Ebola virus disease and social media: A systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1660-1671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Chun-Hai Fung ◽  
Carmen Hope Duke ◽  
Kathryn Cameron Finch ◽  
Kassandra Renee Snook ◽  
Pei-Ling Tseng ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e029617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindi Mathebula ◽  
Duduzile Edith Ndwandwe ◽  
Elizabeth Pienaar ◽  
Charles Shey Wiysonge

IntroductionEbola virus disease is one of the most devastating infectious diseases in the world with up to 90% case fatality observed. There are at least 13 candidate vaccines developed and being tested to prevent the occurrence of the Ebola virus disease. While none of these candidate vaccines has received regulatory approval for use, one candidate vaccine (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) has been granted access for emergency use. Two other candidate vaccines (GamEvac-Combi and Ad5-EBOV) have been licensed for emergency use in their countries of origin. The objective of this systematic review is to summarise the effects of the Ebola candidate vaccines in humans.Methods and analysisWe will search for potentially eligible studies, with no language or date restrictions, in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus, the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, and reference lists of relevant publications. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (DARE) will be searched for related reviews. Two review authors will independently screen search records, assess study eligibility, perform data extraction, and assess the risk of bias; and reconcile their findings. We will pool data from similar studies using Mantel-Haenszel’s fixed-effect model.Ethics and disseminationThis study is exempted from ethical consideration since the data collected are publicly available and at no point will confidential information from human participants be used. We will disseminate our results through publications in peer-reviewed journals and relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018110505.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1307-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Rojek ◽  
A. Salam ◽  
R.J. Ragotte ◽  
E. Liddiard ◽  
A. Elhussain ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (9) ◽  
pp. 1961-1961
Author(s):  
Z. S. Y. WONG ◽  
C. M. BUI ◽  
A. A. CHUGHTAI ◽  
C. R. MACINTYRE

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251101
Author(s):  
Hannah M. Edwards ◽  
Helen Counihan ◽  
Craig Bonnington ◽  
Jane Achan ◽  
Prudence Hamade ◽  
...  

Introduction Viral outbreaks present a particular challenge in countries in Africa where there is already a high incidence of other infectious diseases, including malaria which can alter immune responses to secondary infection. Ebola virus disease (EVD) is one such problem; understanding how Plasmodium spp. and Ebolavirus (EBOV) interact is important for future outbreaks. Methods We conducted a systematic review in PubMed and Web of Science to find peer-reviewed papers with primary data literature to determine 1) prevalence of EBOV/Plasmodium spp. coinfection, 2) effect of EBOV/Plasmodium spp. coinfection on EVD pathology and the immune response, 3) impact of EBOV/Plasmodium spp. coinfection on the outcome of EVD-related mortality. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted with the R package meta to produce overall proportion and effect estimates as well as measure between-study heterogeneity. Results From 322 peer-reviewed papers, 17 were included in the qualitative review and nine were included in a meta-analysis. Prevalence of coinfection was between 19% and 72%. One study reported significantly lower coagulatory response biomarkers in coinfected cases but no difference in inflammatory markers. Case fatality rates were similar between EBOV(+)/Pl(+) and EBOV(+)/Pl(-) cases (62.8%, 95% CI 49.3–74.6 and 56.7%, 95% CI 53.2–60.1, respectively), and there was no significant difference in risk of mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90–1.31) although heterogeneity between studies was high. One in vivo mouse model laboratory study found no difference in mortality by infection status, but another found prior acute Plasmodium yoeli infection was protective against morbidity and mortality via the IFN-γ signalling pathway. Conclusion The literature was inconclusive; studies varied widely and there was little attempt to adjust for confounding variables. Laboratory studies may present the best option to answer how pathogens interact within the body but improvement in data collection and analysis and in diagnostic methods would aid patient studies in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 109966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jude Mary Cénat ◽  
Joana N. Mukunzi ◽  
Pari-Gole Noorishad ◽  
Cécile Rousseau ◽  
Daniel Derivois ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Lee ◽  
Neill K. J. Adhikari ◽  
Henry Y. Kwon ◽  
Koren Teo ◽  
Reed Siemieniuk ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document