Comparison of two bias correction methods for TRMM 3B42 satellite daily rainfall estimates over Northern Tunisia

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saoussen Dhib ◽  
Nathaniel Chaney ◽  
Chris M. Mannaerts ◽  
Zoubeida Bargaoui
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Northern Tunisia ◽  
Trmm 3B42 ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

scholarly journals Performance of TRMM TMPA 3B42 V7 in Replicating Daily Rainfall and Regional Rainfall Regimes in the Amazon Basin (1998–2013)

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Michot ◽  
Daniel Vila ◽  
Damien Arvor ◽  
Thomas Corpetti ◽  
Josyane Ronchail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amazon Basin ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Rainfall Regimes ◽  
Trmm 3B42 ◽  
Good Agreement

Knowledge and studies on precipitation in the Amazon Basin (AB) are determinant for environmental aspects such as hydrology, ecology, as well as for social aspects like agriculture, food security, or health issues. Availability of rainfall data at high spatio-temporal resolution is thus crucial for these purposes. Remote sensing techniques provide extensive spatial coverage compared to ground-based rainfall data but it is imperative to assess the quality of the estimates. Previous studies underline at regional scale in the AB, and for some years, the efficiency of the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM) 3B42 Version 7 (V7) (hereafter 3B42) daily product data, to provide a good view of the rainfall time variability which is important to understand the impacts of El Nino Southern Oscilation. Then our study aims to enhance the knowledge about the quality of this product on the entire AB and provide a useful understanding about his capacity to reproduce the annual rainfall regimes. For that purpose we compared 3B42 against 205 quality-controlled rain gauge measurements for the period from March 1998 to July 2013, with the aim to know whether 3B42 is reliable for climate studies. Analysis of quantitative (Bias, Relative RMSE) and categorical statistics (POD, FAR) for the whole period show a more accurate spatial distribution of mean daily rainfall estimations in the lowlands than in the Andean regions. In the latter, the location of a rain gauge and its exposure seem to be more relevant to explain mismatches with 3B42 rather than its elevation. In general, a good agreement is observed between rain gauge derived regimes and those from 3B42; however, performance is better in the rainy period. Finally, an original way to validate the estimations is by taking into account the interannual variability of rainfall regimes (i.e., the presence of sub-regimes): four sub-regimes in the northeast AB defined from rain gauges and 3B42 were found to be in good agreement. Furthermore, this work examined whether TRMM 3B42 V7 rainfall estimates for all the grid points in the AB, outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) and water vapor flux patterns are consistent in the northeast of AB.

Improvement in rainfall estimates using bias correction with the IAP-DCP Global Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 26-35
Author(s):  
Usa Humphries ◽  
Pramet Kaewmesri ◽  
Pariwate Varnakovida ◽  
Prungchan Wongwises
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Global Model ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

scholarly journals Investigation of Discrepancies in Satellite Rainfall Estimates over Ethiopia

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2347-2369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Young ◽  
Charles J. R. Williams ◽  
J. Christine Chiu ◽  
Ross I. Maidment ◽  
Shu-Hua Chen
Keyword(s):  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Amount ◽  
Shallow Convection ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Satellite Rainfall ◽  
Convective Cells ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Abstract Tropical Applications of Meteorology Using Satellite and Ground-Based Observations (TAMSAT) rainfall estimates are used extensively across Africa for operational rainfall monitoring and food security applications; thus, regional evaluations of TAMSAT are essential to ensure its reliability. This study assesses the performance of TAMSAT rainfall estimates, along with the African Rainfall Climatology (ARC), version 2; the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42 product; and the Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH), against a dense rain gauge network over a mountainous region of Ethiopia. Overall, TAMSAT exhibits good skill in detecting rainy events but underestimates rainfall amount, while ARC underestimates both rainfall amount and rainy event frequency. Meanwhile, TRMM consistently performs best in detecting rainy events and capturing the mean rainfall and seasonal variability, while CMORPH tends to overdetect rainy events. Moreover, the mean difference in daily rainfall between the products and rain gauges shows increasing underestimation with increasing elevation. However, the distribution in satellite–gauge differences demonstrates that although 75% of retrievals underestimate rainfall, up to 25% overestimate rainfall over all elevations. Case studies using high-resolution simulations suggest underestimation in the satellite algorithms is likely due to shallow convection with warm cloud-top temperatures in addition to beam-filling effects in microwave-based retrievals from localized convective cells. The overestimation by IR-based algorithms is attributed to nonraining cirrus with cold cloud-top temperatures. These results stress the importance of understanding regional precipitation systems causing uncertainties in satellite rainfall estimates with a view toward using this knowledge to improve rainfall algorithms.

scholarly journals Nine-Year Systematic Evaluation of the GPM and TRMM Precipitation Products in the Shuaishui River Basin in East-Central China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoying Yang ◽  
Yang Lu ◽  
Mou Leong Tan ◽  
Xiaogang Li ◽  
Guoqing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Central China ◽  
Spatiotemporal Resolution ◽  
Study Region ◽  
East Central ◽  
Hourly Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Estimates ◽  
Different Time Scales

Owing to their advantages of wide coverage and high spatiotemporal resolution, satellite precipitation products (SPPs) have been increasingly used as surrogates for traditional ground observations. In this study, we have evaluated the accuracy of the latest five GPM IMERG V6 and TRMM 3B42 V7 precipitation products across the monthly, daily, and hourly scale in the hilly Shuaishui River Basin in East-Central China. For evaluation, a total of four continuous and three categorical metrics have been calculated based on SPP estimates and historical rainfall records at 13 stations over a period of 9 years from 2009 to 2017. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple posterior comparison tests are used to assess the significance of the difference in SPP rainfall estimates. Our evaluation results have revealed a wide-ranging performance among the SPPs in estimating rainfall at different time scales. Firstly, two post-time SPPs (IMERG_F and 3B42) perform considerably better in estimating monthly rainfall. Secondly, with IMERG_F performing the best, the GPM products generally produce better daily rainfall estimates than the TRMM products. Thirdly, with their correlation coefficients all falling below 0.6, neither GPM nor TRMM products could estimate hourly rainfall satisfactorily. In addition, topography tends to impose similar impact on the performance of SPPs across different time scales, with more estimation deviations at high altitude. In general, the post-time IMERG_F product may be considered as a reliable data source of monthly or daily rainfall in the study region. Effective bias-correction algorithms incorporating ground rainfall observations, however, are needed to further improve the hourly rainfall estimates of the SPPs to ensure the validity of their usage in real-world applications.

scholarly journals Evaluation of High-Resolution Satellite Rainfall Products through Streamflow Simulation in a Hydrological Modeling of a Small Mountainous Watershed in Ethiopia

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 338-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menberu M. Bitew ◽  
Mekonnen Gebremichael ◽  
Lula T. Ghebremichael ◽  
Yared A. Bayissa
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Model Simulations ◽  
Mountainous Watershed ◽  
Satellite Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Abstract This study focuses on evaluating four widely used global high-resolution satellite rainfall products [the Climate Prediction Center’s morphing technique (CMORPH) product, the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) near-real-time product (3B42RT), the TMPA method post-real-time research version product (3B42), and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) product] with a spatial resolution of 0.25° and temporal resolution of 3 h through their streamflow simulations in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrologic model of a 299-km2 mountainous watershed in Ethiopia. Results show significant biases in the satellite rainfall estimates. The 3B42RT and CMORPH products perform better than the 3B42 and PERSIANN. The predictive ability of each of the satellite rainfall was examined using a SWAT model calibrated in two different approaches: with rain gauge rainfall as input, and with each of the satellite rainfall products as input. Significant improvements in model streamflow simulations are obtained when the model is calibrated with input-specific rainfall data than with rain gauge data. Calibrating SWAT with satellite rainfall estimates results in curve number values that are by far higher than the standard tabulated values, and therefore caution must be exercised when using standard tabulated parameter values with satellite rainfall inputs. The study also reveals that bias correction of satellite rainfall estimates significantly improves the model simulations. The best-performing model simulations based on satellite rainfall inputs are obtained after bias correction and model recalibration.

scholarly journals Bias correction of radar rainfall estimates based on a geostatistical technique

ScienceAsia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratchawatch Hanchoowong ◽  
Uruya Weesakul ◽  
Siriluk Chumchean
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

scholarly journals Evaluation of radar-gauge merging methods for quantitative precipitation estimates

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 2975-3003 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Goudenhoofdt ◽  
L. Delobbe
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Radar Observations ◽  
Geostatistical Methods ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Field Bias ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimates

Abstract. Accurate quantitative precipitation estimates are of crucial importance for hydrological studies and applications. When spatial precipitation fields are required, rain gauge measurements are often combined with weather radar observations. In this paper, we evaluate several radar-gauge merging methods with various degrees of complexity: from mean field bias correction to geostatical merging techniques. The study area is the Walloon region of Belgium, which is mostly located in the Meuse catchment. Observations from a C-band Doppler radar and a dense rain gauge network are used to retrieve daily rainfall accumulations over this area. The relative performance of the different merging methods are assessed through a comparison against daily measurements from an independent gauge network. A 3-year verification is performed using several statistical quality parameters. It appears that the geostatistical merging methods perform best with the mean absolute error decreasing by 40% with respect to the original data. A mean field bias correction still achieves a reduction of 25%. A seasonal analysis shows that the benefit of using radar observations is particularly significant during summer. The effect of the network density on the performance of the methods is also investigated. For this purpose, a simple approach to remove gauges from a network is proposed. The analysis reveals that the sensitivity is relatively high for the geostatistical methods but rather small for the simple methods. The geostatistical methods give the best results for all network densities except for a very low density of 1 gauge per 500 km2 where a range-dependent adjustment complemented with a static local bias correction performs best.

scholarly journals Investigating statistical bias correction with temporal subsample of the upper Ping River Basin, Thailand

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srisunee Wuthiwongtyohtin
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Bias Error ◽  
Statistical Bias ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Nonparametric Transformation ◽  
Statistical Bias Correction

Abstract This study aims to investigate different statistical bias correction techniques to improve the output of a regional climate model (RCM) of daily rainfall for the upper Ping River Basin in Northern Thailand. Three subsamples are used for each bias correction method, which are (1) using full calibrated 30-year-period data, (2) seasonal subsampling, and (3) monthly subsampling. The bias correction techniques are classified into three groups, which are (1) distribution-derived transformation, (2) parametric transformation, and (3) nonparametric transformation. Eleven bias correction techniques with three different subsamples are used to derive transfer function parameters to adjust model bias error. Generally, appropriate bias correction methods with optimal subsampling are locally dependent and need to be defined specifically for a study area. The study results show that monthly subsampling would be well established by capturing the monthly mean variation after correcting the model's daily rainfall. The results also give the best-fitted parameter set of the different subsamples. However, applying the full calibrated data and the seasonal subsamples cannot substantially improve internal variability. Thus, the effect of internal climate variability of the study region is greater than the choice of bias correction methods. Of the bias correction approaches, nonparametric transformation performed best in correcting daily rainfall bias error in this study area as evaluated by statistics and frequency distributions. Therefore, using a combination of methods between the nonparametric transformation and monthly subsampling offered the best accuracy and robustness. However, the nonparametric transformation was quite sensitive to the calibration time period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document