Inhibition of protein synthesis leading to unfolded protein response is the major event in abrin-mediated apoptosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 403 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 255-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritu Mishra ◽  
Meenakshi Sundaram Kumar ◽  
Anjali A. Karande
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Major Event ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Inhibition Of Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Response

scholarly journals Estrogen receptor α inhibitor activates the unfolded protein response, blocks protein synthesis, and induces tumor regression

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (15) ◽  
pp. 4737-4742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal D. Andruska ◽  
Xiaobin Zheng ◽  
Xujuan Yang ◽  
Chengjian Mao ◽  
Mathew M. Cherian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Inhibition Of Protein Synthesis ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Recurrent estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast and ovarian cancers are often therapy resistant. Using screening and functional validation, we identified BHPI, a potent noncompetitive small molecule ERα biomodulator that selectively blocks proliferation of drug-resistant ERα-positive breast and ovarian cancer cells. In a mouse xenograft model of breast cancer, BHPI induced rapid and substantial tumor regression. Whereas BHPI potently inhibits nuclear estrogen–ERα-regulated gene expression, BHPI is effective because it elicits sustained ERα-dependent activation of the endoplasmic reticulum (EnR) stress sensor, the unfolded protein response (UPR), and persistent inhibition of protein synthesis. BHPI distorts a newly described action of estrogen–ERα: mild and transient UPR activation. In contrast, BHPI elicits massive and sustained UPR activation, converting the UPR from protective to toxic. In ERα+ cancer cells, BHPI rapidly hyperactivates plasma membrane PLCγ, generating inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3), which opens EnR IP3R calcium channels, rapidly depleting EnR Ca2+ stores. This leads to activation of all three arms of the UPR. Activation of the PERK arm stimulates phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), resulting in rapid inhibition of protein synthesis. The cell attempts to restore EnR Ca2+ levels, but the open EnR IP3R calcium channel leads to an ATP-depleting futile cycle, resulting in activation of the energy sensor AMP-activated protein kinase and phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2). eEF2 phosphorylation inhibits protein synthesis at a second site. BHPI’s novel mode of action, high potency, and effectiveness in therapy-resistant tumor cells make it an exceptional candidate for further mechanistic and therapeutic exploration.

scholarly journals Activation of the Unfolded Protein Response by 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose Inhibits Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Replication and Gene Expression

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 5794-5803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard J. Leung ◽  
Elda M. Duran ◽  
Metin Kurtoglu ◽  
Samita Andreansky ◽  
Theodore J. Lampidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Kaposi's Sarcoma ◽  
Kaposi’S Sarcoma ◽  
Lytic Replication ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Kaposi's Sarcoma Associated Herpesvirus ◽  
Protein Response ◽  
Kaposi’S Sarcoma Associated Herpesvirus

ABSTRACTLytic replication of the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is essential for the maintenance of both the infected state and characteristic angiogenic phenotype of Kaposi's sarcoma and thus represents a desirable therapeutic target. During the peak of herpesvirus lytic replication, viral glycoproteins are mass produced in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Normally, this leads to ER stress which, through an unfolded protein response (UPR), triggers phosphorylation of the α subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2α), resulting in inhibition of protein synthesis to maintain ER and cellular homeostasis. However, in order to replicate, herpesviruses have acquired the ability to prevent eIF2α phosphorylation. Here we show that clinically achievable nontoxic doses of the glucose analog 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG) stimulate ER stress, thereby shutting down eIF2α and inhibiting KSHV and murine herpesvirus 68 replication and KSHV reactivation from latency. Viral cascade genes that are involved in reactivation, including the master transactivator (RTA) gene, glycoprotein B, K8.1, and angiogenesis-regulating genes are markedly decreased with 2-DG treatment. Overall, our data suggest that activation of UPR by 2-DG elicits an early antiviral response via eIF2α inactivation, which impairs protein synthesis required to drive viral replication and oncogenesis. Thus, induction of ER stress by 2-DG provides a new antiherpesviral strategy that may be applicable to other viruses.

scholarly journals Complementary Roles of GADD34- and CReP-Containing Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2α Phosphatases during the Unfolded Protein Response

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (13) ◽  
pp. 1868-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Reid ◽  
Angeline S. L. Tay ◽  
Jeyapriya R. Sundaram ◽  
Irene C. J. Lee ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Current View ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) controls transcriptome-wide changes in mRNA translation in stressed cells. While phosphorylated eIF2α (P-eIF2α) attenuates global protein synthesis, mRNAs encoding stress proteins are more efficiently translated. Two eIF2α phosphatases, containing GADD34 and CReP, catalyze P-eIF2α dephosphorylation. The current view of GADD34, whose transcription is stress induced, is that it functions in a feedback loop to resolve cell stress. In contrast, CReP, which is constitutively expressed, controls basal P-eIF2α levels in unstressed cells. Our studies show that GADD34 drives substantial changes in mRNA translation in unstressed cells, particularly targeting the secretome. Following activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), rapid translation ofGADD34mRNA occurs and GADD34 is essential for UPR progression. In the absence of GADD34, eIF2α phosphorylation is persistently enhanced and the UPR translational program is significantly attenuated. This “stalled” UPR is relieved by the subsequent activation of compensatory mechanisms that include AKT-mediated suppression of PKR-like kinase (PERK) and increased expression ofCRePmRNA, partially restoring protein synthesis. Our studies highlight the coordinate regulation of UPR by the GADD34- and CReP-containing eIF2α phosphatases to control cell viability.

The unfolded protein response is triggered following a single, unaccustomed resistance-exercise bout

2014 ◽  
Vol 307 (6) ◽  
pp. R664-R669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel I. Ogborn ◽  
Bryon R. McKay ◽  
Justin D. Crane ◽  
Gianni Parise ◽  
Mark A. Tarnopolsky
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Knee Extensors ◽  
Leg Extension ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress results from an imbalance between the abundance of synthesized proteins and the folding capacity of the ER. In response, the unfolded protein response (UPR) attempts to restore ER function by attenuating protein synthesis and inducing chaperone expression. Resistance exercise (RE) stimulates protein synthesis; however, a postexercise accumulation of unfolded proteins may activate the UPR. Aging may impair protein folding, and the accumulation of oxidized and misfolded proteins may stimulate the UPR at rest in aged muscle. Eighteen younger ( n = 9; 21 ± 3 yr) and older ( n = 9; 70 ± 4 yr) untrained men completed a single, unilateral bout of RE using the knee extensors (four sets of 10 repetitions at 75% of one repetition maximum on the leg press and leg extension) to determine whether the UPR is increased in resting, aged muscle and whether RE stimulates the UPR. Muscle biopsies were taken from the nonexercised and exercised vastus lateralis at 3, 24, and 48 h postexercise. Age did not affect any of the proteins and transcripts related to the UPR. Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and protein kinase R-like ER protein kinase (PERK) proteins were increased at 48 h postexercise, whereas inositol-requiring enzyme 1 alpha (IRE1α) was elevated at 24 h and 48 h. Despite elevated protein, GRP78 and PERK mRNA was unchanged; however, IRE1α mRNA was increased at 24 h postexercise. Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) mRNA increased at 24 h and 48 h, whereas ATF4, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), and growth arrest and DNA damage protein 34 mRNA were unchanged. These data suggest that RE activates specific pathways of the UPR (ATF6/IRE1α), whereas PERK/eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha/CHOP does not. In conclusion, acute RE results in UPR activation, irrespective of age.

scholarly journals P09.14 Blocking counterregulation of unfolded protein response by targeted protein synthesis inhibition produces highly synergistic cell death in several cancer entities

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A59.1-A59
Author(s):  
F Gsottberger ◽  
C Meier ◽  
S Petkovic ◽  
L Mellenthin ◽  
M Krumbholz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Protein Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Synthesis Inhibition ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Protein Response

BackgroundBecause tumor cells have high proliferation rates the demand for energy on the one hand and proteins on the other hand is high. In line, protein folding machinery of the ER is heavily used. 2-Deoxyglucose (2-DG) not only blocks energy synthesis by inhibiting glycolysis but also blocks synthesis of mannosyl leading to impaired N-linked glycosylation, accumulation of misfolded proteins, and increased unfolded protein response (UPR). However, due to compensatory events, UPR-induced apoptosis is hampered. Therefore, we combined 2-DG with targeted protein synthesis inhibition by immunotoxins, consisting of an antibody and pseudomonas exotoxin, to enhance UPR mediated cell death.Materials and MethodsEstablished cell lines and patient-derived B-ALL samples were treated in vitro with various protein synthesis inhibitors and UPR-inducers. Drug synergy was determined mathematically as fold-increase over additivity. Biochemical studies were performed using western blots. In vivo enhancement was tested using systemic xenograft models.ResultsThe combination of Moxetumomab and 2-DG achieved a two to nine-fold synergy in vitro. Synergy was abrogated by the addition of Mannose suggesting UPR as cause of synergistic cell death. Similarly, Moxetumomab enhanced UPR-inducers Bortezomib and tunicamycin and protein synthesis inhibition by cycloheximide and puromycin enhanced 2-DG suggesting a conserved mechanism. Using HB21, an immunotoxin targeting human transferrin-receptor, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and glioblastoma were sensitized to 2-DG induced cell death. Biochemically, 2-DG increased XBP-1-cleavage, expression of pro-apoptotic CHOP and of anti-apoptotic BIP. Moxetumomab, however, blocked the upregulation of BIP while maintaining CHOP correlating with synergistic increase in PARP-cleavage and apoptosis. In two systemic mouse models, bone marrow (BM) lymphoma infiltration was not reduced by 2-DG or tunicamycin alone but was reduced after treatment with Moxetumomab alone by 5-fold in the JeKo-1 and by 16-fold in the Ramos model, respectively. The combination of Moxetumomab and 2-DG achieved a three-fold synergy in the JeKo-1 model and achieved MRD-negative BM status in the Ramos model. Against patient-derived B-ALL of the Burkitt’s type, 2-DG and Moxetumomab were up to 5-fold more active in vitro and up to 7-fold more active in mouse xenografts in vivo.ConclusionsCell death after persisting unfolded protein response is synergistically enhanced by tumor-cell specific inhibition of protein synthesis against four distinct tumor entities at physiologically achievable concentrations. Our approach of immunotoxin-induced targeted protein synthesis inhibition opens a novel, so far undescribed therapeutic window which may warrant clinical evaluation.Disclosure InformationF. Gsottberger: None. C. Meier: None. S. Petkovic: None. L. Mellenthin: None. M. Krumbholz: None. M. Metzler: None. A. Mackensen: None. F. Müller: None.

Shutdown of Translation: Lethal or Protective? Unfolded Protein Response versus Apoptosis

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 773-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wulf Paschen
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Metabolic Stress ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Transient Cerebral Ischemia ◽  
Stress Genes ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Protein Response

Shutdown of translation is a highly conserved response of cells to a severe form of metabolic, thermal, or physical stress. After the metabolic stress induced by transient cerebral ischemia, translational recovery is observed only in cells that withstand the transient interruption of blood supply, implying that restoration of translation critically determines the final outcome. On the other hand, apoptosis is believed to play a role in ischemia-induced cell death. Apoptosis is an active process that is blocked by agents known to suppress protein synthesis. Thus, the question arises whether stress-induced suppression of protein synthesis is protective or toxic for the affected cells. Accepting the notion that endoplasmic reticulum (ER) dysfunction is the mechanism underlying shutdown of translation after transient cerebral ischemia, an attempt may be made to try to solve the protein synthesis paradox by understanding the role of protein synthesis suppression in conditions associated with ER dysfunction. Endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction-induced accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER lumen is the trigger of two signal transduction pathways: PKR-like ER kinase–induced shutdown of translation to suppress new synthesis of proteins that cannot be correctly folded, and IRE1-induced expression of ER stress genes, a protein synthesis–dependent pathway needed to restore ER functions. Together these comprise the unfolded protein response. They are also induced after transient ischemia, implying a dual effect of protein synthesis suppression, a protective and a pathologic effect during early and prolonged reperfusion.

scholarly journals MIST1 Links Secretion and Stress as both Target and Regulator of the Unfolded Protein Response

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (23) ◽  
pp. 2931-2944 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hess ◽  
Katherine M. Strelau ◽  
Anju Karki ◽  
Mei Jiang ◽  
Ana C. Azevedo-Pouly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Secretory Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Networks ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

Transcriptional networks that govern secretory cell specialization, including instructing cells to develop a unique cytoarchitecture, amass extensive protein synthesis machinery, and be embodied to respond to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, remain largely uncharacterized. In this study, we discovered that the secretory cell transcription factor MIST1 ( Bhlha15 ), previously shown to be essential for cytoskeletal organization and secretory activity, also functions as a potent ER stress-inducible transcriptional regulator. Genome-wide DNA binding studies, coupled with genetic mouse models, revealed MIST1 gene targets that function along the entire breadth of the protein synthesis, processing, transport, and exocytosis networks. Additionally, key MIST1 targets are essential for alleviating ER stress in these highly specialized cells. Indeed, MIST1 functions as a coregulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) master transcription factor XBP1 for a portion of target genes that contain adjacent MIST1 and XBP1 binding sites. Interestingly, Mist1 gene expression is induced during ER stress by XBP1, but as ER stress subsides, MIST1 serves as a feedback inhibitor, directly binding the Xbp1 promoter and repressing Xbp1 transcript production. Together, our findings provide a new paradigm for XBP1-dependent UPR regulation and position MIST1 as a potential biotherapeutic for numerous human diseases.

scholarly journals Translational Regulations in Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Cancers

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manon Jaud ◽  
Céline Philippe ◽  
Doriana Di Bella ◽  
Weiwei Tang ◽  
Stéphane Pyronnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Er Stress ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Unfolded Proteins ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Protein Response

During carcinogenesis, almost all the biological processes are modified in one way or another. Among these biological processes affected, anomalies in protein synthesis are common in cancers. Indeed, cancer cells are subjected to a wide range of stresses, which include physical injuries, hypoxia, nutrient starvation, as well as mitotic, oxidative or genotoxic stresses. All of these stresses will cause the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER), which is a major organelle that is involved in protein synthesis, preservation of cellular homeostasis, and adaptation to unfavourable environment. The accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum causes stress triggering an unfolded protein response in order to promote cell survival or to induce apoptosis in case of chronic stress. Transcription and also translational reprogramming are tightly controlled during the unfolded protein response to ensure selective gene expression. The majority of stresses, including ER stress, induce firstly a decrease in global protein synthesis accompanied by the induction of alternative mechanisms for initiating the translation of mRNA, later followed by a translational recovery. After a presentation of ER stress and the UPR response, we will briefly present the different modes of translation initiation, then address the specific translational regulatory mechanisms acting during reticulum stress in cancers and highlight the importance of translational control by ER stress in tumours.

scholarly journals Thiopurines activate an antiviral unfolded protein response that blocks influenza A virus glycoprotein accumulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Slaine ◽  
Mariel Kleer ◽  
Brett A. Duguay ◽  
Eric S. Pringle ◽  
Eileigh Kadijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Antiviral Effect ◽  
Viral Glycoprotein ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Viral Glycoproteins ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Protein Response

Influenza A viruses (IAVs) utilize host shutoff mechanisms to limit antiviral gene expression and redirect translation machinery to the synthesis of viral proteins. Previously, we showed that IAV replication is sensitive to protein synthesis inhibitors that block translation initiation and induce formation of cytoplasmic condensates of untranslated messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes called stress granules (SGs). In this study, using an image-based high-content screen, we identified two thiopurines, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) and 6-thioguanosine (6-TGo), that triggered SG formation in IAV-infected cells and blocked IAV replication in a dose-dependent manner without eliciting SG formation in uninfected cells. 6-TG and 6-TGo selectively disrupted the synthesis and maturation of IAV glycoproteins hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) without affecting the levels of the viral RNAs that encode them. By contrast, these thiopurines had minimal effect on other IAV proteins or the global host protein synthesis. Disruption of IAV glycoprotein accumulation by 6-TG and 6-TGo correlated with activation of unfolded protein response (UPR) sensors activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6), inositol requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1) and PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), leading to downstream UPR gene expression. Treatment of infected cells with the chemical chaperone 4-phenylbutyric acid diminished thiopurine-induced UPR activation and partially restored the processing and accumulation of HA and NA. By contrast, chemical inhibition of the integrated stress response downstream of PERK restored accumulation of NA monomers but did not restore processing of viral glycoproteins. Genetic deletion of PERK enhanced the antiviral effect of 6-TG without causing overt cytotoxicity, suggesting that while UPR activation correlates with diminished viral glycoprotein accumulation, PERK could limit the antiviral effects of drug-induced ER stress. Taken together, these data indicate that 6-TG and 6-TGo are effective host-targeted antivirals that trigger the UPR and selectively disrupt accumulation of viral glycoproteins. IMPORTANCE Secreted and transmembrane proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where they are folded and modified prior to transport. Many viruses rely on the ER for the synthesis and processing of viral glycoproteins that will ultimately be incorporated into viral envelopes. Viral burden on the ER can trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR). Much remains to be learned about how viruses co-opt the UPR to ensure efficient synthesis of viral glycoproteins. Here, we show that two FDA-approved thiopurine drugs, 6-TG and 6-TGo, induce the UPR, which represents a previously unrecognized effect of these drugs on cell physiology. This thiopurine-mediated UPR activation blocks influenza virus replication by impeding viral glycoprotein accumulation. Our findings suggest that 6-TG and 6-TGo may have broad antiviral effect against enveloped viruses that require precise tuning of the UPR to support viral glycoprotein synthesis.

scholarly journals Stable Ribosome Binding to the Endoplasmic Reticulum Enables Compartment-specific Regulation of mRNA Translation

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 5819-5831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Stephens ◽  
Rebecca D. Dodd ◽  
Joseph W. Brewer ◽  
Patrick J. Lager ◽  
Jack D. Keene ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Stress Proteins ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
The Unfolded Protein Response ◽  
Protein Response

In eukaryotic cells, protein synthesis is compartmentalized; mRNAs encoding secretory/membrane proteins are translated on endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-bound ribosomes, whereas mRNAs encoding cytosolic proteins are translated on free ribosomes. mRNA partitioning between the two compartments occurs via positive selection: free ribosomes engaged in the translation of signal sequence-encoding mRNAs are trafficked from the cytosol to the ER. After translation termination, ER-bound ribosomes are thought to dissociate, thereby completing a cycle of mRNA partitioning. At present, the physiological basis for termination-coupled ribosome release is unknown. To gain insight into this process, we examined ribosome and mRNA partitioning during the unfolded protein response, key elements of which include suppression of the initiation stage of protein synthesis and polyribosome breakdown. We report that unfolded protein response (UPR)-elicited polyribosome breakdown resulted in the continued association, rather than release, of ER-bound ribosomes. Under these conditions, mRNA translation in the cytosol was suppressed, whereas mRNA translation on the ER was sustained. Furthermore, mRNAs encoding key soluble stress proteins (XBP-1 and ATF-4) were translated primarily on ER-bound ribosomes. These studies demonstrate that ribosome release from the ER is termination independent and identify new and unexpected roles for the ER compartment in the translational response to induction of the unfolded protein response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document