scholarly journals A follow-up study of a randomized controlled study evaluating safety and efficacy of leuprorelin acetate every-3-month depot for 2 versus 3 or more years with tamoxifen for 5 years as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 684-697
Author(s):  
Junichi Kurebayashi ◽  
Eiichi Shiba ◽  
Tatsuya Toyama ◽  
Hiroshi Matsumoto ◽  
Minoru Okazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Observation Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Premenopausal Patients

Abstract Background Previously, we conducted the 5-year open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of leuprorelin adjuvant therapy in post-operative premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, which was a pilot study to investigate the optimal duration of leuprorelin treatment. Since, however, long-term outcomes became required for the adjuvant endocrine therapy, we performed this follow-up observation study. Methods Follow-up observation study was performed up to 10th year after randomization, continuing RCT to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leuprorelin every 3 months for ≥ 3 versus 2 years, with daily tamoxifen for 5 years. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and 2-year landmark DFS. Results Eligible patients (N = 222) were randomly assigned to receive leuprorelin for either 2 years (N = 112) or ≥ 3 years (N = 110) with tamoxifen. Leuprorelin treatment for ≥ 3 years versus 2 years provided no significant difference in DFS (HR 0.944, 95% CI 0.486–1.8392) or 2-year landmark DFS (N = 99 and 102 in 2-year and ≥ 3-year groups, HR 0.834, 0.397–1.753). In small, higher-risk subgroup (n = 17); however, 2-year landmark DFS in ≥ 3-year group was significantly longer (HR 0.095, 0.011–0.850) than that in 2-year group. The incidence of bone-related adverse events was around 5% in both groups. Conclusions Adjuvant leuprorelin treatment for ≥ 3 years with tamoxifen only showed similar efficacy and safety profiles to those for 2 years in analyses among all patients but suggested greater benefit in higher-risk patients. No new safety signal was identified for long-term leuprorelin treatment. Trial registration number Not applicable. This was an observational study.

scholarly journals Relationships between pathological factors and long-term outcomes in patients enrolled in two prospective randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of oral tegafur–uracil with CMF (N·SAS-BC 01 trial and CUBC trial)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Ohno ◽  
Shigehira Saji ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Hitoshi Tsuda ◽  
Futoshi Akiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the efficacies of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) and tegafur–uracil (UFT) as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected stage I–IIIA breast cancer by immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtype and to determine the relationships between clinicopathological factors and long-term outcomes. Methods A pooled analysis of the randomized controlled N·SAS-BC 01 and CUBC studies was conducted. Expression of hormone receptors (HRs; estrogen and progesterone receptors), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67were assessed by IHC. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and nuclear/histological grades were determined by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis and hazard ratios were determined by Cox model adjusted for baseline tumor size and nodal status. Results A total of 689 patients (342 CMF and 347 UFT) were included in the analyses with a median follow-up of 11.1 years. There was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the two cohorts (RFS: 0.96 [95% confidence interval: 0.71–1.30], log-rank test p = 0.80; OS: 0.93 [0.64–1.35], p = 0.70). There was no difference in RFS or OS between the two cohorts for HR+/HER2− and HR+/HER2+ subtypes. RFS was significantly longer in patients treated with UFT compared with CMF in patients with HR−/HER2+ subtype (0.30 [0.10–0.88], p = 0.03). A high TILs level was associated with a better OS compared with low TILs level (p = 0.02). Conclusions This long-term follow-up study showed that RFS and OS were similar in patients with luminal-type breast cancer treated with CMF and UFT.

Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Patients with Small (≤ 1 Centimetre) Node-Negative HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Not Treated with Adjuvant Anti-HER2-Targeted Therapy: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenni S. Liikanen ◽  
Marjut Leidenius ◽  
Heikki Joensuu ◽  
Tuomo J. Meretoja
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Her2 Expression ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

Introduction Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is considered an unfavourable prognostic factor in early breast cancer when the patients are not treated with HER2-targeted therapy. However, the long-term prognostic importance of HER2-expression in small (≤1 cm, stage pT1a-b), node-negative HER2+ breast cancer is still incompletely known. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed based on a prospectively collected database including patients with pT1 breast cancer operated at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between March 2000 and April 2006. In this database, 44 patients with pT1a-bN0M0, HER2+ cancer, not treated with adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted therapy (the HER2+ group) and 291 pT1a-bN0M0, hormone receptor positive, HER2- negative cancers (the ER+/HER2- group) were identified and included in the study. Survival outcomes were analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up time was 9.7 years after primary breast surgery. Ten-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) was 84.0% in the HER2+ group and 98.2% in the ER+/HER2- group (p < 0.001). Ten-year overall survival was only 78.5% in the HER2+ group, but 91.7% in the ER+/HER2- group (p = 0.09). Conclusions Cancer HER2-status is strongly associated with unfavourable DDFS during the first decade of follow-up in patients with small (pT1a-bN0M0) breast cancer when adjuvant anti-HER2-targeted treatment is not administered.

scholarly journals Adjuvant Letrozole and Tamoxifen Alone or Sequentially for Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the BIG 1-98 Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Anita Giobbie-Hurder ◽  
Marco Colleoni ◽  
Maj-Britt Jensen ◽  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Contralateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Luminal Breast Cancer ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose Luminal breast cancer has a long natural history, with recurrences continuing beyond 10 years after diagnosis. We analyzed long-term follow-up (LTFU) of efficacy outcomes and adverse events in the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study reported after a median follow-up of 12.6 years. Patients and Methods BIG 1-98 is a four-arm, phase III, double-blind, randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole versus tamoxifen (either treatment received for 5 years) and their sequences (2 years of one treatment plus 3 years of the other) for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. When pharmaceutical company sponsorship ended at 8.4 years of median follow-up, academic partners initiated an observational, LTFU extension collecting annual data on survival, disease status, and adverse events. Information from Denmark was from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Registry. Intention-to-treat analyses are reported. Results Of 8,010 enrolled patients, 4,433 were alive and not withdrawn at an LTFU participating center, and 3,833 (86%) had at least one LTFU report. For the monotherapy comparison of letrozole versus tamoxifen, we found a 9% relative reduction in the hazard of a disease-free survival event with letrozole (hazard ratio [HR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.01). HRs for other efficacy end points were similar to those for disease-free survival. Efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen for contralateral breast cancer varied significantly over time (0- to 5-, 5- to 10-, and > 10-year HRs, 0.62, 0.47, and 1.35, respectively; treatment-by-time interaction P = .005), perhaps reflecting a longer carryover effect of tamoxifen. Reporting of specific long-term adverse events seemed more effective with national registry than with case-record reporting of clinical follow-up. Conclusion Efficacy end points continued to show trends favoring letrozole. Letrozole reduced contralateral breast cancer frequency in the first 10 years, but this reversed beyond 10 years. This study illustrates the value of extended follow-up in trials of luminal breast cancer.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel Compared to Docetaxel as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Dong Lv ◽  
Hong-Ming Song ◽  
Zhao-He Niu ◽  
Gang Nie ◽  
Shuai Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Paclitaxel Group ◽  
Docetaxel Group

BackgroundNanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel with those of docetaxel as neoadjuvant regimens for HER2-negative breast cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, a total of 159 HER2-negative breast cancer patients who had undergone operation after NAC were consecutively analyzed from May 2016 to April 2018. Patients were classified into the nab-paclitaxel group (n = 79, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) and the docetaxel group (n = 80, docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) according to the drug they received for neoadjuvant treatment. The efficacy and adverse events were evaluated in the two groups.ResultsThe pathological complete response (pCR)(ypT0/isN0) rate was significantly higher in the nab-paclitaxel group than in the docetaxel group (36.71% vs 20.00%; P = 0.031). The multivariate analysis revealed that therapeutic drugs, lymph node status, and tumor subtype were the most significant factor influencing treatment outcome. At a median follow-up of 47 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different in those assigned to nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel (82.28% vs 76.25%; P = 0.331). The incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy in the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that in the docetaxel group (60.76% vs 36.25%; P = 0.008), while the incidence of arthralgia was observed more frequently in the docetaxel group (57.50% vs 39.97%; P = 0.047).ConclusionsCompared with docetaxel, nab-paclitaxel achieved a higher pCR rate, especially those patients with triple-negative breast cancer or lymph node negative breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups. This study provides a valuable reference for the management of patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.

Mitomycin C–Enhanced Revision Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 147 (5) ◽  
pp. 937-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameh M. Ragab ◽  
Hossam S. Elsherif ◽  
Emad M. Shehata ◽  
Ahmed Younes ◽  
Ahmed M. Gamea
Keyword(s):  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Endoscopic Dcr ◽  
Causes Of Failure

Objectives (1) To conduct an adequately powered randomized controlled trial investigating the safety and efficacy of mitomycin C–enhanced revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and (2) to analyze causes of failure after primary endoscopic DCR. Study Design A randomized controlled study. Setting General hospital. Subjects and Methods Seventy-six revision endoscopic DCRs were randomized into 2 groups: endoscopic DCR with mitomycin (group I), where 0.5 mg/mL mitomycin C was applied for 10 minutes, and endoscopic DCR without mitomycin (group II). Follow-up settings were done to document the patient’s subjective improvement, to judge ostium patency on irrigation, and to record any complications. Results Causes of failure in the original 92 patients included canalicular obstruction (14%), small misplaced bony window (43%), very small nasolacrimal stoma due to development of synechia (23%), and complete closure of nasolacrimal stoma with tough fibrous tissue (63%). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in subjective and objective success rates and adverse events. Group I demonstrated a significantly longer operative time and a significantly lower number of debridement sessions (mean of 1.2 vs 1.9). Conclusions Recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction after primary endoscopic DCR is mainly due to reclosure of the nasolacrimal stoma with synechia and fashioning of the small misplaced bony window. Mitomycin C does not increase the success rate of revision endoscopic DCR. It is a safe procedure and may be of value only in patients inaccessible to strict follow-up because it induces a better healing profile in terms of mucosal recovery, wound healing, and less need for debridement sessions.

5-Year Results of Dose-Intensive Sequential Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Women With High-Risk Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1118-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hudis ◽  
M. Fornier ◽  
L. Riccio ◽  
D. Lebwohl ◽  
J. Crown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II pilot study of dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin followed sequentially by high-dose cyclophosphamide to determine the safety and feasibility of this dose-dense treatment and to estimate the disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients received adjuvant treatment with four cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus every 21 days, followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m2 every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were assessable, and all but two completed all planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most common toxicity was neutropenic fever, which occurred in 39% of patients. Median disease-free survival is 66 months (95% confidence interval, 34 to 98 months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. At 5 years of follow-up, the disease-free survival is 51.7%, and overall survival is 60.0%. There is no long-term treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study of doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the sequential dose-dense plan. Long-term follow-up, although noncomparative, is promising. However, this regimen is associated with a higher incidence of toxicity (and also higher costs) than the standard dose and schedule of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and therefore it should not be used as conventional therapy in the absence of demonstrated improvement of outcome. Randomized trials testing the dose-dense approach have been completed but not yet reported. Because the sequential plan can decrease overlapping toxicities, it is an appropriate platform for the addition of newer active agents, such as taxanes or monoclonal antibodies.

Psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer stages I and II: six-year follow-up of consecutive patients.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1778-1782 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Omne-Pontén ◽  
L Holmberg ◽  
P O Sjödén
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Psychosocial Adjustment ◽  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Negative Experience ◽  
Follow Up Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
The Impact

PURPOSE To evaluate, in a long-term follow-up study of consecutive patients (N = 99), the impact of surgery--breast-conserving treatment (BCT) versus mastectomy (MT)--on psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer, pTNM stage I/II. PATIENTS AND METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted at a median of 6 years (range, 5.8 to 8.1) after primary surgery. Sixty-six women were available for the long-term follow-up study. Twenty-six women had been treated with BCT and 40 with MT. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning psychosocial adjustment, as measured by the Social adjustment Scale (SAS). In general, the levels of maladjustment were lower than at 13 months postoperatively, but 10% still showed maladjustment. Sixty percent of the women were unwilling to show themselves naked, and 22% felt that they had become less attractive because of the surgical treatment. In an explorative part of the interview, 68% of the women complained about how they had been informed of the diagnosis. A tendency toward a significant difference was found in the relation between previous maladjustment and a negative experience at the time of diagnosis (P = .07). CONCLUSION Few data are available on long-term follow-up results with regard to psychosocial adjustment among women after breast cancer surgery. This study provides the important information that there are no differences in patient psychosocial adjustment that can be ascribed to the type of surgery at 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document