Interfacial bond strength of epoxy and PUR adhesively bonded timber-concrete composite joints manufactured in dry and wet processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 125356
Author(s):  
Ali Nemati Giv ◽  
Qiuni Fu ◽  
Libo Yan ◽  
Bohumil Kasal
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Joints ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesively Bonded

Experimental Research on Interfacial Bond Performance in Rock Anchor with High-Performance Grouting Medium

2012 ◽  
Vol 517 ◽  
pp. 932-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Fang ◽  
Hong Qiao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Rock Mass ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength ◽  
Bond Performance ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Steel Bar ◽  
Reactive Powder ◽  
Ground Anchor

There exist the problems such as low bond strength and bad durability in the ordinary grouting slurry of the ground anchor system at present. The high-performance grouting mediums RPC (Reactive Powder Concrete) and DSP (Densified Systems containing homogeneously arranged ultrafine Particles) would become the potential replacement of grouting medium in ground anchor resulting from their high compressive strength, durability and toughness. Based on a series of pull-out tests on ground anchors with different high-performance grouting medium of RPC and DSP , different bond length in the construction field, the bond performance on the interfaces between anchor bolt (deformed steel bar) and grouted medium as well as between grouted medium and rock mass was studied. The results indicate that the interfacial bond strength between RPC or DSP and deformed steel bolt ranges within 23-31Mpa, far greater than that (about 2-3MPa) between the ordinary cementitious grout and deformed steel bar. Even though the interfacial bond strength between the grouted medium and rock mass of limestone was not obtained in the test since the failure mode was pull-out of those steel bar rather than the interface shear failure between grouted medium and rock mass, the bond stress on the interface reached 6.2-8.38 MPa, also far greater than the bond strength (about 0.1-3MPa) between the ordinary cementitious slurry and rocks.

scholarly journals A Special Single-Fibre Pull-Out Technique for Determining the Fiber/Cement Interfacial Bond Strength

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 096369350201100 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Caceres ◽  
A. N. Netravali
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Interfacial Shear Strength ◽  
Single Fibre ◽  
Interfacial Shear ◽  
Specimen Geometry ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength ◽  
Pull Out ◽  
Fibre Cement

The paper discusses a simple specimen geometry to obtain the fibre/cement interfacial shear strength (IFSS). The specimens are easy to prepare and easy to test. The technique gives reliable and reproducible results. IFSS results for five different fibres with cement were measured. Most IFSS values obtained are in the range of 0.15 to 1.5 MPa. Despite the simplicity of the technique presented in this study, the results are in agreement with those obtained by several other researchers using different techniques and specimen geometry.

scholarly journals The effect of zirconia surface architecturing technique on the zirconia/veneer interfacial bond strength

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Bok Her ◽  
Kyoung Hun Kim ◽  
Sang Eun Park ◽  
Eun-Jin Park
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength

Improved tunable range of the field-induced storage modulus by using flower-like particles as the active phase of magnetorheological elastomers

Soft Matter ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 3504-3509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Tong ◽  
Xufeng Dong ◽  
Min Qi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Modulus ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength ◽  
Magnetorheological Elastomers ◽  
Tunable Range ◽  
Active Particles

The interfacial bond strength and field-induced storage modulus of magnetorheological elastomers can be enhanced by using flower-like active particles.

Interfacial Bond Strength of Various Rigid/Soft Multi-Materials Printed via Fused Filament Fabrication Process

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karun Kalia ◽  
Amir Ameli
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Smart Materials ◽  
Peak Load ◽  
Crack Growth Behavior ◽  
Interfacial Bond ◽  
Interfacial Bond Strength ◽  
Fused Filament Fabrication ◽  
Unstable Crack ◽  
3D Printed

Abstract Layered multi-materials of dissimilar polymers and their nanocomposites offer new opportunities as smart materials and structures. A critical aspect of such structures is the quality of interlayer adhesion between dissimilar polymer matrices. This work reports the development of asymmetric double cantilever beam (ADCB) specimens of dissimilar polymers and its use in the analysis and understanding of their interlayer adhesion in 3D-printed rigid/soft interfaces. Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polycarbonate (PC), polylactic acid (PLA) were chosen as the rigid polymers and combined with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) as the soft component. 3D-printed ADCB specimens were loaded under opening mode, until fracture, to obtain the load-displacement data and the fracture surfaces were analyzed using optical microscopy. ABS/TPU/ABS and PC/TPU/PC material combinations resulted in a more stable crack growth with a high peak load indicating a relatively good interfacial adhesion. The high nozzle temperatures of ABS and PC and their amorphous nature contributed to a good layer-to-layer fusion during 3D printing. However, PLA/TPU/PLA specimens exhibited an unstable crack growth behavior with a pure adhesive failure mode and a significantly lower peak load. This poor interfacial bond strength was correlated to the relatively low nozzle temperature of PLA and its semi-crystalline structure. The maximum loads in ABS/TPU/ABS and PC/TPU/PC specimens were found to be ∼2.5 times greater than that of PLA/TPU/PLA ones. The method provides a valuable tool in quantifying interlayer adhesion quality in printed dissimilar polymers and their functional nanocomposites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document