Prehospital Care and Transport

2011 ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Michael A. Frakes ◽  
Heather A. Waden ◽  
Suzanne K. Wedel
Keyword(s):  
Prehospital Care

Infectious safety of patients in the provision of prehospital care for burns

2020 ◽  
pp. 71-75
Author(s):  
Marina Dmitryeva
Keyword(s):  
Medical Care ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Medical Professionals ◽  
Emergency Medical Care ◽  
Emergency Medical

The article describes the measures taken by medical professionals of emergency medical care to observe infectious safety of patients in the provision of pre-medical care in case of burns.

scholarly journals Optimizing Emergency Medical Service Structures Using a Rule-Based Discrete Event Simulation—A Practitioner’s Point of View

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2649
Author(s):  
Christoph Strauss ◽  
Günter Bildstein ◽  
Jana Efe ◽  
Theo Flacher ◽  
Karen Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Discrete Event Simulation ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Discrete Event ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Public Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Event Simulation ◽  
Emergency Medical

Many studies in research deal with optimizing emergency medical services (EMS) on both the operational and the strategic level. It is the purpose of this method-oriented article to explain the major features of “rule-based discrete event simulation” (rule-based DES), which we developed independently in Germany and Switzerland. Our rule-based DES addresses questions concerning the location and relocation of ambulances, dispatching and routing policies, and EMS interplay with other players in prehospital care. We highlight three typical use cases from a practitioner’s perspective and go into different countries’ peculiarities. We show how research results are applied to EMS and healthcare organizations to simulate and optimize specific regions in Germany and Switzerland with their strong federal structures. The rule-based DES serves as basis for decision support to improve regional emergency services’ efficiency without increasing cost. Finally, all simulation-based methods suggest normative solutions and optimize EMS’ performance within given healthcare system structures. We argue that interactions between EMS, emergency departments, and public healthcare agencies are crucial to further improving effectiveness, efficiency, and quality.

scholarly journals Prehospital identification of Covid-19: an observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Spangler ◽  
Hans Blomberg ◽  
David Smekal
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Primary Hospital ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Rule Out ◽  
Descriptive Statistical Analysis

Abstract Background The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic has affected prehospital care systems across the world, but the prehospital presentation of affected patients and the extent to which prehospital care providers are able to identify them is not well characterized. In this study, we describe the presentation of Covid-19 patients in a Swedish prehospital care system, and asses the predictive value of Covid-19 suspicion as documented by dispatch and ambulance nurses. Methods Data for all patients with dispatch, ambulance, and hospital records between January 1–August 31, 2020 were extracted. A descriptive statistical analysis of patients with and without hospital-confirmed Covid-19 was performed. In a subset of records beginning from April 14, we assessed the sensitivity and specificity of documented Covid-19 suspicion in dispatch and ambulance patient care records. Results A total of 11,894 prehospital records were included, of which 481 had a primary hospital diagnosis code related to-, or positive test results for Covid-19. Covid-19-positive patients had considerably worse outcomes than patients with negative test results, with 30-day mortality rates of 24% vs 11%, but lower levels of prehospital acuity (e.g. emergent transport rates of 14% vs 22%). About half (46%) of Covid-19-positive patients presented to dispatchers with primary complaints typically associated with Covid-19. Six thousand seven hundred seventy-six records were included in the assessment of predictive value. Sensitivity was 76% (95% CI 71–80) and 82% (78–86) for dispatch and ambulance suspicion respectively, while specificities were 86% (85–87) and 78% (77–79). Conclusions While prehospital suspicion was strongly indicative of hospital-confirmed Covid-19, based on the sensitivity identified in this study, prehospital suspicion should not be relied upon as a single factor to rule out the need for isolation precautions. The data provided may be used to develop improved guidelines for identifying Covid-19 patients in the prehospital setting.

scholarly journals Operational experience of the Dutch helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: jeopardy on the prehospital care system?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinten G. H. Rikken ◽  
Sarah Mikdad ◽  
Mathijs T. Carvalho Mota ◽  
Marcel A. De Leeuw ◽  
Patrick Schober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Operational Experience ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Retrospective Comparative Study ◽  
Global And Local

Abstract Purpose The SARS-CoV-2 virus has disrupted global and local medical supply chains. To combat the spread of the virus and prevent an uncontrolled outbreak with limited resources, national lockdown protocols have taken effect in the Netherlands since March 13th, 2020. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence, type and characteristics of HEMS and HEMS-ambulance ‘Lifeliner 1’ dispatches during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period one year prior. Methods A retrospective review of all HEMS and HEMS-ambulance ‘Lifeliner 1’ dispatches was performed from the start of Dutch nationwide lockdown orders from March 13th until May 13th, 2020 and the corresponding period one year prior. Dispatch-, operational-, patient-, injury-, and on-site treatment characteristics were extracted for analysis. In addition, the rate of COVID-19 positively tested HEMS personnel and the time physicians were unable to take call was described. Results During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the HEMS and HEMS-ambulance was requested in 528 cases. One year prior, a total of 620 requests were received. The HEMS (helicopter and ambulance) was cancelled after deployment in 56.4% of the COVID-19 cohort and 50.7% of the historical cohort (P = 0.05). Incident location type did not differ between the two cohorts, specifically, there was no significant difference in the number of injuries that occurred at home in pandemic versus non-pandemic circumstances. Besides a decrease in the number of falls, the distribution of mechanisms of injury remained similar during the COVID-19 study period. There was no difference in self-inflicted injuries observed. Prehospital interventions remained similar during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to one year prior. Specifically, prehospital intubation did not differ between the two cohorts. The rate of COVID-19 positively tested HEMS personnel was 23.1%. Physicians who tested positive were unable to take call for a mean of 25 days (range 8–53). Conclusion A decrease in the number of deployments and increase in the number of cancelled missions was observed during the COVID-19 study period. No major differences in operational- and injury characteristics were found for HEMS and HEMS-ambulance dispatches between the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands and the same period one year prior. These findings highlight the importance of continued operability of the HEMS, even during pandemic circumstances. Level of evidence III, retrospective comparative study.

scholarly journals Efficacy of thrombolytics in patients with acute coronary syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vasin ◽  
O Mironova ◽  
V Fomin
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Optimal Choice ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Thrombolytic Drug ◽  
Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background/Introduction: The optimal choice of the thrombolytic drug for emergency revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) still remains to be defined. Percutaneous coronary intervention is a more safe and effective method of reperfusion compared with thrombolytic therapy, that’s why the last is relatively not common nowadays. But in the COVID-19 era in a number of cases some patients with ACS can’t be quickly hospitalized due to different reasons like the absence of the nearest available cardiovascular center, or lack of an ambulance. A long period of chest pain forces the doctors to use systemic thrombolytic therapy. Purpose This study investigates the efficacy and safety of Alteplase, Prourokinase, Tenecteplase, and Streptokinase in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Methods A retrospective, open, non-randomized cohort study was conducted. We have analysed 600 patients with ACS, who underwent systemic thrombolytic therapy at the prehospital and in-hospital stages from 2009 to 2011. Patients were divided into several groups according to the thrombolytic agent administered: Alteplase (254 patients), Prourokinase (309 patients), Tenecteplase (6 patients), Streptokinase (31 patients). Treatments were to be given as soon as possible. The ECG reperfusion criterion was a decrease in the ST segment by 50% or more from the initial elevation. Results  Among 600 patients (mean age, 61 years (SD = 20); 119 women [19.7%]), 440 had successful reperfusion. The median time from chest pain onset to the start of treatment was 3 hours (P < 0.001). The percentages of successful thrombolysis for each agent were similar: Alteplase 74,4% Prourokinase 71,2%, Tenecteplase 83%, Streptokinase 74,2%. No statistical differences were observed in thrombolytic results among these groups (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0,2868 to 1,217; P = 0.17). At the same time, the hospital treatment with prourokinase was more effective than prehospital care with prourokinase: 110 successful reperfusions in 138 patients (79.7%) and 110 successful reperfusions in 171 patients (64.3%), respectively. Regardless of the onset of the attack (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0,2004 to 0,9913; P = 0.05). The effectiveness of the other thrombolytics cannot be compared between prehospital care and hospital treatment due to the rare use at the hospital stage in our cases. In the study, there was also no statistical difference in complication rates among the treatment groups. Among all patients, there were 9 fatal outcomes (1.5%): Alteplase 3,15% Prourokinase 1,9%, Streptokinase 3,22%. Conclusion(s): In patients with ACS, all thrombolytic drugs showed similar effectiveness. There is no difference in the safety and efficacy among the agents in our study, but there is a difference in cost and route of administration. However, upcoming prospective trials with long follow-up periods might be expected to determine the most appropriate systemic thrombolytic drug.

scholarly journals Safe On-Boat Resuscitation by Lifeguards in COVID-19 Era: A Pilot Study Comparing Three Sets of Personal Protective Equipment

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Roberto Barcala-Furelos ◽  
Cristian Abelairas-Gómez ◽  
Alejandra Alonso-Calvete ◽  
Francisco Cano-Noguera ◽  
Aida Carballo-Fazanes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome ◽  
Personal Protective Equipment ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Preparation Time

Abstract Introduction: On-boat resuscitation can be applied by lifeguards in an inflatable rescue boat (IRB). Due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) and recommendations for the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), prehospital care procedures need to be re-evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine how the use of PPE influences the amount of preparation time needed before beginning actual resuscitation and the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; QCPR) on an IRB. Methods: Three CPR tests were performed by 14 lifeguards, in teams of two, wearing different PPE: (1) Basic PPE (B-PPE): gloves, a mask, and protective glasses; (2) Full PPE (F-PPE): B-PPE + a waterproof apron; and (3) Basic PPE + plastic blanket (B+PPE). On-boat resuscitation using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) and high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter was performed sailing at 20km/hour. Results: Using B-PPE takes less time and is significantly faster than F-PPE (B-PPE 17 [SD = 2] seconds versus F-PPE 69 [SD = 17] seconds; P = .001), and the use of B+PPE is slightly higher (B-PPE 17 [SD = 2] seconds versus B+PPE 34 [SD = 6] seconds; P = .002). The QCPR remained similar in all three scenarios (P >.05), reaching values over 79%. Conclusion: The use of PPE during on-board resuscitation is feasible and does not interfere with quality when performed by trained lifeguards. The use of a plastic blanket could be a quick and easy alternative to offer extra protection to lifeguards during CPR on an IRB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document