scholarly journals Increased expression of adenosine 2A receptors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is associated with poorer response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents and anti-PD-1/Anti-CTLA4 antibodies and shorter survival

Author(s):  
Takao Kamai ◽  
Toshiki Kijima ◽  
Toyonori Tsuzuki ◽  
Akinori Nukui ◽  
Hideyuki Abe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adenosine and its adenosine 2A receptors (A2AR) mediate the immunosuppressive mechanism by which tumors escape immunosurveillance and impede anti-tumor immunity within the tumor microenvironment. However, we do not know whether the adenosine pathway (CD39/CD73/A2AR) plays a role in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Therefore, we studied the role of immunosuppression in RCC by assessing the adenosine pathway in patients with RCC treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents or immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) or both. Methods In 60 patients with metastatic RCC, we examined the expression of CD39, CD73, A2AR, and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemically in surgically resected tumor tissues and studied the clinicopathological characteristics of these patients. Patients were treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy with systemic therapy with anti-VEGF agent or a combination of the ICIs anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibody and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody. Results Increased expression of A2AR in the primary tumors was associated with metastatic profiles. Patients treated with anti–PD-1 antibody in monotherapy, a combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies, or anti-VEGF agents showed better response and longer overall survival if the primary tumor had higher PD-L1 expression and lower A2AR expression. In Cox multivariate regression analysis, higher expression of A2AR was associated with shorter overall survival. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the expression of A2AR and PD-L1 in the primary tumors in RCC might predict the outcomes of treatment with anti-VEGF agents and ICIs and that the A2AR pathway might be a molecular target for immunotherapy.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (34) ◽  
pp. 5794-5799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Y.C. Heng ◽  
Wanling Xie ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Mark A. Warren ◽  
Ali Reza Golshayan ◽  
...  

Purpose There are no robust data on prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) –targeted therapy. Methods Baseline characteristics and outcomes on 645 patients with anti-VEGF therapy–naïve metastatic RCC were collected from three US and four Canadian cancer centers. Cox proportional hazards regression, followed by bootstrap validation, was used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS. Results The median OS for the whole cohort was 22 months (95% CI, 20.2 to 26.5 months), and the median follow-up was 24.5 months. Overall, 396, 200, and 49 patients were treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, and bevacizumab, respectively. Four of the five adverse prognostic factors according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were independent predictors of short survival: hemoglobin less than the lower limit of normal (P < .0001), corrected calcium greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN; P = .0006), Karnofsky performance status less than 80% (P < .0001), and time from diagnosis to treatment of less than 1 year (P = .01). In addition, neutrophils greater than the ULN (P < .0001) and platelets greater than the ULN (P = .01) were independent adverse prognostic factors. Patients were segregated into three risk categories: the favorable-risk group (no prognostic factors; n = 133), in which median OS (mOS) was not reached and 2-year OS (2y OS) was 75%; the intermediate-risk group (one or two prognostic factors; n = 301), in which mOS was 27 months and 2y OS was 53%; and the poor-risk group (three to six prognostic factors; n = 152), in which mOS was 8.8 months and 2y OS was 7% (log-rank P < .0001). The C-index was 0.73. Conclusion This model validates components of the MSKCC model with the addition of platelet and neutrophil counts and can be incorporated into patient care and into clinical trials that use VEGF-targeted agents.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeany Q. Li ◽  
Ulrich Kellner ◽  
Birgit Lorenz ◽  
Andreas Stahl ◽  
Tim U. Krohne

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Durch Verbesserungen in der neonatologischen Versorgung von Frühgeborenen und die Entwicklung neuer Behandlungsmöglichkeiten der Frühgeborenenretinopathie („retinopathy of prematurity“ [ROP]) haben sich die Anforderungen an das ROP-Screening seit der Veröffentlichung der letzten Fassung der deutschen Leitlinie zum ROP-Screening im Jahr 2008 verändert. Auf Grundlage aktueller Studiendaten wurde die Leitlinie in 2020 grundlegend überarbeitet und in einer aktualisierten Fassung veröffentlicht. Ziel Dieser Artikel fasst die wichtigsten Änderungen in der neuen Leitlinie zusammen. Ergebnisse Die Altersgrenze für einen Screeningeinschluss wurde für Kinder ohne zusätzliche Risikofaktoren auf ein Gestationsalter von unter 31 Wochen gesenkt. Die Mindestdauer für eine Sauerstoffsupplementation, die einen Einschluss in das Screening bei Frühgeborenen erforderlich macht, wurde auf über 5 Tage angehoben. Eine Behandlung bei ROP in Zone II kann nun schon bei jedem Stadium 3 mit Plus-Symptomatik unabhängig von der Anzahl der betroffenen Uhrzeiten erfolgen. Für die Nachkontrollen nach Anti-VEGF („vascular endothelial growth factor“)-Therapie wurden Kriterien zur Frequenz und Dauer definiert. Das verbindliche Dokument für diese und weitere neue Empfehlungen ist die Leitlinie selber. Schlussfolgerungen Die Empfehlungen der Leitlinie ermöglichen eine zuverlässige Identifikation von Kindern mit ROP-Risiko für den Einschluss in das Screening und eine rechtzeitige Erkennung fortgeschrittener Krankheitsstadien für die Therapieeinleitung, um so Erblindung durch ROP zu verhindern.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maisarah Jalalonmuhali ◽  
Tengku Ain Fathlun Tengku Kamalden ◽  
Nurul 'Ain Sham Ismail ◽  
See Yen Yong ◽  
Wei Ting Teo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Intravenous (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) is a potent anti-angiogenic factor for the treatment of solid tumours. While, intravitreal anti-VEGF injection is used in the treatment for macular and retinal diseases. The effects of IV anti-VEGF agents are well documented to cause hypertension, renal impairment and proteinuria. However only few reports showed the significance of intravitreal anti-VEGF injection causing minimal change disease (MCD) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Hence, this study is to determine the outcome of renal function following intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. Method This is a prospective, cross sectional study recruiting patients from ophthalmology day-care operation theatre that were scheduled for intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). On the day of the injection of anti-VEGF, patients’ demographic data (age, gender, medical background, medications), blood pressure, height, weight and investigations for serum creatinine and urine protein creatinine ratio (PCR) were collected. Following these, they will receive the intravitreal anti-VEGF as per schedule. All these patients were given a follow-up within 72hours to reassess blood pressure, serum creatinine and urine PCR. Results A total of 90 patients were recruited. However, 15 patients were subsequently excluded as there was no repeated serum creatinine at 72-hours post treatment. Their mean age was 67.25 ± 10.41. Among all, 3 patients had significance increased in serum creatinine (4%) with significance changed of urine PCR post treatment. Table 1 showed baseline parameters prior to treatment and table 2 was post treatment parameters. Higher serum creatinine and proteinuria pre intravitreal anti-VEGF were identified to have higher OR of 1.018 (95% CI 1.001-1.035) (p=0.043) and OR 1.004 (1.000-1.007) (p=0.025) respectively among those who developed AKI. In assessing the association between higher pre-treatment creatinine and proteinuria (independent variable) and development of AKI (dependent variable) estimated by logistic regression with no AKI as a reference group we found that there were no significance. Conclusion Following intravitreal anti-VEGF administration, there were no significant changes in blood pressure. However, 4% from our cohort had AKI and worsening proteinuria at 72 hours post treatment. These patients had higher serum creatinine and proteinuria prior to treatment. However, our study is underpowered to establish the relationship between intravitreal anti-VEGF and development of AKI. Further study with larger sample size and longer-term outcome is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document