scholarly journals Multicenter, cross-sectional observational study of the impact of neuropathic pain on quality of life in cancer patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3759-3767 ◽  
Author(s):  
So Yeon Oh ◽  
Sang Won Shin ◽  
Su-Jin Koh ◽  
Sang Byung Bae ◽  
Hyun Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Hospitalised Cancer Patients Who Develop Intestinal Failure and Require Parenteral Nutrition: An Observational Study

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2357
Author(s):  
Marina Plyta ◽  
Pinal S. Patel ◽  
Konstantinos C. Fragkos ◽  
Tomoko Kumagai ◽  
Shameer Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Intestinal Failure ◽  
Normal Body Mass Index ◽  
The Impact

(1) Background: Malnutrition in cancer patients impacts quality of life (QoL) and performance status (PS). When oral/enteral nutrition is not possible and patients develop intestinal failure, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated. Our aim was to assess nutritional status, QoL, and PS in hospitalised cancer patients recently initiated on PN for intestinal failure. (2) Methods: The design was a cross-sectional observational study. The following information was captured: demographic, anthropometric, biochemical and medical information, as well as nutritional screening tool (NST), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G), and Karnofsky PS (KPS) data. (3) Results: Among 85 PN referrals, 30 oncology patients (56.2 years, 56.7% male) were identified. Mean weight (60.3 ± 16.6 kg) corresponded to normal body mass index values (21.0 ± 5.1 kg/m2). However, weight loss was significant in patients with gastrointestinal tumours (p < 0.01). A high malnutrition risk was present in 53.3–56.7% of patients, depending on the screening tool. Patients had impaired QoL (FACT-G: 26.6 ± 9.8) but PS indicated above average capability with independent daily activities (KPS: 60 ± 10). (4) Conclusions: Future research should assess the impact of impaired NS and QoL on clinical outcomes such as survival, with a view to encompassing nutritional and QoL assessment in the management pathway of this patient group.

The impact of age on general and bladder cancer-specific quality of life among bladder cancer survivors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 463-463
Author(s):  
Pauline Filippou ◽  
Sean McCabe ◽  
Hannah McCloskey ◽  
Kathryn Gessner ◽  
Judy Hamad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Model ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

463 Background: Quality of life among cancer survivors has been shown to vary by age. Our objective was to evaluate differences in general and bladder cancer-specific quality of life based on age among a large cross-sectional bladder cancer cohort. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of bladder cancer patients using the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network and Inspire platforms to determine general and bladder cancer-specific quality of life (QOL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and Bladder Cancer Index. Patients were also queried regarding demographic, socioeconomic and clinical characteristics. We present descriptive statistics and a multiple linear regression model to identify factors independently associated with QOL domain score. Results: 972 respondents self-identified as patients with bladder cancer, of whom 41% were female and 97 % were white. The mean age was 67.6 years (range 29 to 93 years). Respondents were highly educated (67% completed college). 63% of patients identified as having non-invasive (NMIBC) cancer (n=578), 30% had MIBC (n=270), and 7% had metastatic bladder cancer (n=63). On multivariable analysis, older age was significantly associated with better generic QOL and urinary function ( Table), but not sexual function (p=0.19) or bowel function (p=0.73), controlling for sex, race, stage, comorbidity and years since diagnosis. Conclusions: Higher general and domain-specific QOL scores are more common among older bladder cancer patients. Differential impact by age may be important for the development of tailored interventions to improve QOL for bladder cancer patients. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Does the cancer patient's disease stage matter? A comparative study of caregivers' mental health and health related quality of life

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Karine Grov ◽  
Berit Taraldsen Valeberg
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjective:Cancer affects both patients and their caregivers. Caregiver burden may change during different stages of the patients' cancer trajectory. Limited research has focused on the impact of being a caregiver, assessed by the caregiver's mental health and quality of life (QOL) during the curative and the palliative phases of the patient's disease. The aim of this study is to compare caregivers of cancer patients during the curative and a palliative phases with respect to their mental health and health-related QOL.Method:This descriptive, cross-sectional study combines data from two studies. The first group consists of caregivers of patients with cancer in the late palliative phase and the second group consists of caregivers of outpatients with cancer who suffer from pain and/or use analgesics. Data were collected by means of standardized measures and analyzed with descriptive statistics.Results:Based on this material, no significant differences in mental health and health- related QOL were revealed for caregivers of cancer patients in the palliative and the curative phases, respectively. Neither education level in the caregivers, nor the patients' functional status influenced caregivers' mental health or QOL. Younger caregivers seem to have better physical QOL.Significance of results:Being caregivers of cancer patients seems to have a similar pattern of impact on caregivers' mental health and quality of life regardless of the patient's disease stage. We share some reflections about the way in which the cancer stage is divided and the appropriateness of such selection for measuring caregivers' mental health and QOL. Additionally, we discuss the use of generic instruments for measuring specific contexts and particular samples.

scholarly journals Cancer Information Satisfaction among Indonesian Cancer Survivors

2021 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wenny Savitri ◽  
Masta Hutasoit
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cancer Information ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adult Cancer Survivors ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Impact

Information for cancer patients is significant to overcome a cancer diagnosis and its treatment, affecting patients' quality of life. This study aimed to assess the level of satisfaction with the information on illness treatment among Indonesian cancer survivors, explore its association with the patients' demographic and health-related characteristics, and provide recommendations and improve the information. Sixty adult cancer survivors at the oncology unit of Panembahan Senopati Bantul Hospital of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, were recruited in a cross-sectional study design completing a demographic and health-related data form and the Satisfaction with Cancer Information Profile Questionnaire. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and path analysis. Most patients were dissatisfied with the amount and content of cancer information provided by health care ranging from 12-67%, particularly on the information regarding managing unwanted-side effects of the treatment and the impact of their cancer treatment on long-term quality of life. The patients were also discontented with the detail of information, the timing,  and the usefulness of information to others. Demographic and health-related characteristics directly influence the patients' satisfaction of information (β= 0.461, p = 0.045). Patients who were divorced, not living with their spouses, and diagnosed with cancer for a longer time (more than two years) were the significant contributors to directly influencing their satisfaction. Nurses need to enhance the detail of information, find the best time to provide and design a better way to deliver cancer patients' information.

scholarly journals The Impact Of Death Anxiety On Quality Of Life Among Cancer Patients: A Case Of Bahawalpur And Multan District

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5473-5477
Author(s):  
Siraj Hussain Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Death Anxiety ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

The current study aimed to carved the impact of death anxiety on quality of life among cancer patients. The study focused to find out the difference of death anxiety in the context of gender and socio-demographic factors; and to seek out the impact of death anxiety on the quality of life of cancer patients. Purposive sampling technique was opted to collect the N= 110 cancer patients from Victoria hospital Bahawalpur and the Minar hospital Multan though the cross-sectional survey research design. The instrument was adopted from Lemming fear of death anxiety scale and WHOQOL. To cognizant the study Correlation t-test was computed which put forth that women cancer patients have a positive correlation between death anxiety and the quality of life.  The conclusion is there is an impact of death anxiety on quality of life among patients who were hospitalized. Death anxiety has a negative impact on quality of life among cancer patients. Patients both male and female experience death anxiety at a certain level that may impact their quality of life, cancer patients who were hospitalized they have more death anxiety than other cancer patients. Septate Psychological counseling sessions can assist to decline the death anxiety among cancer patients.

scholarly journals Overburden of the caregiver of cancer patients in palliative care

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Augusto Paes Lima Rocha ◽  
Elisângela De Moraes Rocha ◽  
Marli Elisabete Machado ◽  
Andressa De Souza ◽  
Felipe Barreto Schuch
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Caregiver Burden ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Zarit Burden Interview ◽  
Calidad De Vida ◽  
Independent Association ◽  
The Impact

Objetivo: correlacionar o impacto da sobrecarga do cuidador na qualidade de vida do paciente oncológico em cuidados paliativos Método: trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, descritivo, observacional, transversal, com 50 pacientes oncológicos em cuidados paliativos e 50 cuidadores. Aplicou-se um questionário sociodemográfico para os cuidadores e familiares, a Escala Zarit Burden Interview, o Questionário EORT QLQ –C15-PAL, a Escala de Resiliência Adaptada de Wagnild & Young e a Escala de Pensamento Catastrófico da Dor, uso do Teste t, Correlação de Spearman, Correlação de Pearson e regressão linear. Utilizou-se o Programa SPSS, versão 20.0 para a análise dos dados. Resultados: informa-se que os domínios da qualidade de vida que mostraram associação independente com a sobrecarga do cuidador foram a fatiga, a falta de apetite, a constipação e o impacto global. Manteve-se associação independente pelo catastrofismo da dor do paciente com a sobrecarga do cuidador, não houve associação entre a resiliência do paciente e a sobrecarga do cuidador e 40% dos cuidadores apresentaram sobrecarga severa. Conclusão: nota-se que o aumento da sobrecarga do cuidador diminui a qualidade de vida do paciente oncológico em cuidados paliativos. Descritores: Sobrecarga de Cuidadores; Qualidade de Vida; Cuidados Paliativos; Oncologia; Dor do Câncer, Resiliência.AbstractObjective: to correlate the impact of caregiver burden on the quality of life of cancer patients in palliative care. Method: this is a quantitative, descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study with 50 cancer patients in palliative care and 50 caregivers. A sociodemographic questionnaire was applied for caregivers and family members, the Zarit Burden Interview Scale, the EORT QLQ –C15-PAL Questionnaire, the Wagnild & Young Adapted Resilience Scale and the Catastrophic Pain Thinking Scale, using the t Test, Spearman's correlation, Pearson's correlation and linear regression. The SPSS program, version 20.0, was used for data analysis. Results: it is reported that the domains of quality of life that showed an independent association with caregiver burden were fatigue, lack of appetite, constipation and the global impact. An independent association was maintained due to the catastrophism of the patient's pain with the burden of the caregiver, there was no association between the patient's resilience and the burden of the caregiver and 40% of the caregivers presented severe burden. Conclusion: it is noted that the increase in caregiver burden reduces the quality of life of cancer patients in palliative care. Descriptors: Caregivers Burden; Quality of Life; Palliative Care; Oncology; Cancer Pain; Resiliencia.ResumenObjetivo: correlacionar el impacto de la carga del cuidador en la calidad de vida de los pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos Método: este es un estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, observacional, transversal con 50 pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos y 50 cuidadores. Se aplicó un cuestionario sociodemográfico para cuidadores y miembros de la familia, la Escala Zarit Burden Interview, el Cuestionario EORT QLQ-C15-PAL, la Escala de Resiliencia Adaptada Wagnild& Young y la Escala de Pensamiento de Dolor Catastrófico, usando la Prueba t, Correlación de Spearman, la Correlación de Pearson y regresión lineal. El programa SPSS, versión 20.0, se utilizó para el análisis de datos. Resultados: se informa que los dominios de calidad de vida que mostraron una asociación independiente con la carga del cuidador fueron fatiga, falta de apetito, estreñimiento y el impacto global. Se mantuvo una asociación independiente debido al catastrofismo del dolor del paciente con la sobrecarga del cuidador, no hubo asociación entre la resistencia del paciente y la sobrecarga del cuidador y el 40% de los cuidadores presentaron una sobrecarga severa. Conclusión: se observa que el aumento de la sobrecarga del cuidador reduce la calidad de vida de los pacientes oncológicos en cuidados paliativos. Descriptores: Carga del Cuidador; Calidad de Vida; Cuidados Paliativos; Oncología; Dolor de Cáncer, Resiliencia.

scholarly journals IMPACT OF CANCER ON QUALITY OF LIFE & DEPRESSION AMONG CAREGIVERS

2022 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2216-19
Author(s):  
Mahwash Zulfiqar Khan ◽  
Nusrat Qamar ◽  
Shahbaz Ahmad ◽  
AbuBakar Siddique
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Female Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Objective: To determine the impact of cancer on quality of life and depression among caregivers. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Place and Duration of Study: Anmol Hospital, Lahore, from Jul 2019 to Jan 2020. Methodology: Data collected from caregivers of female cancer patients by purposive sampling technique using Standardized Questionnaire of Caregiver Assistance Scale and emotional distress was assessed by the Profile of Mood States. Data were entered into Statistical Package for Social Sciences for statistical analysis. Results: Among 110 participants (caregivers of female cancer patients) 28 (25.5%) were female while 82 (74.5%) were male caregivers. Patients other than breast cancer were 79 (71.8%), while breast cancer patients were 31 (28.2%). There was a significant association between caregiver health, quality of life and level of depression, one year ago, and at current with p-values= 0.001, 0.001 and 0.01 respectively. Conclusion: There was a negative impact on the health and quality of life of caregivers. Their health was better in the beginning but with time, their lives became more difficult.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document