Systematic Literature Review of the Risk Management Process Literature for the Public Sector

2018 ◽  
pp. 865-882
Author(s):  
Eduardo Gomes Salgado ◽  
Fábio Henrique dos Anjos ◽  
Vinicius Nogueira da Silva ◽  
Maik de Souza ◽  
Tomás Dias Sant’Ana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Management Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Risk Management Process

scholarly journals The Manager Competences for Risk Management in the Public Sector

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 393-398
Author(s):  
Ivana Nekvapilova ◽  
Jaromir Pitas
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Management Process ◽  
Moral Competence ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
The Public ◽  
Research Organizations ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
New Situation

Abstract Implementation of risk management to the public sector in the Czech Republic presents itself to the new situation managers associated with many difficulties. These are primarily the ability to identify risks in public administration and ensure the proper functioning of their management process. The article aims to show the specifics of public administration in relation to the identification and risk management process and depending on the help of analogies derived from the model of key competences of managers necessary to successfully manage the entire process. In accordance with the stated aim of the text is divided into two main parts. In the competency model, emphasis is placed on the so-called Soft skills with focus on explaining the growing importance of moral competence in the risk management process, which is often neglected. This article was written as a part of the research project Development of Social Skills of a Soldier (LEADER_DZRO_K104), funded by institutional support which is intended for the development of research organizations in the Ministry of Defence (DZRO K- 104) funded from.

Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Maria Falkner ◽  
Martin R.W. Hiebl
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Risk Identification ◽  
The Body ◽  
Business Strategies ◽  
Management Process ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
Word Search

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review of available research evidence on risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The authors aim to reveal ambiguities, gaps and contradictions in the literature, and to sketch avenues for further research. Design/methodology/approach – The authors follow the tenets of Tranfield et al. (2003) for conducting a systematic literature review. Following a key word search and an assessment of fit for this review, 27 papers were analyzed with respect to bibliographical information, research design and findings. Findings – The review identified various types of risks that may occur in SMEs. In addition, the publication analysis demonstrates the importance of a risk management process in SMEs and that the characteristics of SME owners have a significant impact on their business strategies. Research limitations/implications – Additional empirical research on risk identification, risk analysis, strategy implementation and control in the SME risk management process is needed. Originality/value – This paper is the first comprehensive review of the body of literature on risk management in SMEs.

Ambiguity in public sector performance measurement: a systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Oppi ◽  
Cristina Campanale ◽  
Lino Cinquini
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Performance Measurement ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Academic Journal ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Study Results

PurposeThis paper presents a systematic literature review aiming at analysing how research has addressed performance measurement systems’ (PMSs) ambiguities in the public sector. This paper embraces the ambiguity perspective that PMSs in public sector coexist with and cope with existing ambiguities.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a literature review in Scopus and ScienceDirect, considering articles published since 1985, and the authors selected articles published in the journals included in the Association of Business Schools' Academic Journal Guide (Chartered ABS, 2018). Of the 1,278 abstracts that matched the study’s search criteria, the authors selected 131 articles for full reading and 37 articles for the final discussion.FindingsThe study's key findings concern the elements of ambiguity in PMSs discussed in the literature. The study’s results suggest that ambiguity is still a relevant problem in performance measurement, as a problem that is impossible to be solved and therefore needs to be better understood by researchers and public managers. The analysis allows us to summarize the antecedents and consequences of ambiguity in the public sector.Research limitations/implicationsThe key findings of the study concern the main sources of ambiguity in PMSs discussed in the literature, their antecedents and their consequences. The study results suggest that ambiguity exists in performance measurement and that is an issue to be handled with various strategies that can be implemented by managers and employees.Practical implicationsManagers and researchers may benefit from this research as it may represent a guideline to understand ambiguities in their organizations or in field research. Researchers may also benefit from a summary list of the key issues that have been analysed in the empirical cases provided by this research. Social implicationsThis research may provide insights to limit ambiguity and thus contribute to improve performance measurement in the public sector.Originality/valueThis research presents a comprehensive review on the topic. It provides insight that suggests what future research should attend to in helping to interpret ambiguity, considering also what should be done to influence ambiguity.

scholarly journals Analysis of the Risk Management Process on the Development of the Public Sector Information Technology Master Plan

Information ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Andrade deFreitas ◽  
Edna Canedo ◽  
Rodrigo Santos Felisdório ◽  
Heloise Leão
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Information And Communication Technology ◽  
Communication Technology ◽  
Master Plan ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Risk Management Process ◽  
Information And Communication

The Information and Communication Technology Master Plan—ICTMP—is an important tool for the achievement of the strategic business objectives of public and private organizations. In the public sector, these objectives are closely related to the provision of benefits to society. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) actions are present in all organizational processes and involves size-able budgets. The risks inherent in the planning of ICT actions need to be considered for ICT to add value to the business and to maximize the return on investment to the population. In this context, this work intends to examine the use of risk management processes in the development of ICTMPs in the Brazilian public sector.

scholarly journals Risk Management as a Process Security Tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Kiełbus ◽  
Dariusz Karpisz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Rapid Prototyping ◽  
International Project ◽  
Management Process ◽  
Process Safety ◽  
Successful Completion ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Risk Management Process

AbstractThe article presents the essence and significance of risk management processes in the project, as the key field for successful completion of the project, in the field of project management. Based on literature review, the methods and standards of risk management in the project as well as standards related to process safety were defined. The risk management process according to the PMBoK methodology was discussed as an example of an international project entitled 3DCentral – Catalyzing Smart Engineering and Rapid Prototyping.

Risk management in the public sector: a structured literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-223
Author(s):  
Enrico Bracci ◽  
Mouhcine Tallaki ◽  
Giorgia Gobbo ◽  
Luca Papi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Black Box ◽  
The Body ◽  
Research Knowledge ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Structured Literature Review

PurposeRisk management (RM) is receiving increasing academic and practitioner attention in the public sector. Despite this, there is a lack of systematization of this body of knowledge. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the state of art by examining the knowledge gaps and defining the emerging themes of RM in the public sector to guide future research agendas.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a structured literature review (SLR). They analyzed 63 papers, by using Scopus database, published from 1990 to 2018. All papers were categorized and analyzed according to 11 criteria defined by the literature.FindingsResults show that there is an increasing attention to RM with a need for more effort to consolidate research knowledge. Findings also established a lack of theorization, with a limited explanatory capacity of most studies. The paper defined four main areas for future developments to increase the body of knowledge. Namely, RM and managerial systems (i.e. MCSs and performance management), integrating RM systems and the building blocks of RM that the authors identify will also play a role in helping the authors to understand the diffusion of RM within public sector organizations.Originality/valueDespite the increasing attention to RM in the public sector, more research is required. Considering RM in public sector risks to be a “black box”, this paper revealed some new insights that could help to analyze better RM in the public sector, to open the black box and to avoid a symbolic use of the RM. In fact, integration with the managerial systems and the strengthening of the building block could help to exploit the potential of RM in the public sector.

Matrix organizations and cross-functional teams in the public sector: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko Pakarinen ◽  
Petri Juhani Virtanen
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Management Service ◽  
Typical Application ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Sector Organizations ◽  
Functional Teams ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the empirical research on matrix organizations and cross-functional teams (CFTs) in the public sector, focussing on typical application areas and settings and on motivation for deployment and evidence of utility. Design/methodology/approach This is a systematic literature review compiled from several electronic databases. Data cover the period from 1990 to 2015 and are confined to academic articles written in English. Findings Applications of the matrix approach in public sector organizations are found in human resource management and performance management, service development and public procurement, and creation of new organizations or organization reform and network organizations. While the proven utility of matrix organization is often unclear, especially CFTs are linked to better organizational performance, improved coordination, internal collaboration and development of cross-boundary tasks. Research limitations/implications Methodological limitations relate to excluded data due to non-accessible articles. Practical implications The findings have practical implications for public sector organizations in adapting to a changing environment. Originality/value This is the first systematic literature review of matrix management in public sector organizations.

scholarly journals Sector neutrality: A possible improvement of the accounting standards. Evidence from NZ model

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Marsigalia ◽  
Renato Giovannini
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Systematic Research ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Sector Accounting ◽  
Accounting Model

In May and June 2018, the Italian financial crisis (public debt) got back to the news when the new political government was going to be formed. Part of the literature claims that the public sector needed to be more "business-like" and that in order to do so, the adoption of "better", in this case "accrual", accounting was crucial. New Zealand is the pioneer country for accrual-based government accounting. More than ten years ago, when the adoption of IFRS was mandatory, New Zealand standard setters preserved sector neutrality in the financial reporting standards. Thanks to a systematic literature review, the paper investigates the evidence of NZ accounting sector neutrality model, with the purpose to assess if importing NZ public sector accounting model would be efficient for allowing a higher level of transparency in other countries such as Italy. The methodology is to define the economic literature relevant to the topic, considering the year of publication and the citation rate. Recently, standard setters in NZ decided to adopt a sector specific standard setting approach with multiple tiers for each sector. The for-profit sector will continue to follow IFRS but reporting standards for the public sector will be based on International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). Amongst the former contributes, no systematic research overview on public sector accounting has been created based on the NZ model. This article fills this void by providing a systematic literature review of 258 publications that examines five key aspects of the literature on the benchmark accounting model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document