Comparing self- and expert rating: a self-report screening version (SIAB-S) of the Structured Interview for Anorexic and Bulimic Syndromes for DSM-IV and ICD-10 (SIAB-EX)

2000 ◽  
Vol 250 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred M. Fichter ◽  
Norbert Quadflieg
Keyword(s):  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Expert Rating ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

DSM-IV and ICD-10 personality disorders: a comparison of a self-report questionnaire (DIP-Q) with a structured interview

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Ottosson ◽  
O Bodlund ◽  
L Ekselius ◽  
M Grann ◽  
L von Knorring ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Personality Disorders ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Expert Interview ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

SummaryObjectiveDiagnosing personality disorders according to structured expert interviews is time-consuming and costly. For epidemiological studies, self-report instruments have several advantages. The DSM-IV and ICD-10 personality questionnaire (DIP-Q) is a selfreport questionnaire constructed to identify personality disorder according to DSM-IV and ICD-10.MethodsThe DIP-Q is validated vs a structured expert interview in a clinical sample of 138 individuals. In addition, prevalence rates yielded by DIP-Q among 136 healthy volunteers are assessed and compared to expected prevalence.ResultsFor DSM-IV the agreement for any personality disorder as measured by Cohen's Kappa was 0.61 and 0.56 for ICD-10. Overall sensitivity for any personality disorder was for DSM-IV 0.84 and for ICD-10 0.85. However, specificity was lower: 0.77 and 0.70, respectively. When dimensional scores between self-report and interview for each personality disorder were compared, the intraclass correlation for the DSMIV entities was 0.37–0.87 and for the ICD-10 entities 0.33–0.73. Among healthy volunteers the base rate of personality disorders was found to be 14%.ConclusionsDIP-Q can be used as a screening instrument for personality disorders according to DSM-IV and ICD-10. Self-report questionnaires such as DIP-Q will probably play an increasingly important role in future epidemiological studies.

Posttraumatische Reaktionen polizeilicher Einsatzkräfte

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (01/02) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
K. E. Buchmann ◽  
J. Kepplinger ◽  
S. Rösch ◽  
F. A. Muthny ◽  
E. Bayard
Keyword(s):  
Posttraumatische Belastungsstörung ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Symptom Scale ◽  
Multivariate Analyse ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

ZusammenfassungHintergrund: 2002 waren über dem Bodensee eine amerikanische Frachtmaschine und ein russisches Passagierflugzeug kollidiert und 71 Tote zu beklagen, darunter 45 Kinder. Methodik: Polizeibeamte, die an dem Einsatz beteiligt waren, wurden ein Jahr danach per Fragebogen anonym auf eine posttraumatische Belastungsstörung (PTBS) untersucht, wobei primär die PTBS-Symptom-Scale-Self-Report (PSS-SR) eingesetzt wurde. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war eine Reanalyse des Datensatzes durch eine multivariate Analyse möglicher Einflussfaktoren und im Hinblick auf Kennzeichen von Risikoclustern. Die PSS-SR erfasst anhand von 17 Items die Kriterien des DSMIV in den Bereichen Wiedererleben, Übererregung und Vermeidung. Die Datenbasis bildeten Antworten einer Stichprobe von 1 103 Polizeibeamten. Ergebnisse: Die Kriterien des Vollbildes einer PTBS nach dem DSM-IV erfüllten ein Jahr nach dem Ereignis 3,1% der Beamten; nach der ICD-10 waren es 7,0%; subsyndromale Scores wurden wesentlich häufiger gemessen. Bivariate Zusammenhänge mit dem PSS-Gesamtscore zeigten vor allem Alter, Gesamtzeit des Einsatzes und die Zahl berichteter belastender Einzelergebnisse: allerdings wurden nur Korrelationen von maximal r = 0,25 erreicht. Die Clusteranalyse ergab ein belastetes Risikocluster (ca. 20% der Beamten) mit hohen PTBS-Werten (MW = 4,4), das durch die relativ längsten Einsatzzeiten (und eine entsprechend höchste Zahl belastender Ereignisse), vor allem aber durch eine intensive Konfrontation mit Leichen charakterisiert ist. Die Ergebnisse zeigen eine ausgeprägte Dosis- Wirkungsbeziehung im Hinblick auf einsatzspezifische Belastungen und die Entwicklung einer PTBS. Schlussfolgerungen: Die Ergebnisse sprechen klar für besondere Nachbetreuungsangebote für Beamte mit dieser Risikokonstellation, unabhängig, ob persönlicher Betreuungsbedarf geäußert bzw. im Screening- Fragebogen angegeben wird.

Is antisocial personality disorder continuous or categorical? A taxometric analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1571-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID K. MARCUS ◽  
SCOTT O. LILIENFELD ◽  
JOHN F. EDENS ◽  
NORMAN G. POYTHRESS
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorder ◽  
Antisocial Personality Disorder ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Latent Structure ◽  
Antisocial Personality ◽  
Taxometric Analysis ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
State Prisons

Background. Although the DSM-IV-TR is organized into discrete disorders, the question of whether a given disorder possesses a dimensional or a categorical latent structure is an empirical one that can be examined using taxometric methods. The objective of this study was to ascertain the latent structure of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).Method. Participants were 1146 male offenders incarcerated in state prisons (n=569), or court-ordered to residential drug treatment (n=577). Participants were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) to assess ASPD symptoms; they also completed the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) ASPD scale. Taxometric analyses were performed to examine whether ASPD is underpinned by a discrete category or a dimensional construct.Results. Multiple taxometric procedures using two different sets of indicators provided no evidence that ASPD has a taxonic latent structure. Instead, the results were far more consistent with the proposition that ASPD exists on a continuum, regardless of whether it is assessed using a structured interview or a self-report measure.Conclusions. Evidence that ASPD is dimensional suggests that it is best studied using continuous measures and that dichotomizing individuals into ASPD versus non-ASPD groups will typically result in decreased statistical power. The findings are also consistent with a multifactorial etiology for ASPD and with recent attempts to conceptualize ASPD within the framework of extant dimensional models of personality.

Diagnostic Validity of ICD-10 Personality Dimensions: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of Two Self-Report Questionnaires and a Structured Interview

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Schroeder ◽  
Burghard Andresen ◽  
Dieter Naber ◽  
Christian G. Huber
Keyword(s):  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Diagnostic Validity ◽  
Personality Dimensions ◽  
Icd 10

Defining the Personality Disorders: Description of an Australian Database

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 824-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Parker ◽  
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic ◽  
Kay Wilhelm ◽  
Marie-Paule Austin ◽  
Catherine Mason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personality Disorders ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Acceptable Reliability ◽  
Sample Recruitment

Objective: We seek to improve the definition and classification of the personality disorders (PDs) and derive a large database for addressing this objective. Method: The paper describes the rationale for the development of a large set of descriptors of the PDs (including all DSM-IV and ICD-10 descriptors, but enriched by an additional 109 items), the design of parallel self-report (SR) and corroborative witness (CW) measures, sample recruitment (of 863 patients with a priori evidence of personality disorder or disturbance) and preliminary descriptive data. Results: Analyses (particularly those comparing ratings on molar PD descriptions with putative PD dimensions) argue for acceptable reliability of the data set, while both the size of the sample and the representation of all PD dimensions of interest argue for the adequacy of the database. Conclusions: We consider in some detail current limitations to the definition and classification of the PDs, and foreshadow the analytic techniques that will be used to address the key objectives of allowing the PDs to be modelled more clearly and, ideally, measured with greater precision and validity.

scholarly journals The structure of genetic and environmental influences on normative personality, abnormal personality traits, and personality disorder symptoms

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (08) ◽  
pp. 1392-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Kendler ◽  
Steven H. Aggen ◽  
Nathan Gillespie ◽  
Robert F. Krueger ◽  
Nikolai Czajkowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Factors ◽  
Personality Traits ◽  
Common Factor ◽  
Environmental Influences ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Correlation Matrices ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Adult Twins ◽  
Congruence Model

AbstractBackgroundCan the structure of genetic and environmental influences on normative personality traits (NPTs), abnormal personality traits (APTs), and DSM-IV criteria for personality disorders (PD) fit a high or low congruence model positing, respectively, close or more limited etiologic continuity?MethodExploratory factor analysis was applied to transformed correlation matrices from Cholesky twin decompositions obtained in OpenMx. In 2801 adult twins from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel, NPTs and APTs were assessed by self-report using the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and PID-5-Norwegian Brief Form (PID-5-NBF), respectively. PDs were assessed at interview using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV).ResultsThe best model yielded three genetic and three unique environmental factors. Genetic factors were dominated, respectively, by (i) high loadings on nearly all PDs and NPT/APT neuroticism and compulsivity, (ii) negative loadings on NPT agreeableness/conscientiousness and positive loadings on APT/PD measures of antisocial traits, and (iii) negative loadings on NPT extraversion and histrionic PD, and positive loadings on APT detachment and schizoid/avoidant PD. Unique environmental factors were dominated, by (i) high loadings on all PDs, (ii) high loadings on all APT dimensions and NPT neuroticism, and (iii) negative loadings on NPT extraversion and positive loadings on NPT detachment/avoidant PD.ConclusionsTwo genetic and one environmental common factor were consistent with a high congruence model while one genetic and two environmental factors were more supportive of a low congruence model. The relationship between genetic and environmental influences on personality assessed by NPTs, APTs, and PDs is complex and does not fit easily into a low or high congruence model.

Structured interview for anorexic and bulimic disorders for DSM-IV and ICD-10: Updated (third) revision

1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manfred M. Fichter ◽  
Stephan Herpertz ◽  
Norbert Quadflieg ◽  
Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann
Keyword(s):  
Structured Interview ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Autismus-Spektrum Störung nach DSM-5

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Freitag
Keyword(s):  
Dsm 5 ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv

Die Autismus-Spektrum Störung (ASS) wird in DSM-5 als eine Erkrankung aus den ICD-10 bzw. DSM-IV TR-Diagnosen frühkindlicher Autismus, Asperger Syndrom und atypischer Autismus/PDD-nos zusammengefasst und weist entsprechend revidierte Kriterien auf. In dem vorliegenden Artikel werden diese Kriterien vergleichend dargestellt, Studien zu Validität und Reliabilität der neuen ASS-Diagnose präsentiert und offene Fragen diskutiert. Ein Ausblick auf die klinische und wissenschaftliche Bedeutung wird gegeben.

Das Konzept der «Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder» (MCDD)

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Kamp-Becker ◽  
Klaus Baumann ◽  
Linda Sprenger ◽  
Katja Becker
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Disorder ◽  
Wird Eine ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Dsm Iv ◽  
Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder ◽  
Complex Developmental Disorder

Fragestellung: Die «Multiple complex developmental disorder» (MCDD) ist ein wenig bekanntes Störungsbild, das durch Auffälligkeiten in der Emotionsregulation, der sozialen Interaktion und Denkstörungen gekennzeichnet ist. Weder im Klassifikationssystem des ICD-10, noch im DSM-IV kommt diese Diagnose vor. Methodik: In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird eine Übersicht über die diagnostischen Kriterien und den aktuellen Forschungsstand zum Konzept der MCDD gegeben und anhand einer Kasuistik eines 17-jährigen Jugendlichen illustriert. Ergebnis: Das Störungsbild der MCDD weist Überschneidungen zu autistischen Störungen, aber auch zu Störungen aus dem schizophrenen Formenkreis auf. Eine klare Abgrenzung bzw. Zuordnung ist bisher nicht eindeutig möglich. Schlussfolgerungen: Viele Fragen bezüglich des Störungsbildes bleiben offen, weitere Forschung ist hier vonnöten.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document