Modified albumin–bilirubin grade to predict eligibility for second-line therapies at progression on sorafenib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Tokunaga ◽  
Motohiko Tanaka ◽  
Kentaro Tanaka ◽  
Satoshi Narahara ◽  
Takeshi Kawasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

scholarly journals Mistletoe Extract Viscum Fraxini-2 for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Series

2021 ◽  
pp. 224-231
Author(s):  
Richard T. Lee ◽  
Peiying Yang ◽  
Asrar Alahmadi ◽  
Jennifer McQuade ◽  
Eric Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Injection Site Reaction ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Site Reaction ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Mistletoe Extract ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy ◽  
Mistletoe Extracts

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide, and for advanced HCC the prognosis is poor. Preliminary studies indicate mistletoe extracts may have anticancer activity for HCC. Methods: A prospective observational case series of advanced HCC patients that chose to take a mistletoe extract called viscum fraxini-2 (VF-2) alone for treatment. Time on treatment, imaging, and laboratory values were collected for descriptive analyses. Results: A total of 12 patients with advanced HCC enrolled onto the protocol, and 10 patients had data available for evaluation. The majority were male (10/12) with a median age of 64 (SD 11). Most patients had received sorafenib therapy (9/12) and had varying Child-Pugh classes (A-4, B-6, C-2). Treatment with VF-2 ranged from 1 to 36 weeks with a mean of 12.3 weeks (SD 12). Six patients received 8 weeks of treatment, and 3 patients received 12 or more weeks of treatment. For patients that received at least 4 weeks of treatment, the average AFP value stabilized during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Two patients experienced an AFP decrease of >30%, approximately 37 and 40% decreases at the nadir. One patient had stable disease of 9 months. Major side effects were fever, fatigue, rash, and local injection site reaction of swelling, redness, and tenderness. Conclusion: This case series of advanced HCC indicates that mistletoe extract VF-2 may have potential biological activity against HCC for selected patients. Research is needed to identify the active compound and predictive markers of response.

Modeling sequential systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: What comes next?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
Ciro Celsa ◽  
Giuseppe Cabibbo ◽  
Marco Enea ◽  
Salvatore Battaglia ◽  
Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sequential Strategy

324 Background: Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab represents the new best performing first-line approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, the best sequential strategy after every first-line failure (for progression or intolerance) remains elusive, and options for retreating patients failing Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab with multi-kinase inhibitors (MKI) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) are yet undefined. Methods: We developed a Markov model to analyze simulated-Overall Survival (s-OS) of second-line ICIs or MKIs after first-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab over a lifetime horizon. For first-line therapy, PFS of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab was extracted from Imbrave 150 trial and it was used as endpoint since it is not influenced by post-progression survival. For second-line retreatment, pooled OS of MKIs (Regorafenib and Cabozantinib), or ICIs (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) were adopted. Survival estimates for sequential settings considered the proportion of patients who did not receive second-line therapy due to death during first-line therapy. Individual patient survival data were extracted from PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier curves of RESORCE trial for Regorafenib, CELESTIAL trial for Cabozantinib, CheckMate-040 for Nivolumab and Keynote-240 for Pembrolizumab. Each reconstructed survival curve was inspected for accuracy and was compared with originally published curves. Results: First-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by second-line ICIs turned on from the model as the best sequential strategy (median s-OS 24 months; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23-26 months) and extends survival when compared Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by MKIs (median s-OS 20 months; 95% CI 19-21 months). Conclusions: To our knowledge and given the absence of adequately designed sequential RCTs, this is the first model to date which suggests, with a proper methodological approach, an accurate estimate of outcome of patients with u-HCC treated by sequential systemic therapies. In patients with u-HCC failing first-line treatment, modelling estimates of s-OS for each retreatment strategies may assist in choosing the most promising sequences in order to plan appropriate RCTs.

scholarly journals Favorable response to second-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab following progression on nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (25) ◽  
pp. e26471
Author(s):  
Brandon Swed ◽  
Kara Ryan ◽  
Omar Gandarilla ◽  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Gagandeep Brar
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Second Line

scholarly journals How Much Time Should Be Waited and What Are the Main Findings to Evaluate the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Regorafenib? A Real-Life Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Gustavo Hideki Kawanami ◽  
Leopoldo Katsuda ◽  
Thiara Barcelos Rocha ◽  
Fabio da Silva Yamashiro ◽  
Leonardo Pelafsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment

Background. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a relevant cause of mortality worldwide, mainly among patients who have a prior liver disease. In spite of clear recommendations regarding surveillance and screening methods, most patients are still diagnosed only when they are no longer candidates to curative treatment modalities, while others do not achieve the goals of such treatments, thus increasing the need of anticancer drugs. Moreover, when cirrhotic patients begin to receive these drugs, many types of adverse events are seen as a reason to withdrawal, even when there are findings suggesting a good response to the treatment. Case Summary. This case report is about a cirrhotic patient who received many types of treatment, from surgery and chemoembolization during early stages to first- and second-line systemic therapy when the disease turned to be advanced. Since he had no signs of liver dysfunction and suffered tumor progression during sorafenib treatment, regorafenib was initiated. The main findings that make this case important are the adverse events after taking this second-line agent, which would certainly be considered unacceptable and would lead to the drug withdrawal. The reasons why regorafenib was maintained are explained based on clinical and imaging findings, showing how this decision led to an excellent response. Conclusions. The knowledge of the main adverse events described in the pilot clinical trials can avoid unnecessary withdrawal of regorafenib. In addition, some clinical and imaging findings can be deemed as predictors of good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

scholarly journals Sorafenib Therapy for BCLC Stage B/C Hepatocellular Carcinoma; Clinical Outcome and Safety in Aged Patients: A Multicenter Study in Japan

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 499-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Nishikawa ◽  
Haruhiko Takeda ◽  
Kaoru Tsuchiya ◽  
Kouji Joko ◽  
Chikara Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Analysis of Post-Progression Survival in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Lenvatinib

Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 787-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuwa Ando ◽  
Tomokazu Kawaoka ◽  
Yosuke Suehiro ◽  
Kenji Yamaoka ◽  
Yumi Kosaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Class A ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Pugh Class ◽  
Ecog Ps

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Although a strong antitumor effect of lenvatinib (LEN) has been noted for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are still no reports on the prognosis for patients with disease progression after first-line LEN therapy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients (<i>n</i> = 141) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver function, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 who were treated with LEN from March 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred and five patients were treated with LEN as first-line therapy, 53 of whom had progressive disease (PD) at the radiological evaluation. Among the 53 patients with PD, there were 27 candidates for second-line therapy, who had Child-Pugh class A liver function and an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 at progression. After progression on first-line LEN, 28 patients were treated with a molecular targeted agent (MTA) as second-line therapy (sorafenib: <i>n</i> = 26; ramucirumab: <i>n</i> = 2). Multivariate analysis identified modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 or 2a at LEN initiation (odds ratio 5.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.465–18.31, <i>p</i> = 0.011) as a significant and independent factor for candidates. The median post-progression survival after PD on first-line LEN was 8.3 months. Cox hazard multivariate analysis showed that a low alpha-fetoprotein level (&#x3c;400 ng/mL; hazard ratio [HR] 0.297, 95% CI 0.099–0.886, <i>p</i> = 0.003), a relative tumor volume &#x3c;50% at the time of progression (HR 0.204, 95% CI 0.07–0.592, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and switching to MTAs as second-line treatment after LEN (HR 0.299, 95% CI 0.12–0.746, <i>p</i> = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Among patients with PD on first-line LEN, good liver function at introduction of LEN was an important and favorable factor related to eligibility for second-line therapy. In addition, post-progression treatment with MTAs could improve the prognosis for patients who had been treated with first-line LEN.

scholarly journals Baseline and Early Predictors of Good Patient Candidates for Second-Line after Sorafenib Treatment in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hitomi Takada ◽  
Masayuki Kurosaki ◽  
Kaoru Tsuchiya ◽  
Yasuyuki Komiyama ◽  
Jun Itakura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Early Predictors

Background: Recent advances in the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have enabled patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to receive multiple TKIs in sequence. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of good candidates for second-line treatment after disease progression during sorafenib treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 190 consecutive HCC patients who were treated with sorafenib in our hospital. Three criteria of good candidates for second-line TKI at the time of disease progression during sorafenib treatment were defined as follows: criterion 1 was the same as the inclusion criteria of the regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE) study, criterion 2 was the inclusion criteria of the RESORCE study plus Child–Pugh score 5, and criterion 3 was the inclusion criteria of the RESORCE study plus albumin–bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1. Factors at baseline and at week 4 during sorafenib treatment were used to predict patients fulfilling each of these three criteria. Results: The distribution of patients was 29%, 13%, and 6% in criteria 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant factors for meeting criterion 1 was the combination of baseline albumin >3.7 g/dL (odds ratio (OR) 2.7) plus degree of decrease in albumin (Δalbumin) at week 4 <0.2 g/dL (OR 2.6), or the combination of baseline ALBI score <−2.33 (OR 2.5) and ΔALBI at week 4 <0.255 (OR 4.9). For criterion 2, the value of baseline albumin and ALBI score was identical to criterion 1; however, Δalbumin (<0.1 g/dL) and ΔALBI score (<0.19) became stricter. For criterion 3, the value of baseline albumin (>3.8 g/dL) and ALBI (<−2.55) became stricter, as did Δalbumin (<0.1 g/dL) and ΔALBI (<0.085). Furthermore, tumor burden (>11) was selected as an additional predictor (OR 5.4). Conclusion: Predictors to satisfy the RESORCE study inclusion criteria were as follows: preserved liver function at baseline, as reflected by albumin or ALBI score, and small deterioration of liver function early during sorafenib therapy, as reflected by Δalbumin or ΔALBI at week 4. Liver function at baseline and degree of change in liver function during sorafenib treatment need to be stricter for better outcomes of liver function with disease progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document