Antimicrobial prophylaxis

Abstract Background Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are first-line agents for most patients receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Despite evidence showing low cross-reactivity between classes of BLs, patients with allergies commonly receive vancomycin as an alternative to avoid allergic reaction. The objective of this study was to identify potentially inappropriate use of vancomycin surgical prophylaxis among patients with reported BL allergies. Methods Adult patients (≥18 years) receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis with a reported penicillin and/or cephalosporin allergy at our institution between August 2017 to July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for potential eligibility for penicillin allergy testing and/or receipt of standard prophylaxis. Surgery type and allergy history were extracted from the electronic medical record. Per our institution’s penicillin-testing protocol, patients with IgE-mediated reactions < 10 years ago were eligible for penicillin skin testing (PST), mild reactions or IgE-mediated reaction > 10 years ago were eligible for direct oral amoxicillin challenge, and severe non-IgE mediated allergies were ineligible for penicillin allergy evaluation or BL prophylaxis. Results Among 830 patients who received vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, 196 reported BL allergy and were included in the analysis (155 with penicillin allergy alone; 21 with cephalosporin allergy; 20 with both cephalosporin and penicillin allergy). Approximately 40% of surgeries were orthopedic. Six patients were ineligible for BL prophylaxis. Per institutional protocol, 73 of 155 patients (48%) may have qualified for PST; 81 of 155 (52%) patients may have received a direct oral amoxicillin challenge. Only 3 of 22 patients with history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus appropriately received additional prophylaxis with vancomycin and a BL. Conclusion Patients with BL allergies often qualify for receipt of a first-line BL antibiotic. An opportunity exists for improved BL allergy assessment as an antimicrobial stewardship intervention. Future studies should evaluate outcomes associated with BL allergy evaluation and delabeling in patients receiving surgical prophylaxis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

1095. Investigation of Risk Factors Associated with Serious Bacterial, Viral and Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematologic Patients on Ibrutinib

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1281 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S576-S577

Author(s):

Thomas Holowka ◽

Harry Cheung ◽

Maricar F Malinis ◽

Sarah Perreault ◽

Iris Isufi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Fungal Infections ◽

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Hematologic Malignancy ◽

Invasive Fungal Infections ◽

Risk Of Infection ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Serious Infection ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Serious Infections

Abstract Background Ibrutinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat hematologic malignancies that may increase the risk of serious infection including invasive fungal infections (IFI). In a study of 378 patients with hematologic malignancy on ibrutinib, serious infection and IFI occurred in 11% and 4% respectively (Varughese et al. Clin Infect Dis). The primary aims of our study were to determine the incidence of serious infection and associated risk factors in patients on ibrutinib. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with hematologic malignancy prescribed ibrutinib for ≥ 1 week at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2014 to 2019 to identify serious infections defined as those requiring inpatient management. We collected demographic, clinical and oncologic data. Chi-squared tests were used to determine factors associated with an increased risk of infection. Results A total of 254 patients received ibrutinib including 156 with CLL, 89 with NHL and 9 with other leukemias. Among these, 21 underwent HSCT, 9 complicated by GVHD. There were 51 (20%) patients with serious infections including 45 (17.7%) bacterial, 9 (3.5%) viral and 5 (2%) IFI (1 pulmonary cryptococcosis, 4 pulmonary aspergillosis). Anti-mold prophylaxis was prescribed to 7 (2.8%) patients, none of whom developed IFI. Risk factors associated with serious infection included ECOG score ≥ 2 (OR 4.6, p < 0.001), concurrent steroid use (≥ 10 mg prednisone daily for ≥ 2 weeks; OR 3.0, p < 0.001), neutropenia (OR 3.6, p < 0.01), lymphopenia (OR 2.4, p < 0.05) and maximum ibrutinib dose of 560 mg (OR 2, p < 0.05). There was a dose dependent increase in infections based on number of chemotherapy regimens prior to ibrutinib initiation: 14.3% with 0, 19.7% with 1-2 and 28.7% with ≥ 3 prior treatments. Conclusion The incidence of serious infection in hematologic patients on ibrutinib was higher than previously reported (20% versus 11%) but the rate of IFI was lower (2% versus 4%). High ECOG score, leukopenia, steroids, and higher ibrutinib doses were associated with an increased risk for serious infection. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered for patients on ibrutinib with these risk factors. Improving functional status may also reduce the risk of infection in patients on ibrutinib. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Novel Methodology to Measure Preprocedure Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Integrating Text Mining With Structured Data

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1017/ice.2020.485 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (S1) ◽

pp. s12-s13

Author(s):

Hillary Mull ◽

Kelly Stolzmann ◽

Emily Kalver ◽

Marlena Shin ◽

Marin Schweizer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

High Sensitivity ◽

Structured Data ◽

Fiscal Year ◽

Veterans Health ◽

Health Administration ◽

Implementation Barriers ◽

Cardiac Device ◽

Device Infection ◽

Manual Review

Background: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is an evidence-proven strategy for reducing procedure-related infections; however, measuring this key quality metric typically requires manual review, due to the way antimicrobial prophylaxis is documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). Our objective was to combine structured and unstructured data from the Veterans’ Health Administration (VA) EMR to create an electronic tool for measuring preincisional antimicrobial prophylaxis. We assessed this methodology in cardiac device implantation procedures. Methods: With clinician input and review of clinical guidelines, we developed a list of antimicrobial names recommended for the prevention of cardiac device infection. Next, we iteratively combined positive flags for an antimicrobial order or drug fill from structured data fields in the EMR and hits on text string searches of antimicrobial names documented in electronic clinical notes to optimize an algorithm to flag preincisional antimicrobial use with high sensitivity and specificity. We trained the algorithm using existing fiscal year (FY) 2008-15 data from the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology (CART-EP), which contains manually determined information about antimicrobial prophylaxis. We then validated the performance of the final version of the algorithm using a national cohort of VA patients who underwent cardiac device procedures in FY 2016 or 2017. Discordant cases underwent expert manual review to identify reasons for algorithm misclassification and to identify potential future implementation barriers. Results: The CART-EP dataset included 2,102 procedures at 38 VA facilities with manually identified antimicrobial prophylaxis in 2,056 cases (97.8%). The final algorithm combining structured EMR fields and text-note search results flagged 2,048 of the CART-EP cases (97.4%). Algorithm validation identified antimicrobial prophylaxis in 16,334 of 19,212 cardiac device procedures (87.9%). Misclassifications occurred due to EMR documentation issues. Conclusions: We developed a methodology with high accuracy to measure guideline-concordant use of antimicrobial prophylaxis before cardiac device procedures using data fields present in modern EMRs that does not rely on manual review. In addition to broad applicability in the VA and other healthcare systems with EMRs, this method could be adapted for other procedural areas in which antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended but comprehensive measurement has been limited to resource-intense manual review.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Download Full-text

Implementation of a Leeches + Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Order Panel to Optimize Medicinal Leech Use at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center

Journal of Pharmacy Practice ◽

10.1177/0897190021993683 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 089719002199368

Author(s):

Nicole M. Palm ◽

Jill C. Wesolowski ◽

Janet Y. Wu ◽

Pavithra Srinivas

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Medicinal Leech ◽

Aeromonas Species ◽

Leech Therapy ◽

Before And After ◽

Timing Of Initiation ◽

Medicinal Leeches

Medicinal leech therapy promotes vascular flow and can be used to salvage grafts. Medicinal leeches have a symbiotic relationship with Aeromonas species and can therefore present a risk of bacterial transmission to patients. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is warranted for the duration of leech therapy, however, an institutional evaluation of 40 patients receiving medicinal leech therapy demonstrated poor adherence with recommendations. An electronic medical record order panel for antimicrobial prophylaxis with medicinal leech therapy was implemented, leading to a subsequent improvement in adherence to prophylaxis use, including significant increases in the ordering of antibiotics and the appropriate timing of initiation in the subsequent 10 patients receiving medicinal leech therapy after panel implementation. Aeromonas infections were rare before and after panel implementation, and developed only in the patient subset with non-optimized prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Reducing Broad Spectrum Antimicrobial Use in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Reduce AMMO Study

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciab118 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Aditya Shah ◽

Priya Sampathkumar ◽

Ryan W Stevens ◽

John K Bohman ◽

Brian D Lahr ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Time Series ◽

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽

Broad Spectrum ◽

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Antimicrobial Use ◽

Infection Rates ◽

Interrupted Time Series Analysis ◽

Membrane Oxygenation ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in critically ill adults is increasing. There are currently no guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis. We analyzed 7 years of prophylactic antimicrobial use across three time series for patients on ECMO at our institution in the development, improvement, and streamlining of our ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol. Study design and Methods In this quasi-experimental interrupted time series analysis, we evaluated the impact of an initial ECMO antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol, implemented in 2014, on antimicrobial use and NHSN reportable infection rates. Then, following a revision and streamlining of the protocol in November 2018, we re-evaluated the same metrics. Results Our study population included 338 ICU patients who received ECMO between July 2011 and November 2019. After implementation of the first version of the protocol we did not observe significant changes in antimicrobial use or infection rates in these patients; however, following revision and streamlining of the protocol, we demonstrated a significant reduction in broad spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO without any evidence of a compensatory increase in infection rates. Conclusion Our final protocol significantly reduces broad spectrum antimicrobial use for prophylaxis in patients on ECMO. We propose a standard antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen for patients on ECMO based on current evidence and our experience.

Download Full-text

Re: Overuse of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Community Practice Urology

The Journal of Urology ◽

10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2947 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 194 (2) ◽

pp. 597-598 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Xiang Chen ◽

Jican Dai

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Community Practice

Download Full-text

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prophylaxis in the Elderly after Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Femur Fractures: Insights and Challenges

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics10040429 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (4) ◽

pp. 429

Author(s):

Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo ◽

Laura Escolà-Vergé ◽

Júlia Sellarès-Nadal ◽

Pablo S. Corona ◽

Benito Almirante ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Joint Infection ◽

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria ◽

Infection Prophylaxis ◽

Beta Lactam ◽

Hip Hemiarthroplasty ◽

Femur Fractures ◽

Published Evidence ◽

Prophylactic Measures

We review antibiotic and other prophylactic measures to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) surgery in proximal femoral fractures (PFFs). In the absence of specific guidelines, those applied to these individuals are general prophylaxis guidelines. Cefazolin is the most widely used agent and is replaced by clindamycin or a glycopeptide in beta-lactam allergies. A personalized antibiotic scheme may be considered when colonization by a multidrug-resistant microorganism (MDRO) is suspected. Particularly in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or a high prevalence of MRSA-caused PJIs a glycopeptide with cefazolin is recommended. Strategies such as cutaneous decolonization of MDROs, mainly MRSA, or preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria treatment have also been addressed with debatable results. Some areas of research are early detection protocols in MDRO colonizations by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), the use of alternative antimicrobial prophylaxis, and antibiotic-impregnated bone cement in HHA. Given that published evidence addressing PJI prophylactic strategies in PFFs requiring HHA is scarce, PJIs can be reduced by combining different prevention strategies after identifying individuals who will benefit from personalized prophylaxis.

Download Full-text

Intraoperative Bacterial Contamination and Activity of Different Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Regimens in Primary Knee and Hip Replacement

Antibiotics ◽

10.3390/antibiotics10010018 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 18

Author(s):

Alba Rivera ◽

Alba Sánchez ◽

Sonia Luque ◽

Isabel Mur ◽

Lluís Puig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hip Replacement ◽

Bacterial Contamination ◽

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽

Joint Infections ◽

Prosthetic Joint ◽

Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽

Total Knee ◽

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽

Almost All

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is important for the prevention of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and must be effective against the microorganisms most likely to contaminate the surgical site. Our aim was to compare different SAP regimens (cefazolin, cefuroxime, or vancomycin, alone or combined with gentamicin) in patients undergoing total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. In this preclinical exploratory analysis, we analyzed the results of intraoperative sample cultures, the ratio of plasma antibiotic levels to the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for bacteria isolated at the surgical wound and ATCC strains, and serum bactericidal titers (SBT) against the same microorganisms. A total of 132 surgical procedures (68 TKA, 64 THA) in 128 patients were included. Cultures were positive in 57 (43.2%) procedures (mostly for coagulase-negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium spp.); the rate was lower in the group of patients receiving combination SAP (adjusted OR 0.475, CI95% 0.229–0.987). The SAP regimens evaluated achieved plasma levels above the MICs in almost all of intraoperative isolates (93/94, 98.9%) and showed bactericidal activity against all of them (SBT range 1:8–1:1024), although SBTs were higher in patients receiving cefazolin and gentamicin-containing regimens. The potential clinical relevance of these findings in the prevention of PJIs remains to be determined.

Download Full-text