Fixed Capital Investments in the Russian Federation: Territorial Differences

2021 ◽  
pp. 311-320
Author(s):  
Natalia Ivanova ◽  
Lubov Pashina
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3(72)) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
A.A. Stecenko

The materials of this article include a comparative analysis of the structure of investments in machinery, equipment, and vehicles in the total volume of fixed capital investments aimed at reconstruction and modernization in the light food industry of the Russian Federation. The structure of investments in food production, including beverages, tobacco production, textile production, clothing production, fur dressing and dyeing, and leather, leather products, and footwear production is presented in detail.


2020 ◽  
pp. 166-173
Author(s):  
M. N. Solomko

The high level of differentiation of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation determines different approaches to the policy of budget investment. The purpose of the paper is to identify common regional trends in the implementation of capital investments at the expense of budget funds, interregional differences and interpret it. In the study, horizontal and vertical analysis of budget investments has been made, the lack of a significant relationship between the level of budgetary security of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation and the scales of its budget investments has been shown. It has been shown that the investment activity of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is not a determining fac tor, but an important factor of their investment attractiveness. The materials of the article can be used as an information base for further theoretical and applied research on the expenditures of regional budgets in general and the problem of budget investment in particular.


Author(s):  
Olga A. Zykova ◽  

The growing issue of attracting private investment in the Russian economy from year to year gave rise to the development of new measures of support from the state in relation to organizations implementing an investment project, which also form the most favorable investment climate in the country. Such preferences, which consist in a stabilization clause, are contained in the new Federal Law No. 69-FZ of 01.04.2020 “On Protection and Promotion of Capital Investments in the Russian Federation”. However, based on the conducted research, it is concluded that there are a number of legal imperfections, which are expressed in a number of conditions, non-compliance with which entails the inadmissibility of concluding an agreement on the protection and promotion of investment between a private and public person. At the same time, those provisions are so unattainable, infringing and limiting that the question of the expediency of the analyzed investment law will be justified. That is why proposals were made to adjust the rules, which would allow widening the range of persons entitled to state support and thereby attract their capital as an investment in the Russian economy – that is, to achieve the goals originally set.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2096 (1) ◽  
pp. 012161
Author(s):  
E L Stepanova ◽  
S N Sushko ◽  
A P Ovchinnikov

Abstract Research was carried out on the volume of gas turbine commissioning in the range of unit capacities of 30–125 MW at TPPs of the Russian Federation operating as part of a CCPP in the period from 2015 to the first quarter of 2021. The purpose of the research was to determine the average specific capital investment in construction and the average specific fuel consumption for the supply of electricity and heat for the CCPP introduced over the years in the united energy systems of the Russian Federation. Gas turbines are classified by electrical capacity into three groups: from 100 to 125 MW, from 60 to 99 MW and from 30 to 59 MW. An assessment of the quantitative distribution of gas turbines over the interconnected energy systems of the Russian Federation has been carried out. The results of the comparison of the quantitative commissioning of gas turbines are shown in the period from 2010 to the economic crisis of 2014 and in the period from 2015 to the present. A preliminary estimate of the increase in average specific capital investments in the construction of CCPP, which included gas turbines of the same electric power, was made for these periods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
VYACHESLAV Y. SINYUGIN ◽  

The article discusses the urgent problems of increasing life expectancy and involving older people in the active social space in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No.204 of May 7, 2018 “On national goals and strategic tasks for development of the Russian Federation for the period until 2024”. The article considers the term ‘productive longevity’ as a comprehensive idea of the tasks facing the authorities in this direction. It is noted that the regulatory framework provides the basis for the development and implementation of the program of systemic support and improvement of the quality of life of older citizens. The author proposes to consolidate the main signs of active longevity, which could be considered as criteria for the involvement and participation of various ministries and departments in fulfilling the tasks formulated by the Presidential Decree. In addition, the features of public administration by solving the problem of active longevity are considered. The need for interagency cooperation, as well as the creation of a federal portal on the Internet, is noted, where all available opportunities for the older generation will be laid out in the public domain: for the field of healthcare, education, and creative implementation. The need for targeted use of capital investments and systematic use of the resources laid down for the implementation of the program is emphasized.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40
Author(s):  
S. Kazantsev

Measures, imposed on the Russian Federation in 2014 to isolate Russia from the world community, were called sanctions. Their immediate goal is to deprive Russia of resources (financial, economic, technical and technological, information, scientific, cultural) that are needed for its development. The sanctioning countries suppose that the damage caused by their sanctions will weaken the socio-economic, military-political, scientific and technological potential of Russia. Some results of the author’s analysis of the impact of sanctions on the macroeconomic indicators of the Russian Federation i presented in this paper. The following indicators were studied: the volume of financial resources provided to Russian organizations, individuals and credit organizations; the volume and dynamics of capital investments and fixed assets; gross domestic product and industrial output; labour and capital productivity, and some other indicators. The years in which anti-Russian sanctions caused the most considerable damage have been identified. The author also shows that the negative impact of sanctions on the economic development of the country is, in many ways, similar to the damage, caused by the global financial and economic crises. The similarity of their impact is because both crises and sanctions deprive the country of resources for economic development. First of all, we are talking about financial resources.


2022 ◽  
Vol 962 (1) ◽  
pp. 012035
Author(s):  
T O Tagaeva ◽  
V M Gilmundinov ◽  
L K Kazantseva ◽  
D D Sinigaeva

Abstract The authors of this scientific paper examine the current situation in the Russian Federation associated with the pollution of water and the atmospheric resources, with the problem of production and consumption waste accumulation, and draw their attention to the imperfection of statistical information, which does not allow for an objective assessment of the environmental situation. The quality of natural resources is not improving despite the statistical decrease in emissions and discharges of pollutants. They concluded an inconsistency of the economic development in the Russian Federation with the principles of sustainability and the “green” economy. It is necessary to intensify investment activities to protect the natural environment, in order to change the situation. At present, the share of the environmental investments in all national economic capital investments is negligible - less than 1%. The sluggish dynamic of investment processes led to insufficient commissioning of the main environmental funds. Recently, the situation has worsened in connection with the sequestration of the national project “Ecology” due to the pandemic problems. The article is devoted to the analyses of the “green” investment processes in Russia. The author’s definition of “green” investment is given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document