The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review

2018 ◽  
Vol 111 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 103-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongshan Chen ◽  
Marta Camps-Arbestain ◽  
Qinhua Shen ◽  
Balwant Singh ◽  
Maria Luz Cayuela
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 2244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno ◽  
Ilenia Calcaterra ◽  
Roberta Lupoli ◽  
Antonio Storino ◽  
Giorgio Alfredo Spedicato ◽  
...  

Background: Complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) include coagulopathy. We performed a meta-analysis on the association of COVID-19 severity with changes in hemostatic parameters. Methods: Data on prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), D-Dimer, platelets (PLT), or fibrinogen in severe versus mild COVID-19 patients, and/or in non-survivors to COVID-19 versus survivors were systematically searched. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated. Results: Sixty studies comparing 5487 subjects with severe and 9670 subjects with mild COVID-19 documented higher PT (SMD: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.21, 0.60), D-Dimer (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.52, 0.82), and fibrinogen values (SMD: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.21, 2.47), with lower PLT count (SMD: −0.74; 95%CI: −1.01, −0.47) among severe patients. Twenty-five studies on 1511 COVID-19 non-survivors and 6287 survivors showed higher PT (SMD: 0.67; 95%CI: 0.39, 0.96) and D-Dimer values (SMD: 3.88; 95%CI: 2.70, 5.07), with lower PLT count (SMD: −0.60, 95%CI: −0.82, −0.38) among non-survivors. Regression models showed that C-reactive protein values were directly correlated with the difference in PT and fibrinogen. Conclusions: Significant hemostatic changes are associated with COVID-19 severity. Considering the risk of fatal complications with residual chronic disability and poor long-term outcomes, further studies should investigate the prognostic role of hemostatic parameters in COVID-19 patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S15-S15
Author(s):  
E. Vieta

Antipsychotics are widely used for the short and long-term treatment of bipolar disorder. Depot and long-acting injectable formulations (LAIs) can be particularly useful for certain subgroups of patients. This lecture will discuss the available data from randomized controlled trials of LAIs in bipolar disorder. A recently published meta-analysis and individual studies assessing depot medications, as well as modern LAIs such as risperidone, paliperidone and aripiprazole, will be reviewed, looking carefully into the prevention of either pole of illness and tolerability. Potential indications and patient profile, based on data and clinical experience, will be discussed.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceazón T Edwards ◽  
Peter A Schneider ◽  
Cindy Huynh

The role of paclitaxel in the treatment of femoropopliteal peripheral arterial disease is currently ambiguous. A summary-level meta-analysis of randomised trials published in 2018 demonstrated that paclitaxel-coated devices were associated with an increased all-cause mortality in those who underwent treatment at 2 years and 5 years. Further evaluation has been undertaken to establish whether there is a specific dose response, mechanism or reproducible signal. At this time, there has been no confirmation of dose response, as was initially asserted by the summary-level meta-analysis. No mechanism of harm has been identified. Although an association with increased mortality has been confirmed by patient-level meta-analysis, the strength of the signal has been inconsistent. The information suggests there is only an association between paclitaxel-coated devices and increased all-cause mortality, not causation. The authors encourage additional studies designed to follow long-term results after treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices, using real patient data, before a conclusion can be made.


2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R Kolodziej ◽  
Charles L Campbell ◽  
Richard Charnigo ◽  
Raphael Twerenbold ◽  
Christian Mueller ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is intimately involved in pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Small studies have shown that high levels of MPO are a poor prognostic factor in patients presenting with ACS. However, due to the small nature of these studies, the relationship between MPO and outcomes has not been confirmed. Here we aimed to examine the prognostic value of MPO in patients with ACS. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to compare the long-term prognosis of ACS patients with high MPO and low MPO levels. The literature was retrieved by formal searches of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, OVID, and web of knowledge) from inception to November 2013. A total of 16 trials were included in this meta-analysis involving 10572 patients. Data were analyzed using random-effects model and study quality was assessed using appropriate scales. RESULTS: High MPO group was associated with overall worse outcomes than low MPO group in terms of recurrent myocardial infarction (9% [211 of 2336] vs. 7.7% [240 of 3101], odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-2.15, p 0.11); all cause mortality (8% [236 of 2920] vs. 5% [209 of 4263], OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.31-2.54, p <0.0004) and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) (24% [334 of 1400] vs. 14% [133 of 949], OR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.46-2.85, p< 0.0001) (Figure). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis examining the long-term outcomes in ACS patients, high MPO levels were associated with worse outcomes. These observations support prospective trials tailoring more aggressive therapy to patients with suspected worse prognosis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
J. Miettunen ◽  
K. Kasurinen ◽  
N. Hirvonen ◽  
E. Oinas ◽  
J. Käkelä ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-79
Author(s):  
Jay Narayan Shah ◽  
Priscilla Samson ◽  
Nabees Man Singh Pradhan ◽  
Shreekrishna Maharjan ◽  
Ashis Shrestha ◽  
...  

After a year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meta-analysis in Dec 2020 did not support its reinfections. Now it’s clear that not only reinfection following earlier exposure is a reality, but also breakthrough infections after vaccinations have been increasingly reported. A breakthrough infection means that the infection has broken through the protection provided by the vaccine. The course of the disease, strict observation for preventive measures, together with safe vaccines is necessary long-term solutions. The effectiveness of the vaccine, durability of immunity, the role of the virus variants, the incidence and severity of breakthrough infections are the challenges in real life. A breakthrough infection is the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in the respiratory specimen ≥14 days after inoculation of a vaccine. A breakthrough infection of 0.04 to 13% has been reported in the literature. Nepal began vaccine rollout in late Jan 2021. Nearly 3 million population has been vaccinated by two vaccines, the Covishield (AstraZeneca, from India) and Vero Cell (Sinopharm, China). Only minor ‘Adverse Event Following Immunization’ after the initial vaccine rollout has been reported. There is a lack of reports on the breakthrough infection for these vaccines in the local population. Analysis of the data on breakthrough infection from the vaccine rollouts in Nepal is awaited.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
J. Miettunen ◽  
K. Kasurinen ◽  
T.M. Paaso ◽  
A. Mustonen ◽  
N. Hirvonen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chongxiang Zhao ◽  
Jingwu Wang ◽  
Qiang Xiao

Background: The study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of teprenone with control or other drugs for reducing the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in patients receiving long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched up to November 10th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing teprenone with control or other drugs. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used for assessing the certainty of evidence.Results: Seven RCTs were included. Six compared teprenone with control and one with famotidine. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant reduced risk of GI ulcers in patients receiving teprenone as compared to control after 12 weeks/3months (RR 0.37 95% CI 0.17, 0.18 I2 = 0% p = 0.01). Pooled data of three open-label studies indicated statistically significant reduction of GI symptoms in patients on teprenone as compared to control at 6 months and 12 months, but not at 3 months. Comparing teprenone with control, our analysis indicated non-significant but a tendency of better reduction in Modified Lanza Score (MLS) with teprenone. The RCT comparing teprenone to famotidine demonstrated better reduction of MLS with famotidine. The certainty of evidence-based on GRADE was deemed to be low.Conclusion: Low-quality evidence indicates a beneficial role of teprenone in preventing GI injuries in patients receiving long-term NSAIDs. Further high-quality RCTs comparing teprenone with placebo as well as other gastroprotective drugs are needed to strengthen current evidence.


2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 511-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Li ◽  
Ding-Hui Liu ◽  
Lu-Lu Chen ◽  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Yan-Zhe Yu ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe adverse effects of azithromycin on the treatment of patients with chronic lung diseases (CLD) were evaluated in the present study. MEDLINE and other databases were searched for relevant articles published until August 2013. Randomized controlled trials that enrolled patients with chronic lung diseases who received long-term azithromycin treatment were selected, and data on microbiological studies and azithromycin-related adverse events were abstracted from articles and analyzed. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of bacterial resistance in patients receiving long-term azithromycin treatment was increased 2.7-fold (risk ratio [RR], 2.69 [95% confidence interval {95% CI}, 1.249, 5.211]) compared with the risk in patients receiving placebo treatment. On the other hand, the risk of bacterial colonization decreased in patients receiving azithromycin treatment (RR, 0.551 [95% CI, 0.460, 0.658]). Patients receiving long-term azithromycin therapy were at risk of increased impairment of hearing (RR, 1.168 [95% CI, 1.030, 1.325]). This analysis provides evidence supporting the idea that bacterial resistance can develop with long-term azithromycin treatment. Besides the increasingly recognized anti-inflammatory role of azithromycin used in treating chronic lung diseases, we should be aware of the potential for adverse events with its long-term use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document