Effects of l-phenylalanine on energy intake in overweight and obese women: Interactions with dietary restraint status

Appetite ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael J. Pohle-Krauza ◽  
Juan L. Navia ◽  
Elizabeth Y.M. Madore ◽  
Jessica E. Nyrop ◽  
Christine L. Pelkman
Appetite ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
NANCY L. KEIM ◽  
DAVID J. CANTY ◽  
TERESA F. BARBIERI ◽  
MEI-MIAU WU

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Morin ◽  
Catherine Bégin ◽  
Julie Maltais-Giguère ◽  
Alexandra Bédard ◽  
André Tchernof ◽  
...  

Weight loss has been associated with changes in eating behaviors and appetite sensations that favor a regain in body weight. Since traditional weight loss approaches emphasize the importance of increasing cognitive dietary restraint (CDR) to achieve negative energy imbalance, it is difficult to untangle the respective contributions of energy restriction and increases in CDR on factors that can eventually lead to body weight regain. The present study aimed at comparing the effects of energy restriction alone or in combination with experimentally induced CDR on eating behavior traits, appetite sensations, and markers of stress in overweight and obese women. We hypothesized that the combination of energy restriction and induced CDR would lead to more prevalent food cravings, increased appetite sensations, and higher cortisol concentrations than when energy restriction is not coupled with induced CDR. A total of 60 premenopausal women (mean BMI: 32.0 kg/m2; mean age: 39.4 y) were provided with a low energy density diet corresponding to 85% of their energy needs during a 4-week fully controlled period. At the same time, women were randomized to either a condition inducing an increase in CDR (CDR+ group) or a condition in which CDR was not induced (CRD− group). Eating behavior traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire and Food Craving Questionnaire), appetite sensations (after standardized breakfast), and markers of stress (Perceived Stress Scale; postawakening salivary cortisol) were measured before (T = 0 week) and after (T = 4 weeks) the 4-week energy restriction, as well as 3 months later. There was an increase in CDR in the CDR+ group while no such change was observed in the CDR− group (p=0.0037). No between-group differences were observed for disinhibition, hunger, cravings, appetite sensations, perceived stress, and cortisol concentrations. These results suggest that a slight increase in CDR has no negative impact on factors regulating energy balance in the context of energy restriction.


2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma L. Brown ◽  
Michael E. Lean ◽  
Catherine R. Hankey

Direct observation(s) of energy intake (EI) via buffet meals served in the laboratory are often carried out within short-term exercise intervention studies. The reproducibility of values obtained has not been assessed either under resting control conditions or post-exercise, in overweight and obese females. A total of fourteen sedentary, pre-menopausal females (BMI 30·0 (sd5·1) kg/m2) completed four trials; two exercise and two control. Each trial lasted 24 h spanning over 2 d; conducted from afternoon on day 1 and morning on day 2. An exercise session to expend 1·65 MJ was completed on day 1 of exercise trials, and three buffet meals were served during each trial. Reproducibility of post-exercise changes in energy and macronutrient intakes was assessed at each individual buffet meal by intraclass correlation coefficient (ri). Only therivalues for post-exercise changes in energy (ri0·44 (95 % CI − 0·03, 0·77),P = 0·03) and fat intake (ri0·51 (95 % CI 0·04, 0·81),P = 0·02) at the lunch buffet meal achieved statistical significance; however, theserivalues were weak and had large associated 95 % CI, which indicates a large degree of variability associated with these measurements. Energy and macronutrient intakes at the breakfast and evening buffet meals were not reproducible. This study concludes that the frequently used laboratory-based buffet meal method of assessing EI does not produce reliable, reproducible post-exercise changes in EI in overweight and obese women.


2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy C. Raymond ◽  
Lindsay T. Bartholome ◽  
Susanne S. Lee ◽  
Roseann E. Peterson ◽  
Susan K. Raatz

Appetite ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 284
Author(s):  
M.A. Cornier ◽  
S.S. Von Kaenel ◽  
D.H. Bessesen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document