Collateral benefit of screening patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission: Isolation of patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Jones ◽  
Christopher Nielson ◽  
Kalpana Gupta ◽  
Karim Khader ◽  
Martin Evans
2019 ◽  
Vol 366 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jichun Wang ◽  
Junrui Wang ◽  
Yanyan Wang ◽  
Peng Sun ◽  
Xiaohui Zou ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Imipenem is a beta-lactam antibiotic mainly active against gram-negative bacterial pathogens and also could cause cell wall impairment in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA). However, related antibacterial mechanisms of imipenem on MRSA and mixed infections of MRSA and gram-negative bacteria are relatively poorly revealed. This study was to identify proteins in the MRSA response to subminimal inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of imipenem treatment. Our results showed that 240 and 58 different expression proteins (DEPs) in sub-MICs imipenem-treated S3 (a standard MRSA strain) and S23 (a clinical MRSA strain) strains were identified through the isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation method when compared with untreated S3 and S23 strains, respectively, which was further confirmed by multiple reactions monitoring. Our result also demonstrated that expressions of multiple DEPs involved in cellular proliferation, metabolism and virulence were significantly changed in S3 and S23 strains, which was proved by gene ontology annotations and qPCR analysis. Further, transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis showed cell wall deficiency, cell lysis and abnormal nuclear mitosis on S23 strain. Our study provides important information for understanding the antibacterial mechanisms of imipenem on MRSA and for better usage of imipenem on patients co-infected with MRSA and other multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cipriano ◽  
Fábio Videira Santos ◽  
Rita Dias ◽  
André Carvalho ◽  
Ernestina Reis ◽  
...  

Introduction: Septic arthritis of a native joint represents a medical emergency. Drainage and effective antibiotic treatment are critical to avoid joint destruction and long-term impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with the diagnosis of septic arthritis to help establish local guidelines for empirical antibiotic treatment.Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of adult patients admitted at Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto from 2009 to 2017 with suspected native joint septic arthritis. Relevant demographics, microbiology findings and respective antibiotic susceptibilities were analysed.Results: Ninety-seven patients, predominantly males (59.8%) with a median age of 61 years old were included. The most commonly reported comorbidity associated with septic arthritis was diabetes mellitus (20.6%). The knee was the most commonly affected joint (71.1%). Arthrocentesis was performed in all patients, but only 50.5% had positive microbial growth in the synovial fluid. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified microorganism, 86% of which were methicillin susceptible. Gram-negative bacteria were the causative agent in 15% of cases. A wide range of empirical antibiotic regimens were prescribed with a combination of vancomycin/carbapenem being the most common (30.9%). Analysis of antibiotic susceptibility profiles revealed that amoxicillin/clavulanate would have been appropriate as the initial regimen in 89% of cases.Discussion: The main causative pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus remaining rare. The proportion of Gram-negative bacteria implies that these agents should be covered by empirical treatment, although no case of Pseudomonas infection has been identified. Therefore, antipseudomonal coverage is not necessary in empirical regimens.Conclusion: Routine coverage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not warranted but must be considered when specific risk factors are found. Amoxicillin/clavulanate can provide adequate antibiotic coverage as an empirical treatment for adult native joint septic arthritis. Its use may allow a reduction in use of broader spectrum antibiotics.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 848-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Nelson ◽  
Rachel B. Slayton ◽  
Vanessa W. Stevens ◽  
Makoto M. Jones ◽  
Karim Khader ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) on mortality following infection, regardless of patient location.METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with an inpatient admission in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) system between October 1, 2007, and November 30, 2010. We constructed multivariate log-binomial regressions to assess the impact of a positive culture on mortality in the 30- and 90-day periods following the first positive culture, using a propensity-score–matched subsample.RESULTSPatients identified with positive cultures due to MDR Acinetobacter (n=218), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=1,026), and MDR Enterobacteriaceae (n=3,498) were propensity-score matched to 14,591 patients without positive cultures due to these organisms. In addition, 3,471 patients with positive cultures due to MRSA were propensity-score matched to 12,499 patients without positive MRSA cultures. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria were associated with a significantly elevated risk of mortality both for invasive (RR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.85–2.92) and noninvasive cultures (RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.22–1.44) during the 30-day period. Similarly, patients with MRSA HAIs (RR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.39–3.21) and colonizations (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.50) had an increased risk of death at 30 days.CONCLUSIONSWe found that HAIs due to gram-negative bacteria and MRSA conferred significantly elevated 30- and 90-day risks of mortality. This finding held true both for invasive cultures, which are likely to be true infections, and noninvasive infections, which are possibly colonizations.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:848–856


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document