Does Change in Family Structure Affect the Household Headship among Older Adults in India? A Gendered Perspective

Author(s):  
Shobhit Srivastava ◽  
Shekhar Chauhan ◽  
Ratna Patel ◽  
Pradeep Kumar ◽  
Naina Purkayastha ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252722
Author(s):  
Shobhit Srivastava ◽  
Muhammad Thalil ◽  
Rashmi Rashmi ◽  
Ronak Paul

Background Despite huge changes in demographic behaviors, the family continues to be the major source of psychosocial support for older adults in India. The loss of household headship can be a cause of disregard for the aged and is associated in a very fundamental way with other status losses. Our study used the two rounds of the India Human Development Survey to understand the association of family structure on the gain or loss status of household headship among 10,527 older adults. Method Bivariate analysis was done using the chi-square test for association. Equivalently, the multivariate analysis involved estimating multivariable logistic regression models. Multicollinearity did not affect the estimates from the regression models. For examining headship transition, we performed two complete sets of analysis, by taking gain in headship and loss in headship as the outcome variable respectively. Results Across two rounds, a major shift in family structure was noticed as 6.8% of households moved from extended to a single generation. Results indicate that family structure was significantly associated with gaining and losing headship among older adults. Headship loss was more common among nuclear [OR: 2.16; CI: 1.28, 3.65] and extended [OR: 2.76; CI: 1.64, 4.66] family structures. Moreover, gaining headship was found to be significantly associated with married, educated, and working older adults. Conclusion Since living in single generation household may preferably be encouraged among older adults than their living in a complex household without headship and value they deserve, the public intervention may support the independent living within the older population through housing policies that create additional choices presented to older adults making residential decisions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S233-S233
Author(s):  
Alexa J Meinhardt ◽  
Theresa Gmelin ◽  
Allison L Kuipers ◽  
Stacy L Andersen ◽  
Stephanie Cosentino ◽  
...  

Abstract We examined the prevalence and heritability of perceived mental fatigability among older adults enrolled in the Long Life Family Study. Participants (N=2342; 55% female) self-administered the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS; scores range 0-50; higher score=greater fatigability). Using the PFS mental subscale, we evaluated differences across age strata (adjusted for family structure and field center) and estimated genetic heritability using the variance covariance methods implemented in SOLAR to determine genetic heritability (adjusted for age, sex, and field center). PFS mental score (mean±SD) and prevalence of higher mental fatigability (PFS ≥13) was greater across age strata: 60-69 (N=996, 5.9± 6.5, 14.5%), 70-79 (N=830, 6.8 ±7.6, 18.7%), 80-89 (N=251, 11.7±10.8, 41.8%), and ≥90 (N=265, 20.2±13.6, 67.2%), p<0.0001. Only among those ≥90, females (21.7±13.5) had greater mental fatigability than males (18.0±13.5), p=0.03. Residual heritability of mental fatigability was 0.17, p<0.0001. Future analyses will evaluate correlates of mental fatigability to identify potential avenues for intervention.


Author(s):  
Shuichi Hara ◽  
Hiroko Miura ◽  
Tsuyoshi Hita ◽  
Sahara Sasaki ◽  
Hidetoshi Ito ◽  
...  

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to be a widespread pandemic. We investigated the relationship between anxiety/stress and health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in homebound Japanese older adults during January and February 2021. We surveyed 1507 community-dwelling, older Japanese adults using a self-administered questionnaire on primary attributes, including family structure, evaluation of psychological anxiety/stress, and health behaviors. Participants were divided into four anxiety/stress groups based on the frequency of experiencing anxiety/stress, and their association with health behaviors was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. Responses were received from 469 (31.1%) respondents. In the bivariate analysis, age and family structure were significantly associated with anxiety/stress (p < 0.01). The health behaviors significantly associated with anxiety/stress were walking, balanced eating habits, limited snacking, regular lifestyle, and dental visits. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the variables in the bivariate analysis that showed a significant association with anxiety/stress status as independent variables. Finally, age and dietary habits were significantly associated with anxiety/stress status. No significant associations were found between any other variables. Among older adults living in the rural areas of Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety/stress status was significantly associated with age and dietary habits but not with other health behaviors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 256 ◽  
pp. 618-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Chang ◽  
Yeates Conwell ◽  
Donghui Wu ◽  
Yingqi Guo ◽  
Paul S.F. Yip

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 603-603
Author(s):  
Christine Mair ◽  
Katherine Ornstein ◽  
Feinian Chen

Abstract Nearly all older adults cross-nationally rely on close family members to facilitate care at the end-of-life, but recent demographic shifts toward declining fertility and marriage rates have yielded an unprecedented increase in older adults who lack traditional family ties (“kinless”). “Kinless” older adults may be at risk for social isolation, lack of caregiving options, and poorer end-of-life outcomes, and these risks may be buffered or exacerbated by social and economic resources as well as country context. Because the potential impact of “kinlessness” on end-of-life outcomes cross-nationally is unknown and virtually unstudied, this symposium composed of overlapping, interdisciplinary research teams investigate if and how “kinlessness” is associated with end-of-life outcomes cross-nationally. Mudrazija and Ornstein analyze a sample of older European adults (SHARE) to predict location of death (e.g., home deaths) by family size, living alone, and size of social network. Plick, Ankuda, and Ornstein examine a sample of older American decedents (HRS) to predict end-of-life outcomes (e.g., hours of care received, location of death). Mair, Ornstein, Aldridge, and Thygesen explore associations between family structure and multiple end-of-life outcomes (e.g., hospitalizations, ICU visits, medical treatment) among the population of decedents aged 50+ from Denmark. Finally, Mair, Ornstein, Calvo, Donoso, and Medina explore family structure, social isolation, loneliness, and end-of-life outcomes among a sample of older adults from 20 countries (Gateway to Global Aging). These papers will be discussed by Feinian Chen, a family sociologist and social demographer who specializes in cross-national comparisons of older adults’ family structures, country context, and health.


Author(s):  
Michal Isaacson ◽  
Ashwin Tripathi ◽  
Tannistha Samanta ◽  
Lisa D’Ambrosio ◽  
Joseph Coughlin

Gerontological scholarship has long seen the environment to be a silent partner in aging. Environmental Gerontology, an established approach in Social Gerontology, has shown how the everyday lives of older adults are deeply entangled in socio-spatial environments. Adopting an Environmental Gerontology approach, we explore social and cultural dimensions of the association between out-of-home mobility and wellbeing among older adults in a north western city of India. This was established by combining high resolution time-space data collected using GPS receivers, questionnaire data and time diaries. Following a multi-staged analytical strategy, we first examine the correlation between out-of-home mobility and wellbeing using bivariate correlation. Second, we introduce gender and family structure into regression models as moderating variables to improve the models’ explanatory power. Finally, we use our results to reinterpret the Ecological Press Model of Aging to include familial structure as a factor that moderates environmental stress. Findings emphasize the central role that social constructs play in the long-established relationship between the environment and the wellbeing of older adults.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shobhit Srivastava ◽  
S. K. Singh ◽  
Manish Kumar ◽  
T. Muhammad

Abstract Background The status of household headship accorded to the older members of the family is often symbolic and seldom vested with some control over resources. The increased dependency and diminished ability to contribute to household economy are major factors that lead to a decline in the respect accorded to older people and their status in the family. The present study aimed to understand the distinction between the functional and nominal household headship status of older adults based on their decision-making power and examine how it is associated with their subjective well-being. Method The present research used data from the 'Building a Knowledge Base on Population Aging in India' (BKPAI) which is nationally representative. The survey was conducted in 2011, across seven states of India. Descriptive statistics along with percentage distribution were calculated for subjective well-being over explanatory variables. For finding the association between subjective well-being over explanatory variables, binary logistic regression model was used. Results The mean age of the study population was 68 years [CI: 67.8–68.2]. About 5 % of older adults had nominal while 95% had functional headship status. The prevalence of low subjective well-being (LSWB) was significantly higher among older adults with nominal headship status (58%) than functional headship status (23%). After controlling for several other variables, older adults with nominal headship status were 59% significantly more likely to have low subjective well-being than individuals with functional headship status (OR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.31). Further, older adults with psychological distress, chronic morbidity, poor self-reported health, no community involvement and no one to trust on were at higher risk of LSWB than their counterparts. Conclusions Findings suggest that older adults who do not have a household headship with power with active participation in household decision-making as well as those who have no involvement in social activities or have poor health conditions need to be given more attention. Thus, to keep a large proportion of older population gainfully engaged, their care and support should be ensured via providing appropriate services that would enhance their roles and responsibilities and overall wellbeing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (103) ◽  
pp. 233-265
Author(s):  
Sergio Cuauhtémoc Gaxiola Robles Linares ◽  
◽  
Daniel Lozano Keymolen ◽  

The objective of the article is to analyze the inequality between households with older adults in Mexico in 2015. The source of information is the Intercensal Survey 2015 of the National Insti-tute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). The methodological proposal of this research is based on the application of a Multiple Correspondence Analysis that allows studying the relationship between the variables of households with older adults in Mexico based on three dimensions: indi-vidual, household and context. The results indicate the presence of permanent inequalities among households with people aged 60 and over, in addition to significant differences in assets, family structure and government aid, which impacts the living conditions of older adults in Mexico in 2015.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 604-604
Author(s):  
Esteban Calvo ◽  
Christine Mair ◽  
Katherine Ornstein ◽  
Rosario Donoso ◽  
José Medina

Abstract Countries across the globe are experiencing declining rates of fertility and marriage, which present a distinct challenge for older adults’ social integration, well-being, and end-of-life care. However, older adults who are “alone” (e.g., no partner, no child) may not be lonely, and end-of-life risks faced by “kinless” older adults likely vary significantly by country context. Using harmonized, cross-national data from 20 countries (United States (HRS), England (ELSA), and European Union (SHARE)), we examine associations between family structure, loneliness, and end-of-life outcomes. Although “kinless” family structures are associated with greater loneliness in the pooled sample, the percent of “kinless” who report no signs of loneliness ranges from 7% (Greece) to 56% (Denmark). Family structure is associated with various end-of-life outcomes, and these associations vary by country—likely reflecting differences in healthcare structure. We discuss distinctions between “being alone,” “being lonely,” and “being without care” in light of cross-national variation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document