Positional accuracy and convergence time assessment of GPS precise point positioning in static mode

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Emin Ayhan ◽  
Bandar Almuslmani
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Positional Accuracy ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Time Assessment

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of Real-Time Precise Point Positioning with Both BDS-3 and BDS-2 Observations

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 6027
Author(s):  
Lin Pan ◽  
Xuanping Li ◽  
Wenkun Yu ◽  
Wujiao Dai ◽  
Cuilin Kuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
The Real ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Time Critical

For time-critical precise applications, one popular technology is the real-time precise point positioning (PPP). In recent years, there has been a rapid development in the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), and the constellation of global BDS (BDS-3) has been fully deployed. In addition to the regional BDS (BDS-2) constellation, the real-time stream CLK93 has started to support the BDS-3 constellation, indicating that the real-time PPP processing involving BDS-3 observations is feasible. In this study, the global positioning performance of real-time PPP with BDS-3/BDS-2 observations is initially evaluated using the datasets from 147 stations. In the east, north and upward directions, positioning accuracy of 1.8, 1.2 and 2.5 cm in the static mode, and of 6.7, 5.1 and 10.4 cm in the kinematic mode can be achieved for the BDS-3/BDS-2 real-time PPP, respectively, while the corresponding convergence time with a threshold of 10 cm is 32.9, 23.7 and 32.8 min, and 66.9, 42.9 and 69.1 min in the two modes in the three directions, respectively. To complete this, the availability of BDS-3/BDS-2 constellations, the quality of BDS-3/BDS-2 real-time precise satellite products, and the BDS-3/BDS-2 post-processed PPP solutions are also analyzed. For comparison, the results for the GPS are also presented.

scholarly journals Research on Accelerating Single-Frequency Precise Point Positioning Convergence with Atmospheric Constraint

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (24) ◽  
pp. 5407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ren Wang ◽  
Jingxiang Gao ◽  
Nanshan Zheng ◽  
Zengke Li ◽  
Yifei Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
External Information ◽  
Tropospheric Delay ◽  
Unknown Parameters ◽  
Weighted Interpolation ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Delay Constraints ◽  
Point Positioning

An increasing number of researchers have conducted in-depth research on the advantages of low-cost single-frequency (SF) receivers, which can effectively use ionospheric information when compared to dual-frequency ionospheric-free combination. However, SF observations are bound to increase the unknown parameters and prolong the convergence time. It is desirable if the convergence time can be reduced by external information constraints, for example atmospheric constraints, which include ionosphere- or troposphere constraints. In this study, ionospheric delay constraints, tropospheric delay constraints, and their dual constraints were considered. Additionally, a total of 18,720 test experiments were performed. First, the nearest-neighbor extrapolation (NENE), bilinear- (BILI), bicubic- (BICU), and Junkins weighted-interpolation (JUNK) method of Global Ionospheric Map (GIM) grid products were analyzed. The statistically verified BILI in the percentage of convergence time, average convergence time, and computation time consumption of them shows a good advantage. Next, the influences of global troposphere- and ionosphere-constrained on the convergence time of SF Precise Point Positioning (PPP) were analyzed. It is verified that the ionosphere-constrained (TIC2) has significant influence on the convergence time in the horizontal and vertical components, while the troposphere-constrained (TIC1) has better effect on the convergence time in the vertical components within some thresholds. Of course, the dual constraint (TIC3) has the shortest average convergence time, which is at least 46.5% shorter in static mode and 5.4% in kinematic mode than standard SF PPP (TIC0).

scholarly journals Real-time GNSS precise point positioning for low-cost smart devices

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Zishen Li ◽  
Ningbo Wang ◽  
Zhiyu Wang
Keyword(s):  
Carrier Phase ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Smart Devices ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Phase Measurements ◽  
Positioning Errors ◽  
Point Positioning

AbstractGlobal Navigation Satellite System raw measurements from Android smart devices make accurate positioning possible with advanced techniques, e.g., precise point positioning (PPP). To achieve the sub-meter-level positioning accuracy with low-cost smart devices, the PPP algorithm developed for geodetic receivers is adapted and an approach named Smart-PPP is proposed in this contribution. In Smart-PPP, the uncombined PPP model is applied for the unified processing of single- and dual-frequency measurements from tracked satellites. The receiver clock terms are parameterized independently for the code and carrier phase measurements of each tracking signal for handling the inconsistency between the code and carrier phases measured by smart devices. The ionospheric pseudo-observations are adopted to provide absolute constraints on the estimation of slant ionospheric delays and to strengthen the uncombined PPP model. A modified stochastic model is employed to weight code and carrier phase measurements by considering the high correlation between the measurement errors and the signal strengths for smart devices. Additionally, an application software based on the Android platform is developed for realizing Smart-PPP in smart devices. The positioning performance of Smart-PPP is validated in both static and kinematic cases. Results show that the positioning errors of Smart-PPP solutions can converge to below 1.0 m within a few minutes in static mode and the converged solutions can achieve an accuracy of about 0.2 m of root mean square (RMS) both for the east, north and up components. For the kinematic test, the RMS values of Smart-PPP positioning errors are 0.65, 0.54 and 1.09 m in the east, north and up components, respectively. Static and kinematic tests both show that the Smart-PPP solutions outperform the internal results provided by the experimental smart devices.

scholarly journals Precise Point Positioning Using Dual-Frequency GNSS Observations on Smartphone

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Mengfei Sun ◽  
Changjie Zhou ◽  
Peng Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Frequency Mode ◽  
Single Frequency ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Static Mode ◽  
Position Errors ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Similar Accuracy ◽  
Positioning Algorithm ◽  
Gnss Observations

The update of the Android system and the emergence of the dual-frequency GNSS chips enable smartphones to acquire dual-frequency GNSS observations. In this paper, the GPS L1/L5 and Galileo E1/E5a dual-frequency PPP (precise point positioning) algorithm based on RTKLIB and GAMP was applied to analyze the positioning performance of the Xiaomi Mi 8 dual-frequency smartphone in static and kinematic modes. The results showed that in the static mode, the RMS position errors of the dual-frequency smartphone PPP solutions in the E, N, and U directions were 21.8 cm, 4.1 cm, and 11.0 cm, respectively, after convergence to 1 m within 102 min. The PPP of dual-frequency smartphone showed similar accuracy with geodetic receiver in single-frequency mode, while geodetic receiver in dual-frequency mode has higher accuracy. In the kinematic mode, the positioning track of the smartphone dual-frequency data had severe fluctuations, the positioning tracks derived from the smartphone and the geodetic receiver showed approximately difference of 3–5 m.

scholarly journals Precise Point Positioning Using the Regional BeiDou Navigation Satellite Constellation

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aigong Xu ◽  
Zongqiu Xu ◽  
Xinchao Xu ◽  
Huizhong Zhu ◽  
Xin Sui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Satellite Orbits ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Asia Pacific Region ◽  
Point Positioning

On 27 December 2012 it was announced officially that the Chinese Navigation Satellite System BeiDou (BDS) was able to provide operational services over the Asia-Pacific region. The quality of BDS observations was confirmed as comparable with those of GPS, and relative positioning in static and kinematic modes were also demonstrated to be very promising. As Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technology is widely recognized as a method of precise positioning service, especially in real-time, in this contribution we concentrate on the PPP performance using BDS data only. BDS PPP in static, kinematic and simulated real-time kinematic mode is carried out for a regional network with six stations equipped with GPS- and BDS-capable receivers, using precise satellite orbits and clocks estimated from a global BDS tracking network. To validate the derived positions and trajectories, they are compared to the daily PPP solution using GPS data. The assessment confirms that the performance of BDS PPP is very comparable with GPS in terms of both convergence time and accuracy.

scholarly journals Positioning Evaluation of Single and Dual-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers Signals Using PPP and Static Relative Methods in Urban Areas

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 10642
Author(s):  
Rosendo Romero-Andrade ◽  
Manuel E. Trejo-Soto ◽  
Alejandro Vega-Ayala ◽  
Daniel Hernández-Andrade ◽  
Jesús R. Vázquez-Ontiveros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urban Areas ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Dual Frequency ◽  
Positional Accuracy ◽  
Gnss Receivers ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Error Circle ◽  
Vertical Positioning

A positional accuracy obtained by the Precise Point Positioning and static relative methods was compared and analyzed. Test data was collected using low-cost GNSS receivers of single- and dual-frequency in urban areas. The data was analyzed for quality using the TEQC program to determine the degree of affectation of the signal in the urban area. Low-cost GNSS receivers were found to be sensitive to the multipath effect, which impacts positioning. The horizontal and vertical accuracy was evaluated with respect to Mexican regulations for the GNSS establishment criteria. Probable Error Circle (CEP) and Vertical Positioning Accuracy (EPV) were performed on low cost GNSS receiver observation data. The results show that low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers can be used in urban areas. The precision was obtained in the order of 0.013 m in the static relative method. The results obtained are comparable to a geodetic receiver in a geodetic baseline of <20 km. The study does not recommend using single and dual frequencies low cost GNSS receivers based on results obtained by the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method in urban areas. The inclusion of the GGM10 model reduces the vertical precision obtained by using low cost GNSS receivers in both methods, conforming to the regulations only in the horizontal component.

Improving Precise Point Positioning Convergence Time through TEQC Multipath Linear Combination

2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 04018002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Abou Galala ◽  
Mosbeh R. Kaloop ◽  
Mostafa M. Rabah ◽  
Zaki M. Zeidan
Keyword(s):  
Linear Combination ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Point Positioning

scholarly journals Multi-GNSS Combined Precise Point Positioning Using Additional Observations with Opposite Weight for Real-Time Quality Control

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenju Fu ◽  
Guanwen Huang ◽  
Yuanxi Zhang ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Bobin Cui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Precise Point Positioning ◽  
Satellite System ◽  
Convergence Time ◽  
Navigation Satellite ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Global Navigation ◽  
Point Positioning ◽  
Global Navigation Satellite

The emergence of multiple global navigation satellite systems (multi-GNSS), including global positioning system (GPS), global navigation satellite system (GLONASS), Beidou navigation satellite system (BDS), and Galileo, brings not only great opportunities for real-time precise point positioning (PPP), but also challenges in quality control because of inevitable data anomalies. This research aims at achieving the real-time quality control of the multi-GNSS combined PPP using additional observations with opposite weight. A robust multiple-system combined PPP estimation is developed to simultaneously process observations from all the four GNSS systems as well as single, dual, or triple systems. The experiment indicates that the proposed quality control can effectively eliminate the influence of outliers on the single GPS and the multiple-system combined PPP. The analysis on the positioning accuracy and the convergence time of the proposed robust PPP is conducted based on one week’s data from 32 globally distributed stations. The positioning root mean square (RMS) error of the quad-system combined PPP is 1.2 cm, 1.0 cm, and 3.0 cm in the east, north, and upward components, respectively, with the improvements of 62.5%, 63.0%, and 55.2% compared to those of single GPS. The average convergence time of the quad-system combined PPP in the horizontal and vertical components is 12.8 min and 12.2 min, respectively, while it is 26.5 min and 23.7 min when only using single-GPS PPP. The positioning performance of the GPS, GLONASS, and BDS (GRC) combination and the GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GRE) combination is comparable to the GPS, GLONASS, BDS and Galileo (GRCE) combination and it is better than that of the GPS, BDS, and Galileo (GCE) combination. Compared to GPS, the improvements of the positioning accuracy of the GPS and GLONASS (GR) combination, the GPS and Galileo (GE) combination, the GPS and BDS (GC) combination in the east component are 53.1%, 43.8%, and 40.6%, respectively, while they are 55.6%, 48.1%, and 40.7% in the north component, and 47.8%, 40.3%, and 34.3% in the upward component.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document