Is there any predictor for clinical outcome in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs?

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 1063-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Yun Lee ◽  
Sung Hee Lim ◽  
Moonjin Kim ◽  
Sungmin Kim ◽  
Hyun Ae Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of BIM Deletion in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients Treated with EGFR-TKIs: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Fangfang Lv ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Qiuping Yang ◽  
Zheng Pan ◽  
Yuhua Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Deletion Polymorphism ◽  
Asian Populations ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Background. Resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is inevitable in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A germline 2903 bp deletion polymorphism of Bcl-2-like protein 11 (BIM) causes reduced expression of proapoptotic BH3-only BIM protein and blocks TKI-induced apoptosis of tumor cells. Yet the association between the deletion polymorphism and response to EGFR-TKI treatment remains inconsistent among clinical observations. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis. Methods. Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases prior to March 31, 2021. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated by using a random effects model. Sensitivity, metaregression, and publication bias analyses were also performed. Results. A total of 20 datasets (3003 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving EGFR-TKIs from 18 studies) were included. There were 475 (15.8%) patients having the 2903-bp intron deletion of BIM and 2528 (84.2%) wild-type patients. BIM deletion predicted significantly shorter PFS ( HR = 1.35 , 95% CI: 1.10-1.64, P = 0.003 ) and a tendency toward an unfavorable OS ( HR = 1.22 , 95% CI: 0.99-1.50, P = 0.068 ). Patients with deletion polymorphism had lower ORR ( OR = 0.60 , 95% CI: 0.42-0.85, P = 0.004 ) and DCR ( OR = 0.59 , 95% CI: 0.38-0.90, P = 0.014 ) compared with those without deletion. Conclusion. BIM deletion polymorphism may confer resistance to EGFR-TKIs and can be used as a biomarker to predict treatment response to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients from Asian populations.

The combination of EGFR-TKIs and anlotinib as a first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9030-9030
Author(s):  
Zhiyong He ◽  
Jinghui Lin ◽  
Yueming He ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Dongyong Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

9030 Background: Currently,EGFR-TKIs are widely accepted as the standard treatment for EGFR- mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, acquired resistance is inevitable. Combination therapy is considered as a strategy to overcome the resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Anlotinib, a novel multi-targeting, small-molecule TKI, has shown active to suppress tumor angiogenesis and growth. However, there is still a lack of evidence supporting the use of EGFR-TKIs in combination with anlotinib for the treatment of NSCLC until now. A multi-center, single-arm, phase II clinical trial was therefore designed to examine the efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs combined with anlotinib for treatment-naïve, advanced NSCLC patients, and unravel the possible mechanisms. Methods: This study was conducted in 14 research centers in Fujian, China. The main eligibility criteria were stage IV or relapsed nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion,, and L858R), ECOG score 0-2,and age 20 to 75 years and no previous systemic treatment. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases were admitted.Eligible patients were given gefitinib (250 mg QD) or icotinib (125 mg TID) in combination with anlotinib (10 mg per day, on days 1‒14; 21 days per cycle) until disease progression. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, and the secondary endpoint is overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).Peripheral blood was sampled pre-treatment, once every two months during treatment and after disease progression, and T790M mutation was detected in plasma ctDNA using a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay. Results: Of 60 patients enrolled (August 2, 2018 to May 28, 2020). As of February 1, 2021, 37 patients (61.7%) experienced PFS events and 10 (16.7%) died. The ORR was 78.3%, and the DCR was100%.Median PFS was 13.0 months (95%CI,10.7-15.3).The 5 most common treatment-related adverse events included rash (63.3%), fatigue (55.0%), hypertension (48.3%), diarrhea (33.3%) and hand-foot syndrome (30.0%), and grade 3 adverse events included hypertension (5.0%), rash (1.67%), hypertriglyceridemia (1.67%), vomiting (1.67%) and elevated ALT (1.67%); no grade 4 adverse events or drug-related deaths were observed. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 36 patients pre-treatment, and 30.6% were identified with low-frequency de novo T790M mutations, with the mutation-allele frequency (MAF) ranging from 0.01% to 0.28%. Conclusions: The combination of the first-generation EGFR-TKIs and anlotinib shows impressive ORR and DCR, and acceptable toxicity in treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with activating EGFR mutations, and we observed a high proportion of patients harboring de novo EGFR T790M mutations in this study. Clinical trial information: NCT03720873.

Effect of BIM and mTOR expression on clinical outcome to erlotinib in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8072-8072
Author(s):  
Niki Karachaliou ◽  
Ana Drozdowskyj ◽  
Ana Gimenez Capitan ◽  
Andres Felipe Cardona Zorrilla ◽  
Radj Gervais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients

BIM and SHP2 expression levels to predict clinical outcome to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19078-e19078
Author(s):  
Rosario Garcia Campelo ◽  
Teresa Moran ◽  
Felipe Cardenal ◽  
Guillermo Alonso-Jaudenes Curbera ◽  
Enric Carcereny Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients

ctDNA resistance landscape of lazertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9601-9601
Author(s):  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Egfr Amplification ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
In Cis ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

9601 Background: While EGFR mutant ( EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients usually experience improved clinical benefit with EGFR TKIs, most eventually progress. Understanding mechanisms of resistance (MoR) may allow for more personalized treatment. Lazertinib is an irreversible third generation EGFR TKI for which MoR are unknown. Obtaining sufficient tumor tissue for genotyping at progression is often difficult. Therefore, we utilized plasma ctDNA from patients treated with lazertinib to explore MoR. Methods: Plasma samples from 47 NSCLC patients in the phase 2 trial of lazertinib (NCT03046992) were collected at screening and progressive disease (PD) and underwent ctDNA NGS of 74 genes using Guarant360. All patients were positive for an EGFR Ex19del or L858R ( EGFRm) and T790M by tissue testing at screening. Acquired, nonsynonymous, characterized mutations detected in a PD sample but not in the screening sample from the respective patient were considered putative MoR, excluding aneuploidy. Patients with detectable plasma EGFRm and/or T790M at screening were evaluable. Results: ctDNA was detected in 47 (100%) screening samples and 43/45 (96%) PD samples (two failed sequencing). An EGFRm was detected in 85% of patients at screening (n = 40), 38 of which had PD ctDNA results and were included in analysis. T790M was detected in 30 patients at screening and subsequently not detected at PD in 21 of these patients, 55% of all 38 included patients. Among the ten patients with T790M detected at PD, on-target MoR were detected in 7 (18% of all included patients) including EGFR C797S (n = 3, 8%), EGFR amplification (n = 3, 8%), and EGFR T854A (n = 1, 3%). All C797S were in cis with T790M. No on-target MoR were detected in patients without T790M detected at PD. Off-target MoR were seen in 34% of patients (13/38) including mutations in PIK3CA (13%; 2 E545K, 2 E542K, 1 E81K), ERBB2 (5%; 1 D769H, 1 V777L), KRAS (3%; 1 G12C), and BRAF (3%; 1 G469A). Gene amplifications were detected in CCND1 (n = 1, 3%) , CCNE1 (n = 2, 5%) , ERBB2 (n = 1, 3%) , FGFR1 (n = 1, 3%) , MET (n = 4, 11%) , and PIK3CA (n = 1, 3%), with some patients having multiple MoR. Conclusions: The spectrum of MoR identified in this cohort of patients treated with lazertinib is similar to that reported in other third generation EGFR TKIs, but with some differences in frequencies. The most common resistance mechanisms are T790M loss and PIK3CA alterations which may address the mechanism of action. Our findings suggest putative MoR of lazertinib and show that ctDNA NGS is an effective way to identify MoR in patients progressing on targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03046992 .

scholarly journals Predictors of Outcomes in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Buonerba ◽  
Simona Iaccarino ◽  
Pasquale Dolce ◽  
Martina Pagliuca ◽  
Michela Izzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
L858r Mutation ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Some commonly available patient or disease characteristics may be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving EGFR-TKIs (epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) to explore differences in outcomes associated with EGFR-TKIs among subgroups of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Pooled HRs for progression or death (PFS-HRs) and pooled HRs for death (OS-HRs) were compared among sub-groups defined according to baseline clinical and demographic variables as well as type of EGFR mutation. In the entire assessable population of 4465 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, significant interactions with PFS were found for gender (males vs. females; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.2; 95% CI 1.12–1.56), smoking history (smokers vs. non-smokers; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.26; 95% CI 1.05–1.51), and type of EGFR mutation (patients with exon 21 L858R mutation vs. exon 19 deletion; pooled ratio of the PFS-HRs = 1.39; 95% CI 1.18–1.63). Male patients, smokers and patients with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation may derive less benefit from EGFR-TKIs compared to female patients, non-smokers and patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion.

scholarly journals Hypothesis generative head-to-head study comparing efficacy of afatinib and osimertinib based on immunological biomarkers in Japanese NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (Heat on Beat study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592096725
Author(s):  
Kei Morikawa ◽  
Hisashi Tanaka ◽  
Hidetoshi Itani ◽  
Saori Takata ◽  
Satoshi Watanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Background: In the FLAURA trial, superiority of osimertinib over the standard of care (SOC) was not demonstrated in Asian patients; SOC seemed favorable among Japanese patients (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 0.82–2.33). Three reasons are suggested: since rechallenge with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is covered by health insurance in Japan, EGFR-TKI rechallenge rate was higher in SOC than in the osimertinib group, which resulted in a long-term sequential administration of EGFR-TKIs; treatment discontinuation rate was high in the osimertinib group due to adverse events such as interstitial pneumonia among Japanese patients. EGFR-TKIs enhance tumor antigen-specific cytotoxicity of T cells, especially first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs, which are more active against various cells with wild-type EGFR, including regulatory T cells. Consequently, subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy seemed more promising in the SOC group. Therefore, optimal first-line EGFR-TKI for EGFR-mutant advanced lung cancer may not have been identified in Japanese patients. Methods: The Heat on Beat study is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase II study to compare OS between initial treatment with afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients with advanced or recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Exploration of immunomonitoring through peripheral blood mononuclear cells will also be performed, before, during, and after treatment. Treatment-naïve EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients ( N = 100) will be randomized to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The co-primary endpoints are 3-year survival rate and characterization of immune environment associated with response to afatinib, osimertinib, or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Enrollment will start in May 2020 at 28 sites in Japan and continue for 1 year, with 3-year follow-up. Discussion: Because there is no clinical trial comparing second- with third-generation EGFR-TKI for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC, our study would provide a major impact on clinical practice. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190221, registered date: 25 February 2020, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031190221

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document