Role of the bZIP transcription factor IREBF1 in the NGF induction of stromelysin-1 (transin) gene expression in PC12 cells

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita deSouza ◽  
Lora A. Nordstrom ◽  
Gary Ciment
2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 23.2-24
Author(s):  
Y. P. Tsao ◽  
F. Y. Tseng ◽  
C. W. Chao ◽  
M. H. Chen ◽  
S. T. Chen

Background:Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with diverse etiological factors. It was recognized that interferon (IFN) signature involved in the progress of SLE. NLRP12 (NOD-like receptor family (NLR) pyrin domain containing 12) is a pyrin containing NLR protein that we had linked its new biological function to the cross-regulation of Toll like receptor (TLRs) and Rig-I like receptor (RIG-I) pathways. NLPR12 acts as an innate immune check-point in regulating type I IFNs expression during TLRs and RIG-I activation. The importance of NLRP12 in lupus disease activity remained to be elucidated.Objectives:To clarify the role of NLRP12 in regulating the interferon signature.Methods:Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from SLE patients and healthy donors for analysis of NLRP12 and IFN-α gene expression by RT-QPCR. PBMCs were applied for Chromatin immuneprecipitation (ChIP) assay and electrical mobility shift assay (EMSA) to determine the putative transcription factor that regulates NLRP12 expression. An involvement of epigenetic regulation of NLRP12 expression in SLE patients was also analyzed. Bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were collected from wild type mouse and Nlrp12 knocked-out mice. Another CD14+ monocytes were isolated from 10 cases of lupus patients and 8 cases of healthy control, following by stimulating different type of nucleic acids, and IFN-α and IL-6 were measured with ELISA assay. CD14+ monocytes in lupus patients were also pre-treated with IFNAR2 antibody for further nucleic acid stimulation. Two mice models were applied for evaluation the role of Nlrp12: intraperitoneal injection of TMPD (2,6,10,14-tetramethylpentadecane, or pristane) in C57BL/6 mice and Faslpr mice. Both models were conducted with and without Nlrp12 knockout.Results:NLRP12 expression was significantly lower in PBMC isolated from SLE patients compared to healthy donors. The inverse correlation was observed in NLRP12 and IFNA gene expression as well as NLRP12 expression and amount of double-stranded DNA autoantibody in SLE patients. NLRP12 expression showed negative correlations with IFN-α treatment, as well as herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infection. Results from ChIP and EMSA analysis indicated a potential transcription factor 1 (TF-1) regulating NLRP12 promoter activity. TF-1 lead to transcriptional suppression of NLRP12 in SLE PBMC, and it was gradually induced after IFN treatment. Recruitment of TF-1 to NLRP12 promoter in SLE PBMC compared to the healthy PBMC was detected, and increased when treating with IFN. Human CD14+ monocytes collected from lupus and healthy control stimulating with different type of nucleic acids revealing significant increasing level of IFN-α and IL-6 in lupus patients. Among animal models, both pristine induced mice and Faslpr mice revealed increasing autoantibodies production and severity of glomerulonephritis in Nlrp12-/- group in comparison with Nlrp12+/+ ones, indicating the role of NLRP12 in maintaining positive interferon signature as well as disease activity.Conclusion:Expression level of NLRP1.2 has been demonstrated to be a biomarker of disease activity in SLE patients. The NLRP12 was involved in the interferon signature, which was also negatively regulated by TF-1. Both clinical samples and animal models revealed NLRP12 in maintaining the positive interferon signature, indicating the possible role of exacerbating factor for lupus disease activity.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kulisara Marupanthorn ◽  
Chairat Tantrawatpan ◽  
Pakpoom Kheolamai ◽  
Duangrat Tantikanlayaporn ◽  
Sirikul Manochantr

AbstractMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are important in regenerative medicine because of their potential for multi-differentiation. Bone marrow, chorion and placenta have all been suggested as potential sources for clinical application. However, the osteogenic differentiation potential of MSCs derived from chorion or placenta is not very efficient. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) plays an important role in bone development. Its effect on osteogenic augmentation has been addressed in several studies. Recent studies have also shown a relationship between miRNAs and osteogenesis. We hypothesized that miRNAs targeted to Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), a major transcription factor of osteogenesis, are responsible for regulating the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts. This study examines the effect of BMP-2 on the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs isolated from chorion and placenta in comparison to bone marrow-derived MSCs and investigates the role of miRNAs in the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs from these sources. MSCs were isolated from human bone marrow, chorion and placenta. The osteogenic differentiation potential after BMP-2 treatment was examined using ALP staining, ALP activity assay, and osteogenic gene expression. Candidate miRNAs were selected and their expression levels during osteoblastic differentiation were examined using real-time RT-PCR. The role of these miRNAs in osteogenesis was investigated by transfection with specific miRNA inhibitors. The level of osteogenic differentiation was monitored after anti-miRNA treatment. MSCs isolated from chorion and placenta exhibited self-renewal capacity and multi-lineage differentiation potential similar to MSCs isolated from bone marrow. BMP-2 treated MSCs showed higher ALP levels and osteogenic gene expression compared to untreated MSCs. All investigated miRNAs (miR-31, miR-106a and miR148) were consistently downregulated during the process of osteogenic differentiation. After treatment with miRNA inhibitors, ALP activity and osteogenic gene expression increased over the time of osteogenic differentiation. BMP-2 has a positive effect on osteogenic differentiation of chorion- and placenta-derived MSCs. The inhibition of specific miRNAs enhanced the osteogenic differentiation capacity of various MSCs in culture and this strategy might be used to promote bone regeneration. However, further in vivo experiments are required to assess the validity of this approach.


Life Sciences ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 83 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solomon S. Solomon ◽  
Gipsy Majumdar ◽  
Antonio Martinez-Hernandez ◽  
Rajendra Raghow

2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (15) ◽  
pp. 2705-2713
Author(s):  
K. Sawada ◽  
Y. Konishi ◽  
M. Tominaga ◽  
Y. Watanabe ◽  
J. Hirano ◽  
...  

In all vertebrate species, the homeobox gene goosecoid serves as a marker of the Spemann organizer tissue. One function of the organizer is the induction of neural tissue. To investigate the role of goosecoid in neuronal differentiation of mammalian cells, we have introduced goosecoid into PC12 cells. Expression of goosecoid resulted in reduced cell proliferation and enhanced neurite outgrowth in response to NGF. Expression of goosecoid led to a decrease in the percentage of S-phase cells and to upregulation of the expression of the neuron-specific markers MAP-1b and neurofilament-L. Analysis of goosecoid mutants revealed that these effects were independent of either DNA binding or homodimerization of Goosecoid. Coexpression of the N-terminal portion of the ets transcription factor PU.1, a protein that can bind to Goosecoid, repressed neurite outgrowth and rescued the proliferation of PC12 cultures. In contrast, expression of the bHLH transcription factor HES-1 repressed goosecoid-mediated neurite outgrowth without changing the proportion of S-phase cells. These results suggest that goosecoid is involved in neuronal differentiation in two ways, by slowing the cell cycle and stimulating neurite outgrowth, and that these two events are separately regulated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (20) ◽  
pp. 9893-9902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Uyehara ◽  
Daniel J. McKay

The ecdysone pathway was among the first experimental systems employed to study the impact of steroid hormones on the genome. In Drosophila and other insects, ecdysone coordinates developmental transitions, including wholesale transformation of the larva into the adult during metamorphosis. Like other hormones, ecdysone controls gene expression through a nuclear receptor, which functions as a ligand-dependent transcription factor. Although it is clear that ecdysone elicits distinct transcriptional responses within its different target tissues, the role of its receptor, EcR, in regulating target gene expression is incompletely understood. In particular, EcR initiates a cascade of transcription factor expression in response to ecdysone, making it unclear which ecdysone-responsive genes are direct EcR targets. Here, we use the larval-to-prepupal transition of developing wings to examine the role of EcR in gene regulation. Genome-wide DNA binding profiles reveal that EcR exhibits widespread binding across the genome, including at many canonical ecdysone response genes. However, the majority of its binding sites reside at genes with wing-specific functions. We also find that EcR binding is temporally dynamic, with thousands of binding sites changing over time. RNA-seq reveals that EcR acts as both a temporal gate to block precocious entry to the next developmental stage as well as a temporal trigger to promote the subsequent program. Finally, transgenic reporter analysis indicates that EcR regulates not only temporal changes in target enhancer activity but also spatial patterns. Together, these studies define EcR as a multipurpose, direct regulator of gene expression, greatly expanding its role in coordinating developmental transitions.


2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanobu Sato ◽  
Kousuke Kitahara ◽  
Takao Susa ◽  
Takako Kato ◽  
Yukio Kato

Recently, we have reported that a Prophet of Pit-1 homeodomain factor, Prop-1, is a novel transcription factor for the porcine follicle-stimulating hormone β subunit (FSHβ) gene. This study subsequently aimed to examine the role of Prop-1 in the gene expression of two other porcine gonadotropin subunits, pituitary glycoprotein hormone α subunit (αGSU), and luteinizing hormone β subunit (LHβ). A series of deletion mutants of the porcine αGSU (up to −1059 bp) and LHβ (up to −1277 bp) promoters were constructed in the reporter vector, fused with the secreted alkaline phosphatase gene (pSEAP2-Basic). Transient transfection studies using GH3 cells were carried out to estimate the activation of the porcine αGSU and LHβ promoters by Prop-1, which was found to activate the αGSU promoter of −1059/+12 bp up to 11.7-fold but not the LHβ promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay and DNase I footprinting analysis revealed that Prop-1 binds to six positions, −1038/−1026, −942/−928, −495/−479, −338/−326, −153/−146, and −131/−124 bp, that comprise the A/T cluster. Oligonucleotides of six Prop-1 binding sites were directly connected to the minimum promoter of αGSU, fused in the pSEAP2-Basic vector, followed by transfecting GH3 cells to determine the cis-acting activity. Finally, we concluded that at least five Prop-1 binding sites are the cis-acting elements for αGSU gene expression. The present results revealed a notable feature of the proximal region, where three Prop-1-binding sites are close to and/or overlap the pituitary glycoprotein hormone basal element, GATA-binding element, and junctional regulatory element. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the role of Prop-1 in the regulation of αGSU gene expression. These results, taken together with our previous finding that Prop-1 is a transcription factor for FSHβ gene, confirm that Prop-1 modulates the synthesis of FSH at the transcriptional level. On the other hand, the defects of Prop-1 are known to cause dwarfism and combined pituitary hormone deficiency accompanying hypogonadism. Accordingly, the present observations provide a novel view to understand the hypogonadism caused by Prop-1 defects at the molecular level through the regulatory mechanism of αGSU and FSHβ gene expressions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document