patients with high reproducibility. However, for premenopausal women, the 21-gene RS is warranted.

Zoledronic Acid Prevents Cancer Treatment–Induced Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Report From the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 820-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F.X. Gnant ◽  
Brigitte Mlineritsch ◽  
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth ◽  
Stephan Grampp ◽  
Helmut Kaessmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
T Score

Purpose Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer can be associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) that may lead to skeletal morbidity. This study examined whether zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized, open-label, phase III, four-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/d orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days subcutaneously) ± zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) versus anastrozole (1 mg/d orally) and goserelin ± zoledronic acid for 3 years in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. In a BMD subprotocol at three trial centers, patients underwent serial BMD measurements at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Results Four hundred one patients were included in the BMD subprotocol. Endocrine treatment without zoledronic acid led to significant (P < .001) overall bone loss after 3 years of treatment (BMD, −14.4% after 36 months; mean T score reduction, −1.4). Overall bone loss was significantly more severe in patients receiving anastrozole/goserelin (BMD, −17.3%; mean T score reduction, −2.6) compared with patients receiving tamoxifen/goserelin (BMD, −11.6%; mean T score reduction, −1.1). In contrast, BMD remained stable in zoledronic acid–treated patients (P < .0001 compared with endocrine therapy alone). No interactions with age or other risk factors were noted. Conclusion Endocrine therapy caused significant bone loss that increased with treatment duration in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months effectively inhibited bone loss. Regular BMD measurements and initiation of concomitant bisphosphonate therapy on evidence of bone loss should be considered for patients undergoing endocrine therapy.

Cost-Effectiveness of Zoledronic Acid Plus Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Women With Hormone-Responsive Early Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Delea ◽  
Charu Taneja ◽  
Oleg Sofrygin ◽  
Satyin Kaura ◽  
Michael Gnant
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Premenopausal Women
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document