Recall bias and major depression lifetime prevalence

2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott B. Patten
2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Elisabeth Kruijshaar ◽  
Jan Barendregt ◽  
Theo Vos ◽  
Ron de Graaf ◽  
Jan Spijker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Kiewa ◽  
Samantha Meltzer-Brody ◽  
Jeanette Milgrom ◽  
Elizabeth Bennett ◽  
Tracey Mackle ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundHistory of psychiatric disorders, particularly depression, is the strongest risk factor for perinatal depression (PND). Yet many women without such history experience their first depression episode perinatally, whilst other women with depression history do not experience any episodes during the perinatal period. PND may itself be heterogenous, according to differences in psychiatric history. However, a comprehensive investigation of characteristics of women with PND, with and without a prior psychiatric history, has not been attempted.MethodsIn a large sample of parous women with depression, we sought to identify risk factors associated with PND after previous depression episodes, or as first-onset depression. Using data from the Australian Genetics of Depression Study, we identified two subgroups of PND cases (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score >= 13) with and without prior depression history. For both subgroups, we investigated lifetime prevalence, length and severity of PND. Logistic regression compared a range of characteristics of cases to those of a comparison group with major depression without any perinatal episodes. ResultsCriteria for PND was met by 5,058 (70%) of 7,182 parous women who met criteria for major depression. Of women reporting depression onset before first pregnancy, 2,261 (77%) PND cases were compared to 672 (23%) without PND. Among women reporting their first depression episode during or after their first pregnancy, 878 women for whom this first episode was PND were compared to 2,124 parous women who had experienced depression but never perinatally. Of women who experienced depression prior to first pregnancy, PND cases were significantly more likely to report more episodes of depression (OR=1.1 per additional depression episode, CI=[1.1-1.1], P=1.3E-13), non-European ancestry (OR=1.8, CI=[1.3-2.5], P=1.2E-03), severe nausea during pregnancy (OR=1.3, CI=[1.1-1.6], P=6.6E-03) and emotional abuse (OR=1.4, CI=[1.1-1.7], P=2.0E-03). Women without any depression before their first perinatal episode were significantly more likely to report emotional abuse (OR=1.3, CI=[1.1-1.6], P=1.1E-02) than women with depression without PND.ConclusionsThe majority of parous women in this study experienced PND, associated with more complex, severe depression. Results highlight the importance of perinatal assessments of depressive symptoms, particularly for women with a history of depression or childhood adverse experiences.


1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Bellodi ◽  
M Battaglia ◽  
G Diaferia ◽  
A Draisci ◽  
G Sciuto

SummaryWe assessed the lifetime prevalence of major depression in a sample of 145 patients with a current diagnosis of panic disorder and/or social phobia. The prevalenee tended to be higher in patients with both diagnoses. Patients with panic disorder and social phobia had an earlier onset of the former condition. Familial rates of panic were higher in patients with pure panic disorder, and the rate of depression was increased in relatives of probands who had a lifetime diagnosis of depression.


Diabetes Care ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Marcus ◽  
R. R. Wing ◽  
J. Guare ◽  
E. H. Blair ◽  
A. Jawad

2000 ◽  
Vol 177 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey D. Wade ◽  
Cynthia M. Bulik ◽  
Kenneth S. Kendler

BackgroundPrevious studies have found that the reliability of the lifetime prevalence of bulimia nervosa is low to moderate. However, the reasons for poor reliability remain unknown.AimsWe investigated the ability of a range of variables to predict reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of reporting of both bulimia nervosa and major depression.MethodTwo interviews, approximately 5 years apart, were completed with 2163 women from the Virginia Twin Registry.ResultsAfter accounting for different base rates, bulimia nervosa was shown to be as reliably reported as major depression. Consistent with previous studies of major depression, improved reliability of bulimia nervosa reporting is associated with more severe bulimic symptomatology.ConclusionsFrequent binge eating and the presence of salient behavioural markers such as vomiting and laxative misuse are associated with more reliable reporting of bulimia nervosa. In the absence of the use of fuller forms of assessment, brief interviews should utilise more than one prompt question, thus increasing the probability that memory of past disorders will be more successfully activated and accessed.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Kececi ◽  
S Dener ◽  
E Analan

The aim of the present study was to estimate the co-morbidity of migraine and major depression in the Turkish population. The households were selected randomly from all district areas. The study included 947 subjects aged ≥ 18 years. The diagnosis of migraine was made according to the criteria of the International Headache Society. The diagnosis of major depression was made according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria. Migraine was identified in 163 subjects. Major depression was identified in 155 subjects, and in 53 subjects with migraine. The lifetime prevalence of major depression was approximately three times higher in persons with migraine in this Turkish population.


1995 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G Carta ◽  
B Carpiniello ◽  
V Kovess ◽  
R Porcedda ◽  
A Zedda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melike Yildirim ◽  
Bradley N Gaynes ◽  
Pinar Keskinocak ◽  
Brian W Pence ◽  
Julie Swann

AbstractBackgroundMajor depression is a treatable disease, and untreated depression can lead to serious health complications. Therefore, prevention, early identification, and treatment efforts are essential. Natural history models can be utilized to make informed decisions about interventions and treatments of major depression.MethodsWe propose a natural history model of major depression. We use steady-state analysis to study the discrete-time Markov chain model. For this purpose, we solved differential equations and tested the parameter and transition probabilities empirically.ResultsWe showed that bias in parameters might collectively cause a significant mismatch in a model. If incidence is correct, then lifetime prevalence is 33.2% for females and 20.5% for males, which is higher than reported values. If prevalence is correct, then incidence is .0008 for females and .00065 for males, which is lower than reported values. The model can achieve feasibility if incidence is at low levels and recall bias of the lifetime prevalence is quantified to be 31.9% for females and 16.3% for males.LimitationsModel is limited to major depression, and patients who have other types of depression are assumed healthy. We assume that transition probabilities (except incidence rates) are correct.ConclusionWe constructed a preliminary model for the natural history of major depression. We determine the lifetime prevalence are underestimated. We conclude that the average incidence rates may be underestimated for males. Our findings mathematically prove the arguments around the potential discordance between reported incidence and lifetime prevalence rates.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Heidi Splete
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document