Role of the host cell cycle in theAgrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation ofPetunia: Evidence of an S-phase control mechanism for T-DNA transfer

Planta ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estelle Villemont ◽  
Fr�d�ric Dubois ◽  
Rajbir S. Sangwan ◽  
G�rard Vasseur ◽  
Yvan Bourgeois ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 1288-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim Bourras ◽  
Thierry Rouxel ◽  
Michel Meyer

Agrobacterium species are soilborne gram-negative bacteria exhibiting predominantly a saprophytic lifestyle. Only a few of these species are capable of parasitic growth on plants, causing either hairy root or crown gall diseases. The core of the infection strategy of pathogenic Agrobacteria is a genetic transformation of the host cell, via stable integration into the host genome of a DNA fragment called T-DNA. This genetic transformation results in oncogenic reprogramming of the host to the benefit of the pathogen. This unique ability of interkingdom DNA transfer was largely used as a tool for genetic engineering. Thus, the artificial host range of Agrobacterium is continuously expanding and includes plant and nonplant organisms. The increasing availability of genomic tools encouraged genome-wide surveys of T-DNA tagged libraries, and the pattern of T-DNA integration in eukaryotic genomes was studied. Therefore, data have been collected in numerous laboratories to attain a better understanding of T-DNA integration mechanisms and potential biases. This review focuses on the intranuclear mechanisms necessary for proper targeting and stable expression of Agrobacterium oncogenic T-DNA in the host cell. More specifically, the role of genome features and the putative involvement of host’s transcriptional machinery in relation to the T-DNA integration and effects on gene expression are discussed. Also, the mechanisms underlying T-DNA integration into specific genome compartments is reviewed, and a theoretical model for T-DNA intranuclear targeting is presented.



2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (23) ◽  
pp. 8364-8373 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Veis ◽  
H. Klug ◽  
M. Koranda ◽  
G. Ammerer

ABSTRACT In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the periodic expression of the G2/M-specific gene CLB2 depends on a DNA binding complex that mediates its repression during G1 and activation from the S phase to the exit of mitosis. The switch from low to high expression levels depends on the transcriptional activator Ndd1. We show that the inactivation of the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex bypasses the essential role of Ndd1 in cell cycle progression. Sin3 and its catalytic subunit Rpd3 associate with the CLB2 promoter during the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Both proteins dissociate from the promoter at the onset of the S phase and reassociate during G2 phase. Sin3 removal coincides with a transient increase in histone H4 acetylation followed by the expulsion of at least one nucleosome from the promoter region. Whereas the first step depends on Cdc28/Cln1 activity, Ndd1 function is required for the second step. Since the removal of Sin3 is independent of Ndd1 recruitment and Cdc28/Clb activity it represents a unique regulatory step which is distinct from transcriptional activation.



2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2441-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Sansregret ◽  
Brigitte Goulet ◽  
Ryoko Harada ◽  
Brian Wilson ◽  
Lam Leduy ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The CDP/Cux transcription factor was previously found to acquire distinct DNA binding and transcriptional properties following a proteolytic processing event that takes place at the G1/S transition of the cell cycle. In the present study, we have investigated the role of the CDP/Cux processed isoform, p110, in cell cycle progression. Populations of cells stably expressing p110 CDP/Cux displayed a faster division rate and reached higher saturation density than control cells carrying the empty vector. p110 CDP/Cux cells reached the next S phase faster than control cells under various experimental conditions: following cell synchronization in G0 by growth factor deprivation, synchronization in S phase by double thymidine block treatment, or enrichment in G2 by centrifugal elutriation. In each case, duration of the G1 phase was shortened by 2 to 4 h. Gene inactivation confirmed the role of CDP/Cux as an accelerator of cell cycle progression, since mouse embryo fibroblasts obtained from Cutl1z/z mutant mice displayed a longer G1 phase and proliferated more slowly than their wild-type counterparts. The delay to enter S phase persisted following immortalization by the 3T3 protocol and transformation with H-RasV12. Moreover, CDP/Cux inactivation hindered both the formation of foci on a monolayer and tumor growth in mice. At the molecular level, expression of both cyclin E2 and A2 was increased in the presence of p110 CDP/Cux and decreased in its absence. Overall, these results establish that p110 CDP/Cux functions as a cell cycle regulator that accelerates entry into S phase.



Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 349-349
Author(s):  
Lina Li ◽  
Cynthia A. Presley ◽  
Bryan Kastl ◽  
Jose A. Cancelas

Abstract Contact between bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and osteoblast/stromal (OS) cells has been shown to be critical in the regulation of hematopoiesis. However, very little is known about the regulatory mechanisms of direct cell-to-cell communication in the hematopoietic microenvironment. BM cells are directly connected through gap junctions (GJs) which consist of narrow channels between contacting cells and are composed by connexins. Connexin 43 (Cx43) is expressed by BM OS cells. Multiple osteogenic defects have been reported in human Cx43 mutations and Cx43 has been shown to be essential in controlling osteoblast functions. Due to the perinatal death of Cx43 germline null mice, an interferon-inducible, conditional genetic approach (Mx1-Cre), expressed by both hematopoietic and stromal BM cells, was used to study the role of Cx43 in stem cell function. We have previously reported that Cx43 is critical for the interaction between stroma and HSC in CAFC assays (Cancelas J.A. et al., Blood 2000) and in adult hematopoiesis after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration (Presley C, et al., Cell Comm. Adh., 2005). Here, we observed that after 5-FU administration, Cx43 expression is predominantly located in the endosteum. To study the role of stroma-dependent Cx43 in hematopoiesis, we developed hematopoietic chimeras by BM transplantation of wild-type Cx43 HSC into stromal Cx43-deficient mice. Stromal Cx43 deficiency induced a severe impairment of blood cell formation during the recovery phase after 5-FU administration compared to stromal Mx1-Cre-Tg wild-type controls (Table 1), as well as a significant decrease in BM cellularity (~60% reduction) and progenitor cell content (~83% reduction). Cell cycle analysis of 5-FU-treated BM progenitors from stromal Cx43-deficient mice showed an S-phase arrest (S phase: 63.5%; G2/M phase: <1%) compared to wild-type chimeric mice (S phase: 38.6%, G2/M phase: 7.8%, p=0.01) suggesting a cell division blockade. Unlike Cx43-deficient primary mice, a differentiation arrest at the HSC compartment was observed in 5-FU-treated, stromal Cx43-deficient mice, since the content of competitive repopulating units (CRU) at 1 month, of 14-day post-5-FU BM of stromal Cx43-deficient mice was increased (27.7 ± 0.67) compared to recipients of HSC from stromal wild-type counterparts (26.5 ± 0.92 CRU, p < 0.01). Interestingly, wild-type hematopoietic progenitor homing in stromal Cx43-deficient BM was severely impaired with respect to wild-type BM (5.1% vs10.4 %, respectively, p < 0.01), while hematopoietic Cx43-deficient BM progenitors normally homed into the BM, suggesting a differential role for Cx43 in stromal and HSC. In conclusion, expression of Cx43 in osteoblasts and stromal cells appears to play a crucial role in the regulation of HSC homing in BM and hematopoietic regeneration after chemotherapy. Peripheral blood counts of WT and stromal Cx43-deficient chimeric mice after 5-FU administration (150 mg/Kg) Neutrophil counts (×10e9/L) Reticulocyte count (%) Day post-5-FU WT Cx43-deficient WT Cx43-deficient * p < 0.05 Day +8 2.89 ± 0.06 0.81 ± 0.02* 2.0 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.9 Day +11 9.11 ± 2.5 3.13 ± 0.8* 6.1 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.3* Day +14 6.22 ± 5.7 7.58 ± 8.2 7.5 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.5*



Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2687-2687
Author(s):  
Hengyou Weng ◽  
Huilin Huang ◽  
Xi Qin ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Okwang Kwon ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA cytosine methylation is one of the best-characterized epigenetic modifications that play important roles in diverse cellular and pathological processes. The mechanism underlying the dynamic regulation of the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) as well as the biological consequence of DNA methylation deregulation have been interesting research topics in recent years. TET1, first identified as a fusion partner of the histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is the founding member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family of DNA hydroxylases which are capable of converting 5mC to 5hmC (5-hydroxymethylcytosine) and lead to gene activation. Our group has previously demonstrated that TET1 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged leukemia (Huang H, et al. PNAS 2013; 110(29):11994-9). The expression of the TET1 protein and the global level of its enzymatic product, 5hmC, are significantly up-regulated in MLL-rearranged leukemia, whereas the opposite has been reported in other cancers where TET1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, a global understanding of the targets of TET1 in MLL-rearranged leukemia would greatly help to understand the role of TET1 in this specific type of AML. To this end, we performed proteomics study in parallel with RNA-seq to systematically explore the functional targets of TET1 in a genome-wide and unbiased way. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based proteomic profiling showed that when Tet1 was knocked down in MLL-ENL-estrogen receptor inducible (ERtm) mouse myeloid leukemia cells, a total of 123 proteins were down-regulated whereas 191 were up-regulated with a fold-change cutoff of 1.2 (Fig. 1A and B), representing positively and negatively regulated targets of TET1, respectively. Most of the proteins with altered expression upon Tet1 knock-down showed a corresponding change at the mRNA level as reflected by the RNA-seq data. Interestingly, gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated enrichment on genes associated with DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Among these genes, the minichromosome maintenance complex genes, including MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, and MCM7, showed significant downregulation when Tet1 expression was depleted. We further conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and demonstrated that TET1 binds directly to the CpG islands in the promoters of these MCM genes, suggesting that the regulation of the MCM genes by TET1 may occur at the transcriptional level. The six main minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM2-7) are recruited to DNA replication origins in early G1 phase of the cell cycle and constitute the core of the replicative DNA helicase. We showed that not only the total levels of the MCM2-7 proteins, but also their binding to chromatin (Fig. 1C), were decreased by shRNAs against TET1 in human leukemia cell lines. Examination on cell cycle distribution revealed a significant decrease in the S phase population upon TET1 knockdown (Fig. 1D), which could be phenocopied by silencing of individual MCM genes. Consistently, incorporation of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) into newly synthesized DNA in the S phase can be inhibited by TET1 shRNAs (Fig. 1E), indicating the inhibition on DNA replication by TET1 silencing. Furthermore, DNA combing assays suggest that TET1 knockdown inhibits new origin firing (Fig. 1F) but does not influence replication fork speed. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel role of TET1 on regulating DNA replication in MLL-rearranged leukemia through targeting of MCM genes and highlight the therapeutic implication of targeting the TET1/MCM signaling. Figure 1 Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Figure 1. Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.



Transcription ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaffer Ullah Zargar ◽  
Shweta Tyagi


2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (18) ◽  
pp. 9056-9064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Roberts ◽  
Sarah R. Kingsbury ◽  
Kai Stoeber ◽  
Gillian L. Knight ◽  
Phillip H. Gallimore ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Productive infections by human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are restricted to nondividing, differentiated keratinocytes. HPV early proteins E6 and E7 deregulate cell cycle progression and activate the host cell DNA replication machinery in these cells, changes essential for virus synthesis. Productive virus replication is accompanied by abundant expression of the HPV E4 protein. Expression of HPV1 E4 in cells is known to activate cell cycle checkpoints, inhibiting G2-to-M transition of the cell cycle and also suppressing entry of cells into S phase. We report here that the HPV1 E4 protein, in the presence of a soluble form of the replication-licensing factor (RLF) Cdc6, inhibits initiation of cellular DNA replication in a mammalian cell-free DNA replication system. Chromatin-binding studies show that E4 blocks replication initiation in vitro by preventing loading of the RLFs Mcm2 and Mcm7 onto chromatin. HPV1 E4-mediated replication inhibition in vitro and suppression of entry of HPV1 E4-expressing cells into S phase are both abrogated upon alanine replacement of arginine 45 in the full-length E4 protein (E1^E4), implying that these two HPV1 E4 functions are linked. We hypothesize that HPV1 E4 inhibits competing host cell DNA synthesis in replication-activated suprabasal keratinocytes by suppressing licensing of cellular replication origins, thus modifying the phenotype of the infected cell in favor of viral genome amplification.



1997 ◽  
Vol 150 (5) ◽  
pp. 528-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Miyake ◽  
Seiichiro Hasezawa ◽  
Toshiyuki Nagata


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gideon Grafi ◽  
Brian Larkins

The focus of this research project is to investigate the role of endoreduplication in maize endosperm development and the extent to which this process contributes to high levels of starch and storage protein synthesis. Although endoreduplication has been widely observed in many cells and tissues, especially those with high levels of metabolic activity, the molecular mechanisms through which the cell cycle is altered to produce consecutive cycles of S-phase without an intervening M-phase are unknown. Our previous research has shown that changes in the expression of several cell cycle regulatory genes coincide with the onset of endoreduplication. During this process, there is a sharp reduction in the activity of the mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and activation of the S-phase CDK. It appears the M-phase CDK is stable, but its activity is blocked by a proteinaceous inhibitor. Coincidentally, the S-phase checkpoint protein, retinoblastoma (ZmRb), becomes phosphorylated, presumably releasing an E2F-type transcriptional regulator which promotes the expression of genes responsible for DNA synthesis. To investigate the role of these cell cycle proteins in endoreduplication, we have created transgenic maize plants that express various genes in an endosperm-specific manner using a storage protein (g-zein) promoter. During the first year of the grant, we constructed point mutations of the maize M-phase kinase, p34cdc2. One alteration replaced aspartic acid at position 146 with asparagine (p3630-CdcD146N), while another changed threonine 161 to alanine (p3630-CdcT161A). These mutations abolish the activity of the CDK. We hypothesized that expression of the mutant forms of p34cdc2 in endoreduplicating endosperm, compared to a control p34cdc2, would lead to extra cycles of DNA synthesis. We also fused the gene encoding the regulatory subunit of the M- phase kinase, cyclin B, under the g-zein promoter. Normally, cyclin B is expected to be destroyed prior to the onset of endoreduplication. By producing high levels of this protein in developing endosperm, we hypothesized that the M-phase would be extended, potentially reducing the number of cycles of endoreduplication. Finally, we genetically engineered the wheat dwarf virus RepA protein for endosperm-specific expression. RepA binds to the maize retinoblastoma protein and presumably releases E2F-like transcription factors that activate DNA synthesis. We anticipated that inactivation of ZmRb by RepA would lead to additional cycles of DNA synthesis.



2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Xiang Wang ◽  
Hai-Xia Wang ◽  
Wei Na ◽  
Fei-Yue Qin ◽  
Zhi-Wei Zhang ◽  
...  

AbstractRetinoblastoma 1 (RB1) has been extensively studied in mammalian species, but its function in avian species is unclear. The objective of this study was to reveal the role of chicken RB1 (Gallus gallus RB1, gRB1) in the proliferation of preadipocytes. In the current study, quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that the expression levels of gRB1 transiently increased during the proliferation of preadipocytes. The MTT assay showed that gRB1 overexpression suppressed preadipocyte proliferation, and gRB1 interference promoted preadipocyte proliferation. Additionally, cell-cycle analysis indicated that gRB1 may play a crucial role in the G1/S transition. Consistently, gene expression analysis showed that gRB1 knockdown promoted marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKi67) expression at 96 h (P < 0.05), and that overexpression of gRB1 reduced MKi67 expression at 72 h (P < 0.05). Together, our study demonstrated that gRB1 inhibited preadipocyte proliferation at least in part by inhibiting the G1 to S phase transition.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document