Masonry Buildings, Seismic Performance, and Eurocodes

Author(s):  
Miha Tomaževič
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Javed ◽  
Guido Magenes ◽  
Bashir Alam ◽  
Akhtar Naeem Khan ◽  
Qaisar Ali ◽  
...  

Unreinforced masonry buildings, constructed with stones or bricks, are common in the northern areas of Pakistan. In the October 2005 Kashmir earthquake, the seismic performance of stone masonry buildings was found to be poor, which was the primary source of fatalities. Unreinforced brick masonry (URBM) buildings, however, performed well even in severely jolted areas. The performance of URBM could have been much better if the affected buildings were constructed by using proper guidelines. Taking lessons from the disaster, an experimental investigation, based on typical geometry and precompression levels of the URBM shear walls in the affected region, was conducted to evaluate their seismic performance. Twelve walls were tested in the in-plane direction using quasi-static cyclic loading. First-story drift ratios for various performance levels in URBM buildings are proposed. The influences of relative precompression level and aspect ratio on the damage pattern, ultimate drift ratio, and equivalent viscous damping of the walls are examined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 106501
Author(s):  
Daniele Losanno ◽  
Nagavinothini Ravichandran ◽  
Fulvio Parisi ◽  
Andrea Calabrese ◽  
Giorgio Serino

2013 ◽  
Vol 139 (8) ◽  
pp. 1326-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Klingner ◽  
W. Mark McGinley ◽  
P. Benson Shing ◽  
David I. McLean ◽  
Seongwoo Jo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1_suppl1) ◽  
pp. 385-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Astroza ◽  
Ofelia Moroni ◽  
Svetlana Brzev ◽  
Jennifer Tanner

Engineered masonry, namely reinforced and confined masonry, has been widely used for housing construction in Chile over the last few decades. Most one- and two-story single-family masonry dwellings did not experience any damage due to the 27 February 2010 Maule earthquake, with the exception of a few dwellings of pre-1970 vintage, which suffered moderate damage. A similar statement can be made for three- and four-story confined masonry buildings: a large majority of buildings remained undamaged. However, several reinforced and partially confined three- and four-story masonry buildings suffered extensive damage, and two three-story partially confined buildings collapsed. The key damage patterns and the causes of damage are discussed in the paper. The extent of damage observed in the field was correlated with calculated vulnerability indices, and relevant recommendations were made related to the design and construction practices.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1157-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo B. Lourenço ◽  
Leonardo Avila ◽  
Graça Vasconcelos ◽  
J.Pedro Pedro Alves ◽  
Nuno Mendes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Luisa Beconcini ◽  
Paolo Cioni ◽  
Pietro Croce ◽  
Paolo Formichi ◽  
Filippo Landi ◽  
...  

<p>In nonlinear static analysis of masonry buildings, the hysteric behaviour of masonry walls is commonly idealized through a bi-linear resistance envelope defined by the lateral stiffness of the wall, the ultimate shear resistance and the ultimate inter-storey drift. Therefore, it becomes fundamental to properly set the modulus of elasticity and shear modulus for masonry as well as to properly evaluate the drift capacity of the walls.</p><p>In the paper, the combined influence of shear modulus and drift capacity definition on the assessment of seismic performance of masonry buildings is investigated in details by means of a simplified non-linear pushover type algorithm developed by the authors. In particular, two different definitions are considered for the drift capacity, in terms of ductility and in terms of percentage of the inter-storey height, while for the shear modulus a reasonable set of values is investigated according a database collected combining masonry test results available in the relevant scientific literature with an in situ experimental campaign carried out by the authors.</p><p>The results show how the variation in shear modulus can lead to conflicting outcomes for the evaluation of seismic performance of masonry buildings depending on the assumed definition of drift capacity.</p>


Mauerwerk ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Rosin ◽  
Christoph Butenweg ◽  
Pamela Cacciatore ◽  
Niklas Boesen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document