Versatility and HIV Vulnerability: Patterns of Insertive and Receptive Anal Sex in a National Sample of Older Australian Gay Men

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1370-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Lyons ◽  
Marian Pitts ◽  
Jeffrey Grierson
Keyword(s):  
Gay Men ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex ◽  
Hiv Vulnerability

Never Too Old To Feel Good: Happiness and Health among a National Sample of Older Black Gay Men

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Battle ◽  
Daniels ◽  
Pastrana ◽  
Turner ◽  
Espinoza
Keyword(s):  
Gay Men ◽  
National Sample ◽  
Black Gay Men

scholarly journals Trends and differences in sexual practices and sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and men who have sex with men and women (MSMW): a repeated cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037608
Author(s):  
Mario Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Richard Case ◽  
Christopher Fairley ◽  
Jane S Hocking ◽  
Catriona Bradshaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Centre ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex ◽  
Sex With Men

ObjectivesIn the 2010s, there has been an increase in sexually transmitted infections (STI) in men who have sex with men (MSM) in Australia, and since 2015 also in urban heterosexuals. Men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW) have characteristics that may differ from both men who have sex with men only (MSMO) and heterosexual men. We aimed to compare the sexual practices and the trends in HIV/STI positivity between MSMO and MSMW.DesignRepeated cross-sectional study.SettingA sexual health centre in Melbourne, Australia.ParticipantsMSM aged 18 years and above who attended the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for the first time between 2011 and 2018. This includes 12 795 MSMO and 1979 MSMW.Primary outcome measuresDemographic characterics, sexual practices and HIV/STI positivity.ResultsCompared with MSMW, MSMO were more likely to practice anal sex and to have condomless receptive anal sex with casual male partners, and less likely to have a current regular relationship. Over the 8-year period, there was an increase in condomless receptive anal sex with casual male partners for both groups (MSMO: from 46.2% to 63.3%, ptrend <0.001; MSMW: from 41.3% to 57.9%, ptrend=0.011). Syphilis positivity increased in MSMO (from 5.5% to 7.9%, ptrend=0.012) and MSMW (from 0.9% to 6.4%, ptrend=0.004) and HIV remained stable. Gonorrhoea increased among MSMO from 2011 to 2014 (from 6.7% to 9.6%, ptrend=0.002), and remained stable from 2015 to 2018. MSMO had higher odds of testing positive for gonorrhoea (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.64), chlamydia (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.67), syphilis (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.22) and HIV (aOR 4.60, 95% CI 2.43 to 8.70) than MSMW.ConclusionsMSMW have overall lower condomless sex and lower HIV/STI positivity. In the last years, changes in sexual practices in MSM have affected both MSMW and MSMO leading to an increased STI risk.

Time trends in the risk of HIV infection among men who have sex with men in Chiang Mai, Thailand: an observational study

2021 ◽  
pp. 095646242110213
Author(s):  
Amaraporn Rerkasem ◽  
Nuntisa Chotirosniramit ◽  
Pongpun Saokhieo ◽  
Antika Wongthanee ◽  
Kittipan Rerkasem
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Consistent Condom ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Health Seeking ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex ◽  
Sex With Men

A cross-sectional study on men who have sex with men (MSM) for the HIV prevention project was conducted to assess the prevalence of HIV infection–related behaviors among 551 MSM recruited in 2008–2009 and 1910 MSM in 2014–2018 for voluntary counseling and testing at a HIV clinic in Chiang Mai. Overall, the study found that the prevalence of HIV infection was significantly decreased from 12.9% (71/551) in the earlier study (2008–2009) to 8.2% (157/1910) in the recent study (2014–2018) ( p = 0.001). By comparison, in 2008–2009 and 2014–2018, there was no statistically significant difference in consistent condom use (39.0% [186/477] vs. 38.9% [591/1512], p = 0.969), while unprotected anal sex with casual partners significantly increased (44.5% [159/357] vs. 51.9% [645/1242], p = 0.014) and receptive anal sex significantly increased (37.7% [180/477] vs. 45.1% [860/1905], p = 0.004). However, previous HIV testing within 1 year increased significantly from 64.6% (197/305) to 74.7% (677/906, p = 0.001). In exploratory multivariate analysis, the factors associated with HIV infection included gay men, age below 20 years, being self-employed, being an employee, having only receptive anal sex, having both receptive/insertive anal sex, being a former substance user, using online dating, having a history of sexually transmitted infection symptoms, self-perception as being at high risk for HIV, last HIV testing >1 year, and never previously testing for HIV. The data represent the trend of health-seeking behavior improvements. The findings demonstrated the need for a novel sexual health service in an endemic setting and health promotion for online partner-seeking.

scholarly journals Age at first anal sex and HIV/STI vulnerability among gay men in Australia

2012 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Lyons ◽  
Marian Pitts ◽  
Jeffrey Grierson ◽  
Anthony Smith ◽  
Stephen McNally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gay Men ◽  
Anal Sex

Australian men's sexual practices in saunas, sex clubs and other male sex on premises venues

Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Lyons ◽  
Anthony M. A. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey W. Grierson ◽  
Henry von Doussa
Keyword(s):  
Anal Intercourse ◽  
Unprotected Anal Intercourse ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Sexually Transmissible Infections ◽  
Younger Men ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex ◽  
Risky Sexual Practices ◽  
Sexual Encounters ◽  
Sex With Men

Background: Sex on premises venues (SOPVs) where men have sex with men have been implicated in the spread of sexually transmissible infections, but few studies have described men’s sexual encounters in SOPVs, particularly the degree to which men from different backgrounds engage in risky sexual practices. Methods: Interviewer administered surveys were conducted with 186 Australian men who have sex with men (MSM) within 48 h of visiting an SOPV. They reported their sexual practices, the characteristics of their partners and other circumstances surrounding their sexual encounters. Results: All analyses were based on the number of sexual encounters (n = 430). Oral sex was the most common practice, occurring in 74.9% of encounters, followed by massage, frottage or kissing (53.7%), solo or mutual masturbation (36.3%), and anal sex (32.1%). Multivariate analyses revealed age as a significant factor for having protected anal sex (P = 0.001), insertive anal sex (P = 0.004) and receptive anal sex (P < 0.001). These practices were more frequent in encounters among younger men, while masturbation (P = 0.03) was more frequent among older men. When men’s sexual partners were affected by alcohol, encounters were less likely to involve unprotected anal intercourse (P = 0.006) and more likely to involve massage, frottage or kissing (P = 0.009). Men disclosed their HIV status in only 7.7% of encounters. Conclusions: With the likelihood of risky sexual practices varying according to background, results from this study should be used to guide interventions aiming to promote safer sex in SOPVs.

Sexual behaviour and human herpesvirus 8 infection in homosexual men in Australia

Sexual Health ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew E. Grulich ◽  
Philip Cunningham ◽  
Mee-Ling Munier ◽  
Garrett Prestage ◽  
Janaki Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Behaviour ◽  
Sexual Transmission ◽  
Human Herpesvirus ◽  
Immunofluorescence Assay ◽  
Human Herpesvirus 8 ◽  
Homosexual Men ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Herpesvirus 8 ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex

Background: Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is a common sexually transmitted agent among homosexual men, but there are few Australian data. We aimed to describe the prevalence and risk factors for seropositivity to HHV-8 in Australian homosexual men. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 179 homosexual men in Sydney Australia in 1992–1998. Detailed data on sexual behaviour was collected annually, and HHV-8 status was determined at the end of the study by an algorithm based on results of an immunofluorescence assay and an enzyme-linked immunoassay to the K8.1 protein of HHV-8. HHV-8 DNA was detected in buffy coats using a nested qualitative PCR. Results: Data on sexual behaviour in at least three interviews and HHV-8 status were available in 174 (97%) of 179 men who agreed to participate. Of these, 31 (18%) were HHV-8 seropositive, and HHV-8 DNA was detected in 5 (16%) of these. The prevalence of HHV-8 infection was much higher in HIV positive (52%) than HIV negative (11%) men (OR 8.60, 95% CI 3.55–20.86). HHV-8 infection was related to more frequent reporting of unprotected receptive anal sex (OR for most frequent versus least frequent category 3.03, 95% CI 1.01–9.03, P trend 0.02), insertive oro–anal sex (OR for most frequent v. least frequent category 3.02, 95% CI 1.15–7.93, P trend 0.02) and receptive oro–anal sex (OR for most frequent v. least frequent category 3.09, 95% CI 1.11–8.60, P trend 0.05) with casual partners. Conclusions: These data are consistent with sexual transmission of HHV-8, but the precise mode of HHV-8 transmission remains unclear. Studies to elucidate the precise mode of sexual transmission of HHV-8 need to focus on potential salivary transmission, and should collect data on the HHV-8 infection and excretion status of the sexual partner.

64. DOES CIRCUMCISION MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO THE SEXUAL EXPERIENCE OF GAY MEN? FINDINGS FROM THE HEALTH IN MEN (HIM) COHORT

Sexual Health ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
L. Mao ◽  
J. Imrie ◽  
G. Prestage ◽  
A. Grulich ◽  
B. Donovan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Premature Ejaculation ◽  
Sexual Experience ◽  
Potential Effect ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Receptive Anal Sex ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Loss Of Libido ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Hiv Negative

The relevance of circumcision in preventing HIV male-to-male sex transmission is poorly understood, in particular because any potential effect could be obscured by sexual practice as a mediating or confounding factor. Using data from the Health in Men (HIM) cohort of 1426 HIV-negative homosexually active men in Sydney, we compared the sexual practices and sexual experiences of circumcised and uncircumcised men. Overall 66% of men (n�=�939) in the cohort were circumcised. After adjusting for age and ethnicity, we found no difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men in anal sexual practices, difficulty using condoms, or sexual difficulties (e.g. loss of libido). Among the circumcised men, we compared those circumcised at infancy (n�=�854) with those circumcised after infancy (n�=�81). The majority cited phimosis (i.e., an inability to fully retract the foreskin) and parents' decision as the main reasons for circumcision after infancy. After adjusting for age and ethnicity, men circumcised after infancy were more likely to practise receptive anal sex (88% vs 75%, p�<�0.05) and to experience erection difficulties (52% vs 47%, p�<�0.05); but less likely to practise insertive anal sex (79% vs 87%, p�<�0.05) and to experience premature ejaculation (15% vs 23%, p�<�0.05) than those circumcised at infancy. Our data suggest that overall circumcision status does not affect HIV-negative gay men's anal sexual practices, experience of condom use or likelihood of sexual difficulties. However, there is some suggestion of differences between circumcised men depending on the age at circumcision.

Neuroendocrine Influences on Human Sexuality

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashlyn Swift-Gallant ◽  
S. Marc Breedlove
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Orientation ◽  
Gay Men ◽  
Sexual Partners ◽  
Anal Sex ◽  
Gender Nonconforming ◽  
Androgen Exposure ◽  
Prenatal Androgens ◽  
Prenatal Androgen Exposure ◽  
Prenatal Androgen ◽  
Neuroendocrine Factors

While prenatal sex hormones guide the development of sex-typical reproductive structures, they also act on the developing brain, resulting in sex differences in brain and behavior in animal models. Stemming from this literature is the prominent hypothesis that prenatal neuroendocrine factors underlie sex differences in human sexual orientation, to explain why most males have a preference for female sexual partners (gynephilia), whereas most females display a preference for male sexual partners (androphilia). Convergent evidence from experiments of nature and indirect markers of prenatal hormones strongly support a role for prenatal androgens in same-same sexual orientations in women, although this finding is specific to a subset of lesbians who are also gender nonconforming (“butch”). More gender-conforming lesbians (“femmes”) do not show evidence of increased prenatal androgens. The literature has been more mixed for male sexual orientation: some report evidence of low prenatal androgen exposure, while others report evidence of high androgen levels and many other studies find no support for a role of prenatal androgen exposure in the development of androphilia in males. Recent evidence suggests there may be subgroups of gay men who owe their sexual orientation to distinct biodevelopmental mechanisms, which could account for these mixed findings. Although this research is young, it is similar to findings from lesbian populations, because gay men who are more gender nonconforming, and report a preference for receptive anal sex, differ on markers of prenatal development from gay men who are more gender conforming and report a preference for insertive anal sex. This chapter concludes with future research avenues including assessing whether multiple biodevelopmental pathways underlie sexual orientation and whether neuroendocrine factors and other biological mechanisms (e.g., immunology, genetics) interact to promote a same-sex sexual orientation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document